Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Unemployment issues in the United States
Inequality in the united states
Social inequalities in the US
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Unemployment issues in the United States
The main problems facing contemporary America stem from the fact that the rich keep getting richer, the poor keep getting poorer, and this is causing a growing gap between the social classes that have existed in this country. In her book, This Land is Their Land, Barbara Ehrenreich describes many of the problems she sees in contemporary America. Using a different approach to develop a novel, Ehrenreich takes a series of blog posts and compiles them to discuss topics that people are thinking about, but are hesitant to say openly. These stories are short, but they are packed with much interesting information, and they focus on this growing social problem. The first tale is one of “CEOs vs. Slaves” which discussed the pay gap between CEOs and …show more content…
workers. This gap is astonishing, and continues to grow. Only 30 or 40 years ago, “CEOs of major companies earned 80 percent more, on average, than the third-highest-paid executive. By the early part of the twenty-first century, however, the gap between the CEO and the third in command ballooned up to 260 percent” (Ehrenreich, 20). She argues that the CEOs are getting richer by the minute, but they are unwilling to share this wealth and do not give their second or third in command an amount close to what they make. The people who work for them will probably get somewhere around minimum wage, maybe a dollar over if they are lucky. These people, who Ehrenreich compares and refers to as slaves, work hard, are not treated well, and do not get the pay they deserve for how hard they work. In her book, Ehrenreich had an example of a man in Long Island, New York who paid two Indonesian women $100 a month and tortured them with cigarette burns, beatings, and other horrors. A more concrete example is between college professors and adjunct professor. Ehrenreich states that full time college professors get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, which may or may not be true. On the other hand, adjunct college professors get paid around $5,000 to teach a class for a semester. Obviously, the full time professors get more money, but the adjunct professors teach the same amount of days, but get severely less money. The next two stories are interrelated because they are both about the struggles of different classes in America.
When you see a man in a suit walking down the street, you automatically think that he is a multi-million dollar owner of a company. That man is not necessarily the owner of a big company, he could just be getting out of a meeting where everyone had to dress nicely because the CEO of the coffee shop was going to be there. The people of America made their assumptions that if people dress a certain way then they are a big time corporate executive. What Ehrenreich does is make a list of “classes” that college students should be taking to inform them of what is happening in the real world once they graduate. These classes include : Elementary Class Structure of the U.S., Presidential Architecture, Race, Gender, and Occupational Preference, Topics in University Financing. The next story that is very closely related to this is called “could you afford to be poor?” This story talks about the high cost of living in low-income urban neighborhoods. Since there is such a high cost of living in these neighborhoods, it is harder to provide for your family if there is low income there. In these low-income neighborhoods, people are less likely to have bank accounts because of the expenses it can cause them to have if they have a low balance. To cash their checks, they have to pay anywhere from $5-$50 just to cash their check. So essentially you are paying more money to cash your check. They are also less likely to have access to a large supermarket store without driving a long way to get there, so they rely on smaller, but more expensive food stores with lower quality for their
meals. Another important piece of information to point out is the issue of illegal immigrants and what America “owes” them. Some people believe that if they are caught living undocumented in America the they should be deported. The biggest reason they believe that is because it will open up millions of jobs. People who say that undocumented citizens should be deported is because they believe that they are taking their jobs in elite private nursing schools or law school. That is not the case at all. Undocumented people are mostly working at minimum wage paying jobs and are probably not attending that high of a level of education. There used to be just a fine of $5,000 for illegal immigrants but now deportation is the main course of action. Fatalities for Latinos has risen and dropped for other racial classes. The Communist Manifesto had its’ 160th anniversary in 2008. The same topics have arisen and they are that the rich keep getting richer and the poor keep getting poorer. The middle class is sliding towards ruin, so if that happens, it will be the upper elite class and the poor class that is either very close to or living below the poverty line. Immiseration is also a big issue that is wreaking havoc on middle and working class families. Immiseration is when you or a loved one has a terminating illness, like cancer, and have to get treatments, but you don’t have any health insurance to cover any of the costs, leaving you in more debt and in a financial struggle. Another significant topic is titled “The Cheapskate Warfare State” by Ehrenreich. Many people are surprised at the number of military families that are on food stamps. When you enter the army, a food stamp application is included in the orientation packet. If you are in the front of a line of troops, you earn $17,000 a year. You would expect the people who keep our country free and safe and risk their lives for us each and every day would earn a little more than $17,000 a year. To make it even worse, the mother of a marine said that she had to charge over $1,000 a year for items that the military did not supple for their men, including camouflage paint and socks. Again, you would think the government would provide these courageous men who fight for our freedom with the things they need to go into battle. The last topic to be addressed is titled “The Shame Game” by Ehrenreich. In this story, Ehrenreich says that she was a guest on a radio show where people called in and talked about their economic struggles. She listened to these callers say pretty much the same thing over and over again. These people got laid off, tried to find a job for such a long time, and either didn’t find one, or found one that only paid half of their former wage. She notes that most of the callers talked in third person, acting like it happened to a spouse or friend, when in reality, it most likely happened to them. She also told them to blame the government and to never blame themselves for getting laid off. Going along with blaming someone, a Saudi Arabian women was sentenced to 200 lashes, a form of torture, after accusing someone of raping her. Usually, it is the other way around and the assailant would get the form of torture, not the victim. Some women’s first response in the face of sexual violence is that they did something wrong and that they did something to have someone do that to them. In the book, The American People; Creating a Nation and Society, Gary B. Nash agrees with what Barbara Ehrenreich says about how the rich keep getting richer and the poor keep getting poorer. Republicans aimed to alter the economic neutrality of the Carter years and wanted to create and provide new chances for companies to flourish. Reagan proposed an economic recovery program in which there were tax cuts involved. These tax cuts resulted in the rich gaining far more than the middle and lower class Americans while the poverty stricken Americans, who are already the most disadvantaged, did not benefit at all. As for myself, I agree that the rich keep getting richer and the poor keep getting poorer. A lot of Americans are working long hours every single day and still can’t provide enough for their family and are living below the poverty line. I also agree with Ehrenreich and her examples in the story “CEOs vs. Slaves”. I think part of it has to do with your heritage. If you are born into a family that has money and everyone in your family has been making exorbitant amounts of money their whole life, you are most likely to not give your workers more than minimum wage. On the other hand, if you had to work for your money and you eventually make it up to the point of being a CEO, then you will most likely understand where your employees are coming from and are more likely to give them an above minimum wage salary.
