Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of conquest and colonization on the native Americans
Effects of conquest and colonization on the native Americans
Challenges faced by indigenous religions around the world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Submergence and Exclusion of Native Americans by the Spaniards and the Puritans I have chosen to compare the Native Americans to both the Spaniards and the Puritans. I will do so on three levels: culture, religion, and literature. I will show how both the Spaniards and the Puritans wanted to impose their traditions upon the Native American; however, the Spaniards did so by merging with the Indians and the Puritans did so by oppressing the Indian. To begin the comparison, I will explore the American Indians and their culture, religion, and literature. Culturally speaking the Indians were "well adapted to their environment" (Lauter, 5). In the Indians environment, their land was their culture which gave them a sense of a fixed place in the world. The Indians primary goal was to survive on their land which had survived throughout many ancestral generations. The Indians could "retain their culture if their land remained in their possession" (Utley, 23). Another important part of the Indians culture, which was also a part of their environment, was nature. The Indians existence was nature-based and everything from nature was to be noted and respected. The Native Americans began to supplement and replace their own tools and other objects by the Europeans . However, this process reflected "merely a substitution not an alteration of their basic culture pattern" (Utley, 38). Life for the Indians remained essentially the same. There were "no changes in settlement patterns, warfare practices, means of subsistence, social or ceremonial activities" (Weber, 241). The Native Americans religion "reflected their cultural practices" (Lauter, 5). The Indians religious practices were associated with their me... ... middle of paper ... ...llowed for the Spaniards to get down on the same level as the Indians. The questions to justify the toleration set forth by the Spaniards to the Indians could go on; but, one thing is for sure, the Puritans must have known what they were doing because even though their influence was last, it still impacts what is now called the United States. Works Cited Lauter, Paul, vol. 1, 3rd ed. The Heath Anthology of American Literature. Pub: by Houghton Mifflin, 19 Segal, Charles M. and David C. Stineback, Foreword by Sacvan Barcovitch, Puritans, Indians and Manifest Destiny. Pub: by Putnam, 1977 Utley, Robert M., The Indian Frontier of the American West 1846-1890. Pub: by University of New mexico Press, 1984 Weber, David J., New Spain's Far Frontier: Essays on Spain in the American West, 1540-1821. Pub: by University of New Mexico Press, 1979.
In George E. Tinker’s book, American Indian Liberation: A Theology of Sovereignty, the atrocities endured by many of the first peoples, Native American tribes, come into full view. Tinker argues that the colonization of these groups had and continues to have lasting effects on their culture and thus their theology. There is a delicate balance to their culture and their spiritual selves within their tightly knit communities prior to contact from the first European explorers. In fact, their culture and spiritual aspects are so intertwined that it is conceptually impossible to separate the two, as so many Euro-American analysts attempted. Tinker points to the differences between the European and the Native American cultures and mind sets as ultimately
The essay starts with the “Columbian Encounter between the cultures of two old worlds “ (98). These two old worlds were America and Europe. This discovery states that Native Americans contributed to the development and evolution of America’s history and culture. It gives the fact that indians only acted against europeans to defend their food, territory, and themselves.
Religion played a very important role in both Puritan and Native American society, though their ideologies differed greatly. According to Puritan beliefs, God had chosen a select number of people to join him in heaven as his elect. The Native Americans, on the other hand, believed that everyone was the same; no one was better than anyone else. As Sitting Bull once said, "Each man is good in [the Great Spirit's] sight. (Quotes from our Native Past). This theory was in direct conflict with the Puritan's view. The means through which the beliefs of these two groups were carried on also differed greatly. The Puritans had their Bible which detailed their entire religion and held the answers to all possible questions. The Native Americans on the other hand relied on oral transmission of their theology. Thus, while the Puritans had a constant place to turn to when they wanted to figure out what they believed, Native Americans were forced to fill in the blanks between stories they had heard when it came to their basic ideals. This aspect made them both unable to relate to one another. The most prominent difference between the two religions were their gods. The Puritans believed in one God and one God only. The Native Americans, though also worshipping their own almighty "Great Spirit," took further reverence for all living (and once living) things, worshipping the trees and their ancestors as well as their omnipotent Tirawa (or Wakan Tanka). The Puritans, holding all aspects of the Bible literal and as divine mandate, saw this worship of beings other than their God as idolatry (which was in clear violation of the first commandment). Therefore, the Puritans held the Native American society as a society wallowing in sin.
In conclusion, many soviets citizens appeared to believe that Stalin’s positive contributions to the U.S.S.R. far outweigh his monstrous acts. These crimes have been down played by many of Stalin’s successors as they stress his achievements as collectivizer, industrializer, and war leader. Among those citizens who harbor feelings of nostalgia, Stalin’s strength, authority , and achievement contrast sharply with the pain and suffering of post-revolutionary Russia.
Stalin’s hunger for power and paranoia impacted the Soviet society severely, having devastating effects on the Communist Party, leaving it weak and shattering the framework of the party, the people of Russia, by stunting the growth of technology and progress through the purges of many educated civilians, as well as affecting The Red Army, a powerful military depleted of it’s force. The impact of the purges, ‘show trials’ and the Terror on Soviet society were rigorously negative. By purging all his challengers and opponents, Stalin created a blanket of fear over the whole society, and therefore, was able to stay in power, creating an empire that he could find more dependable.
