Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Extinction of animals due to global warming
The effect of climate change on animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Extinction of animals due to global warming
In Stephen Jay Gould’s article, “Sex, Drugs, Disasters, and the Extinction of Dinosaur”, he analyses the difference between science and speculation. Gould starts the article by defining science. He states that science allows humans to know and gain knowledge. In contrast, today many popular ideas are being passed as “scientific” but are actually not. To show the difference between real science and pseudoscience Gould presents the question of how the dinosaurs became extinct. The first possibility is the sex hypothesis. This states that dinosaurs may have become extinct because their testes can only function in a certain temperature. Therefore, when the global temperature increased during the Cretaceous period dinosaur’s testes stopped functioning …show more content…
and they became sterile. The next proposal for dinosaur’s extinction is because of drugs. It states that flowering plants developed extremely close to when the dinosaurs died. Many of these plants have psychoactive chemicals. As a result, dinosaurs possibly became extinct because of massive overdoses. The last proposal for their extinction is the well known theory of a disaster. This hypothesis states that a comet or asteroid hit the earth at the time of the dinosaurs and created a cloud of dust that blocked sunlight. Consequently, photosynthesis ceased and the world’s temperature plummeted. Accordingly, dinosaurs as well as many other creatures became extinct. Each of these proposals for the extinction of dinosaurs are fascinating. In this article the author, Stephen Gould, expands on each of these theories. He explains who developed each of these theories and he explains in depth the reasoning behind them. Although all these theories create excitement in the public only one is real science. The first theory of testicular failure is only mere speculation.
There isn’t a way to test this hypothesis. As a result, this theory holds little water as true science, although it may hold some validity. The second theory of plant chemical overdosing is also speculation. This theory as well has an untestable hypothesis. The theory that dinosaur extinction was a result of a natural disaster is the definition of real science. It is testable and can be furthered. To test this theory, individuals measured levels of iridium in rocks at the time of the dinosaur’s extinction. Therefore, Iridium is a “the source of testable evidence”. Testable evidence is what separates science and speculation. The testing of iridium alerted many other scientists around the globe to test levels in the rocks at their locations. This fueled the hypothesis and made is well publicly known. The other two theories drifted away and are still not well known. Gould then proves how the theory that the extinction of dinosaurs occurred because of a natural disaster has led to other important findings. He proclaims that because of this theory the renowned scientist, Carl Sagan, studied the climate and nuclear warfare. Sagan found that a nuclear holocaust would instill the same dust cloud that caused the mass deaths of dinosaurs due to blocking the sun. This is also why the Cold War was so …show more content…
scary. The structure of this essay is that it offers an argument and gives claims.
Gould’s article, “Sex, Drugs, Disasters and the Extinction of Dinosaurs” begins with an introduction and foreshadowing statement. Gould then develops the body of the article by analyzing each theory for the extinction of dinosaurs. He then states what Science is and then backs up the reason why. Gould then concludes by showing that the theory that natural disasters caused the extinction of dinosaurs, and how this theory has spread and the other fascinating research this led
to. In this article Gould does offer a refutation to each theory and viewpoint. In Gould’s article he is not only stating which theory he personally believes, he’s stating which theory is the most scientific. Gould states that “good, fruitful, exciting science generates tests, provides us with things to do, and expands outward.” The theory that natural disasters caused the extinction of dinosaurs has been tested, provided us with things to do and expand on. It can be said that this theory is the epitome of science. Gould also says that science “is a fruitful mode of inquiry, not a lit of enticing conclusion”. This stresses the point that science is not knowledge. Science is the mode in which we attain knowledge, this difference is often forgotten.
