“I don't care what views he holds, even what bad things he may have done, what lack of ability he may display, he's my brother, he's my kinsman, he's my landsman,he comes from my neighborhood, he's a Southerner, this is my country right or wrong.” Voters such as this represent the very idea behind identity politics. When one votes against or for someone based upon religion, skin color, gender, sexual preferences, and/or any subject matter at that, and it drives their voting decision towards a yes or no result for a particular candidate, they are practicing identity politics. Writer Stanley Fish dives into identity politics in his New York Times article “When ‘Identity Politics’ Is Rational .” He brings forth the good and bad, and the right …show more content…
or wrong identity politics may present. With the 2016 presidential election in session Stanley Fish’s 2008 article on identity politics games that just on the basis of what we are seeing today within these prospective presidential candidates. By breaking down identity politics into two forms, Fish distinguishes the difference between tribal identity politics and interest identity politics. Fish gives a clear understanding that no matter which form of identity politics one mostly identifies with more, it is not all bad. He reflects on the history of liberalism and how identity politics is this era's version. Stating that although people were excluded because of race, gender, and other forms of governmental classifications that those should not be the reasons one makes the decisions on who should lead their country, for the laws they used to govern it. He also, speaks on the concern or question rather if identity politics is as irrational or wrong as it is depicted to be. Stanley Fish, as a writer grasp my attention from beginning to end.
He organizes his ideas and opinions precisely with supportive reasoning and statements from other writers. How he voices his findings are relatable and uplifting. Reviewing this article has broaden my understanding of identity politics. The tone he uses throughout the article exemplifies great expression and all and all human emotions towards the subject at hand. The way he stands up for those who may choose to vote for those whom they most identify with, shows that he still understands himself that to some extent identity politics is rational and just. For example when he argues Stanley Crouch’s objection that “groups and populations are not monolithic but display a diversity of attitudes and positions.” He voices that although that statement may be true it is not to say the least that those same members of those particular groups are populations can't come together for the greater good for a shared concern or …show more content…
concerns. Fish clearly defines the terms of identity politics, uses fair use of information, and he avoids using logical fallacies.
As mentioned previously when he distinguishes the two forms of identity politics as tribal and interest; he breaks them down in two ways that are not only understandable but also realistic and logical. Stating that “tribal identity politics is politics based on who a candidate is rather than on what he or she believes or argues for”, and that interest politics are “ based on the assumption that because of his or her race or ethnicity or gender a candidate might pursue an agenda that would advance the interests a voter is committed to.” Both forms of identity politics to some extent are rational and yet can be irrational depending on the views of an individual. With tribal identity politics no matter what positions of the candidate Stanley states, the steps is important to the history of the country. As far as interest identity politics there cannot be any justification or measure calculated that says a voter is wrong with choosing a candidate that interest them or relates to the interest of their own progression in the
future. Stanley provides ample proof that support his stance on when identity politics is rational. I agree with what is sad throughout the article because as a scholar he still talks to us as opposed to down on us. He builds that rapport that as a reader I am looking for. By reflecting on the fact that interests that are both ideological and tribal shows an individual's humanity. I as a voter, an African American voter, can relate to the point he made in regards to the fact that any non African American candidates or voters will not understand the obstacles that an African American’s success and/or mobility may have coincided with. That as an African American our obstacles, (although I cannot agree that they are invisible to any other race in this country) should not go unforeseen. Stanley states, as an “African American it would be a mere affirmation of identity but also a political judgment that an African American candidate indeed will move the country in a way that will support the journey of success of fellow African Americans like themselves. Another point that I took from this article was that the candidates today also include identity politics into their campaigns. Trump Clinton and all of the other candidates target voters basebased according to things that they identify with. Majority can say that they do this irrationally because are they really necessarily communicating with us as voters because it is the right thing to do or because they want to lure us in for our votes and not fulfill the objectives they persuaded us with. After reading this article it is clear to me that I should further research candidates before making my final decision for the 2016 presidential election. Also that although I may identify with some candidates and there objectives does not deem them the best candidates for the country. However I should not feel as though my ideal candidate can not look like me, talk like me, practice the same religion as I do, or even choose to be with a person of the same sex as themselves.
