Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits of increasing nasa funds
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits of increasing nasa funds
Argumentative Essay
There are a lot of people wondering through towns and cities looking for money to buy food and personal items, but while people are struggling the government is spending about $209 billion to send people up into space. If U.S government would continue to keep founding space exploration it wouldn’t be good because, there are a lot of things that could happen and ruin people’s lives. If there weren’t space exploration founding we could avoid putting lives at danger, and economic spending.
Sending astronauts out into space can bring danger to their lives and pain to their love once lives. For example, as stated in source 1 “Being in space poses many risks to astronauts, and with our current abilities, astronauts cannot realistically make it past Mars, let alone other galaxies or exoplanets” (Farrar). The government would risk people’s lives just to explore more planets, but it’s true that we can
…show more content…
barely make it past Mars. Being out there in space can be a unique and wonderful experience but also it can be an outrageous trip out there, and it could lead to one of those astronauts to lose their lives. Although, in source 2 “were living in a tremendously virtual age where many young people think that all of the discoveries that they need to make will happen on their laptops and smartphones” (Hanbury). Many people would argue that the government’s shuttles are safe, but even though they could be safe in there imagine when their outside the shuttles discovering new thing, at that point their lives could be at danger. The government should stop spending money on space explorations, because there are many other ways and more resourceful use that it could be spent on.
For example, as stated in source 1 “Others argue that this money would be better spent exploring and conserving our home planet, rather than fantasizing about colonizing other ones” (Farrar). People spent enough money as it is, we don’t need the government also wasting money that we pay in our taxes. Although, it says in source 2 “Some will say that we’re in the deepest economic crisis since the 1930s and we simply don’t have spare pocket money for this. But, the first thing to remember when looking at the recent announcement that Nasa is to put $1.6bn into a project to get its astronauts up the International Space Station, is that this is actually not a very large sum of money” (Bizony). People could say that money is no issue but technically it is to people with low incomes, mainly because they don’t earn a lot of money and them money that the government is spending it’s from the taxes as I stated
before. Space exploration programs shouldn’t continue because there are so many people that will suffer with things like family loss and also the money to use to care for the family. If there wasn’t space exploration founds then people could avoid putting lives at danger, and economic spending. The next time you are reminded of space explorations remember that they are messing with many families’ lives.
Eliminating federal funding for NASA is short sighted and risky. The benefits derived from NASA’s work over the last five decades have been tremendous. Future generations will continue to benefit from the many discoveries led by NASA and their space research. The risks of reducing funding for NASA and to cease its existance are great, as it is unknown what the next discovery will be and its impact on the USA and the world. The true potential of space research can only realized by continuing to fund NASA.
Bill Nye, the “Science Guy,” asserts, “NASA is an engine of innovation and inspiration as well as the world's premier space exploration agency, and we are well served by politicians working to keep it that way, instead of turning it into a mere jobs program, or worse, cutting its budget.” The United States of America’s government is currently in an economic debt encompassing billions of US dollars. Unfortunately, the government has attempted to balance finances by cutting the funding for most programs, including NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA, in over half a century, has brought the most economic, technological, and social benefits than any other program held here in the USA, as well as any other extraterrestrial program in the world. The last thing this nation needs is the cutting of NASA finances. NASA should be receiving more funding because the Earth will not last forever and humans will need a place to live, there’s a curiosity within humans about the vast universe they live in, there is evidence to suggest life on other planets, the USA’s superpower status will be improved, and the economical income NASA brings is more efficient than any other governmental or educational program.
Knowing the impermanence of the Earth, do humans have a moral obligation to find and
This essay is being written to prove that NASA spending has a negative impact on American society. Continuing NASA and the programs run by it is harmful to American society and Government. NASA harms the economy. NASA also harms the environment in which we live. And the money that NASA spends could be used to help solve problems in our country, not on another planet.