The possibility if a meteor strike as the cause of extinctions is discarded, something that most specialists agree on. There is no evidence of any meteor crater big enough or recent enough to be accountable for it; there are no “elements that are common extraterrestrially but less so on Earth, such as iridium, and no sign of a tsunami or other phenomena following the impact.” The extinctions where also very selective and occurred over a very long period of time. If a “one shot” catastrophe had been the cause it would have affected all species at the same time and in similar
Michael Crichton’s classic novel Jurassic Park sparked controversy among scientists, excited science-fiction fans, and captivated paleontologists as Chrichton proposed the idea that dinosaurs could be cloned. The plot elicited criticism from scientists around the world, but support from others. Cloning a dinosaur was made possible in the fictional text: take some amber, fill in missing DNA, obtain an ostrich egg, keep the egg in a controlled environment, then a dinosaur is born. Unfortunately, each of the steps are of intricate design.
One of the previous papers in English class required the class to pick a paper to explore, this question will be concentrated on further in the synthesis essay. What evidence do scientist have to prove that prehistoric sharks existed? The reason behind picking this question wasn’t just to find proof that these monsters swam the seas, but to learn more about them from different resources. One of the resources that were used was a chapter in Angelo Mojetta’s book Sharks, called “ The Birth Of A Legend”. The other resource that was used for information was an article in Discovery Channels website called “ Prehistoric Sharks”. Sharks and Discovery Channel are the two resources that led to many other questions about their different, and similar views on prehistoric sharks existence.
The disaster theory, Gould claims, is an example of good science. It has testable evidence and has an impact on studies in other fields of science, it develops further and explains why the extinction of dinosaurs occurred simultaneously with other events. This theory suggests that a large comet hit the Earth sixty five million years ago, causing the cloud of dust to rise into the sky and to block sunlight. As a result, world temperatures went down significantly, the ice age bega...
For some people the numbers and facts don’t really matter, they read through Manning’s description of extinction and focus on the conclusion he created. Others will focus blindly on the increased extinction rate and rue the day mankind was created. But, there is one group of people who will see “before human domination” (pg. 1) and lose their scientifically accurate minds. Manning is unknowingly referring to the ratio between the background extinction rate and the actual distinction rate, i.e. what scientist think is the extinction rate right now with humans vs. no humans, and referring to it as if it is two completely different rates at two completely different points in time. Small flaws like these are insignificant to the average reader but comparable to kryptonite to credibility from a scientific audiences view. Throughout the essay, these inaccuracies consistently occur, those who know the law of thermodynamics know is not the same as energy transformation in a food-chain and that the scientific method that you simply can’t make conclusions drawn from two different fields of inaccurately portrayed science based on your opinion and call it
In order to better understand these "implications," it is necessary to define and explain the major theories regarding North American megafaunal extinction. The two most widely supported theories are those of environmental change and overkill. Two theories finding less support within the field are those of hyperdisease and "keystone herbivores."
...ories of why dinosaurs went extinct abound, and as there is no theory yet to be truly confirmed as the “right one”, my theory of dinosaur cannibalism is also purely anecdotal. The discovery of the cannibalistic Majungatholus atopus in Madagascar is an important scientific find because it confirms a long-standing theory of cannibalism among certain carnivorous dinosaurs. Behavioral patterns of extinct animals are difficult to establish; however, these bones give authentication to previous unfounded beliefs about the ancient feeding practices of some dinosaurs.
[1] This problem with the theory of evolution was addressed by Stephen Jay Gould and other evolutionists. They postulated the punctuated equilibrium theory of evolution, which does not predict the numerous fossils predicted by the orthodox theory of evolution.
Darwin's theory of Evolution have been known by the world for many centuries. Even so, not all scientists supp...
