Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Macroeconomics quizzlets
Income inequality and sociological theories
Macroeconomics quizzlets
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Robert E. Lucas Jr.’s journal article, “Some Macroeconomics for the 21st Century” in the Journal of Economic Perspectives, uses both his own and other economist’s models to track and predict economic industrialization and growth by per capita income. Using models of growth on a country wide basis, Lucas is able to track the rate at which nations become industrialized, and the growth rate of the average income once industrialization has taken place. In doing so, he has come to the conclusion that the average rate of growth among industrialized nations is around 2% for the last 30 years, but is higher the closer the nation is to the point in time that it first industrialized. This conclusion is supported by his models, and is a generally accepted idea. Lucas goes on to say that the farther we get from the industrial revolution the average growth rate is more likely to hit 1.5% as a greater percentage of countries become industrialized. To create a model as broad as …show more content…
He asserts that prior to the industrial revolution, average income did not grow in real terms, and the standard of living was not really changed up until then. After the industrial revolution, entire nations began to grow their economies and increase the standard of living not just for the super rich, historically ‘landed’, elite, but instead for everyone. Although this sounds like a great thing, Lucas adds that it also increase inequality to levels greater than ever before. He ends with the prediction that the world income in real dollars will grow at a steady rate of 1.5%, but with that inequality will also rise. On the contrary, the model he created seems to be almost too linear. There does not seem to be much variation in his graphs, only steady rise over a period of 200 years. Lucas’ model works well for tracking the past, but it is not a good tool for predicting the
Nardinelli, C. (1993). Industrial Revolution and the Standard of Living. Retrieved February 25, 2014, from The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics: http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/IndustrialRevolutionandtheStandardofLiving.html
In many people's eyes that doesn’t look that bad but if we were to look at the upper-middle class then we can notice a huge jump. The upper-middle class has increased by 16.5%, which is a drastic increase between the years 1979 to 2014. The poor class has decreased by 4.5%. The middle class would decline to the point where there would only be there rich
Briefly state the main idea of this article: The main idea of this article is that economic inequality has steadily risen in the United States between the richest people and the poorest people. And this inequality affects the people in more ways than buying power; it also affects education, life expectancy, living conditions and possibly happiness. Another idea that he brought up was that the American government tends to give less help to the unemployed than other rich countries.
Starting in the mid 1700s and continuing to the late 1850s, arguably still ongoing today, industrialization is centered on the development of machinery and urbanization. This new era found its roots in Great Britain, and later in the entirety of Western Europe once the French Revolution and the Congress of Vienna were resolved. Development was essential in Great Britain simply because it was not connected to continental Europe and Britain had the resources, like coal, to fuel the industrial revolution. Once the idea of industrialization was sparked, it burned like wildfire and spread to the rest of Europe. Results of industrialization were exceptional and robust; calling for others to join. Industrialization was a time for growth, both economically and politically, wide
Similar to Craft (2004b), Craft (2004a) uses a similar method to explore the effects the steam engine had on labor productivity growth. The difference between these two pieces is that Craft (2004a) studies the short-term effects that the steam engine had on productivity growth since he focuses only during the Industrial Revolution. However, both pieces explore the steam engines impact on growth by focusing on the contribution to growth of productivity. Craft (2004a) analogous to Craft (2004b) uses an embodied innovation growth accounting context (p.525). Craft (2004a) explains that technology contributes to growth in two ways. Technology can first contribute to growth by increasing the productivity by the fact that new technology is more beneficial
...sterlin, Richard A. "Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot?". Nations and Households in Economic Growth:
It was said that once-in-a-century advances in technology are transforming our economy. The computer chip is doing for today's knowledge economy what electricity did for our industrial economy a century ago. Synergies in technology are driving acceleration in productivity growth that enables us to grow faster with less inflation. Economic progress is speeding up; the speed limit is rising. “Real GDP growth has averaged 4 percent for the past four years, with declining inflation. This almost doubles the 2 percent to 2.5 percent not long ago considered the maximum noninflationary potential. But we've been growing faster than potential and sustaining the unsustainable for four years and counting. Sounds odd, doesn't it? Our faster output growth is based primarily on faster productivity growth and secondarily on faster labor force growth”. Productivity growth now appears to be at least 2.5 percent and rising. An increase from 1 percent to 2.5 percent is an increase of 150 percent, a huge jump with profound implications if sustained. Last year was encouraging. Productivity raised over 3 percent for the year and over 5 percent in the second half. It was said that the United States entered the 21st century with its economy on a roll. GDP growth averaged more than 3 percent a year in the 1990s. The country created 17 million jobs, driving unemployment down to a 30-year low of 4.1 percent. In the 1999-2000 the economy wasn’t doing so bad the unemployment rate was down, there were more jobs available, and production was doing well. When 2001 stated and even before then the economy was going down, many people were being laid off and so on. Then it happened the September 11th attack on the US, this attack has left the
The industrialization era is one of the most important and wonderful events that have occurred in the past 400 years. Industrialization has had an over all ripple effect upon the world. “Industrialization led to a better quality of life for most people” (Beck, 723). While it may seem to some that Industrialization only impacted Great Britain, it is actually true that industrialization many characteristics and consequences that had a worldwide impact. Industrialization had its up’s and down’s such as economic prosperity, jobs, and innovation. On the downside, unhealthy working conditions, pollution, and child labor issues.
