Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The nature of revenge
Revenge and its consequences
Factors of revenge
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The nature of revenge
Revenge’s Successful Implementation in Dumas’s The Count of Monte Cristo
In order to discuss the merit of a revenge, effective revenge must be defined. Fruitful vengeance must have completed objectives, acclimate to obstacles and challenges that occur, provide the avenger with closure, and the transgressor with understanding. The Count of Monte Cristo’s rebuttal is based on his precise design, has equal punishments for every party, ensures that everyone who wronged him comprehends his motivation, adapts to incidents, and gives the Count the opportunity justify his actions, making his revenge a successful one.
According to the Complicated Psychology of Revenge, “…the avenger must be assured that the offender has made a direct connection between
…show more content…
Unfortunately, Edouard met an unplanned demise, causing the Count to feel rather guilty. However, Edouard’s passing was simply a casualty of his mother’s obsessively overprotective tendencies. He probably would have met a similar end anyways, either through another of his mother’s selfish actions or perhaps through suicide when he discovered that his mother’s unhealthy fixation on him caused the death of the majority of his family. Not to mention that the Count’s solution to his guilt was the other major alteration to his plans. He left Danglars alive after revealing that his sudden poverty and imprisonment were both products of his betrayal years earlier. This diminishing of planned suffering did not derail the plot. Some argue that it shows a sudden humanization of Monte Cristo that waters down the revenge. This is simply not true. Danglars is forced to live with his ruined name, sudden poverty, and the knowledge that Edmond Dantes would always win. Some also debate that the fact that Monte Cristo himself didn’t die changes everything far too drastically to allow for realization of his goals. His nonchalance about his own possible death is shown throughout, perhaps most obviously so when he tells Franz, “Besides, the worst that can happen to him is a public execution, and what does he care about hat, as long as he has had his …show more content…
His plan for resolution was to die in proper fashion almost immediately after he achieved retribution. Haydee provided him with a more pleasant and romantic path. His letter to Maximillian and Valentine allowed him to vent about his actions and feelings. This enabled him to at least create an opportunity for someone directly involved with his actions to understand his incentive and for him to review everything he had done in such way that he was able to determine how just it was. He opened new doors for a future and a life with the woman he loved. The combination of explanation and new prospects creates the ideal scenario for him to both acknowledge his past and move on to his
Evil exists naturally in the world, and there are many acts that are considered evil. As a result, evil is often a theme in literature. “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” by William Shakespeare, and “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe each rely heavily on evil to portray a message. Out of all of the evil acts that exist, exacting revenge is the evilest act that a person can make, for a person’s rash decision to exact revenge will ruin their sense of morality. The characters of Hamlet and Laertes in “Hamlet” each commit terrible acts of revenge, as does Montresor in “The Cask of Amontillado.”
revenge on the rebels who had taken everything from him by taking part in the fight against
In modern times, phrases such as “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind,” are commonly used. Also, the mere word revenge holds negative connotations as it is seen as immature and unnecessary. The theme of revenge uses archetypes to develop ideas without having to reiterate their meaning. According to the creator of the term, Carl Jung, “archetypes are defined as being a collectively inherited unconscious idea, pattern of thought, image, etc., universally present in individual psyches.” (Dictionary) The Count of Monte Cristo, one of the novels that pioneer this theme, tells the story of a man’s quest for revenge on those who betrayed him. This man spends 14 years of his life imprisoned because of his betrayers, but he manages to escape to avenge his suffering. In the novel The Count of Monte Cristo, Alexandre Dumas uses the archetypes of the byronic hero, the betrayer and the old sage to demonstrate that one’s suffering doesn’t give them the right to seek revenge on those who have failed them.
Many people percieve revenge to be something that falls under justice, as they are driven by emotions, while others consider getting the police involved as serving justice. Moreover, some people find revenge to be pleasing and satisfying, but to argue the point that just because something is more satisfying does not mean it is
While getting inspiration for Monte Cristo, he heard a story about a man, which inspired the plot for his novel. Picaud, the man whom inspired the story, gained vengeance in a much more gruesome way than Dantes does. Picaud takes vengeance whereas Dantes is avenged. Justice is achieved because good is stronger than evil, not because of the Count’s power (Stowe 125). Perhaps this is Dumas’s opinion on vengeance. If it is well earned, then it will fall into the man’s hands rightfully (Maurois). Dumas’s inspiration for the novel also came from his personal life. His father was heavily mistreated, and as he watched helplessly for his whole childhood, it became important to him to avenge his father. Although people in his own life may not have wronged him as they did his father, he believes in revenge, and sought revenge through his literature (Maurois). Through the character of Edmond Dantes, Dumas portrayed his own desire to justify his father’s oppressors. In Maurois’s article, he speaks about this, saying, “He must have been sorely tempted to find compensation in fiction for the iniquities of the real world.” Perhaps he was afraid to vocalize his opinion publicly, so he decided on a more subtle route, which was to create a story that everyone could identify with. Writing Monte Cristo must have been closure for Dumas at the expense of his father. He sought vengeance in the form of literature
Revenge is a fairly strong emotion; it’s wanting to retaliate towards those who wronged you. Revenge is such an uncontrollable way of retaliation that it can result in a destructive outcome or carried out successfully. Although the results may vary, revenge sums up to one thing which is pain of some sort, affecting both parties or just one. Throughout history we see many tales of revenge and redemption. Often revenge does leave the one carrying it out feeling victorious but this can suddenly change as the process of karma generally begins in some tales.
