Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of the Sons of Liberty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Sons of Liberty were barbaric and did many awful things. They destroyed houses and tar and feather people to get what they wanted. They had rallied to go against Britain and decided not to pay their taxes. They also hired smugglers and thugs to help them do the things they did. The Sons of Liberty organized the Boston Tea Party and destroyed the British tea.
The Sons of Liberty hated the tax collectors, so they did many horrible things to them and went against the law. They ransacked tax collectors houses, even though they were just doing their job. They took tax collectors furniture and burned it in the street. After that the Sons of Liberty tied up the tax collector then tar and feathered him. Then they forced them to publicly swear an oath to never to be a tax collector ever again. They did this to many tax collectors to get their way. The Sons of Liberty held secret meetings to discuss when they would have their rallies. They were opposed to pay their taxes and smuggled in illegal tea to get out of the tea tax.
The Sons of Liberty had help from others to them do what they did, like the Boston Tea Party. They hired smugglers and thugs that were violent and undisciplined. The smugglers and thugs helped them do many of
…show more content…
the violent things they did. They had a rally to go dump tea into the Boston Harbor because of the tax break for tea. They went to the boat the tea was stored on and dumped 342 crates of tea overboard. The Sons of Liberty wasted so much tea and it was an act of terrorism. Admittedly, there are others that believe that the Sons of Liberty were heroes.
People believe they were heroes for a few reasons. They were heroes because their acts were justified in the end and they gave the colonists a voice. However, they are wrong for many reasons. Their acts were justified, but they did so many terrible things. There was an easier way to settle it. They could have had a boycott or a peaceful revolt. The colonist could have joined them on the boycotts or peaceful revolts. The Sons of Liberty broke many laws when they vandalized and committed their acts. If they did the peaceful things they would have broken a few or none of the laws set in place. The Sons of Liberty were fanatics because of the things they said and
did. They were fanatics because they tar and feathered, vandalized, hired thugs and smugglers, and carried out the Boston Tea Party. They were against Britain’s tax collectors and went overboard with the things they did to them. The Sons of Liberty were overactive to Britain and did horrible things.
The Sons of Liberty answered the call. In an act of defiance, “a few dozen of the Sons of Liberty, opposing new British laws in the colonies, systematically dumped three shiploads of tea into Boston harbor. They acted to prevent the royal authorities from collecting taxes on that import” (Bell). This left Parliament infuriated. They did what they only knew how to do and put a tighter squeeze on the colonists.
It was efficient for the burdens, approximating 160,000 euros. On February, the colonial people were pissed when they saw stamped tax on almost every item. During the summer, a group of Bostonians formed a resistance called the Sons of Liberty, led by Samuel Adams and planning something on
The March of the Paxton Boys, the Regulator Movement, Shays’ Rebellion, and the Whiskey Rebellion all illustrate the tensions between the governing bodies before, during, and after the War for Independence.
If you live in the United States, you probably are aware of the American Revolution. Most educated adults in America can name at least on hero of pre-Revolutionary America such as Samuel Adams, John Hancock, Paul Revere and Thomas Jefferson . But to what extent did these few men, credited with our freedom, actually participate in events that lead up to the revolution? How many countless men remained unnamed and unnoticed despite the work they put into the Revolution? These men have often been overlooked in textbooks, despite the fact most of the freedoms we have now are derived from their brave actions. But why did these men get the wheels of a revolution turning? What was the reason they had for their actions, the very ones that led America and Great Britain to begin a fight not only for freedom, but for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?
.... The Patriots believed in themselves, and they never thought about the idea of losing battles. Two people whom provided this ideology was George Washington and Benedict Arnold. In schools, these days students, are learning about Benedict Arnold as a hero, but back in time the congress did not consider him and respect him as he needed to be respected. There were some logical reasons why he left the Patriots and went to the British side. First of all, he was not respected as much as the other generals. Second of all, he had sacrificed a lot of things for his country and he had fought for the country by risking his life. Lastly, the government was not giving him the credits that he deserved from the victories that he had in the battles. These reasons pushed and forced him to go to the British side. After he went to London, everybody started calling him a traitor.
Liberty, equality, and freedom are all essential parts to avoiding anarchy and maintaining tranquility even through the most treacherous of times. The Reign of Terror is well known as the eighteen month long French Revolution (1793-1794). In this period of time, a chief executive Maximilien Robespierre and a new French government executed gigantic numbers of people they thought to be enemies of the revolution; inside and outside of the country. The question is; were these acts of the new French government justified? Not only are the acts that occurred in the Reign of Terror not justified, they were barbaric and inhumane.
The Sons of Liberty was a group of men fighting for their independence. They were fighting before the Continental Congress or the beginning of the Revolutionary War. They were called out as being disobedient. They were believed to be political radicals at the time doing what they felt was right for their town and their colonies. The Sons of Liberty were everyday men that expanded from New England all the way down to the thirteen colonies.
