Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on impact of tv advertisement
Essay on impact of tv advertisement
Tv ads commercials an essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For over 60 years, presidential campaigns have used television ads to communicate ideas and campaign plans to the American people. With hopes of influencing people to vote, politicians have used various tactics and strategies to persuade. After observing television campaign ads throughout the years, a few themes are observed.
For the 1952 presidential election, Dwight D. Eisenhower ran against Adlai Stevenson. Dwight D. Eisenhower was a member of the Republican party, while Adlai Stevenson was a member of the Democratic party. At that point in time, America’s biggest issues revolved around social security, war, wages, and taxes. Both Eisenhower and Stevenson used television campaign ads to not only portray themselves in a certain light, but also portray their opponent in a certain negative light. These men were among the earliest to use television ads to do so, and they set a trend for years to come.
During the 1952 presidential election, Eisenhower ran against Adlai Stevenson with his vice president Richard Nixon. Together, Eisenhower and Nixon hoped to convince America that they were the best option for the job in the White House. At the time, the Korean War was going on, and World War II had
…show more content…
ended just a few years prior. People were concerned with who could lead the nation following Harry Truman’s presidency, and Eisenhower knew this. During World War II, Eisenhower had commanded the D-Day invasion, serving as Supreme Allied Commander, and he used this to his advantage when running for president. In addition to focusing on his wartime success, Eisenhower’s television campaign ads also featured other common themes and topics. Dwight Eisenhower was one of the first to truly use TV ads as a way to advertise himself and his campaign. His ads, titled “Eisenhower Answers America”, were the first of their kind. His ads were simple, often featuring citizens speaking about their concerns and issues in regards to the election and the views of the Democrats; and Eisenhower would address these topics or questions that they had. For example, in Eisenhower’s “Never Had It So Good” advertisement, an ordinary voter appears on the screen explaining to Eisenhower that the Democrats told him that he “never had it so good.” Eisenhower then appears in the ad, in another camera shot, asking the man if this statement could be true when “America is billions in debt, prices have doubled, taxes break our backs, and [they] are still fighting the Korean War?” Throughout a few Eisenhower’s advertisements, this same format can be seen with voters asking a question and Eisenhower responding in a way that portrays the Democratic party and their ideas in a negative manner. Eisenhower’s ads were created with the purpose of portraying the candidate in a certain light. In his “Ike for President” commercial, a cartoon is shown that includes citizens marching around with drums and elephants in a playful manner singing, “You like Ike! I like Ike! Everybody likes Ike!” This commercial attempted to make Eisenhower a likable man. In a few of his other commercials, he focused on discrediting the Democratic party as a whole, rather than his opponent Stevenson as an individual. Running against Eisenhower in the 1952 election was Adlai Stevenson, a member of the Democratic party, along with his hopeful vice president, John Sparkman.
While Eisenhower appeared in his own TV ads, Adlai Stevenson did not; he was the only candidate to not appear in his own ads. His advertisements were a bit more animated than those of Eisenhower; they often featured cartoons or short, catchy jingles. Because of the fact that Eisenhower was the better known candidate, Stevenson also made sure to get his name out there by putting his name in his own advertisements. He portrayed himself as a good, honest man that represented all American people, while he simultaneously implied that Eisenhower was a man that could not be trusted and did not care about the American
people. [Compare/Contrast, Conclusion]: In the 1960 presidential election, John F. Kennedy ran against Dwight D. Eisenhower’s vice president, Richard Nixon. Kennedy was a member of the Democratic party, while Nixon was a member of the Republican party. The election issues at the time revolved around threats of war, keeping the peace, civil rights injustices, taxes, and the cost of living. Both candidates had certain qualities and strengths that they played to their advantages and advertised in their TV campaign ads. At 43 years old, candidate John F. Kennedy hoped to be the youngest man elected as president. His youth was a topic of debate among the American people, but he used this, as well as his Catholic religion, to his advantage in his campaign. Kennedy was young and attractive, and this worked to his advantage in his televised campaign ads. His ads focused more on making himself appealing, rather than simply slandering his opponent. His advertisements portrayed him as a likable, courageous leader, who was just like the rest of the American people. He emphasized the fact that if elected, he would take charge and lead America to prosperity and peace. With regards to his opponent, Kennedy portrayed Nixon as a man who would not do anything in office because he had not been doing anything in office as Vice President. Kennedy frequently alluded to idea that Nixon was incapable of making decisions in the White House and could not be a strong leader. Richard Nixon, Eisenhower’s former vice president, was no stranger to being in the White House, and he used this to his advantage in his campaign. At the time, Nixon had recently shown his foreign policy skills after an exchange with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev. In his advertisements, Nixon attempted to display his leadership qualities and explain to the American people that he had what it took to keep America out of turmoil. His campaign advertisements frequently consisted of a question being asked by a person offscreen, and he would answer with poise and conviction. His ads refuted Kennedy’s claims in which he stated that Nixon was not a strong leader, nor did he take action in while in office. Nixon’s ads aimed to show that he was experienced, he was strong, and ultimately, he