Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positives and negatives to fracking
Fracking does more harme than good
Positives and negatives to fracking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positives and negatives to fracking
“Soon this will be us”
Imagine a desolate world where all your drinking water is infected. The ground underneath your feet slowly is deteriorating away and the air is always filled with pollutants, until you can barely breathe.Soon the rain will be acid. Soon this will be our reality. The United States of America, the “the greatest nation in the world,” won't be as great as people say. What is going to be our demise? Fracking. This is a major problem that can happen sooner than you think. Fracking will soon turn this nation into the worst nation in the world. “The fluids used in fracking (and the wastewater that comes back up the well) is disposed of by injecting it into wells deep underground. This is generally the safest, most cost-efficient way to get rid of it. But in some parts of
…show more content…
the country, especially in the Barnett Shale area around Dallas-Fort Worth,Texas, it has also been causing earthquakes.”( "How Oil and Gas Disposal Wells Can Cause Earthquakes." ) This world will soon be our reality if we don't put a stop to hydraulic fracking. All over this country fracking fluids and waste are being left in open air pits/ponds, which in result release harmful chemicals into the air we breathe and the atmosphere. Advocates for fracking protest that it's safe, but critics claim that it can destroy water supplies and produce greenhouse gases. 21 out of 50 states in the United States ,including Missouri, support fracking in their own state. Fracking can produce man-made earthquakes causing massive damage to any buildings around. A US Geological Survey study that found the number of earthquakes occurring in the central United States was six times higher in 2011 than it was in 2000. For example,Oklahoma experienced less than three quakes a year from 1975 – 2008. Since then, there have been an average of 40 earthquakes every year.(“States unite to fight fracking-linked earthquakes”) These problems are starting to pop up all over the world. Many countries have started to ban fracking all over the world including Australia, Bulgaria, and France. The court in Paris, France has stated that the law on fracking has “conformed to the constitution, and is too excessive.” The Bulgarian drilling ban imposed a fine of 100 levs (£43; $66) for any infringements. Protesters rallied in several Bulgarian cities urging the government to halt drilling for shale gas. Bulgaria and many of its former communist neighbors rely heavily on imported Russian gas and Chevron’s permit to prospect for shale gas in northeastern Bulgaria. Fracking is also a huge waste of resources. For one fracking job, it is required for 400 tanker trucks to carry water and supplies to and from the site.
In order to complete a job it takes 1-8 million gallons of water.72 trillion gallons of water and 360 million gallons of chemicals are needed to run our current gas wells. After the water is brought in it is then mixed with sand and approximately 40,000 gallons of chemicals to just make the fluid. Over 600 chemicals have been found in fracking fluid including, Lead, Uranium, Mercury, Ethylene, Glycol, Radium, Methanol, Hydrochloric Acid, and Formaldehyde.(“what goes in and out of fracking”) These are just some of the chemicals that can be in your drinking water. During the process of shale fracturing, Methane gas and toxins pour out from the system and contaminate the groundwater. The methane concentrations are 17 times higher in drinking water wells near fracking sites, than in normal wells. The chemicals in your drinking water can cause sensory, respiratory and neurological damage if ingested. (“what goes in and out of fracking”) In the end, hydraulic fracking produces 300,000 barrels of natural gas a day, but it cost us our environment and creates health
hazards. At a federal level, fracking is excluded from the Safe Water Drinking Act. Particularly the requirement to disclose the chemicals used in the process of fracking. In 2005, Dick Cheney negotiated the Halliburton loophole. Since hydraulic fracking is not currently regulated by the EPA. This means that oil companies don't have to disclose the toxic chemicals used in the process. But it doesn't always have to be this way. You can help support the FRAC (Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals Act) which would require fracking companies to properly disclose of the chemicals used in fracking fluids. It would also repeal the exemption to the Safe Water Drinking Act. Now more than ever people are using solar power. Just in the year 2015, 784,000 homes and businesses have gone solar. Solar and wind power has the potential to create millions of jobs and break our dependency on oil and fossil fuel like the gas extracted by fracking. Many alternative energy sources could also be used like geothermal energy and wind power. Policymakers should avoid to “sell” fracking to the public. Currently the EPA is undertaking a national study to understand potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources. Underground Injection Control (UIC) is setting requirements for proper well siting, construction, and operations to minimize risk to underground sources of drinking water. One major thing that you can do is sign a petition to pass the Safe Drinking Water Act. You could also urge the president to deny permits to export fracked gas to China. Most of all use renewable energy as much as possible.