Bar-elli, G. and Heyd, D. (1986), Can revenge be just or otherwise justified?. Theoria, 52: 68–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-2567.1986.tb00100.x
Throughout history, revenge, or vengeance, has been altered by several cultures and even the American culture. This is shown throughout many ancient greek epics. Throughout these two epics, what is just revenge and what the action of revenge is are much different than what Revenge is seen through today’s society. Revenge is the main theme in The Iliad, with Achilles’ revenge on Agamemnon and Hector, and in The Odyssey, with Poseidon’s revenge on Odysseus and Odysseus’s revenge on the Suitors, and these epics define how revenge was seen in the ancient Greek world.
Revenge is such an enormous part of a being human. It is something that no matter how much you try to avoid part of you will persistently lust for it. When you are hurt in any way your natural instinct will always tell you to make the one who hurt you feel just as bad if not worse as how you felt. It is such a natural and powerful feeling, that when revenge is incorporated into a story it makes it so much stronger. Revenge will make you see so many more sides of characters and make them seem much more complex. Revenge can give fictional characters a more human quality. That is why so many writers use it as their theme.
Throughout Hamlet, each character’s course of revenge surrounds them with corruption, obsession, and fatality. Shakespeare shows that revenge proves to be extremely problematic. Revenge causes corruption by changing an individual’s persona and nature. Obsession to revenge brings forth difficulties such as destroyed relationships. Finally, revenge can be the foundation to the ultimate sacrifice of fatality. Hamlet goes to show that revenge is never the correct route to follow, and it is always the route with a dead
“Those who plot the destruction of others often fall themselves” (Phaedrus). This quote was said by a Roman fabulist and it depicts the entire concept of revenge in Hamlet. The nature of revenge causes someone to act upon anger rather than reason. Hamlet takes place in Denmark and is about Hamlet’s uncle who kills his dad to gain power of Denmark. After the killing, Hamlet seeks revenge on his uncle. In the play, there are several characters wanting vengeance like that of Hamlet. Throughout the play, Hamlet, Laertes, and Fortinbras all had a tragic death of a family member which caused their decision for revenge. Consequentially, these revenges caused the demise of two characters and the rise of power of another. The retaliation shown by the Prince of Denmark, as well as Laertes led to the downfall of their government.
Revenge is one of the main drivers found in stories and in life. One of these stories is The Count of Monte Cristo. Edmond Dantes ultimately will have temporary satisfaction from enacting his revenge before he spirals into a depression he will never be able to come out of. Dantes would not feel remorse over his decision to enact his revenge. The men who destroyed Edmond Dantes’ life never got their just desserts, and in fact, it was quite the opposite.
Sir Francis Bacon once said “The first wrong breaks the law; revenge of that wrong destroys law itself” (Bacon). Bacon explains this in his essay Of Revenge. If one seeks revenge, one is only going to hurt oneself in the end. Revenge is hurtful and spiteful and one will possibly hurt others through it. One can fix it if one changes ones view on things. Throughout the following, Romeo and Juliet, Biography of Takashi Tanemori, Present Tense, The Blade of Grass in a Dreamless Field, one will see how revenge affects a person and the people around them.
Taking revenge is a bitter sweet thing. I have always thought that people should always get what they desire, whether it be a grade, a smile and hug or in some cases, revenge. When I was in high school there seemed to be someone always trying to get me in trouble, they would say things that wouldn’t be true or do things to make me look bad. The fact that I never seemed to do anything to them would make me mad and wonder what I could do to get them back. Revenge would usually come in some sort of verbal put down or I would try to physically hurt them. It always seemed when I would get the revenge right away I would feel really good but as I thought about what I did, and what they did to me I would always feel guilty or wish I would have never done anything to them in return.
People can be motivated to take revenge on others for various reasons. While these reasons may be considered as very serious or rather trivial, they are all motives for revenge. Revenge occurs when a person has been offended or angered by an individual and in result they have the desire to pay them back. People’s opinions on revenge differ from each other, some may believe it is justified and some don’t. Mahatma Ghandi believed that revenge is not the answer and he stated that “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”. This quote portrays the opinion that if everyone gets even then there will be no one else; if we all take an eye for an eye everyone would be blind. Revenge can be learnt through real life experiences as well as fiction and can be shown as justice or unacceptable. It becomes difficult to determine when revenge can be justified but is revenge always worth it?