Ehrenreich’s use of statistical information also proves to her audience that she in fact has done her research on this topic. She admits that poverty is a social topic that she frequently talks about. She researched that in 1998 the National Coalition for the Homeless reported that nationwide on average it would take about a wage of $8.89 to afford a one bedroom apartment and that the odds of common welfare recipients landing a job that pays such a “living wage” were about 97 to 1. Ehrenreich experiences this statistic in first person when she set out job hunting in Key West, Florida when she applied to 20 different jobs, ranging from wait tables to housekeeping, and of those applications, zero were responded to.
...Even with the pitfalls in Ehrenreich's research, she managed to shine a light on the everyday plight of the low wage worker. She achieved employment at several different low wage service jobs and she also achieved friendliness with the coworkers there. Unfortunately, she could not achieve her goal of making enough money to pay the following month's rent at her accommodations, as she dictated to be her sign of success at the beginning of the project. Without this success, she can truly say that the plight of the low wage worker and the women leaving welfare is an extremely difficult one with great hardship and lack of fulfillment as these participants of the lower class work day to day to keep their chins up and make do with what, even if little, they have.
In light of the most recent election results I find myself worrying about the countless social and economic injustices that will perpetuate to occur in our country. I dwell on our history, of how our social welfare system created and continues to reinforce discrimination, privilege and oppression. How did we end up like this and where is that “American dream” promised to those within our boarders? Literary works $2.00 a Day: Living on Almost Nothing in America by Kathryn Edin and Luke Shaefer, Nobody: Casualties of America’s War on the Vulnerable, from Ferguson to Flint and Beyond by Marc Lamont Hill, and Bryan Stevenson’s book, Just Mercy: A story of justice and redemption, seek to describe how social injustices and economic issues manifest
Reading Nickel and Dimed, enlightened me to see how some people have to live. The idea behind writing the book provided an interesting look into poverty, however, Ehrenreich did not offer any real solution to the problem at hand. Ehrenreich made the assumption that all persons working these low paying positions are uneducated, unskilled, and just off of welfare. Which this is not entirely true a lot of these courageous people have some education if not college degrees. In the book I believe some people are richer in their families with love and respect that the highest paying careers could not satisfy. Material items are not as important to a great deal of the population. As long as their loved ones have a roof over their head, food on the table and clothes to wear the rest is just icing. I know people who have fortune in their bank accounts and they are some of the poorest individuals you could ever meet.
