Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Spankings negative effect
Spankings negative effect
Discipline in childhood
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Spankings negative effect
Within the past five years, I have noticed a dramatic increase of parents "sparing the rod." Discipline has decreased to the point that some pre-schools are not allowed to tell children "no," but instead suggest different things the child could do instead. Some family members of mine follow the same guidelines. They do not want to hurt their child in any way emotionally, so they do not use discipline at all. Instead of telling my cousins when they do something wrong, such as biting or pulling fist-fulls of hair, my aunt and uncle will praise their children for the things they did right and distract them from going back for another chomp. I have read several articles recently on the negative effects of discipline, particularly spanking. Refraining from spanking children has become the new "normal" for many households. In the past three years of working in childcare, I have seen many different children from many types of homes. Interestingly enough, after spending about fifteen minutes with a child one is able to tell whether or not they were spanked. In my own experience, children who have been "spared the rod" tend to have more …show more content…
negative interactions with other children. I have also noticed that they have a more difficult time following instruction from adults. For instance, I have two cousins who live in Florida. One was spanked as a discipline, and the other was not. The oldest child, who was spanked, has a higher respect for adults and does not pick fights when playing with other children. Even after being spanked, she is still a happy child who loves her family. Her younger sister who was not spanked is a different story. She directly disobeys the parents often for the enjoyment aspect. She does not play well with other children as she frequently bites them. The parents discipline the youngest girl, but she does not respond to anything they do. There is a stark difference between spanking and hitting a child.
After many conversations with other individuals, I have come to the conclusion that much of the difference lies in whether or not you are spanking out of anger. Spanking when done out of anger is not discipline, it is abuse. When one spanks their child, it should be because no other disciplinary actions have worked. Parents should attempt to use methods such as time out before spanking their child. If other methods work then there is no reason the child should be spanked. As a child, time out was always sufficient as a disciplinary action for me. For my sister however, my parents had no such luck. They exhausted every form of discipline before finally resorting to spanking. The only reason they used spanking was because she did not respond to any other type of
discipline. While I understand the concept behind what the author of "Spare The Rod" was trying to convey, I believe they were not entirely correct. I do not think that if a child is old enough to understand reason that they should be spanked. After a child can comprehend reasoning, they should receive punishments that have a correlation to what they did wrong. Children who are too young to understand cause and effect should only be spanked if they do not respond to any other form of punishment. I firmly believe that no child should be spanked out of anger. If they are spanked out of anger, it no longer qualifies as "spanking," but as "beating" which causes many psychological issues in the child.
Introduction It is obvious the position the author of the article "Spanking children isn’t abusing them" has on this point. The author makes two points about the decision Justin Trudeau made in order to keep a campaign promise. The first point is the approach or steps Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is giving in order to implement one of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) recommendations and in the second point the author brings our attention to section 43 and makes a distinction between spanking (use of reasonable force) and Physical punishment where harsh punishment is inflicted to a child. In this paper I will attempt to make a distinction between reasonable force and beating a child and to explore Section 43 of the
Spanking could also teach children that it's all right to hit, and that it's all right to be hit and that could have a negative long term effect on the children. I
Spanking is the most effective form of discipline when a child knows doing something is wrong, but the child does it anyway. A child who is properly disciplined through spanking is being taught how to control her or his impulses and how to deal with all types of authorities in future environments. Parents can control their child’s future
According to Park (2010) spanking has serious long term effects on a child.I agree with this argument drawn from conclusions in her article “The Long-Term Effects
The use of spanking is one of the most controversial parenting practices and also one of the oldest, spanning throughout many generations. Spanking is a discipline method in which a supervising adult deliberately inflicts pain upon a child in response to a child’s unacceptable behaviour. Although spanking exists in nearly every country and family, its expression is heterogeneous. First of all the act of administering a spanking varies between families and cultures. As Gershoff (2002) pointed out, some parents plan when a spanking would be the most effective discipline whereas some parents spank impulsively (Holden, 2002). Parents also differ in their moods when delivering this controversial punishment, some parents are livid and others try and be loving and reason with the child. Another source of variation is the fact that spanking is often paired with other parenting behaviours such as, scolding, yelling, or perhaps raging and subsequently reasoning. A third source of variation concerns parental characteristics. Darling and Steinberg (1993) distinguished between the content of parental acts and the style in which it was administered (Holden, 2002). With all this variation researchers cannot definitively isolate the singular effects of spanking.
In order to conclude an argument, it is first necessary to define any vague or ambiguous terms. Spanking is an unclear term in need of explanation. To some spanking means to slap a child on the buttocks, while others believe it is a mild form of corporal punishment which does not cause harm to the child. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) defines spanking as ?one or two flat-handed swats on a child?s wrist or rear end? (Rosellini 52). The New American Webster Handy College Dictionary also agrees with the AAP when defining spanking as ?[to] strike with an open hand.? Spanking does not infer a sustained whipping from Dads belt, but a mild form of corporal punishment that does not cause injury.
