Have you wondered if you were related to a dinosaur or a chimp?through the process of descent with modification, the common ancestor of life on Earth gave rise to the fantastic diversity that we are able see documented in the fossil record and that are around us today. Species need to evolve over time so that they would be better at competition, adapting to new environments, we are able to see this by going back and looking at history. We are able to do so by looking at fossils and seeing what species are more closely related than we thought.
If a certain species is better at competing than another species, then the better one will survive and pass on their genes to future generations, this means they will be better at competition. light
…show more content…
The wolves in Bunny lab, were able to see the white bunnies on the darker dirt. The bunnies had time to evolve to their environments before the wolves were added in. Since there were no predators hunting the bunnies, the bunnies were not used to being hunted. When the wolves were added in the wolves wiped out the white bunnies not able to blend into their environment, so they had little to barley anytime to evolve. The white bunnies that were able to survive were able to pass on their genes, then those future generations had to adapt to the environment. Stickleback fish have had moving environments,they got trapped into smaller areas such as lakes or river or ponds. The ponds and rivers had less predators. Stickleback fish from the oceans have a lot more armor than the ones in ponds. Some of the stickleback fish lost their armour and some evolved to have armour. They have less armour because there are barely any predators to worry about. In the lab we looked at two different places to see how the populations in each were different. In Bear Paw lake the stickleback fish that lived there have little armour, because there are barely any predators. The stickleback fish living in Frog lake have more armour because there are more predators. Changing environments can force a species to change how they look so they can better blend into their backgrounds. In the rock pocket mouse lab, the …show more content…
The more common two animals are the more able we would be able to see that they are also closely related on a tree. Some branches are bigger because of the evolution process they have done. These trees can become complicated because each species has evolved to look and act in a different way, for example humans and chimps are on the same tree but have evolved differently. Rock pocket mice changed over time in order to survive. The rock pocket mice lived in light colored sand and rocks. A volcanic eruption happened which changed the color of the rocks and ground. Slowly over time the mice evolved with darker fur. This helped them not to be so visible by predators, they were able to live on the dark rock and survive better. In the comparative anatomy lab we can see that some species have evolved differently in their bone structure. We can see that some species are similar to each other and if you looked at their ancestors they will probably be similar, they would be in the same “tree” as each other. The species that have changed their bone structure over time have evolved. When you look in the stickleback fish lab, they don't have protection because there are no predators. They swam into smaller lakes where there were no predators. But over time other bigger fish found these small lakes. Some of the stickleback had to evolve to have protection so that they would be able to survive.
1These two populations are different species because they have different capabilities of performing in nature. For example there is behavioral isolation. My evidence for that is that in the data, it states that the average time spent in courtship display for the St. Kitts rodent is 12.6 seconds. While the courtship display for the Nevis Rodent is 21.3. You can see that there is a major difference in the way that they behave. Also there is another type of isolation which is gametic isolation. There is gametic isolation because the average gestation time for St. Kitts rodent is 29.3 days. The average gestation for the Nevis rodent is 42.7 days. Therefore a sperm from St. Kitts rodent wouldn’t survive in the reproductive tract of the Nevis rodent. It wouldn’t survive because it wouldn’t develop properly and is not accustomed to its environment. There is also another type of isolation happening with the rodents of St. Kitts. This type of isolation is called temporal isolation. There is temporal isolation because the article states, “the reproductive seasons are being delayed by up to one year.” This is talking about that the rodents are having a hard time finding mates therefore, their reproductive season is being delayed. Also in the article it states, “In the 240 attempts to bring a Nevis animal into the St. Kitts population, you are unable to observe a single successful reproductive event.” The rodents are mechanically isolated, because if you can’t have a reproductive event, there reproductive organs might not be matching with one another. Their appearance might look identical but they are genetically different.
Chapter two consists of Darwin continuing his studies. He talks about variation in the natural world compared to the domesticated species. He defines species variation and says that every naturalist has a different idea of the definition. He explains to the reader that linking other species together by characteristics of variation is challenging because some are so similar but vary in other ways. Environmental conditions could be effecting the variation. Climate, temperature, the separation of the animals could transform them. The species changes over time and have chi...
Traits must be identified based on how they affect fitness and their ecological relevance. In other words, we need to find a trait that clearly makes a difference in whether or not the animal survives.
In Mivart’s Genesis of Species, the author highlights the inconsistencies of Darwin’s natural selection theory. He supports his assertion by emphasizing how species placed in similar environments acquire different traits, questioning the long-term advantages of these evolved traits, and noting the logical inconsistencies of how traits can span in all directions.
Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection explains the general laws by which any given species transforms into other varieties and species. Darwin extends the application of his theory to the entire hierarchy of classification and states that all forms of life have descended from one incredibly remote ancestor. The process of natural selection entails the divergence of character of specific varieties and the subsequent classification of once-related living forms as distinct entities on one or many levels of classification. The process occurs as a species varies slightly over the course of numerous generations. Through inheritance, natural selection preserves each variation that proves advantageous to that species in its present circumstances of living, which include its interaction with closely related species in the “struggle for existence” (Darwin 62).
1. The way in which the process of learning is the result of Natural Selection is by the way we learn on how to live our life and to survive to be able to make offspring. Our book says that “those of their offspring that share their parents ' advantage will also tend to survive and reproduce” (Chance,2014). There is also the example in the book of Gregor Mendel in which he did the experiement with the peas and with natural selection he was able to have a garden full of peas. And last there is the experiment of the birds with different shapes of beak Charles Darwin said that "it is very remarkable that a nearly perfect gradation of structure in this one group can be traced in the form of the beak, from one exceeding in dimensions that of the
Evolution in general, is a hard concept to grasp. There are multiple factors that effect the outcome a species, for example: genetics, nurture, nature, and the environment all play an important role. It was once said that species do not survive due to the fact that they are the strongest or the most intelligent, but because that species is the most responsive to change.