Stalin’s leadership of the Soviet Union can be best described as a period of terror and censorship. In other words, he was very strict, considering the fact that he created the totalitarian government. In order to create this type of government, Stalin used fear and propaganda. He took part in The Great Purge, which was a campaign of terror that was supposed to eliminate anyone who threatened Stalin’s power. He also relied on secret police, who would arrest and execute any traitors. The online blog, “The Reasons For the Failure of The Russian Revolution”, brings up information on how Stalin planned to rule as dictator of Russia. It has been noted, “This ‘reshaping’ had three main aspects: the elimination of all dissent; the liquidation of all forms of democracy and of working class organisation; the slashing of the living standards of the working class and the physical annihilation of millions of peasants” (Text 5). This quote explains how Stalin wanted to industrialize Russia, which includes the deaths of several peasants of Russia. The Russians did not just die from The Great Purge, but also from Stalin’s Five-Year Plan. The Five-Year Plan was an attempt to industrialize the Soviet Union. It was also a plan for increasing the output of steel, coal, oil, and electricity. He had control over economic resources, including farms and
Native Americans have orally passed down stories that describe everything about the world and the correct morals that people should follow. They are magical and relates heavily with nature. Puritan literature on the other hand is very strict and religious. They are closely related with God and they only learn to gain salvation. Puritans and Native Americans have very different cultures. Nevertheless, they both have similar intentions of teaching their young; thus it is important to keep in mind that even if other cultures seem strange there is not much difference when it comes to the core and that there needs to be respect for
During the years 1930 the the Soviet people was brutalized, and these are some examples that Stalin used against them. Stalin had three objectives, which were: to build a power industrial base, to collectivize agriculture, and to impose the nation complete conformity. Also, he believed that the system need sacrifices and sacrificial victims for the good of the cause and happiness of future generations. Stalin, to begin the industrialization, needed to construct a base virtually from scratch, but he need to be in the same level of this capitalist rivals. Therefore, without regardless of human cost, emphasized the entire the national economy to heavy machinery and capital goods. Stalin implemented many ratification for to have the control of
During the journey to the New World, many Europeans explored this unknown place and viewed the Native Americans as savages, but the Natives were much more different than they thought. In each text, La Relacion, Plymouth Plantation and Iroquois Constitution, they had significant views of the Native Americans during their journeys in the New World. Not only did they have different views in their stories, but they also connect in certain aspects. In early Native American literature, Native Americans are portrayed as being peacemakers, resist violence and avoid being enemies, helpful, helps the ones in need, and compassionate, feels sorrow and sympathy to the ones who goes through the most pain.
One of the key factors that led to the civil war was the contrasting beliefs of King Charles and the parliament. The monarchy believed in the divine rights of kings, explained by Fisher (1994, p335) as a biblically-based belief that the king or queen's authority comes directly from God and that he is not subjected to the demands of the people. On the other hand, the parliament had a strong democratic stance and though they respected and recognized the king's authority, they were constantly desiring and fighting for more rights to power. Although climaxing at the reign of King Charles, their antagonism stretched for centuries long before his birth and much of the power that once belonged to the monarchy had shifted over to the parliament by the time he came into power.
Much like Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin was one of the most ruthless and despised people in the recorded history of the world. Stalin though his policies found it fit to abused his people in any way he saw fit. This man started what history now calls "The Great Purges."
The Native Americans had similar cultures, economic activities and physical looks. They all had their subsistence from hunting and agriculture and used the existing raw materials in the plains for food and clothing. Due to the regular changes in the weather patterns of the Great Plains, the Native Americans changed their way of life in the same way through the seasons. They also all shared a similarity in language, currencies for trade and weapons. The belief systems and religions practiced were also similar for all the different Native American dwellers of the Great Plains. The Native Americans of the Great Plains defended their territory from the white settler’s expansion through similar methods. They fought back with military force, tried to settle through treaties and finally tried alliances with other forces to stop the loss of their lands to the white settlers. The federal government destroyed the cultures of the Native Americans hoping that; by westernizing them, they could be ‘better citizens’. The government had hoped to integrate the Native Americans into the wider white American
The native American discovered the Americas, where they lived until the Spaniards came in wanting to change their religion. The native American believed in the Great Spirit before the Europeans came into their land. This topic is interesting to me because these indigenous people already had their religion build up when the Spaniards forced the natives to accept there will. The natives were a big group of people who resisted the Spaniards colonization as we read in the Borinqueños “Revolt of the ” how they fought back to the conquistadors but natives were decent people who believed these people were too powerful to defeat. The Native American should have fought for their beliefs, resulting today in a society where they are not able to express their true beliefs.
Stalin’s policies were both a success and a failure whether as a result of his direct orders or as a result of his policies. Nethertheless, the success they achieved came at a huge price with nearly 20 million death’s during his reign; It was seen as a small price to pay as Stalin achevied what he set out to do, turning an undeveloped nation into an industrial super power, it was due to his policy’s that Russia became one of the most powerful nations in the world.
The opposition may make multiple arguments justifying Spanish treatment of Indians: the Indians were well suited to slave labor, the Spanish had the right to correct "savage" behavior, and it is the job of the Spaniards to "save the Indians from heathenism and prevent them from falling under the sway of Protestantism" (GML, 26). Despite these counters, there are many instances where the Natives did not receive humane treatment. When reviewing Spain’s actions, one will understand that the invaders did not respect the sovereignty of the Indian people, and treated them as “beasts tied to a rope…” (VOF, 9). For example, in Spanish America, “the Spanish forced tens of thousands of Indians to work in gold and silver mines, which supplied the