First of all, spanking does not lead to violence. Our surrounding world and media do. "The average sixteen-year- old has watched 18,000 murders during his formative years, including a daily bombardment of stabbings, shootings, hangings, decapitations, and general dismemberment" (Meier 34). It seems unjust to blame parents who are trying to raise their children properly for today's violence. If a child touches a hot stove he does not become a more violent person because of it, he just learns not to do it again because he learned a valuable lesson from the pain (Meier 34).
Narvaez suggests that children who are spanked over time become more and more aggressive. Now there is no way to prove this research without conducting the experiment or gathering the information. Dr. Jared Pingleton on the other hand says “Disciplining our sons and daughters is part of the tough work of parenting, but it will pay big dividends in the long run.” Dr. Narvaez chooses to only look at the extreme cases of a parent choosing a more physical punishment, what she fails to see is that spanking shows kids that our actions have consequences. As Dr. Pingleton says “Spanking, then, can be one effective discipline option among several in a parents’ tool chest as they seek to steer their children away from negative behaviors and guide them toward ultimately becoming responsible, healthy, happy adults.”
Spanking Children Yelling in public, crying over the smallest things, throwing a tantrum every five minutes; all these things have the same solution, which is spanking. People think spanking is a way to raise their children. Spanking is used among parents to teach their children a lesson if they act in a way they are not suppose to act. Some parents use spanking as a way to discipline, a way to teach the child a lesson, or it can be a natural thing in their household.
I personally do not advocate spanking. I could not imagine losing my temper to a point where I thought I needed to spank my child. While I do anticipate that having children will be a real test of patience, I do not expect that I will lose my patience so much that I will spank my children. I find spanking to be a real contradiction to what most parents tell their children. Most parents do not allow their children to hit, whether they are angry or not. Even when kids think another kid did something wrong, or bad, they are still not allowed to hit. If a parent tells a kid this, and then turns around and spanks the kid when they do something wrong, how will the kid ever learn that hitting is wrong? In my opinion, there has to be a better way to discipline children. I think that sending a child to a room where they cannot interact with anyone else, and then taking away a privilege would be a better way of handling discipline. Also, when I was a child, I can remember that when I was angry, my dad would come in to my room after I had time to cool down and talk to me about why I was angry. I can remember these as really fond times with my dad. It helped me identify why I was so angry, and most of the time it was at my mom for not letting me have my way. When I could identify why I was angry, my dad and I could come up with a solution to solve the problem. I think that rather than spanking, this is a good way to discipline children.
You are doing more for your kid if you are spanking them then if you don't. It is proven that spanking builds character, kids who get spanked at the appropriate age, and for the appropriate amount have higher test scores and better attitudes. “Unruly and spoiled children are not the blessings the Bible says they should be to their parents.” Kids should be treasures to their parents. Sure they should be a handful sometimes.
Many parents find themselves using frequent sayings such as, “do not touch that”, do not do that”, and “stop being mean to your sister!” Along with those sayings, parents still refer to a specific passage from the Bible, Proverbs 22:15, which states: Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him. The chapters 22 and 23 of Proverbs speak of how the rod should be used and when. It also tells parents spanking the child will not kill him. Many researchers and parents would argue these facts and state is does cause harm but if they could understand the limitations of the teachings, incorporate communication, and set boundaries the use of a rod would instill wisdom, instruction, and understanding in a child.
Some people believe spanking a child is child abuse, and that it causes the child to grow up aggressive and violent. This would mean that every child that is spanked during their developmental stages will grow up to be an example of bad behavior. However, there is no actual data or information that can confirm that spanking a child will cause a child to grow up to be violent or too aggressive. Children have been trained to obey rules or a set code of behavior for centuries. It is the best way to mold a child to be a respectable adult, and they can pass on the behavior to their future children. It may not always happen, but its pretty effective.
Most of us that are currently in our late teens to early 20’s were raised to the supreme, and most of us were raised to be polite, self-disciplined and respectful to all people. When asked if it is appropriate to spank a child, my answer is immediately yes, but only for the right reasons.
As children grow up, they’re more than likely exposed to being disciplined in one way or another. “Surveys of parents show that 90 percent have used some form of physical punishment on their children” (Graziano 1). So therefore, we can all agree that when it comes down to being punished, parents more often than not resort to spanking their child(ren). That being said, many parents will readily agree that spanking a child should not be considered a form of child abuse. However, the question still stands: how far does the spanking have to go in order for it to be considered child abuse? Although some are convinced that there are better ways to discipline a child, there are others that maintain the idea that spanking is the best option for disciplinary action.