The concept of transitional species is an important and complex notion in evolutionary biology. To begin with, there is no such thing as transitional species since all living things were always evolving in the past, not stopping at one stage or another, and they will continue to evolve in the future. In terms of evolutionary biology, we use the concept of transitional species as a way to dim ambiguity. Much like the use of the Linnean taxonomic system of species, we come up with concepts like transitional species to organize and classify species in order to understand their evolutionary roots and how those species changed through life’s history to become what they are today. “In the same way that the concept of species can be provisionally meaningful to describe organisms at a single point in time, the concept of transitional species can be provisionally meaningful to describe organisms over a length of time, usually quite a long time, such as hundreds of thousands or millions of years” (111). Though it can be difficult to distinguish what can be considered an ancestral species from another, the fossil record can show us how species change through time as they develop ways to adapt to stresses found in their environments. “In the modern sense, organisms or fossils that show intermediate stages between ancestral and that of the current state are referred to as transitional species” (222). The concept of transitional species is, in essence, fairly straight forward. This paper will outline the concept of transitional (or sometimes termed intermediate) species and the latter’s role in evolutionary biology, as well as go in depth about several common transitional species: Tiktaalik, an animal at the cusp between life in the water and ...
“The scientific study of how humans developed did not begin until the 1800s in Europe. Until that time, people relied on religious explanations of how humans came into existence. Starting in the 1500s a scientific revolution began to sweep Europe. Thinkers started using scientific methods and experiments to try to better understand the world and the creatures living in it. Eventually these methods were turned to the question of human origins” (The Nature Of Human Origins, 1). Earth made it possible for species to change over time because Ancient Earth provides ability to plenty of time.The Homo Sapien a is very complex creature. The species started off very simple by living in caves and surviving with little food and then later evolved into a species that were able to do many more complex things. The first species was Sahelanthropus tchadensis They were one of the most simple humans in that time period and on. They had very small skulls compared to Homo Sapiens today and their motor skills were just the same. We have evolved and changed for the better both mentally and physically. The Evolution of Homo Sapiens started off simple, such as the Neanderthals, and now we are the most advanced species to ever walk the planet so far.
Charles Darwin also showed how new species were created on the acts of evolution. It is easily explained by having big differences from the effect of natural selection, which were considered to be new species. So back in the beginning, before the effects of evolution had occurred there was just one specie, which evolved to make the species that we know today. So somehow all species are somewhat connected. The basis of what Darwin was proving was that life on Earth is simply the result of billions of years of adaptation to the changing environments. That is why certain species can only live in certain climates. This can be explained with the color of your skin, or the growing of plants.
...o happen. But with the help of fossil evidence we are able to identify common ancestors and evolutionary pathways between species. We also identify oxygen as a major key contribution for life to evolve. Also, through scientific research it has been established that arthropods and chordates have shared genes, leading to the path of vertebrates and human life.
Phylogenetic trees allow us to organize all of life onto a single tree based on a common feature that all of life shares, to understand how things are related. We can also create specialized trees that map the evolutionary history of a specific species, such as mammals or reptiles. There are three features of a phylogenetic tree that must be understood: first, a phylogenetic tree depicts the common ancestry of the species that we are studying, whether it be all of life or just mammals. Second, there are the splitting of lineages within a tree which show the branching of the species that we are studying. Lastly, there are changes in inherited characteristics along a lineage (1). All of this shows the order in which all of life has evolved overtime. In addition, phylogenetic trees use an outgroup analysis method that allows us to compare the closest relative of our species of interest, called the ingroup, to a group that is closely related to the ingroup, but not as close as the ingroup are related to each other. For example, all vertebrates can be compared to the cephalochordates, a group of species that are closely related to the vertebrates.
There are multiple strong pieces about the evidence of evolution, but there is one piece that happens to be the most convincing. One strong piece of evidence that is the most convincing is comparative anatomy because it proves that multiple animals have a common ancestor. Comparative anatomy shows multiple homologous structured with similar parts that make them capable of having similar ancestors. The rib cage of a human and monkey is just one reason why comparative anatomy is convincing. The rib cages of humans and monkeys are vastly similar which means they have similar ancestors. A human rib cage is longer and wider than a monkey, but has the same structure as it. This is convincing to me because if monkeys have the same build as humans
Throughout the various phyla discussed evolutionary advancements are relevant. Starting from the basic, simplistic life forms of a sponge, up to the intelligence of an octopus and advance organ systems of Annelida the changes have only improved. Some species changed and evolved because as populations grow, they spread out farther and different conditions begin to affect their life. Why some species haven’t changed is because their body plan and system works for the environment they inhabit. Evolution has helped animals spread out all over the world and adapt to various conditions, seen in the habitats Aschelminthes can prosper in.
Physcially humans and other organisms have clear similarities and differences. One such similarity is a commom ancestry. The first signs of life appeared around 4.1 to 3.7 billion years ago. Over time evolving into more complex life, from single-celled life, into multicelluar oragisms. Multicelluar organisms appeared over 2 billion years ago. 230 million years ago dinosaurs and mammals evolved around the same time from different evolutionary branches. When dinosaurs were declining, mammals were able to dominate the planet. Adaptations are the reason for these species evolution into today 's species. These adaptations come in many forms, but it is for the survival of the species in there environment. Some examples are being communial, flight, and camouflage, and many more. The phisiology of species is dependent on their evolution and adapations, but the phisiology does not always change what a species can do. One of the question posed is that humans are unique in the way we shape our environment. Either creating shelters, into towns, or just making it more habitable. We are not that special as other species can do that same. Beavers are a prime example as they can deforest large areas of fore...