Speech: An Analysis Of Vladimir Putin's Speech

Vladimir Putin started his speech from the gratifying and appreciation of Crimean people’s desire for self-determination, calling them ‘’the Russian citizens’’. Despite the calm manner of speech of Vladimir Putin, precisely this speech was really epic, intellectually heavy and emotional. The whole audience was responding to him by emotional applauds and sometimes even standing. This says about the great inspiration and approval because of happening truly historical event.
Putin as a really great orator started from the kind and pathetic deepening into the common history of Crimea and Russian Empire, afterwards USSR. Usually such laudatory reminders have a relaxing effect of ecstasy on the auditory. V. Putin reminded about the recipiency of

After The Great October Revolution Bolsheviks gave (not returned) to the Ukraine territories of the south of Russia. All these territorial reforms were held without the consideration of the national population of these territories. Even in our Central Asian region there are a lot of misunderstandings that Bolsheviks and then Soviet nomenclature left us: tensions on the Kyrgyzstan – Tajikistan border in the south, tensions between Tajikistan and Uzbekistan about the status of historical city of Bukhara. Similar tensions were brought to the afterwards sovereign Republic of Ukraine and Russian Federation in far 1954 year by the General Secretary of the CPSU – Nikita Khrushchev, who handed the Crimean region and Sevastopol to the Ukrainian Republic. It was not the big deal or territorial problem, because these lands were transiting inside of one huge country. That’s why it was accepted as a trifle formality. The soviet population couldn’t imagine that Russia, Georgia or Kazakhstan separately from the USSR – it was one big united area. But fortunately or unfortunately it happened. ‘’ Millions of people went to bed in one country and awoke in different ones, overnight becoming ethnic minorities in former Union republics, while the Russian nation became one of the biggest, if not the biggest ethnic group in the world to be divided by borders.’’ Problems that were launched decades before surfaced on the surface of political problems’ sea of Russia and Ukraine.But those problems were masked and lulled by the afterwards peaceful policy-making between two states, f.e. – delimitation of borders (by Kuchma’s initiative in 2000), maritime delineation of boundary in the Sea of Azov and the Kerch