Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Suffering and redemption in king lear
Human suffering of the king lear
Suffering and redemption in king lear
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Suffering and redemption in king lear
Suffering in Titues Andronicus and King Lear
An essential element to any Shakespearean tragedy is the idea of human suffering. In both Titus Andronicus and King Lear no one can deny that the characters in these plays do indeed suffer and at great lengths, but the question begs to be asked what is the source of this suffering? Keeping in mind that during the times in which William Shakespeare wrote death, adultery and fragrant sexuality where at an optimal level and as such single parent families frequently resulted. Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus and King Lear are indeed tales that show the follies of such single parent families and more precisely those families that lack a mothering figure. It is this lack of the female in the parental role, which serves as a source of suffering for both the parents and their children.
With out female partner in the play, Titus Andronicus is with a doubt a completely masculine figure who instead of being dedicated to a wife is instead is dedicated to his country, Rome. These two factors greatly play against each other in Titus Andronicus and serve to be extremely problematic for Titus and his children. Valerie Traub states in her essay Gender and Sexuality in Shakespeare , that "the sixteenth century was patriarchal. The Father was likened to the ruler of the realm, with extreme powers and complete control." (Traub, 129) Within the first scene, the Titus that the reader is presented with desire's complete control over his family and it is the lack of a female presence that gives him such control. Left with out a mothering influence in the play Titus is able raise each of his sons to be warriors, manly men who like their father serve Rome in a militaristic way. Titus leads them int...
... middle of paper ...
...Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Jaynes, Nanette. "Violence in Titus Andronicus." The Explicator.
Vol. 54 Issue 4 (1996) 200par, 4P. 02/27/2002.
www.unipissing.ca/department/library/njournal.htm
Potter, Lois. "Shakespeare in the Sixteenth Century." Ed. de
Grazua, Margreta & Wells, Stanley. The Cambridge Guide to
Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Shakespeare, William. "King Lear." The Riverside Shakespeare:
Second Addition. New York: The Houghton Mifflin Company,
1997.
Shakespeare, William. "Titus Adronicus." The Riverside
Shakespeare: Second Addition. New York: The Houghton
Mifflin Company, 1997.
Traub, Valerie. "Gender and Sexuality in Shakespeare." Ed. de
Grazua, Margreta & Wells, Stanley. The Cambridge Guide to
Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus demonstrates how aggressive challenges and divisions are born out of conflicting belief systems. For example, because the Roman citizens, the Goths, and Aaron the Moor all differ in matters of consciousness, tension ensues. Nicholas Moschovakis comments extensively about these clashes in his essay ““Irreligious Piety” and Christian History: Persecution as Pagan Anachronism in Titus Andronicus,” and Moschovakis not only magnifies persecution, but he remarks extensively about the major elements in Titus Andronicus that can be understood as anachronistic. While Moschovakis carefully and thoroughly observes the Shakespearean realms of violent “human sacrifice,” the “relevance of Judeo-Christian sacrificial discourses,” the anti-papist Elizabethan attitudes, and other religious and pagan traditions, Moschovakis plainly admits that “Titus evades all attempts to be read as partisan invective” (Moschovakis 462). Because Shakespeare included a wide range of conflict and overlapping belief systems, assertions tend to become, as Moschovakis puts it, “curiously inconsistent” and “overshadowed” (Moschovakis 462). What can be claimed as transparent in Titus Andronicus, and what I think is appealing to the masses, is that Shakespeare drew upon the major controversial motifs in human history and religion, and he included the evils of hypocrisy which allow for realistic interest regardless of what your religious or political stance is. Moreover, I would argue that Shakespeare exposes a more obvious anachronistic element that can serve in expanding Moschovakis’ arguments. Titus Andronicus demonstrates the time honored obsession over first born sons, and because the play includes a first born son in each family t...
Pitt, Angela. "Women in Shakespeare's Tragedies." Readings on The Tragedies. Ed. Clarice Swisher. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1996. Reprint of Shakespeare's Women. N.p.: n.p., 1981.
Titus Andronicus and Medea are both Greek tragic plays. They show the changes in society and the structure of Greek and Roman government. Medea portrays the role of all women in Corinth and she sheds light on the truth about corruption in Greece. Titus Andronicus is a typical war hero, he does everything to bring pride to Rome. Titus kills his son for going against him and Titus’s daughter, Lavinia is raped and her tongue is cut out and her hands cut off. The pain Lavinia encounters destroys Titus and his reputation. Civilization in Medea and Titus Andronicus is distorted by the notions of gender, monstrosity, and identification.
There are only two female characters in the entire play Titus Andronicus by William Shakespeare. These two women, Tamora and Lavinia, seem to be complete opposites. Tamora appears to give up her femininity in the name of revenge and power, while Lavinia’s femininity and value as a woman is taken from her. Tamora has power outside of men, but Lavinia only has power when men aid her. The play portrays Tamora as a sensual strong being, whereas Lavinia encompasses the more traditional virtuous, passive role that a woman would be expected to take. By creating this dichotomy between the two women, the play is able to explore female sexuality and power.
Pitt, Angela. “Women in Shakespeare’s Tragedies.” Readings on The Tragedies. Ed. Clarice Swisher. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1996. Reprint from Shakespeare’s Women. N.p.: n.p., 1981.
