Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories of behavioral finance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories of behavioral finance
Standard finance theory as defined by Thaler (1999) assumes “the representative agent” acts rationally by following the principles of the Expected Utility Theory and making future predictions based on rational information. It assumes there is no element of cognitive bias or sentiment affecting asset prices (O’Keeffe, 2014).
The Expected Utility Theorem introduced by Bernoulli (1738) and further developed by Von Neumann and Morgenstern (1947) states that the “decision maker” bases their decision regarding “risky outcomes” solely on their predicted return or “expected utility”, this recognises the risk averse nature of most market participants. This theory forms a basis for Standard finance theory. People place a larger weight on what they stand to gain or lose from an event rather than the expected value of the event’s result. The Von Neumann and Morgenstern (1947) utility theory has four axioms of choice which need to be present in order the theory to be accurate. Transitivity; which assumes peoples choices are consistent, completeness; which assumes people have well defined preferences, independence; which assumes that an individual’s decision will not change despite irrelevant variables being added and finally, convexity/continuity; which assumes that when several different outcomes from which an individual has certain preferences, there should be an outcome which the individual is indifferent to. These axioms allow for the theory of risk aversion to be introduced which suggests that utility functions are concave and show diminishing marginal wealth utility (O’Keeffe, 2014). Kahneman & Tversky (1979) however, believed that individuals displayed more tendencies towards being “risk seeking” and basing their decisions on cognitive ...
... middle of paper ...
...t believes that in the long-run, mispricing or any perceived anomalies will be eradicated as the market corrects itself. However it can be clearly seen from the above that market participants are indeed susceptible to biases and they do make mistakes based on these biases. Therefore, herding and positive feedback trading do not allow the market to correct and noise traders can affect the markets prices for prolonged periods.
Conclusion
Based on standard finance theory, noise traders should not exist in the market and their presence should not have an impact on prices. However, they do and this can be attributed to the various aspects of behavioural finance which are outlined in this paper. Standard finance theory itself does not stand up to scrutiny when faced with the existence of anomalies and market participants who continually achieve positive abnormal returns.
Nineteenth century British philosophers, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill sum up their theory of Utilitarianism, or the “principle of utility,” which is defined as, “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Munson, 2012, p. 863). This theory’s main focus is to observe the consequences of an action(s), rather than the action itself. The utility, or usef...
The Rational expectations model was developed by Robert Lucas,rational economic agents are assumed to make the best of all possible use of all publicly available information. Before reaching a conclusion, people are assumed to consider all available information before them, then make informed, rational judgments on what the future holds. This does not mean that every individual’s expectations or predictions about the future will be correct. Those errors that do occur will be randomly distributed, such that the expectations of large numbers of people will average out to be correct.
Shermer, Michael. The mind of the market: how biology and psychology shape our economic lives. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 2009. Print.
“The value of the next best alternative foregone as the result of making a decision”(Brue, 2005)
The efficient market hypothesis has been one of the main topics of academic finance research. The efficient market hypotheses also know as the joint hypothesis problem, asserts that financial markets lack solid hard information in making decisions. Efficient market hypothesis claims it is impossible to beat the market because stock market efficiency causes existing share prices to always incorporate and reflect all relevant information . According to efficient market hypothesis stocks always trade at their fair value on stock exchanges, making it impossible for investors to either purchase undervalued stocks or sell stocks for inflated prices. As such, it should be impossible to outperform the overall market through expert stock selection or market timing, and that the only way an investor can possibly obtain higher returns is by purchasing riskier investments . In reality once cannot always achieve returns in excess of average market return on a risk-adjusted basis. They have been numerous arguments against the efficient market hypothesis. Some researches point out the fact financial theories are subjective, in other words they are ideas that try to explain how markets work and behave.
Discussion of availability of theories in real world Many theories such as the dividend irrelevance, tax and clientele effects and information content and signalling effects are controversial in financial studies. Economists often argue whether they are applicable and reliable in reality. Miller and Modigliani’s (1961) dividend irrelevance theory is the typical one. MM suggested shareholders are indifferent to the changes in dividend policy in the company.