would be better in office than a young, inexperienced John F. Kennedy. [Compare/Contrast, Conclusion]: In 1964, the presidential election was between Lyndon B. Johnson and Barry Goldwater. Johnson was a member of the Democratic party, while Goldwater was a Republican. At the time, America had been facing a lot of internal struggles. President John F. Kennedy had recently been assassinated, and the nation hoped to move past this tragedy. People were concerned with the strength of America, and were looking for a leader who could be strong, but also cared about the issues of the time, including civil rights, poverty, and medicare. Following the assassination of John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson took over office in 1963. While in office, he passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a landmark in the fight against discrimination, while simultaneously demonstrating his ability to lead and make decisions. His TV campaign ads sought to display his presidential abilities, while also informing America that Goldwater was certainly not the man for the job. Johnson’s ads portrayed Goldwater as an extremist, frequently speaking of his right-wing conservative views. With his slogan, “The stakes are too high for you to stay at home,” Johnson succeeded in getting voters to the poll to vote for him. Barry Goldwater, Johnson’s opponent, took a different approach in his candidacy. His conservative beliefs rendered a campaign based on the ideas of morality and making America a strong nation. His slogan, “In your heart you know he’s right,” was often featured in his ads, and he frequently spoke of his respect for the country and his American pride. Goldwater’s campaign ads were simple and monotone, and his portrayal of himself was not as a man who represented the American people, but more as a man who wanted to take control of America. In regards to his opponent, he focused more on attacking Johnson’s ideas and policies instead of Johnson himself. [Compare/Contrast, Conclusion]: In the 1968 presidential election, Richard Nixon ran against Hubert Humphrey. Nixon represented the Republican party, while Humphrey was a Democrat. Domestic struggles in America were at an all-time high during this time, and the American people were looking for a leader who could calm the storm and deliver promises. The issues at the time included civil rights, social order, and the Vietnam War. The election came at a time when society was changing, and America needed a president that could successfully lead the nation. Nixon’s run for president came after a hiatus of 8 years out of public office, and his campaign centered around his new-found perspective after being out of office for that time. His slogan, “Vote like your world depended on it,” was featured in his television ads which sought to convince America
The presidential election that took place in 1960 was an interesting one. Newcomer, John F. Kennedy verses the Vice President, Richard M. Nixon. It was experimental with its trail of televised debates. It also marked the second in which a catholic had run for president and more importantly the first in which a catholic attained victory.
It is very common among the United States’ political sphere to rely heavily on T.V. commercials during election season; this is after all the most effective way to spread a message to millions of voters in order to gain their support. The presidential election of 2008 was not the exception; candidates and interest groups spent 2.6 billion dollars on advertising that year from which 2 billion were used exclusively for broadcast television (Seelye 2008.) Although the effectiveness of these advertisements is relatively small compared to the money spent on them (Liasson 2012), it is important for American voters to think critically about the information and arguments presented by these ads. An analysis of the rhetoric in four of the political campaign commercials of the 2008 presidential election reveals the different informal fallacies utilized to gain support for one of the candidates or misguide the public about the opposing candidate.
Millions of viewers tuned into the National Broadcasting Company television network for a special broadcast on the 27th of October. Viewers were anticipating Ronald Reagan’s “A Time for Choosing” speech. Reagan was acknowledged for his acting in motion pictures and television episodes since 1937, and was now being seen in an unfamiliar role. Reagan emerged in support of the Republican nominee Barry Goldwater. Barry Morris Goldwater was a businessman and five-term United States Senator from Arizona and the Republican Party's nominee for president in the 1964 election. “A Time for Choosing” was effective, because he gave personal examples to capture the audiences’ attention, and gave humor to a tough subject.
“The Candidate” is the prime example of how an election is ran including the campaign strategies, the media, the debates, and the arguments. While Jarmens campaigning was not completely viewed throughout the movie it was clear he knew McKay was a threat. McKay’s idea of running a campaign included his personal touches of not listening to his campaign manager. Actually listening to what the people want and what they need seems to gain their attention and vote; this is the strategy that won McKay the election.
During the 1896 elections William McKinley was running against William Jennings Bryan for president (DeGregorio). McKinley won the majority of electors and entered his first term as president (Bassett). After winning over the people during the elections McKinley went straight to work by helping the people. The time when the 1896 elections were happening the United States was ongoing depression.
The aim of this paper is to look at the relationship between the mass media, specifically television, and presidential elections. This paper will focus on the function of television in presidential elections through three main areas: exit polls, presidential debates, and spots. The focus is on television for three reasons. First, television reaches more voters than any other medium. Second, television attracts the greatest part of presidential campaign budgets. Third, television provides the candidates a good opportunity to contact the people directly. A second main theme of this paper is the role of television in presidential elections in terms of representative democracy in the United States.