In many of William Shakespeare’s late plays, the focus is often on the concept of sin, penance, and punishment, whether as the focal source of tension that drives the plot forward or as an undercurrent of tension that is craftily interwoven into the framework of the play itself. This is an idea that is explored in Shakespeare’s Pericles and The Tempest. However, while each play has male characters who commit sinful acts, it is the innocent loved ones — usually the child or the wife of the sinful, or morally problematic, male characters — who are forced to perform penitential acts to absolve the father or husband of sin. In the case of both Pericles and The Tempest, the problematic male characters are Pericles and Alonso, who are both figures
Pitt, Angela. "Women in Shakespeare's Tragedies." Readings on The Tragedies. Ed. Clarice Swisher. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1996. Reprint from Shakespeare's Women. N.p.: n.p., 1981.
The tragedy King Lear by William Shakespeare ought to be seen as a lesson on what not to do as a parent. By picking favorites, King Lear and the Earl of Gloucester leave a lasting impact on their children 's psyche, ultimately leading to them committing horrible crimes. The rash judgments, violent reactions, and blindness of both Lear and Gloucester lead to both their and their children 's demise. As a result, all of the father-child relationships in the play begin to collapse.
Pitt, Angela. “Women in Shakespeare’s Tragedies.” Readings on The Tragedies. Ed. Clarice Swisher. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1996. Reprint from Shakespeare’s Women. N.p.: n.p., 1981.
In Shakespeare's “King Lear”, the tragic hero is brought down, like all tragic heroes, by one fatal flaw; in this case it is pride, as well as foolishness. It is the King's arrogant demand for absolute love and, what's more, protestations of such from the daughter who truly loves him the most, that sets the stage for his downfall. Cordelia, can be seen as Lear’s one true love, and her love and loyalty go not only beyond that of her sisters but beyond words, thus enraging the proud King Lear whose response is: "Let pride, which she calls plainness, marry her". Here, Lear's pride is emphasized as he indulges in the common trend of despising in others what one is most embarrassed of oneself.
Shakespeare’s works are some of the finest examples of Tragedy and Comedy from the English cannon of literature. The reason that his works are so poignant and reflective is his use of both emotions in order to progress the other. In his interpretation of Troilus and Cressida the traditional story of tragic love and loss are peppered with irony and satire in order to address topical issues of Gender roles, Government action/inaction, and hero worship through juxtaposition and humor.
Both Shakespeare and Neil Biswas in King Lear and Second Generation, explore the idea of physical and psychological suffering. In King Lear and Second Generation, almost every character seems to fall victim to some nature of suffering: Sharma and Lear's madness when daughter's abandon them, Edmund reminded of being illegitimate, Edgar's true identity has to be hidden, Sam's clash of culture with his true love, Kent's obedience towards his master, Khan committing suicide and Gloucester's blindness. Therefore, both Shakespeare and Biswas exploit and outline this to the audience as to how suffering is a result of physical, psychological pain which can lead to realisation. The theme of suffering starts at the very beginning of King Lear when Cordelia, Lear's favourite and youngest daughter, fails to please him with her lack of speech 'half my love with him, half my care and duty'.
During the Elizabethan Era, women were oppressed to men and had no authority and power to make their own decisions. This idealistic view of gender is defied in William Shakespeare’s well-known tragedy, King Lear, for female empowerment is central to the play. Firstly, the bold characteristics of the women contribute greatly in enhancing the plot. Furthermore, women play a major role in developing the theme of power. Moreover, when power is given to the female characters, they reveal their true nature, thus aiding with their character development.
... or desires. This claustrophobic sensation daily burdens women, disabling them to reach their greatest potential. In Romeo and Juliet, this thick environment suppresses each of the three crucial women, and ultimately, it is the agent of their fate. Would Juliet's tragic death been avoided if the societal structure been changed? Would Lady Capulet had been so apathetic, withdrawn, and submissive if she was no longer bound by marriage? Or would the Nurse be so condemned every time she desired to speak her voice? Shakespeare constructs and illuminates these three distinct reactions to social oppression by portraying a determined, passionate lover, an idyllic, apathetic housewife, and a vociferous, bawdy attendant, and by doing so, he establishes that no matter what a woman does, the patriarchal society has already determined her fate in infinite, confined entrapment!
From the expansion days of Ancient Rome to the fall of the Roman Empire, women have always succumbed to living subjacent to the status of their omnipotent and dominant male figures. After leaving her childhood home and the rule of her father, a young Roman girl would then be coerced into the dominion of her husband, often taking a plethora of roles, ranging from lover, caretaker, and best friend. It is often lightheartedly stated that, “Behind every great man is an even greater woman,” and William Shakespeare exemplifies this concept beautifully in Julius Caesar, in which he effectively used the spouses of the two main characters to add more depth, drama, and literary elements to the play, bringing it to life. Although the only two female characters in Julius Caesar, Portia and Calpurnia do not play a pivotal role in the overall plot of the story, their presence is vital in illuminating and developing the characters of their husbands, Brutus and Caesar. What they reveal about their husbands leads the reader to infer that Portia is the more admirable and redeeming character.