In this year 's presidential election there have been controversy given by one of the candidates, Mr. D. Trump describing my ethnic background as “me” being a rapist, drug dealer, and a person whose convicting criminal crimes. No ethnic group should be categories in these slots because it isn 't true no ethnic race is perfect we shouldn 't blame a whole community for something a small portion is responsible for. Christine Marin the author of Spanish lessons, wrote her life story growing up as a mexican- american and expressing the obstacles she went through, to get where she is right now. A voice. Garten Cook the author of Life with dyslexia, ashamed of having a disorder, having that fixed mindset of avoid making
he argues in support of racial identity and flexibility complementing one another. This proves that the further society evolves, the closer mankind gets to eradicating the idea of a dominant race. However, there are occasions where labels could hinder a person’s opportunity. In fact, culture is the newest label that society takes into account the most, and to a minority, the main goal is to embed the roots of the old generation into the next generation.
In her work, “Identity,” Carla Kaplan frames the difficulty of defining the term “identity.” She argues that identity is a tension because personal identity conventionally arbitrates taste and lifestyle, while social identity is regarded as a constellation of different and often competing identifications or “cultural negotiations” (Kaplan, 2007). In addition, she argues that identity politics has caused “suspicion and criticism” by limiting new democratic possibilities by encouraging narrow solidarities rather than broader identification resulting in the struggle for recognition becoming a questioning of recognition (Kaplan, 2007). Lastly, she argues that “A realistic identity politics” is needed to recognize that identities are multiple/dynamic
Identity is primarily described primarily as what makes a person who they are. While it is seen as an individual asset, one’s identity can be shaped and persuaded not only by life experiences, but by society as well. Bryan Stevenson speaks on several controversial issues and proclaims certain societal problems and the typical behaviors noticed in response to them. How one approaches the issues that are spoken about may expose their true identity. Stevenson argues that how one reacts to racial inequality within the criminal justice system may regulate their identity. In addition to that, how dealing with the nation’s history may force a growth on one’s identity, eventually bringing peace and acceptance to the nation. Lastly, how one views the
Identity is one of the main questions throughout all of our readings, because it is hard for people to accept who they are in society. Accepting their identity as a minority with little if any freedoms sparks many of the social problems which I will show happening in all communities and cultures. The main issue we will discuss is how social environments effect the search for identity. The Mexicans in the U.S. module gives us examples how Mexicans try to keep their customs while living in a discriminated environment by the Whites. This module also gives us examples how people are searching for personal identity while struggling with cultural traditions. Finally, the African-American module gives us more examples to compare with the Mexicans in the U.S. module, because these readings deal with Blacks finding personal identity also through discrimination from the Whites. To properly understand the theme of identity, we must first look the factors influencing it.
In “Language and Identity Politics: The Linguistic Autobiographies of Latinos in the United States,” by Lea Ramsdell, she talks about three different autobiographies by Richard Rodriguez, Ariel Dorfman and Gloria Anzaldua. She describes that how their views on their different language differs from one another. Ramsdell states that “Language is identity and identity is political” in the beginning of her paper. She asserts that the language choice for each writer was a political act for which they use for self-empowerment. After reading the works by all three, she realized that the language heritage was brought together by their family and each ethnic history. I agree with the assumption of Lea Ramsdell because throughout the autobiography of Richard Rodriguez, we can sense that kind of relation of languages. Rodriguez thinks that by leaving Spanish behind and mastering English language, he becomes a member of the world of success. But question is that whether it is necessary to abandon your first language, while learning another language? I think Rodriguez has chosen a wrong direction while assimilating into English culture. He could be a successful person under these circumstances, without losing his cultural traditions.
In the book, Identity and Difference by Kathyrn Woodward, she goes into depth about one’s own identity. Struggling with identity is bound to happen because one might have a different perspective of the world that was set by one’s community, ethnicity, or even social class. Furthermore, identity gives us a certain place in the world in which one can be connected with society where he live. Though much of identity is used to show the difference in each other, it can also be used to show how similar one is to another. Identity, however, can be used to set one group apart from another. In the apartheid and genocide in Rwanda, the Hutu was seen killing off of the Tutsis due to social class differences where the Tutsis was apparently wealthier, taller, and higher in the social status than the Hutus. Social class differences contributes to how one perceive another identity to the other. Much of what makes up one’s identity has to deal with culture, also because the way one’s culture shape a person is due to his/her experience. This experience of cultures is what makes each individual different from one another and also contributes to one’s own ideas and morals. Identity can be used to separate one person from another, but it can also be used to see how similar one is to
Identity, according to Yep (2015), can be defined as giving “people a sense of ‘being’, a lens through which they perceive and experience the social world and a prescription for ways of acting.” (p. 87) My avowed identity (Sorrells, p. 78), or how I see myself, is a white, cisgender , twenty-year old, Apple loving, North American U.S. citizen, who 's Christian and Republican. I hold true to the Bible and the life of Jesus Christ, Republican values and have high value for friends and family. With family and friends, my level of affection and openness varies slightly. I do not openly show affection towards family, but I would do anything to protect them, their integrity, and would not hesitate to lay down my life for
Retrieved from The Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/01/08/most-political-independents-actually-arent/ Tajifel, H. a. d. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/258189.
