Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Violence in our society today
Chapter6 the right to freedom of speech
Courses of violence in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Ben Shapiro is a Jewish conservative blogger that recently spoke at the University of Berkeley back in September. In regards to the topic of the speech, it was about Campus Thuggery but the majority it, he kept referencing to Antifa since they were protesting him speaking at Berkeley. Antifa is protest movement that is against fascism and is known for their violent protests. Within ten minutes or less, he destroyed the Democrats’ argument of free speech. If you draw your attention to the speech itself, it contains myriads of logos, ethos, and pathos. As a matter of fact, Shapiro constantly uses logos or logic throughout his speech. The big components are the statistics. The majority of the speech, he switches topics quickly, as a result it’s …show more content…
well constructed in a way it flows together very well. He briefly discusses the wage gap by stating statistics that show 147 out of the 150 cities pay women 8% more than their male counterparts. He also mentions that 55% of people that go to college are women. (9) He utilizes statistics in his argument by displaying logos. Additionally, Shapiro uses ethos which is also defined by Webster Dictionary as convincing someone of character and credibility. When Shapiro visited Berkeley last February, he stated that it was a packed house and there was a very little security due to the fact that Antifa wasn’t that well known. Furthermore, Shapiro uses very little amount of pathos or emotion in his speech.
Shapiro hardly displays emotion throughout the speech itself. He also discusses the hierarchy of people that are the most common victims of society. “So, the hierarchy goes something like this: the people whose views are most valuable and been most victimized. At the very top are people who are LGBT, and then you get black people, and then you get women, and then you get Hispanic people, and then you get Native Americans, and then you get Asians, and then you get Jews — Jews may be above Asians, maybe Jews — then Asians, and at the very, very bottom, you get straight white males. Those are the people who have nothing to say about anything because obviously they are the beneficiaries of this “white-privilege” system.” (Shapiro) would be when Shapiro talks about victims. He mentions how people say they’re a victim when they’re not a victim at all and how they should prove how they are a victim. Again: America is the greatest country in human history. “You are not a victim. If you are a victim of something, you need to show me what you are a victim of and I will stand beside you. But do not blame the freest, most civil society in the history of planet Earth for your failures, because that’s on you.”
(Shapiro) In the final analysis of the speech, he utilizes statistics display logos. He uses ethos by mentioning how packed the auditorium was the last time he came to Berkeley. Also he was stoic and solemn during the speech that so the emotion so he doesn’t use pathos throughout the speech. This showcases that Shapiro cares more about facts than feelings or opinions. Because logos could be backed by scientists and other credible sources whereas ethos and pathos centers around one person’s beliefs.
He moves the audience like a pendulum. He talks about the evil, compassion, indifference and hope. His pathos moved deep into the audience by questioning the history which returns made the audience question also. The argument of indifference, making people felt abandoned and forgotten didn’t really hit home until he added the phrase “All of us did.” He reminded the audience of the raw emotion of how all the Jewish people felt being in those camps for so long and nobody, not one person jumping to their aid. The speech would have less meaning coming from anyone who wasn’t a survivor of the Holocaust. Just a little sentence like that can feel sharper than a knife and leave a great reminder on why we should be
He uses Logos in his speech to show the reasoning behind what he is saying. For example, when Fredrick Douglass was speaking about how he will see America’s Independence Day from the slaves’ point of view. He doesn’t hesitate to declare that it never looked blacker to him due to the character and conduct of the nation and slavery. He explains his statement with reasoning making the rhetorical appeal Logos. Fredrick Douglass also uses Pathos during his speech to provoke emotion in the audience. An example is in the third to last paragraph he was expressing his anger for what America has done and that they should be punished severely. “Had I the ability, and could reach the nation’s ear, I would today, pour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke. For it is not light that is needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake.” This contains many strong words that he wants to use to provoke an emotion of rage or disapproval in the audience. He also wants to show how he feels about America’s slavery and the punishment they should face. These are two rhetorical appeals Fredrick Douglass uses in his speech to persuade the
Franklin Roosevelt use of logos promotes the organization and shape of his rhetorical response. When Roosevelt begins speaking, he addresses
There are many reasons that this issue disturbs Lawrence. The first being the fact that the use of racist speech on college and university campuses has greatly risen since the past. Another reason he is troubled is the fact that there are actual people being victimized and being perceived as a minority because of race, sex, class ...
In this paper I am going to discuss the rhetorical appeals, as well as the argumentative structure, audience and purpose set forth by George W. Bush in his September 27 speech in Flagstaff, Arizona. More specifically I will refer to the rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos and logos, and explain how they are used to gain the support and attention of the audience and further the further the purpose of the speech. As I explain these appeals I will also give an insight into the argumentative structure and why it is apparent in this particular speech.
"Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus” by Derek Bok, published in Boston Globe in 1991, is an essay about what we should do when we are faced with expressions that are offensive to some people. The author discusses that although the First Amendment may protect our speech, but that does not mean it protects our speech if we use it immorally and inappropriately. The author claims that when people do things such as hanging the Confederate flag, “they would upset many fellow students and ignore the decent regard for the feelings of others” (70). The author discusses how this issue has approached Supreme Court and how the Supreme Court backs up the First Amendment and if it offends any groups, it does not affect the fact that everyone has his or her own freedom of speech. The author discusses how censorship may not be the way to go, because it might bring unwanted attention that would only make more devastating situations. The author believes the best solutions to these kind of situations would be to
Anti-Semitism has been a plague on humanity since biblical times. According to Merriam Webster Online Dictionary, anti-Semitism is defined as “hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group.” This is one of the major themes of Philip Roth’s fictional novel The Plot Against America. In his novel, Roth creates an alternate universe where Charles A. Lindbergh, Nazi sympathizer and friend of Hitler, was picked as the republican candidate and ends up winning the presidency over the democratic candidate, Franklin D. Roosevelt. Throughout the novel, Roth shows how this theoretical change in history could have affected both the outcome of the war and the future for Jews in America, all through the eyes of a young Philip Roth and his family.
We cannot have our children die. This is just heartbreaking. Please.” Things like this and many other aspects of the article can invoke an emotional response for the reader - whether that is anger or sadness. There are more parts of the article that are emotionally charged, such as this quote from Trump: “It’s very difficult, it’s very complex, but we’re going to find the solution...there are many different ideas. Some, I guess, are good. Some aren’t good. Some are very stringent...and a lot of people think they work, and some are less so.” This quote could inspire anger due to the dismissive or vague tone that Trump takes on while speaking to the victims. The authors likely included these parts of the article to show the true impact the shooting had on the victims - obviously large and heartbreaking. The inclusion of the Trump quote, however, seems to be the nail in the coffin. It was the last part of the article, and by the tone of the entirety of the piece seems to establish Trump as weak in the face of tragedy and frankly unequipped to face victims of something he supports -
Toronto, Ontario — On September 27th, tenured University of Toronto psychology professor Jordan Peterson released the first video in a three-part series on the subject of “political correctness”. In said video, he addressed his refusal to respect the pronouns of non-binary gender identities, which would include his own students. Further, questioned the work and legitimacy of the Black Liberation Collective, a group of students who initiated the University’s commitment to administering mandatory equity training and collecting race-based data.
...e, a reliable source. Although the rhetorical appeal of logos is sparsely used, Ellison’s idea is not hindered.
Incidents like the Ferguson police shooting of innocent young black civilians hold the county back from becoming a country that respects equal rights. After reading the speech I was interested in these horrific actions that were still taking place, even if they don't happen often. From reading this speech I have grown an appreciation of how a culture in society can be change is just over 50 years.
Not only does he negatively connote the white way of life, he blatantly threatens them by saying “ those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual” and that “there will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights”(2). By basically stating that there will not be peace until Negros get rights, therefore threatening the white way of life. Outright threatening the audience would make them not even listen to one’s argument, even if it were supported by
My composer, Steve Reich, has written and continues to write contemporary, minimalist, vocal, and tape pieces. His pieces these pieces have been influenced not only by what he has encountered, but the music he had composed has influenced many others composer similar to him (Service). In this paper I will give a short biography of Reich that includes the many different places that he studied, what influenced his not so ordinary music styles, and what made him who he is today. I will also talk about his composition styles, which are different from many others, what influenced them, and what types of music her produced. Lastly, I will give my evaluation of one of his several world-renowned compositions.
...erson that shows that there might actually be something going on. That this man is intelligent about this horrific case. If you were a non Jew and you tried to fight back you would end up dead, or severely injured by the punishment that the Nazis inflicted on you. Sadly, this rebellion of non Jews never happened to free the Jewish people suffering in the Concentration camps.
For example he shares an emotional anecdote about his grandmother making racist comments: “A women who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a women who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe” (pg. 4). Along with this his notable humility also reveals a sincere tone: “I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy – particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own” (pg. 6). Traditionally politicians rarely adopt such an open and sincere tone. Choosing to adopt this tone proved beneficial, as it allowed him to connect with his audience on a deeper level, ultimately giving his views greater