To me, this emphasizes the fact that we continually embark on useless space voyages instead of considering the problems at hand. I can support this because the cost of space voyages is at the minimum of $500 to the maximum of $700 million. Found in Source B, on page 201, paragraph 3, lines 14-15 “It costs $500 to $700 million every time the shuttle flies.” This is a large sum of money, that has the capability to help many, yet we do not do this. If you can possibly visualize this, many people can find new homes, get well fed, and give their children a future to look up to, instead of wasting the money on a government project. In fact, the National Census Bureau of Statistics claimed over 46.5 people fell in poverty since 2014. Also stated, it would roughly take $175.3 billion to completely eliminate poverty. This is a tremendous amount of money, although we could have easily reduced this amount of money by limiting space exploration. Found on page 202, paragraph 3, lines 24-28 it is stated “The space station costs upward of $100 billion, yet its critics call it a “station to nowhere.” It has no clearly defined scientific purpose. Once, President George H.W. Bush’s science adviser was asked about the benefits of doing experiments in weightlessness and microgravity. His response was, “Microgravity is of micro importance.” This showing, space exploration had no importance whatsoever compared to the amount of people dying every
As a country we need to start investing more money and research into space technology. Programs currently exist for this effort, but the potential for research and progress is limited by a lack of funding; compared to other government funded programs, aerospace funding is pitiful. Continued research in space technology is a necessary step in our growth and development not just as a country but also as entire human race. If we are to achieve this goal, it is necessary to increase funding for space research and technology and consider the possibility of colonizing outer space. If we limit our existence to the planet Earth, and continue to drain the resources on this planet, we will destroy the only home we have.
Space exploration is not worth the cost because, according to an article written by Brian Kennedy, “even though Americans are proud of NASA’s achievements and that they value the program, Americans are reluctant to pay more for space exploration.” (paragraph 10) According to Kennedy, he says that “Americans say that the US government spends too little on education (70%) and healthcare (57%)” (paragraph
NASA’s research and innovation looked promising, but it came at a cost. Money, resources, and spacecraft accidents, most famously Apollo 13 all hindered NASA’s research. In the 21st century, the debate over funding for NASA is at its peak since the birth of the organization in 1958, especially when there are numerous problems throughout the world. Is the money spent on space exploration worth the advantages and advances it contributes to society? When considering this topic, one might ask themselves, why explore space?
In 2011 NASA’s budget was recorded at about eighteen billion dollars, .5% of the $3.4 trillion federal budget of the United States. This statistic can raise a few questions: Is it worth it? Why is the US spending so much money for space exploration when there are so many problems back at Earth that need to be solved? After further research I can safely conclude that space exploration, and manned missions to the moon have been very important in order to make scientific discoveries for the
The main argument against space travel is that the money used could be better put on other matters. This is, in fact, very untrue. Looking at NASA’s 2015 budget of $17.5 billion, it may seem like a lot, until you realize that the US military budget for 2014 was $581 billion (5). Furthermore, it was estimated that each dollar in NASA’s budget was equivalent to 8 – 10 dollars of economic benefit (6). If an organization can bring about economic value at 10 folds the original budget, it would be logical to continue funding it, if not increasing the funds.
Mankind has always been fascinated with exploring the unknown. From sailing to distant lands to someday setting foot on other planets, the spirit of exploration is the same. Bur now with the current economic situation and the high cost of sending people to space, NASA is being looked at as a way to free up some much needed funds. Although, there is many problems here on planet Earth that need addressing, the benefits of space exploration far out weight the disadvantages. Space exploration has given us more advanced technology, advances in the medical field, and a boost to the economy and these facts cannot be disputed.
Some people think that space exploration is not worth the risks and cost. A lot of people think that we can just send robots and rovers into space. The problem with this is we won’t be able to tell the effects gravity has on humans. Robots can not show feelings so it would be hard to tell what gravity does to the robot. Also, most people think that it is a drain of the economy. In reality, it actually draws in more money than it spends. The total budget is just a tiny fraction of the total $13 trillion total G.P.D.
In Source C, Andrew Chamberlain allows us a visual representation of the 2006 estimates regarding how each federal dollar is spent. The most funded programs are social security with twenty-one cents and national defense with nineteen cents, with the least funded programs being a tie between transportation and veterans benefits and services which are both at a mere three cents. Other programs, such as space exploration, only rack up six cents per tax dollar. This has come to a shock to some, such as David Livingston who argues that “the manned space exploration is absolutely worth the cost . . . [t]he money disperses throughout the economy . . . [and] builds wealth for [our] nation, solves problems, and enhances life” (Source A). Others would disagree however, and may even suggest that six cents is far too much for space exploration. Margaret R. McLean argues that “almost $17 billion will fly into NASA’s coffers with around $5.3 billion dedicated to space exploration” which is “potentially exploiting” tax payers (Source E). Unfortunately,
Most people think that the costly downside to funding space exploration is a reason to avoid spending money on sciences and instead spend it on problems here on earth, but such funding for space exploration actually promotes economical as well as scientific benefits. Space exploration is an important expenditure for the high cost because of the potential for numerous benefits such as the possibility to find useful resources to cultivate, space exploration and satellites produce many thousands of jobs in our economy, and it creates and discovers newer and better technologies through research and development.
Space exploration is very beneficial to humankind because it creates new technologies, it brings different countries together, and gives people a better understanding of our Earth.