Schools often lack funding for their basic needs. This makes sports funding insufficient, for all athletes. Sports funding needs to be provided by student athletes. Outside sources need to provide help in funding, for school sports. These fees are cheap and inexpensive to participants in sports. Only interested students will participate in sports. Children need to learn that not everything should be given to them.
Government provide an enormous amount of funding in a school’s budget. Giving enough money for educational supplies in most cases. Without spending any of the government money on athletic supplies. Making it necessary to charge athletes for the sports they participate in. This steady flow of cash keeps these athletic programs running. Benefits include, facility upgrades, new uniforms, and paying coaches. This keeps athletic programs thriving, but denies the government from making cuts to the budget. Athletes and their parents must take a stand by providing some type of funding.
Paying a minimal amount to a sport the participant is in will not be a struggle. Costs are extremely inexpensive. As low as fifty dollars for one sport the athlete is in. These small fees add up rapidly and boost sports programs. A
…show more content…
person’s love for sport is much greater than a material item, like money. When students can not afford these low prices waivers are available for them. Reducing the cost to an extremely low fee, or even absolutely no fee. Millions of students participate in athletics, so when every student puts a small amount of money into their program it makes a gigantic difference. These minimal costs can change everything, for a school lacking government funding for these programs. Student athletes often participate in sports with no reasoning behind playing.
When a price comes to mind, for them it might be time to change their decision. Participating in athletics is a serious, and unforgiving choice. Wasting time and money on something that will not benefit them will keep these children away. Funding should only be provided by those with love, for the sport they participate in. Student lacking interest will keep their money, and put it back in the bank. Participants in athletics will feel a sense of urgency and true passion, for their sport. Building strong relationships with peers that feel the same way. True character is shown by those who will put in the work to find a way to pay for a
sport. In life everything is not handed out to the people of this world. Government funding treats students that way in a few cases. Taking away this money and forcing students to find it teaches them how life works. Everything a person has they have worked hard for. Why not make a student work hard to participate in sports? A sense of the real world is shown to these athletes finding this money. Working at jobs and even fundraising to gain enough money, for their participation. Life throws these hurdles at everyone, so make these athletes jump over them. Working strenuously, for the ability to compete every day in their favorite sport. Only the strong survive in this world, forcing these athletes to rise to new limits and work to take part in these activities. Athletes must be required to pay to compete in sports. Funding for school sports lacks the revenue it needs, for these athletes the cost is minimal. Inexpensive charges to the student need to be made to keep a functioning athletic department. Participants will only be those who have a strong interest in sports. Children need to learn that not everything will be provided for them in life. Paying to keep these programs running has an immense effect on students. Sports change the lives of people every day. While school budgets continue to shrink this additional funding is absolutely needed. John Wooden once said “sports do not build character, they reveal it.” The future of high school athletics lies on the people of this generation.
Critics feel that the term amateurism is only a term used in collegiate sports to show the distinguish the difference between professional and collegiate so that they don’t have to pay college athletes. College athletes are just as talented and just as exposed as professional athletes. The argument is for there to be a share in the profits for wage compensation amongst players is know as pay-for-play. College athletics is a corporate enterprise that is worth millions of dollars in revenue. Pay-for-play is an assumption that colleges and universities receive huge revenues from marketing their collegiate sports programs and that the profits from these revenues are not shared with players who perform in the arena. Which some feel that they should.
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
Money Hurts College athletes attend post-secondary schools in order to receive an education and to participate in sports. “Student athletes participate in an organized competitive sport sponsored by the educational institution in which he or she is enrolled. Student athletes must typically balance the roles of being a full-time student and a full-time athlete” (“Student athlete” 1). Additionally, some people believe athletes should receive a salary. However, paying college athletes hurts the school, the sports, and the athletes.
Financial aspects and profitability of college athletic programs is one of the most important arguments involved in this controversy. A group of people expresses that college athletic programs are over emphasized. The point they show on the first hand, is that athletic programs are too expensive for community colleges and small universities. Besides, statistics prove that financial aspects of college athletic programs are extremely questionable. It is true that maintenance, and facility costs for athletic programs are significantly high in comparison to academic programs. Therefore, Denhart, Villwock, and Vedder argue that athletic programs drag money away from important academics programs and degrade their quality. According to them, median expenditures per athlete in Football Bowl Subdivision were $65,800 in 2006. And it has shown a 15.6 percent median expenditure increase fro...
As I said in my last paragraph, many athletes who receive full ride scholarships have been given thousands of dollars for tuition, a meal plan, free books, and school fees, just to play sports. These athletes are also entitl...