The voice of a rich popular fellow could sway opinions and a more common use was advertisments. A campaign ad. by William Henry Harrison and Tyler, bribed their voters with an endless supply of hard cider. Some campaigning strategies were widely used and effective such as; on Jackson’s democratic ballot he included the term “The People’s Ticket”, this can be a tactic used to make the public feel involved, just by this wording. One famous tactic still used to this very day was first described by a man named David Crockett. He explained the easiest way to win the heart and votes of the people. He said to kiss the children of women, make lot of promises, give long speech anytime you can, talk about your devotion to your country and its fallen soldiers. (Crockett, 1837). There were campaigns, elections, candidates...etc., but none of them would be possible without the votes of the common man. With the public becoming more involved in voting, and the popular vote coming into play, candidates cared more about general public’s views about them. Using popular media outlets and adding persuasive wording to ballots increased the common man’s
In the 2012 election Obama used posters and commercials to help get the people’s support. He used posters that said “hope” to reach out to the people and get their help. Politicians such as presidents and mayors use propaganda to persuade people to vote for them. With propaganda they can change people’s minds to vote for them. Using political propaganda for their campaigns, politicians have been able to get the people’s support and win elections.
Television has affected every aspect of life in society, radically changing the way individuals live and interact with the world. However, change is not always for the better, especially the influence of television on political campaigns towards presidency. Since the 1960s, presidential elections in the United States were greatly impacted by television, yet the impact has not been positive. Television allowed the public to have more access to information and gained reassurance to which candidate they chose to vote for. However, the media failed to recognize the importance of elections. Candidates became image based rather than issue based using a “celebrity system” to concern the public with subjects regarding debates (Hart and Trice). Due to “hyperfamiliarity” television turned numerous people away from being interested in debates between candidates (Hart and Trice). Although television had the ability to reach a greater number of people than it did before the Nixon/Kennedy debate, it shortened the attention span of the public, which made the overall process of elections unfair, due to the emphasis on image rather than issue.
The two ideologies that dominate America are Liberalism and Conservatives. The Republican Party known as right wing are conservative, while the Democrats are the left wings known as Liberal. To start off the Liberals and Conservatives have different opinions on things, Conservatives tend to be traditional, they focus more on the economy, limited government, while Liberals focus more on equality and freedom, they also protect human rights and believe that their leader should mostly help the people. In my opinion the Liberals are more open minded they believe abortion should be legal because mistakes happen, they believe gays should be treated like a normal human bean with the same rights, they do believe that the death penalty isn't correct
Election (1999) is a film is about an election at a high school for student council president. In this year’s election teacher Jim McAllister becomes irritated with the only candidate Tracy Flick, as he finds she not deserve to become president. This is partly due to the relationship Tracy had with his best friend and former colleague Dave Novotny. Tracy Flick, Paul Metzler and Jim McAllister tell the story about the election years after high school. As the teenagers tell the story while they are adults and the teacher is also an adult, the viewpoint of the movie is an adult perspective and thus not from a teenager perspective. According to Johanna Wyn Stereotypes from adults “derive more from ‘the desires, fantasies and interests of the adult
Every four years on the second tuesday in November we elect a new president or reelect the same president. Political propaganda helps presidents get their beliefs and what they want to do when they become president. Document B is showing a TV ad for President Reagan trying to convince the public to reelect him. “Why would we ever want to return to where we were just four short years ago?”. This quote is basically saying that nobody would be the better at president than anyone else running for president. Ads in TV commercials and on billboards play a big role in convincing voters to vote for a certain candidate. In the recent election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton campaign propaganda helped Donald Trump
The two separate ads exemplify exactly what a candidate could say in an campaign ad and what they shouldn’t say. For an example, swaying away from the 2012 election and going into the in the 2017 presidential election Hillary resorts to using Trumps words against him to show America who he really is as if they hadn’t already knew. In “Who Are We”, Clinton showed slides of Trump using profane language and belittling a disabled man. The ad gave a clear understanding of the candidates’ main focus and the initial reason for running for president. Although it was just like any other political campaign ad in regards to selling herself and her brand, there were still a lot of differences between her and her republican opponent, Donald Trump.
“Negative advertising gets the supporters committed and excited” (Bike 1). What Bike is trying to say is that negative advertisement gets people excited and wanting to look into that specific person. This essay is going to be about how negative advertisement should be allowed. People should have the right to pledge whatever they want to pledge in. “ A ban on negative political advertising would open the political world up to those who don’t want to be expose themselves to media bullies” (Admin 2). I believe that if people are scared to expose themselves then they must have something to hide. Even though negative things said about those candidates are not true, I believe that negative political advertisement should be allowed because negative advertisement makes people want to look more into that specific candidate and we are emotionally attached to negativity.
Stereotypes In the Media Stereotypes play an important role in today's society and particularly in propaganda. According to the Webster's Dictionary, stereotyping is defined as a fixed conventional notion or conception of an individual or group of people, held by a number of people. Stereotypes can be basic or complex generalizations which people apply to individuals or groups based on their appearance, behaviour and beliefs. Stereotypes are found everywhere in the world. Though our world seems to be improving in many ways, it seems almost impossible to liberate it from stereotypes.