In today's global economy, energy is one of the most crucial and sought after commodities. Who supplies it and how much they supply determines how much influence they have over other countries as well as the global economy. This is why hydraulic fracturing is currently such an important and controversial topic in the United States. Hydraulic fracturing, more commonly known as "fracking" or hydrofracturing, is the process of using pressurized liquids to fracture rocks and release hydrocarbons such as shale gas, which burns more efficiently than coal. This booming process of energy production provides a much needed economic boost, creating jobs and providing gas energy for Americans. The efficiently burning shale gas reduces carbon emission from electricity production plants, reducing carbon footprints on the environment. However, the process of hydraulic fracturing uses millions of gallons of pressurized liquid, which contains toxic chemicals, and some of this water is left over undealt with. The air near fracking sites is often also polluted and unsafe for nearby community residents. Injecting millions of gallons of water laced with toxic chemicals into the rock thousands of feet deep can cause earthquakes, causing a safety hazards for all nearby areas. Hydraulic Fracturing makes rare natural gases easily attainable, boosting the economy and reducing carbon emissions. However, the negative side effects such as contaminated water and air, make hydraulic fracturing a process that may not be worth the benefits.
1. Initially, I would like to discuss the process of what hydraulic fracturing is and the process that takes place.
While methane is not a rare contaminant in drinking water wells, the fracking process seems to allow more methane to seep into the wells. A study headed by Duke University’s Robert B. Jackson, a professor of Environmental Sciences, shows that in Pennsylvania, drinking water wells within one kilometer of fracking sites contain nearly six times more methane than in wells farther away (Banerjee). Methane, no matter where it is contained, is flammable, thereby posing a risk for explosion, which is not good for homes. Reports show that a fracking site in Dimock, Pennsylvania caused methane to leak into a water well, where it detonated, leading to even further contamination of other water wells and homes (Henheffer 30). The domino effect presented here raises fear in critics of fracking, who seek only to stop the process from happen-
Fracking can cause harm to people, animals, and nature. When they drill into the ground they are pumping chemicals to extract the gas and oil, and this contaminates the water sources around it. “An editorial on gas extraction from the Marcellus Shale in the Post-Star, a newspaper in Glens Falls, New York, contends, “New York state simply can’t take the risk. There are plenty of places to find fuel. It’s not so easy to find a new water supply for 17 million people.”” (Hydrofracking
Fracking is quickly becoming a debatable topic in our society today. The practice involves injecting fluid into the ground to fracture rock in order to release natural gas. It sounds like it would be a safe way to harness fuels in the earth’s surface, but it actually is a danger to our environment. Because of the dangers of fracking, what little fresh water remains on earth is being contaminated. It is also releasing toxins into the airs creating contaminated air and acid rain. Because of the many health and environmental dangers of fracking, it should be stopped immediately to help prevent more worldwide health issues down the road.
Oil and natural gas companies have developed a way to drill for natural gas, a process called hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking. Natural gas is a flammable gas mixture consisting of methane and several other hydrocarbons that occur naturally underground. Natural gas is used as fuel for heating, cooking, and even in some automobiles like the “RideOn” buses. This technique has only recently become economically feasible with the rising prices of fossil fuels, and there is much potential for recovering natural gas through fracking. However, fracking has many waste products and unusual side effects caused by the unnatural forces and materials used. Fracking has a detrimental effect on the surrounding environment through pollution and earthquakes.
Conflicting reports make it difficult to discern just how detrimental the practice is to the environment and people. What is known is that fracking uses phenomenal amounts of water, which is becoming a scarce resource in many parts of the country. There is no doubt that the fluid used in the fracking process contains chemicals, and when released into water supplies, has negative effects on these sources. Injection of flowback materials into deep wells has been definitively linked to increased seismic activity.
The title of the article I read is What is fracking and why is it controversial? It starts off by explaining what fracking is. Fracking is the process of drilling down in the ground until rock is hit. Once rock is hit a high pressured solution of sand, water, and chemicals is shot into the rock to dissolve it so it can release the gas trapped inside the rock. After it is released it flows out of the top of the well. It is usually done vertically through shale rock or horizontally. The article then explains that fracking is the short version of hydraulic fracturing. Fracking is controversial for multiple reasons the first is that you need large amounts of water which is a environmental drain. There is also concern that the chemicals
Before one can see the devastating effects of fracking, one must first understand how fracking works. As previously stated, the main intent of hydro-fracking is to access and harvest natural gas that lies below the surface of the Earth. Having formed over 400 million years ago by the collision of tectonic plates (Marsa 3), the Marcellus Shale plays host to a gold mine of natural gas, which is currently at the center of the fracking debate in the Northeastern region of the United States. Unfortunately, access...
