Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Overcrowding at schools
Overcrowding in schools essay
Overcrowding at schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Overcrowding at schools
The attendance fees at Granger High are ridiculous and many students and teachers are against them. The administrators say that these fines are helping attendance, but if they were actually helping then why did we have to get rid of second lunch because of outstanding absences after lunch? I believe that we should get rid of the fines because they are stressful, can get expensive, and hold us back from graduating.
Attendance at school is pretty bad and has led to attendance fines to be enforced. The attendance is still pretty bad and the fines are growing out of hand and causing many problems for students and faculty. The attendance has led to removing second lunch, teachers having to waste their time trying to get students to class, and students to lose motivation to get to class. Many students don’t have the money or the help from parents to pay them off. Students have the option to go to Saturday or after school classes, but some students can’t do this because of work, sports, or clubs. The Saturday and after school classes are helpful, but they don’t get rid of a
…show more content…
Some students have hundreds of dollars in fines they have to pay off, so 5 dollars isn’t going to help. 90 minutes is a long time to stay at school and do nothing. A lot of students have to go to work or have plans, so staying after school for that long isn’t really convenient. Most students don’t care enough to come during school, so what makes the administration think that they would come after school? Students who don’t care about the fines and think they are a joke are surprised when they are actually enforced. Staying after school is a waste of time because students just sit there and read or do homework. Which is beneficial to the student, but it wastes the faculties time and the students don’t learn much from the experience and could be doing something better with their
I agree with Garland I feel that attendance shouldn’t be mandatory because that’s just forcing those who don’t want to learn go to school. Those who are always getting into fights and causing problems shouldn’t be able to attend school. I like how Garland talks about why mandatory attendance is just based upon the idea that every American has the right to basic education. “But as the old saying goes, your rights stop where the next guy’s begin” (620). Garland explains how every student who wants an education regardless of their inabilities should find a way to receive an education. On the other hand, I remember when I used to go to high school and I witnessed how my friends thought attendance was a big joke. My classmates would always show up late or not even bother to show up. Participation points weren’t a big deal in Hope Academy since all of our classes were online. It didn’t take long before the school started to enforce strict rules. If one doesn’t want to attend school, shouldn’t show up. I feel that mandatory attendance is outrageous. One who wants to learn will find a way to receive an education. Mandatory attendance just gives the trouble-makers an opportunity to waste everyone’s time for those who really want to learn. To sum up, mandatory attendance shouldn’t be allowed. Schools are learning centers that provide students education they aren’t centers of entertainments. Garland also talks about school cafeterias and how they serve unhealthy
Students are deprived from there leaning do to the tardy policy. A policy that is unfair this tardy policy makes students serve a 30 min detention if there even a second late to class and after multiple absences or tardies you can face legal consequences. There's many reasons why students may be late for example students need to take the city buss, bikes ,cars to school but there's always traffic so sometimes it's not the students fault , students shouldn't be given a 30 minute detention for being a couple of minutes late.
Students may need to nap to compensate for energy expended throughout the day. However, if schools were to start later, adolescents would not have to nap, allowing for a larger window of time to spend with their families after school, even with a later start time. Another opposing argument is that students would have less time to participate in extracurricular activities. However, this issue can be resolved by making practices for sports and club meetings shorter and more frequent to accommodate the schedule variation. Overall, the benefits of later start times far outweigh the drawbacks.
The After School Program provided an opportunity for students to work on homework, play games, and interact with friends and positive role models. The program was an alternative for students who might partake in risky behavior such as experimenting with drugs and alcohol, committing illegal or violent acts, and having unprotected sex. Parents benefited from the After School Program because they could trust their children were in a supervised place from 3:00 p.m. until they left work. Students benefited from the program because they were able to interact with their friends in a safe space without being trapped in an overbearing or structured program until their parents
Students can want to continue their perfect attendance not because they truly care for waking up super early in the morning and then going off for six hours of learning but the idea of a free brand new car is quite intriguing. Children all over the United States recognize
...ive strategies. Teachers and parents have to get involved to fix this issue, they have a greater impact on their lives. This can prevent students to make the wrong choice, that it is to dropping out of school.
One way to handle truancy is to enforce harsher consequences. In the student handbook it states that, “Students are expected to attend school every day it is in session.” When I read this I laughed a little to myself. I take a class with a student who will, on a good week, show up to school three out of five days. If he does show up, he will never be on time. When asked why he does not show up to school more often his usual response is, “Why should I when there is no real punish...
School days starting later would help improve student attendance by a lot! For example, a copious amount of students oversleep which results in lateness to school. However, if school started at least one to two hours later, then the students perhaps will not be late, and as a result, they can...
Many colleges have mandatory attendance polices that students have to follow. At Florence-Darlington Technical College the attendance policy requires that there is not more than 10% of class time missed which only allows 3 absences for each class. After the three absences the instructor has the choice to either withdraw a student from the course or to drop them a letter grade. FDTC should abolish the attendance policy because it teaches students to be responsible for themselves and their time and it leaves room for uncontrollable emergencies, although some would argue that abolishing the policy would encourage students to miss class which would cause a drop in grades.
School can be frustrating for students. Going to school, doing homework, and then repeating it all over again the next day can become quite tedious. Especially when one feels as if they are not gaining anything from doing well in school, it causes students to have very little motivation to complete their schoolwork. Students might be motivated if there was some sort of incentive for attending school and doing well at it. A law should be passed that requires students to be paid for doing well in school because it gives them motivation, helps them with financial issues, and allows them to learn how to manage money more effectively.
Students that do not want to learn are a distraction in the classroom. If there were no longer a compulsory attendance law, then those students that are a distraction would no longer be in the classroom to be a distraction. People who do not want to learn should stay away from schools. By ending the attendance policies, it would require those students to stay away if they do not wish to learn. In his essay, Mr. Sipher states: “schools are neither day-care centers nor indoor street corners”.
Imagine dropping out of school and soon your relationships with family, friends, and significant others start failing. What would you do? Many young Americans are dropping out of school, which causes many consequences in many aspects of their lives. Relationships of dropouts are ruined because they have limited education. High school dropouts have little to no luck finding a job. There are many advantages to raising the high school dropout age to 18. Dropping out of high school should be banned because it has many long-term consequences for individuals and society.
While studying or even registering for a class presents a challenge to some college students, the greatest obstacle remains, going to class. Attending college is supposed to signify a new found freedom to make many important choices regarding education without high school mandatory attendance policies. However, students everywhere are coming to the staggering realization that college is not too different from high school. Teachers still take class roll and students are still expected to be at every class on time. What next, hall monitors in the hall? The time has come for action to be taken. Colleges must abolish mandatory student attendance policies for several reasons to be further discussed.
Some college students argue that they should not be punished for poor attendance since they are paying for these classes. Beside, attendance should not be mandatory, student is adults, and they should be able to make the decision to attend classes on their own. If someone wants to jeopardize their future by not attending classes, that’s their
Mandatory attendance policy does not really enhance students' school performance as it's usually expected. Some teachers and schools believe students would study better if they come to class regularly. They argue that all lessons in text books should be explained, discussions should be held with full class. If students do not come to class, they would study nothing or make no progress. Some even think of students as lazy creatures who play truant to do everything they like but homework or assigned reading, so they take roll-call to ensure that all students come to class and work with them. What i can say is that attending class regularly does not mean you will have better understanding or performance. Some students sometimes miss class but they still study well. That's because there are some lessons they can study by themselves at home without spending too much time as those who study in class. On the other hand, so...