Sonmez Drops The Mic On Office Shenanigans

1388 Words3 Pages

Bigot-busting Tweet: Sonmez Drops the Mic on Office Shenanigans In the fast-paced world of journalism, where integrity and courage are currency, ethical dilemmas often emerge, casting a spotlight on the delicate balance between professional duty and personal conviction. Felicia Sonmez, a journalist at The Washington Post, ignited a fervent debate about the ethical responsibilities of journalists in confronting injustice within their own workplaces when she took to Twitter to address a coworker's bigotry. In response to David Weigel’s retweet of a sexist joke implying that women are either bipolar or bisexual, Sonmez tweeted "Fantastic to work at a news outlet where retweets like this are allowed!" (Sonmez) Sonmez's tweet, seen by some as a bold assertion of moral courage and by others as a breach of professional decorum and an act of public shaming, …show more content…

In conclusion, Felicia’s tweet is ethical because it adheres to the moral imperative by promoting honesty despite undermining company privacy. In regards to virtue ethics, critics emphasise the importance of temperance and prudence in ethical decision-making, suggesting that Sonmez's actions may have lacked prudence and consideration of potential consequences. This sentiment is echoed in The Washington Post's coverage, which highlights concerns about the impact of Sonmez's tweet on workplace dynamics and professional relationships. As Jose Del Real tweeted in response to Sonmez, “Engaging in repeated and targeted public harassment of a colleague is neither a good look nor is it particularly effective.” (qtd. in Schwartzman and Barr). That being said, Sonmez's tweet embodies several virtues central to the framework of virtue ethics, including courage, honesty, and integrity, which in turn consolidate her identity as a virtuous agent in the pursuit of moral

Open Document