Investment theory is based upon some simple concepts. Investors should want to maximize their return while minimizing their risk at the same time. In order to accomplish this goal investors should diversify their portfolios based upon expected returns and standard deviations of individual securities. Investment theory assumes that investors are risk averse, which means that they will choose a portfolio with a smaller standard deviation. (Alexander, Sharpe, and Bailey, 1998). It is also assumed that wealth has marginal utility, which basically means that a dollar potentially lost has more perceived value than a dollar potentially gained. An indifference curve is a term that represents a combination of risk and expected return that has an equal amount of utility to an investor. A two dimensional figure that provides us with return measurements on the vertical axis and risk measurements (std. deviation) on the horizontal axis will show indifference curves starting at a point and moving higher up the vertical axis the further along the horizontal axis it moves. Therefore a risk averse investor will choose an indifference curve that lies the furthest to the northwest because this would r...
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is an ex ante concept, which is built on the portfolio theory established by Markowitz (Bhatnagar and Ramlogan 2012). It enhances the understanding of elements of asset prices, specifically the linear relationship between risk and expected return (Perold 2004). The direct correlation between risk and return is well defined by the security market line (SML), where market risk of an asset is associated with the return and risk of the market along with the risk free rate to estimate expected return on an asset (Watson and Head 1998 cited in Laubscher 2002).
An 'economic cost-benefit analysis' approach to reasoning sees actions favoured and chosen if the benefit outweighs the cost. Here, the benefits and costs are in the form of economic benefits and costs, such as, monetary loss or profit. One who is motivated by such an approach will deem a course of action preferable if doing so results in an economic profit. Conversely, actions will be avoided if they result in an economic loss (Kelman 1981).
Howells, Peter., Bain, Keith 2000, Financial Markets and Institutions, 3rd edn, Henry King Ltd., Great Britain.
Prospect theory is a descriptive model concerning the issue of decision making under risk. The theory stated that people tend to made decision by examining the potential gain and loss comparing to reference point and exhibit certain kinds of heuristics and biases in this process such as certainty effect, reflection effect, probabilistic insurance and isolation effect. It also divided choice process into editing phases and the subsequent phase of evaluation, which were modified to framing and valuation phases in the later version (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979, Tversky and Kahneman, 1992).
Chapter 11 closes our discussion with several insights into the efficient market theory. There have been many attempts to discredit the random walk theory, but none of the theories hold against empirical evidence. Any pattern that is noticed by investors will disappear as investors try to exploit it and the valuation methods of growth rate are far too difficult to predict. As we said before the random walk concludes that no patterns exist in the market, pricing is accurate and all information available is already incorporated into the stock price. Therefore the market is efficient. Even if errors do occur in short-run pricing, they will correct themselves in the long run. The random walk suggest that short-term prices cannot be predicted and to buy stocks for the long run. Malkiel concludes the best way to consistently be profitable is to buy and hold a broad based market index fund. As the market rises so will the investors returns since historically the market continues to rise as a whole.
Wall Street Outliers There seem to be two kinds of people in this world: those who take things at face value—meaning, they accept what they're told as being true, with no thought of further verifying for themselves—and those who don’t. And it’s the ones who don’t that sometimes win big. However, defying the status quo takes guts and perseverance because often they will be ridiculed by the same people who follow conventional wisdom. About eleven years ago, there were four such fortitudinous men who defied the norm by betting against big banks, making millions on Wall Street. Starting in 2007, the U.S. went through the worst financial crises in history since the great depression.
Have you ever been faced with a decision that you knew what you should have done but chose differently? At one point in a person’s life, everyone experiences making a risky decision, and depending on the decision it may play out in favor of what that person was hoping for, other times not. The studied performed is called Risky Decisions and it takes into account the idea of a framing effect where an outcome of a decision can almost be predicted based off of the wording (Kahneman and Tversky, 1982). The point of this experiment is to discover if people take risks that involve any type of gain if loss is a possibility opposed to the idea of risk aversion when there are only gains. “Risky” has different definitions depending on the person that is asked and how the context is framed, but it all breaks down to the expected utility theory based off of the idea that if a person has relevant information they will make a decision based off of the maximum expected utility (Goldstein 2011). Utility normally refers to monetary value, but other factors such as emotions, stress, and even video games can lead to an individual making risky decisions to experience a better payoff in the end because people feel the need to justify their decisions to others.
Financial theories are the building blocks of today's corporate world. "The basic building blocks of finance theory lay the foundation for many modern tools used in areas such asset pricing and investment. Many of these theoretical concepts such as general equilibrium analysis, information economics and theory of contracts are firmly rooted in classical Microeconomics" (Oaktree, 2005)