Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The story of the hour analysis
Where is symbolism in the story of an hour
The Story of an Hour Analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The story of the hour analysis
In the following passage from “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin, Mrs. Mallard has just come into a sense of freedom from her husbands passing. Only to have that stripped away from her when her husband returns form work. Brently, having no idea what has happened, stands stunned at the sight before him. Chopin reveals both victory and defeat for Mrs. Mallard in this passage. Victory being finally feeling a sense of freedom that she had not felt in so many years, and defeat being dying from the single thing that withheld her freedom. The use of irony by Chopin shows how the person that gave Louise Mallard a sense of freedom took it away in a split second. In the quote, “a feverish triumph in her eyes”, Chopin shows uses the word feverish to show that Mrs. Mallard has this new energy about her because she now feels a sense …show more content…
Mallard is seen to receive victory not by the death of her husband, but by the freedom that his death brings; that freedom ends up being the death of her. Chopin states “she carried herself unwittingly”. By this Chopin can bring to attention that Mrs. Mallard was not happy that her husband had just died, but unintentionally felt a sense of relief from not being under his control anymore. Many people never realize what is holding them down until it is gone, and then when it is gone they feel like a new person. When Brently comes into the situation it says, “he stood amazed”. He had no idea what was happening in that house, or what had even been going on. Much like he was with his wife. The amazed expression comes from not knowing what to do in that situation. Chopin can show the defeat in Mrs. Mallard when she said, “she had died of a heart disease”. The heart disease she had died from is a broken heart. As soon as she had received her freedom it was taken away, and it was too much for her to handle. Ultimately, it would have been better for Brently to be dead than to return like he did because his return was too much for Louise to
Both Chopin and Deneau put major emphasis on the passage of the story where Mrs. Mallard is alone in her room and makes the transition from heartbroken housewife to joyful, independent and free widower. Chopin says “There was something coming to her and she was waiting for it, fearfully. What was it? She did not know; it was too subtle and elusive to name. But she felt it, creeping out of the sky, reaching toward her through the sounds, the scents, the color that filled
“Story of an Hour”, Kate Chopin unveils a widow named Mrs. Louise Mallard in which gets the news of her husband’s death yet, the audience would think she would feel sorrowful, depressed, and dispirited in the outcome her reaction is totally unusual. Meanwhile, day after day as time has gone by Mrs. Mallard slowly comes to a strange realization which alters a new outlook over her husband's death. "And yet she had loved him- sometimes. Often she had not. What did it matter! What could love the unsolved mystery, count for in the face of this possession of self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being!" (Chopin, 2). The actuality that she finds a slight bit of happiness upon the death of a person who particularly is so close to her is completely unraveling w...
Mallard had a love/hate relationship with her husband. She loved him dearly, but it was very apparent that in some ways she did not always like him very much and that showed in her actions after she found out he died. “She knew she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death; the face that had never looked save with love upon her; fixed and gray and dead. But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely. And she opened and spread her arms out to them in welcome.” (Chopin in Gardner, Lawn, Ridl & Schakel, 2013, p. 60-61). That clip leads you to believe that the husband sometimes looked at her as if he did not love her also. Mrs. Mallard makes it very clear that is sad that he has died, but is not sad that she is “free” from him. “And yet she had loved him – sometimes. Often she had not. What did it matter! What could love, the unsolved mystery, count for in face of this possession of self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being! “Free! Body and soul free!” she kept whispering.” (Chopin in Gardner, Lawn, Ridl & Schakel, 2013, p. 61). From the story you cannot tell why Mrs. Mallard feels the way that she feels about her husband, but whatever the reason is, she was very happy to get away from it and start her new life, husband
In “The Story of an Hour,” Kate Chopin shows the reader Mrs. Mallard’s monstrous joy towards her husband’s death. After receiving the news of her husband, Brently Mallard’s, death she wept, but was also overwhelmed with a certain sense of freedom. Suddenly, Mrs. Mallard dies of heart disease, the joy that kills, but is then revealed that Brently is still alive. In “The Story of an Hour,” Chopin reveals the character of Mrs. Mallard through the use of diction, detail, and irony.
Louise is said to "not hear the story as many women have heard the same." Rather, she accepts it and goes to her room to be alone. Now the reader starts to see the world through Louise's eyes, a world full of new and pure life.
Mrs. Mallard is the example of a typical housewife of the mid 1800’s. At the time, most women were not allowed to go to school and were usually anticipated to marry and do housework. During that time, the only way women could get out of a marriage was if they were to die or their husbands was to die. In that time period, the husband had control of all of the money, so it would not be wise if the wife were to leave the financial freedom that was provided by the husband. This is most likely why Mrs. Mallard never leaves her husband’s death, she is sad at first but then experiences an overwhelming sense of joy. This shows that she is not in a fulfilling marriage as his death means she will finally have own individual freedom, as well as financial freedom being the grieving widow who will inherit her husband’s wealth. In the words of Lawrence I. Berkove he states, “On the other hand, Chopin did not regard marriage as a state of pure and unbroken bliss, but on the other, she could not intelligently believe that it was desirable, healthy, or even possible for anyone to live as Louise, in the grip of her feverish delusion, wishes: to be absolutely free and to live totally and solely for oneself.” (3) Mrs. Mallard’s reaction to her husband’s death is Chopin’s way of expressin...