In Mass Flourishing by Edmund S. Phelps, the author strives to give his point of view on why some countries in the early 19th century went through periods of vast and unbounded growth of their wages, expansion of employment in the market economy and widespread satisfaction of their work (Phelps). He looks at several different examples of why certain countries, and what factors within those countries led to what he calls “flourishing”, and why that type of growth is no longer happening today. Phelps goes on to argue that flourishing and innovation are not the result of a select few innovators and inventors, but rather a cultural view of the masses, that steers economic growth within one’s industry and country. I believe Phelps’s question is important because he is looking for another way to describe economic growth that does not seem to follow mainstream ideas. Him being such a respected economist adds weight to his views and the evidence he provides throughout the book raises many valid points. Why was there such exponential growth throughout the 1800’s and into the 1900’s? What caused such growth to occur, and likewise, what caused that level of growth to cease? Phelps argues that grassroots innovation is one of the core causes of growth throughout history and gives several examples of why.
The industrial revolution marks a turning point in history, in every day aspect of life, in particularly in average income.
The Industrial Revolution was a time in western cultures when the production of goods became urbanized. Spreading from Great Britain, industrialization had become widespread in Western Europe by the mid-1800’s. France, in particular, progressed in the industrialization process from about 1830 to 1850. Industrialization created an enormous increase in th...
Modern economic growth can be defined as a period with a sustained rate of growth caused by natural, environmental, political, economic, or external forces. Many countries have experienced periods of modern economic growth, but the most prominent is China. Prior to 1949, China’s economy was relatively stagnant and localized. With the formation of he People’s Republic of China, a new era of economic possibilities was created. Since 1978, China has experienced exponential modern economic growth.
Every year there is a ‘league table‘ published showing the level of economic growth achieved by each country. The comparison is made using each countries Gross Domestic Product, or GDP. An important factor to look at is the difference between actual and potential economic growth. Actual economic growth increases in real GDP. This increase can occur as result of using previously unemployed resources, or reallocating resources into more productive areas or improving existing resources. Whereas potential economic growth is the productive capacity of the economy. For example, it can be shown by the predicted ability of the country to produce goods and services. This changes when there is an increase in the quantity or quality of the resources. All countries have different ways of achieving this with the resources they have available to them. For this reason it party answers the question of why some countries are richer than others. It is widely thought that the productive capacity of an economy will increase each year largely due to improvements in education and technology. This will obviously differ from country to country. For example, in the UK the quality of fertilizer could be improved, hence forth increase the years fruit and vegetable output.
Difficulties in Formulating Macroeconomic Policy Policy makers try to influence the behaviour of broad economic aggregates in order to improve the performance of the economy. The main macroeconomic objectives of policy are: a high and relatively stable level of employment; a stable general price level; a growing level of real income (economic growth); balance of payments equilibrium, and certain distributional aims. This essay will go through what these difficulties are and examine how these difficulties affect the policy maker when they attempt to formulate macroeconomic policy. It is difficult to provide a single decisive factor for policy evaluation as a change in political and/or economic circumstances may result in declared objectives being changed or reversed. Economists can give advice on the feasibility and desirability of policies designed to attain the ultimate targets, however, the ultimate responsibility lies with the policy maker.
Ongoing structural changes in world trends have led to the growth rates leveling in developing and developed economies. During the period 2000-2010 difference in the average GDP growth in developed