Fracking is a pressurized, chemically treated mixture of water and sand to release and extract natural gas and petroleum from shale rock. There are many articles, studies being done, and organizations fighting for what they think is right. Environmentalist want the technique of fracking banned because it plays a part in global warming, affects our water, and causes human health problems. If fracking cannot be banned because of its necessity then it should be made safe and eco-friendly. The process involves a well being drilled vertically to the desired depth, then turns ninety degrees and continues horizontally for thousands of feet into the shale believed to contain the trapped natural gas. A mix of water, sand, and various chemicals is pumped into the well at high pressure in order to create fissures in the shale through which the gas can escape. Natural gas escapes through the fissures and is drawn back up the well to the surface, where it is processed, refined, and shipped to market. Flowback returns to the surface after the
Throughout the past three decades, energy has been a perennial issue in United States politics, economics, and media. The main concern surrounding this topic is the idea of energy independence and how the United States should proceed into the future. Energy independence relates to the goal of reducing United States dependence on importing foreign oil and other foreign energy sources. This desire aims to maintain energy dependence domestically so the United States can avoid reliance on any unstable countries and be detached from global energy supply distribution. It is currently being speculated that the United States might not be too far off from this goal. America’s dependence on foreign oil has gone down every single year since 2007. In 2010, the U.S. imported less than 50 percent of the oil the country consumed -- the first time that’s happened in 13 years -- and the trend continued in 2011 (Zhang.) Experts credit new technology as the reason the United States is within several years of again becoming the biggest oil producer in the world, and perhaps two decades away from full energy independence. Hydraulic fracturing, fracking, is the “lead” technology in this technological revolution. Fracking is an economically more feasible way of drilling for oil or gas in harder to reach geological formation. Within the past decade or so, combining hydraulic fracturing with horizontal drilling has opened up shale deposits across the country. It has brought large-scale natural gas drilling to new regions that may not have had accessible deposits in the past. These areas have greatly benefited from the addition of this industry to their local economies. Certain are...
environmental damage mounting, the practice of fracking has only quietly expanded and profited. This concealed expansion into the nation’s backyard has only
In 2010, roughly 25 percent of the nation’s energy came from natural gas, a “fossil fuel” which American consumers and businesses heavily depend on for transport, light, and heat (Squire 6). As the U.S. population increases, so do the country’s energy needs. Political debate over how the U.S. can meet those needs has slowly simmered for several decades, escalating exponentially when the energy supply grows short. Disputes over just how clean natural gas is, as opposed to coal, dominate headlines and presidential campaigns alike. During the presidency of George W. Bush, a bill exempting oil and gas companies from federal environmental restrictions was passed, thus paving the way for natural gas companies to expand production across the nation utilizing a new drilling technology, enabling easier extraction of shale gas. The drilling process of hydraulic fracturing or “fracking” has become synonymous with controversy. Why? Fracking involves injecting dangerously toxic chemicals, mixed with large quantities of water and sand, into wells at extremely high pressure, to release natural gas. Promoted by the natural gas industry as a cleaner, safer alternative to coal, the process of fracking has made shale gas plentiful, which sounds to some Americans as the best answer to their energy prayers. However, the negative consequences associated with the extraction of natural gas through fracking, including environmental hazards and threats to public health, far outweigh the benefits.
Numerous reports have been given on the dangerous affects of hydraulic fracturing. One such affect that has been noticed is that drinking water wells near the fracturing sites have been contaminated. During the hydro-fracking process, injected fluids that help to break and keep open the rock bed where the natural gas is kept, have “been known to travel three thousand feet from the well (Goldman).” This fluid could have the potential to enter and contaminate any water well for homes around hydraulic fracturing sites. This incident is one of the major problems that people want to figure out and know about before they allow a fracturing site by them. It has been the most feared outcome of having a fracking site nearby, and it is highly appropriate. One site in Wyoming had this happen, “…in August, EPA reported that eleven of thirty-nine drinking-water wells near a Wyoming hydraulic fracturing operation were contaminated with chemicals used in the fracturing process (Hobson EPA).” In Pennsylvania, another such case occurred, “There have already been severe pollution cases in Pennsylvania, mo...
Have you ever wondered what it’s like to serve for your country, be able to be part of something big that helps people all over the United States, to make a difference and help those who have lost everything at one point? Joining the military can help you make a difference and help other people. It’s a big commitment, but you can do it if you set your mind straight and just make it happen. In order to do that, having as much information as possible is important to make an informed decision. Most students get their information and learn about joining the military by talking to recruiters that visit high schools.