“Bernie-Splaining” is a good example of the issue “identity politics”. People see “Bernie-Splaining” as explaining to minorities how he is best for black voters. Bernie was known to march with MLK as well as encountering racial issues for his beliefs, and because he stood for African-Americans. Identity politics are how an individual’s political decisions may be shaped by aspects of their identity through loosely correlated social organizations. Although many voters are going the route of voting for Hilary because of the image she wants to look like for her voters. Many people are trying to get the African American groups of voters to vote for Bernie Sanders because of what he actually experienced for black
Kwame Anthony Appiah, an outstanding writer, voices his opinion on the subject of our culture and racism in his essay, “Racial Identities.” Appiah’s conclusion has a lot of meaning to itself along with a sense of explanation. He says, “So here are my positive proposals: live with fractured identities; engage in identity play; find solidarity, yes, but recognize contingency, and above all, practice irony.” Moreover, these positive proposals are Appiah’s ideas to help guide our lives in a positive way. To live with fractured identities and learn to understand the unpredictable. To engage in identity play and test ourselves to new abilities while learning to testing our identity. Finding
Ethnicity is made up of many factors and can be seen through various viewpoints. To cut someone’s identity into specifics can be a difficult task depending on what is being looked at and by whom. Nagel sees this when she writes, “As audience change, the socially-defined array of ethnics choices open to the individual changes. This produces a ‘layering’ (Mcbeth 1989) of ethnic identities which combines with the ascriptive character of ethnicity to reveal the negotiated, problematic nature of ethnic identity. (240)” In this she says that one’s ethnicity can be changed or formatted to fit into a bigger field, varying by who is looking into it. Mohr also sees how different perspectives can play as a factor, when talking about immigrants in the United States. Mohr uses the character if Aldo Fabrizi to demonstrate this, Fabrizi calls out William and says, “What do you think of your paisano. He don’t wanna...
The purpose of this paper is to identify James Marcia’s identity status theory and how it pertains to the author 's life during adolescence and early adulthood. The author will reflect as well as address the four statuses of development. Noting that Marcia’s theory has proven to be an effective and dependable tool in helping to determine the status of the identity development in adolescents.
Zora Neal Hurston’s book, Their Eyes Were Watching God, reveals one of life’s most relevant purposes that stretches across cultures and relates to every aspect of enlightenment. The novel examines the life of the strong-willed Janie Crawford, as she goes down the path of self-discovery by way of her past relationships. Ideas regarding the path of liberation date all the way back to the teachings of Siddhartha. Yet, its concept is still recycled in the twenty-first century, as it inspires all humanity to look beyond the “horizon,” as Janie explains. Self-identification, or self-fulfillment, is a theme that persists throughout the book, remaining a quest for Janie Crawford to discover, from the time she begins to tell the story to her best friend, Pheoby Watson. Hurston makes a point at the beginning of the novel to separate the male and female identities from one another. This is important for the reader to note. The theme for identity, as it relates to Janie, carefully unfolds as the story goes on to expand the depths of the female interior.
...he issue of ethnic minority achievement in schools is bound up with discussion of racial discrimination and integration ... issues which have occasionally come to the boil”. This shows that race and ethnicity does not only become a self-belonging to a cultural and political matter which cannot be solved without meaning. Walton and Caliendo (2011) confirm that the concept of race has to be considered in both cultural and political terms. Society has created a divide between individuals within the human race, to determine political and social power. The concept of race and the awareness that it could be used to distinguish groups from each other has lead to the creation of racism in society (Walton and Caliendo. 2011). This view has stated that identity construction has been used in order to label individuals and this has become a norm within education and society.