They believe because the student athletes are the ones spending their time both preparing and competing, they are deserving of a share of the athletic programs’ revenues. Though being a college athlete entails a considerable amount of a student’s time, there are many reasons why the college athlete should not be paid.... ... middle of paper ... ... Academic Search Complete.
The reality is that college sports programs, namely the "big name" programs such as football and basketball programs at marquee schools, are businesses that stand to make a large amount of money for their respective schools. According to an article in the Harvard Journal on Legislation, "[i]n the past twelve years, the amount of money generated by these two sports has increased nearly 300%, such that they now fund almost all other sports programs. 41 Harv. J. on Legis. 319. The student-athletes who participate in these programs are part of the reason why these schools stand to make such handsome profits: through ticket sales, endorsement deals, broadcasting deals, and jersey sales (although player names cannot be represented on jerseys), among other things.
Intercollegiate athletes are very well taken care of by their schools and don’t need any other compensation. Football and basketball scouts go to high schools to try to persuade young athletes to join their team, by offering free tuition, housing, food, transportation, and tutors. With all of their big college expenses paid for, athletes don’t necessarily need money. There are many students that would love to receive free tuition above all, yet they don’t because they are not on the football team. Another argument not many people thought of is that if sports teams generate revenue and the athletes receive that money, do high school sports players get paid as well? High schoo...
An article, “Should College Student Athletes be Paid,” also brings up an NCAA commitment under the collegiate model which includes institutions creating an environment in which athletes’ activities promote further education. Colleges have the responsibility to create a learning environment, and paying players for participation in sports would inhibit that environment. College athletics are for the purpose of providing entertainment and activity to exist with the intention of attaining higher education. College athletes choose to participate in sports as part of their educational experience, but sports should not become the focus of their college
There is a growing debate as to whether or not student-athletes should be paid. NCAA was much simpler back when President Theodore Roosevelt helped to create it in 1906. Then, it was an institute for regulating certain rules and supporting the sports that everyone loved. Yet now in the 21st century, the NCAA is a billion dollar company that keeps growing. The increasing possibility of the unionization has brought more and more attention to whether student-athletes should be paid. The opinion varies across the board – with some saying that the possibility of a student-athlete seems unfair to those who see the athletes as receiving special treatment with full rides to colleges and universities. “The hope is a union for university athletes concentrates on the competitive environment, not on payments” (Bondy, Web). Many questions are connected to how it would be implemented when college sports create little revenue. There is only profit seen from football and basketball, which would discriminate against the rest of the athletes from other sports. The topic requires an explanation as to where the funds to pay students would come from. Will this be written in a contract or a regular per-hour job? And, if the school were to make little profit while the expenses continued to grow, would the NCAA pay the student-athletes instead of the schools?
Compensating College Athletes Often college athletes get hurt and miss classes. Shouldn’t athletes be compensated for all that is endured? Athletes work hard out on that field and usually get hurt for more than forty hours a week for an entire season. This is why college athletes should be paid.
Parents cannot always support their children financially, there comes a time when they need to be independent adults who can support themselves. During the course of trying to prove their independence, athletes may take out student loans, which put them in a financial dilemma. Paying athletes would make them far less dependent on their parents and take give them a little bit of familiarity and skill in terms managing money. After all, Art students can sell their paintings to the famous museums, science students can publish and sell their findings, and journalism majors can have their articles published in top name newspapers. It is the same situation when someone is able to produce a marketable talent for a school’s athletics department.
Many athletes attend college for free as a motivator for them to learn. By giving money to students with educational capabilities, more students have better focus on graduating and fulfill a
Over the past years the usefulness of athletic scholarships, and its outcomes for both the schools and athletes has been contested. Opposing parties have debated whether or not banning them will solve the problems that lay within. I believe that athletic scholarships should be interdicted because they are no guarantee of education, good academic performance or a proper lifestyle for the athletes.
Competitive sports Pressure and cost is a complicated issue for competitive sports because, parents wants their kids to play competitive sports, but their kids might not want to play that exact sport, their kids might not want to play a sports that season,lastly their kid might not want to say to their parent that they don't want to play because they already paid for them to play and bought all their equipment.this paper will argue that the costs of competitive sport and the pressure parents put on kids are a bad thing, three reason why are, how much a parent pays for their kids to play a sport,the behavior because of pressure their parents are putting on them,and lastly all the pressure kids get. The actual question this paper will argue is do you want to pay $671 to $1000 a season for you kid to play a sport you might not know if they truly want to play. Have you ever wondered about how much your parents paid for? well your parents pay about 671$to$1000 a year on sports equipment and for you to play the sport you want to. In the article will ‘pay to play’ become a permanent part of school sports?