Starbucks Fraud Breach

461 Words1 Page

A California family were in for a shock when they returned home with drinks from Starbucks. The parents knew something wasn't right when they saw a red smudge on the cup after noticing a “strong metallic smell.”

KTLA reports Amanda, her husband, Louis Vice, and his mother, Rhonda Agles, bought drinks from Starbucks in San Bernardino. The odd smell led them to take a closer look at their drinks. Their panic set in when they inspected the cup their 2-year-old daughter was eating whipped cream from.

The mother and father found a second red stain inside of the Starbucks cup their daughter was licking. Then they discovered the red smudges were blood.

Amanda said:

"Once we drank it, then we could see on the inside of the rim that there was blood."

The family checked to see if any of them were bleeding, but …show more content…

They are seeking damages for failure to warn the family, negligence, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, battery, assault, negligent hiring, and negligent training and supervision.

The 19-page suit, provided by the Frish Law Group, claims the family was offered free drinks for a week after the blood was discovered. Then, Starbucks offered $1,000 to all of the family members. Their attorney, Stan Peckler, said it “does not begin to compensate the family for suffered injuries and damages for which Starbucks is liable.”

What the family wanted was a blood test on the employee to find out if the drinks had been contaminated by HIV or another communicable disease. Their suit claims the manager agreed to have the blood test done, but the bleeding employee was never “forced” to have it done.

Amanda explained:

"We felt sick to our stomachs, we shouldn’t have to worry about going to get something to drink and there being blood in our drink where we could get

More about Starbucks Fraud Breach

Open Document