While she was working the minimum wage life she would talk about the rich as selfish people who struck luck and got all their money that way. She says, “ Since the rich have become more numerous, thanks largely to rising stock prices and executive salaries” (Ehrenreich 109). She explains that the rich are becoming more numerous as a result of stocks and executive salaries growing. The New York Times says, "Data Reveal a Rise in College Degrees Among Americans” (Rampell 1). The article says that more and more Americans are earning college degrees over the years. This is the reason why the successful are
The juxtaposed contrasts that she often uses are seen explicitly in anecdotes or implicitly in conscious thoughts. Such contrasts first appear in the first paragraph. Even before Ehrenreich makes any substantial effort to join the poor working class, she is hit with this sudden unease of being recognized. At that time, it is clear that she has not relinquished her middle class status since she feels ashamed of being identified as a poor worker. In the world that the author originally belongs to, name and reputation are considered important to one’s standing in society yet in the working class realm, as Ehrenreich later finds out, one is often “unnoticed” and names are “unuttered.” Not only are names forgotten but one’s ability and education are also ignored when looking for jobs. Oblivious to the “rule” for hiring for unskilled jobs, Ehrenreich initially worries about her over-qualification but only to be shocked when she realizes the employers are not even interested. Whereas jobs for the middle class often demand higher education and past accomplishments, jobs for the low-wage workforce are simply depended simply on luck or as Ehrenreich claims “ being in the right place at the right time.” One can convey this as part of a corporate scheme to ensure the
William Domhoff’s investigation into America’s ruling class is an eye-opening and poignant reading experience, even for enlightened individuals regarding the US social class system. His book, Who Rules America, exploits the fundamental failures in America’s governing bodies to provide adequate resources for class mobility and shared power. He identifies history, corporate and social hierarchy, money-driven politics, a two-party system, and a policy-making process orchestrated by American elites amongst a vast array of causes leading to an ultimate effect of class-domination theory pervading American society. In articulating his thesis and supporting assertions, Domhoff appeals rhetorically toward an audience with prior knowledge of America’s
In The Promised Land, Nicholas Lehmann follows the stories of black migrants, politicians, and bureaucrats through the Great Migration, and attempts to explain the decline of northern cities, the constant liberty struggle of blacks across America, and government response to the issues surrounding the Great Migration. This work signalled a drastic change from the structured approach of Thomas Sugrue’s, The Origins Of The Urban Crisis, which observes the effects of institutions and human agency on postwar Detroit and its marginalized peoples. Both Sugrue and Lemann had (albeit slightly different) holistic views of the political climate of postwar cities, which helped provide context for prejudices towards blacks and the poor, and subsequently
During the middle of the book, Ehrenreich writes, "Maybe, it occurs to me, that I 'm getting a tiny glimpse of what it would be like to be black (p. 100)." I found this interesting because African Americans continuously face inequality due to race, which correlates with the inequalities that lower classes in society face. Throughout Nickel and Dimed, Ehrenreich emphasizes that there are "hidden costs" to being poor, which includes those in poverty who cannot find a way out. The working poor, who Ehrenreich gets to know through work, live in hotels paying daily. These people in the book describe to Ehrenreich that that would rent an apartment, but they cannot afford the security deposit and starting costs. The working poor in the book also must buy unhealthy meals at fast-food restaurants because they cannot afford kitchen appliances or food to cook with. People suffering in poverty often believe they are stuck there and cannot get out, so they
Briefly state the main idea of this article: The main idea of this article is that economic inequality has steadily risen in the United States between the richest people and the poorest people. And this inequality affects the people in more ways than buying power; it also affects education, life expectancy, living conditions and possibly happiness. Another idea that he brought up was that the American government tends to give less help to the unemployed than other rich countries.
The first misconception that he begins to explain is “a liberal-arts degree is a luxury that most families can no longer afford. Career education” is what we now must focus on.” Liberal arts education produces analytical thinking, and professions are looking for that as an alternative of just being specialized in one subject. “Who wants to hire somebody with an irrelevant major like philosophy or French,” but in reality everyone is finding it harder to find a job in this economy, not just liberal arts majors. He then answers the question about “being low income, or first generation college student,” and Ungar begins to state that it is ignorance to consider that just because an individual is the first generation that they cannot be given the same kind of education as someone else who is not a first generation. Some may
In this book, Ehrenreich tries to work in three different places to see what it is like to work as a minimum wage worker. Ehrenreich worked as a server in Florida, housekeeper in Miami, and sales person in Minnesota, and still she didn’t make enough money to live comfortable. As she says, “Something is wrong, very wrong, when a single person in good health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can barely support herself by the sweat of her brow. You don’t need a degree in economics to see that wages are too low and rent too high”(Ehrereich’s 199). She notices how hard it is for poor people to try to survive when they have to work with a minimum
Krugman 's even go about saying that this is why there is such a huge economic gap between social class. According to Krugman “Instead the rise in debt mainly reflected increased spending on housing, largely driven by the competition to get into good school districts. Middle- class Americans have been caught up in a rat race, not because they’re greedy or foolish but because they’re trying to give their children a chance in an increasingly unequal society”(564-565). All in all Krugman is saying that the only way for children in this day in age to receive a good education is by either being from an upper class family or making the public believe that your upper class, even though you can not afford that lifestyle. Which is not necessarily true because if you are willing to work hard enough you can go as far as you want in education.
Immigrants traveled hundreds of miles from their homes, only with what possessions they could carry, in order to obtain the rights and chase the promise that America had to offer. Mary Antin illustrates in The Promised Land how if given the chance, immigrants will represent the promises and virtues of American society. Antin shows that public education, freedom from religious persecution, and freedom of expression as a citizen are aspects of life Americans may take for granted but immigrants certainly do not.
One would expect that social equality would just be the norm in society today. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Three similar stories of how inequality and the hard reality of how America’s society and workforce is ran shows a bigger picture of the problems American’s have trying to make an honest living in today’s world. When someone thinks about the American dream, is this the way they pictured it? Is this what was envisioned for American’s when thinking about what the future held? The three authors in these articles don’t believe so, and they are pretty sure American’s didn’t either. Bob Herbert in his article “Hiding from Reality” probably makes the most honest and correct statement, “We’re in denial about the extent of the rot in the system, and the effort that would be required to turn things around” (564).