Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA): Wearing Courses/Surface Courses?

1457 Words3 Pages

(Book by Hunter)
Wearing courses / surface courses
SMA
Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA) has a course aggregate skeleton like porous asphalt but the voids are filled with a fine aggregate/filler/bitumen mortar. It differs from hot rolled asphalt (HRA) in that the mortar is designed to just fill the voids in the course aggregate, whereas in hot rolled asphalt, course aggregate is introduced into the mortar and does not provide a continuous stone matrix.
(Hunter, 1994)

Figure 1 – Newly Laid SMA
In Figure …. The texture depth can be seen to be minimal. The surface looks flat and worn away. There appears to be very little macro or micro texture of the aggregate to provide skid resistance on the surface. This image would appear to most people to be …show more content…

HRA is a gap graded material which consists of fine aggregate, bitumen and filler. It provides a good resistance to cracking and is relatively easy to compact. P60
For hot rolled asphalts, stone chippings which have been dipped or coated in bitumen are then partially embedded in the surface. These provide the texture in the road for skid resistance in the form of macro and micro texture. This process is carried out as the course aggregate content is low after compaction leading to inadequate skid resistance .The chippings are placed after the surface has been laid and are then rolled into place. Hot rolled asphalts are impermeable.

Figure 2 – Sample of HRA in place (Summers, 2015)
The image shown in Figure … shows an photograph of HRA which is estimated to be in excess of 15 year old. This particular image was taken in the UK and the texture remains in excess of the 1.5mm limit set by the Highways Authority …show more content…

This report takes the reader of the creation of SMA in Germany to its implementation in numerous other countries. The author organised a trip to Germany to see first hand how they combine the individual components to form the finish product. It was discovered that SMA was deformation resistant due to its solid aggregate skeleton structure. This a positive effect caused by the voids within the stone matrix being filled with a mastic of bitumen. The report looks at the use of SMA from the contractor’s point of view

Open Document