We use dinosaurs to represent the changes in nature that have occurred throughout time. Studies found that although the “oldest rock did not show evidence of life, the progression of plant and animal life that changed in recognizable intervals, from ancient life, age of reptiles to the age of mammals” (Dino Nature Metaphor, slide 6), measured the age of the earth. When we think of dinosaurs in relation to nature, we think of that very powerful force that controls the cycle of life. Nature was able to yield such magnificent ferocious creatures that walked the earth and then take them back when they served nature’s purpose. Dinosaurs fit perfectly in nature’s constant
With the introduction of radiocarbon dating the accuracy of which fossil and other samples can be determined are greatly increased. Radiocarbon dating promises to predict fossils within 50,000 years to be recorded with precision. With this advancement, the ability to thoroughly analyze extinction periods of certain species would greatly increase. This leads to a stronger understanding of precisely when these events took place and what their causes may be. Martin goes on to provide an example of the woolly mammoths that survived for thousands of years longer than previously believed on remote islands. With radiocarbon dating, it is now understood that populations of mammoths in certain locations were subject to a different rate of extinction. How could this be the case? Martin states, in reference to the mammoths that survived on remote islands that they, "were temporary refugia, bypassed by the first Americans."(Martin,50) Martin implies that the dramatic differences in the extinction of two populations of the same species is due to the involvement of human interactions during the early colonization of the Americas. This correlation is made when examining previous outbursts of extinctions across the world. One of these outbursts occurred around 13,000 years ago, the same time the extinction of mammoths became prevalent within the same regions of North America.(Martin,50) This shows that the difference in extinction periods between locations in North America and on various islands is differentiated by arrival of human populations. The extinction of the mammoths in North America 13,000 years ago, compared to mammoth on the islands of Wrangel 4,000 years ago conclude rapid human expansion of the Americas was the cause of earlier extinction
Science is the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. While speculating is the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence. In From “Sex, Drugs, Disasters, and the Extinction of Dinosaurs,” Stephen Jay Gould discusses and evaluates the difference between science and speculation. Gould also examines three possible reasons that could he accredited to the dinosaur’s extinction which are: sex, drugs and disasters. Gould believes that the theory of disasters is the most adequate out of two other theories. This is because Gould believes that the theory of disasters generates tests, which makes a scientist
The debate of whether dinosaurs were cold blooded or warm blooded has been ongoing since the beginning of the century. At the turn of the century scientists believed that dinosaurs had long limbs and were fairly slim, supporting the idea of a cold blooded reptile. Recently, however, the bone structure, number or predators to prey, and limb position have suggested a warm blooded species. In addition, the recent discovery of a fossilized dinosaur heart has supported the idea that dinosaurs were a warm blooded species. In this essay, I am going to give supporting evidence of dinosaurs being both warm and cold blooded. I will provide background information on the dinosaur that was discovered and what information it provides scientists.
The most significant event of the Cretaceous era came at its end. Nearly 65 million years ago, the second most severe mass extinction in earth’s history occurred. This resulted in the loss of around 80% of species living at the time. Though nowhere near as severe as the end-Permian mass extinction, the end-Cretaceous extinction is the most well known mass extinction event. This is due to the violent event that caused it the extinction, as well as the chapter of earth’s history that it closed: the Dinosaurs. The Cretaceous Event ( often shortened to K-T event) Of the animals that were killed off were the flying reptiles (pterosaurs) and the last few mosasaurs and plesiosaurs, both early marine reptiles. Many mollusks and species of microscopic plankton were killed. Terrestrial plants suffered mass extinction as well. Almost 60% of terrestrial plants were lost. This led to high extinction rates among insect populations, especially insects that were highly specialized to feed on just a few types of plants had it the worst. It took approximately 9 million years for the global insect populations to recover from the Cretaceous extinction. Immediately after the extinction, the earth saw an explosion of short term species who respond well to fire, or other external disturbance. Evidence of the catastrophe comes from a thin rock layer deposited worldwide just after the impact. It is dominated by fossil plants whose descendants recover quickly after fires of other disturbances, such as Fire Weed in Alaska. The causes of the Cretaceous extinction are still being debated by paleontologists. Scientists agree that the main cause of the extinction was a...
...pdated 1995, accessed 3 Sept. 2000), Dino Buzz – What killed The Dinosaurs ? – Current Arguments,