Mob violence was a persuasive feature of the Revolutionary War in every port city, particularly Boston. These mobs, which were often described as motley crews, were central to protests and ultimately played a dominant role in significant events leading up to the American Revolution. Throughout the years, leading up to the American Revolution, many Americans were growing tired of British rule and thus begun to want to break free from Britain and earn their own independence. Some of these Americans, out of anger, madness, and in defense of their rights, began terrorizing towns, sometimes even to the point of paralysis highlighting grievances and concerns that the common man couldn’t say with mere words. These groups would then be absorbed into a greater organization called the Sons of Liberty. With the use of violence and political strategy , these radicals defending their rights, struck terror into anyone opposing them but also carried out communal objectives ultimately pushing for change which was a central theme for the American Revolution. It will be proved that these men through their actions not only were the driving force behind resistance but also proved to be the men who steered America toward revolution.
The Sons of Liberty did many illegal things before and during the revolution. One of the illegal duties they did was that they smuggled illegal resources. While the British had a tax on tea and the price was high, the Sons of Liberty smuggled in cheaper tea from Africa. With the new, illegal tea they sold it for cheaper and without a tax. Another illegal thing they did was use too much
They were the people who actively participated and sacrificed their lives. Therefore the side they chose to fight on was heavily influenced by their “local interests, grudges, and unfulfilled yearnings [Page 87].”In summary, poor farmers, wanted political rights and land. For slaves they yearned for freedom. Women wanted to have the same rights as men. Native Americans wanted the colonists to stop encroaching on their land. Many of these desires coincided while other clashed. Therein lay the chaos that drove the American Revolution. While many of the people did not succeed the ideas they fought for became deeply embedded into
The East India trading company was in debt and asked parliament for assistance. Parliament made the Tea Act, which made imports of tea to the colonies from the trading company much cheaper than those from local sources. This angered the colonists because they could no longer compete with these prices and they feared that if they acquiesced to this new act, that others like it would soon follow. Groups like the Sons of Liberty and the Daughters of Liberty then organized protests and the boycotting of English goods, not just tea. The sons of liberty even boarded one of the trade ships in Boston harbor dressed as Indians and proceeded to dump all of the tea overboard in an event called the Boston Tea Party. Colonists in other port cities copied
In the 1760s, Boston was full of disorder. With each new British law came protest from American colonists. The people of Boston believed that Britain did not have the right to tax them because they did not elect their representatives in Parliament. Only the Massachusetts Assembly, whose members were elected every year, had the right to tax its citizens. The Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Acts of 1767 led to boycotts and unrest, steered by a group known as the Sons of Liberty. As a result, the British government sent troops to Boston to keep order. Instead of staying in a fort on an island in the Boston harbor, the British troops stayed on the commons and were living in buildings in the middle of town. The British troops’ presence in Boston was not welcome and Bostonians viewed them as a threat. Because they did not like the English army in their city, fights between the American colonists and the British troops were common.
A lot of people say that the southern part of the united states is what started the war. Their stubborn ways force the north to take action which lead to the civil war. In all reality there was more that came into play when the civil war was in the making. States rights was one of the problem that lead to the civil war, the constitution did not define who had what powers and what authority over one what. Also slavery played a part because the slaves were raising up and fighting for their rights in which the south did not like and and the north tried to help only making the problem worse. The differences between the free states and the slave states was the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet
“The Sons of Liberty were initially formed in reaction to the Stamp Act, and during its height of activity during 1765- 1776 the group became an embodiment of the revolutionary movement and fed the development of a national identity”(McKee). While many of their resistance weren’t as extreme as the Boston Tea Party, they utilized intimidation, mob violence, and propaganda to attack their targets which were often representatives of the Crown. “In addition to beatings and the use of tar and feathers, the Sons of Liberty were known to intimidate agents of the ministry by leading an angry and excited mob to their doorstep. It was not uncommon for the Sons of Liberty to ‘surround the houses of the royal Customs Commissioners at night, beating drums, blowing horns and uttering bloodcurdling Indian war whoops”(Wood). Of course, history will remember them most for their Boston Tea
The Movie, The Patriot, was a rousing and vigorous Revolutionary War epic from the view point of a family full of revenge and strong wills. This movie began with the majority of colonists angered. This part of the movie caught my attention and intrigued me to keep watching until the last minute. I especially enjoyed the heartbreaking moments and the realistic war scenes in the movie. Although I liked those aspects of the movie, the storyline was exceptionally good as well. To understand this historical fiction movie, a historical background is needed. If a person does not understand what is meant by “Taxation without representation,” then the subject of conflict will not be understood. The plot of the movie began to develop when Benjamin Martin’s son, Gabriel, was captured by British troops. Benjamin Martin was a former hero of the French and Indian War, but he renounced fighting so that he would be able to raise his family in peace. Attempting to save his brother, Benjamin’s other son stood up to the British soldiers, but was killed in the process. Benjamin, only wanting to save Gabriel, ended up fighting in battle, rescuing Gabriel, and killing the murderer of his other son. After all of this happened Benjamin realized the importance of being involved in the war, so he sent his other children to live with their aunt in order for he and Gabriel to join the army. Once they became part of the army, Benjamin became a general and lead his colonial militia, including Gabriel, into trifling battles. During battle Gabriel was killed, which deeply depressed Benjamin and made him so distraught that he does not feel like fighting anymore. His feelings stayed this way until (while at the camp) he saw the Brit that killed Gabriel. Benjamin then killed that man and understood at that moment why so many men had been dieing. Because of this, Benjamin became extremely patriotic and decided to move on with the Americans because he then had something to fight for. Everything that happened kept me on the edge of my chair wanting to know what was going to happen next. Overall, I thought that this movie was very moving and vigorous.