When she abandoned herself, a little whispered word escaped her slightly parted lips. She said it over and over under her breath: "free, free, free! (Chopin 260) It is after this reawakening that Mrs. Mallard realizes that she can now live her life the way she wants, instead of the current situation where her life is dictated by her husband.
Chopin first shows the struggle by telling how Mrs. Mallard’s sister, Josephine, and friend, Richards, expect Mrs. Mallard to react to her husband’s death. Chopin starts the story by saying, “[k]nowing the Mrs. Mallard was afflicted with heart trouble, great care was taken to break her as gently as possible the news of her husband’s death” (30). The heart condition introduced in the first line of the story is actually the weakness
Another example of how Mrs. Mallard was more uplifted than brought down by the news of her husband?s death is the description of the window. As Mrs. Mallard looks out Chopin explains ?she could see in the open square before her house the tops of trees that were all a quiver with new life?. This is telling the reader about the new life that Mrs. Mallard can see in the distance that symbolizes the new life she saw that lay ahead of her now that she was free of her husband. This thought being supported by Hicks in saying "The revalation of freedom occurs in the bedroom"
After learning about the death of her husband, Mrs. Mallard initially started to weep, she was genuinely in mourning. But not long after, she then imagines her new found freedom. Chopin narrates her reaction: “ But now there was a dull stare in her eyes, whose gaze was fixed away off yonder on one of those patches of blue sky. It was not a glance of reflection, but rather indicated a suspension of intelligent thought”(115) Mrs. Mallard starts to recognize her opportunity for a fresh start, to become her own person and live without the restraint of her husband. The narrator shows through diction how she is different from other women because of her response towards
Freedom is what motivates Mrs. Mallard to be happy with her husband’s death. She is fighting her feeling for her freedom because she has not had freedom at all, rather she was suffering from emotional and physical abuse. However, it was a false rumor htat her husband was dead and as soon as she sees him as she was stepping down the stairs, she passed away. This is because she knows that her freedom and her joyful future is being take naway. Mrs. Mallard’s craving or freedom shows that she was abused in her
Mallard’s emotions over the presumed death of her husband. The author used both dramatic and situational irony to mislead the reader and surprise them with a plot twist ending. By utilizing both external and internal conflict the author expresses the internal debate of Mrs. Mallard’s true feelings and those of the people around her. The author used symbolism to display Mrs. Mallard’s desire for freedom from her marriage. In the end it was not joy that killed Mrs. Mallard but the realization that she lost her
Chopin describes her as a fragile woman. Because she was “afflicted with a heart trouble,” when she receives notification of her husband’s passing, “great care was taken” to break the news “as gently as possible” (1). Josephine, her sister, and Richards, her husband’s friend, expect her to be devastated over this news, and they fear that the depression could kill her because of her weak heart. Richards was “in the newspaper office when the intelligence of the railroad disaster was received, with Brently Mallard’s name leading the list of killed” (1). He therefore is one of the first people to know about his death. Knowing about Mrs. Mallard’s heart, he realizes that they need to take caution in letting Mrs. Mallard know about it. Josephine told her because Richards feared “any less careful, less tender” person relaying the message to Louise Mallard (1). Because of her heart trouble, they think that if the message of her husband’s death is delivered to her the wrong way, her heart would not be able to withstand it. They also think that if someone practices caution in giving her the message, that, ...
The aspirations and expectations of freedom can lead to both overwhelming revelations and melancholy destruction. In Kate Chopin’s “ The Story of an Hour” Louise Mallard is stricken with the news of her husband’s “death” and soon lead to new found glory of her freedom and then complete catastrophe in the death of herself. Chopin’s use of irony and the fluctuation in tone present the idea that freedom can be given or taken away without question and can kill without warning. After learning of her husband’s death in a railroad disaster, Mrs. Mallard sinks into a deep state of grief, as one would be expected to do upon receiving such news.
Mallard. Her self-assertion surpassed the years they were married and the love she had for him. She is beginning to realize she can now live for and focus on herself. The text insists “There would be no one to live for during those coming years; she would live for herself. There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature.” (Chopin 477.) Finally she can live freely and no longer worry about being confined in her marriage and inside her own home. She has come to realization that she is now independent and can think freely and achieves happiness and freedom. She is no longer held down or back by her marriage. She will no longer be someone’s possession she will be free and respected. Her husband Brently returns and he is alive the happiness and freedom she once possessed briefly with the mere image of her deceased husband were quickly torn away. “When the doctors came they said she died of heart disease of joy that kills” (Chopin 477). She was free but still confined without the knowledge of her husband who wasn’t dead. Chopin illustrates at the end that she was free because joy killed her. She was joyous because she was finally set free but she is now once again confined by the grief knowing her husband was not killed