Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cognitive dissonance and its effects on our lives
Cognitive dissonance and its effects on our lives
Cognitive dissonance and its effects on our lives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cognitive dissonance and its effects on our lives
Kathy Gallardo Professor Marfori PHI 101 13 March 2017 The Source of Evil Doesn’t Lower the Harm Socrates says no man voluntarily commits error or evil. When he says this what he means is that when men commit an action seen as evil or erroneous by outsiders, they themselves cannot see that their action was wrong. Due to their inability to see this, ignorance is known as the source of evil. The person does not know where their “true interest” lies, and because they are ignorant of that they can’t know any errors or evil doings they did wasn’t in their best interest. If they fully understood their true interest then they wouldn’t have been able to commit any evil actions. According to Socrates, our true interest lies in living the most virtuous …show more content…
Every action we do is motivated by self-interest. Whether the reward be given before, during, immediately after or long after the action itself, self-interest is still rewarded somewhere in the transaction and without it there wouldn’t be any transaction at all. Even selfless actions like community service or donations are in self-interest because they make you feel good. If they didn’t, they wouldn’t be done. To be done every action must somehow satisfy you, either by being what you perceive as a great option or by simply being better than the other choices you have. Since all of our actions are motivated by self-interest then naturally we are actually incapable of willingly harming ourselves. The reason why we do sometimes cause ourselves harm is because of ignorance. When we make our choice we make it because we think it meets our self-interest, if we are too ignorant to know that our best self-interest is in a virtuous life then all of our choices may suffer at levels varying on just what we perceive our self-interest to be. So the source of our wrong doings is ignorance because due to our human nature we can never willingly cause ourselves harm, and harming our environment or the people around us of course causes us harm. We may do it because in the moment we may think it is right or satisfactory but there are consequences to the soul that we later have to deal with. From these negative consequences we can later see that our motivations were misguided because of our lack of understanding of our “true interest”. And although ignorance can be from being simply unaware, it can also come about in cognitive dissonance. When one deals with the consequences of their wrongful choice they go through cognitive dissonance, because it’s against our nature to go against our best interest. At this point, one has to decide whether they need to change their course of path or whether the consequences of their wrongful choice aren’t as bad
we fail to see the harm that we are doing, and will continue to do if we do not
Any goal in life is achieved through ambition, fueled by determination, desire and hard work. Ambition maybe a driving force to success or to a pit of failure, the path chosen by an individual determines the end. Remember that any goal to be fulfilled needs desire, desire that strives to do good or greedy desire that is selfish. Also the actions that contribute to our ‘hard work’ need to be morally and ethically right to enjoy the sweet success. However, when the desire and determination is stronger than conscience, many tend to fail often reach or don’t reach what they strived for, leaving them emotionally or even physically dead. The inner lying consequence of ambition is clearly stated by Napoleon, he quotes “Great ambition is the passion of a great character. Those endowed with it may perform very good or very bad acts. All depends on the principals which direct them”. The undesirable consequence of ambition can be observed in the lives of the protagonists of ‘The Great Gatsby and Macbeth. This describes the direction in which ambition is driven could change the end result, it is simply based on the individual itself rather than the dream they seek to achieve. Therefore, the strong drive of ambition helps the seeker attain their goal but greedy desires and wrong paths taken eventually lead to downfall.
The idea of self-sacrifice seems relatively common-sense to most of us: we forgo some current potential good in order to maximise either the good of someone we care about, or our own later good. Richard Brandt (1972) includes altruistic desires in his definition of self-interest: "if I really desire the happiness of my daughter, or the discomfiture of my department chairman ... then getting that desire satisfied ... counts as being an enhancement of my utility or welfare ... to an extent corresponding to how strongly I want that outcome." The key point here is that by this definition of self-interest, an altruistic act must have a number of conditions in order to be classed as self-sacrifice. Ove...
A person may have the desire to do everything but it is only one or two things he can do in life. Especially today, although nothing is impossible, it is highly unlikely for one to be able to do all the desired things in life because of how there are too many people competing for the same thing or it takes a lot of effort and dedication to keep up and work hard until reaching the goal. Therefore, humans are given the ability to choose between things because having too many expectations or too few is not good. When these hopes are shattered, they result in a very negative outcome.
Since the beginning of mankind, it has been the need to attain a specific goal, which has driven humans to work hard. Without any ambition, humans would not be inspired to overcome adversities and challenge themselves to become increasingly adaptable. When one is motivated by certain factors in their environment, the probability of them being satisfied with the results of their deeds depends on the moral value of their inspiration. If the individual is aware of the fact that their deed is immoral, then no matter how dire their circumstances which forced them to perform the actions, they will not be content. The irony establishes itself in the fact that those characters who are motivated by a cause bigger than themselves, tend to be happier,
There are times in every mans life where our actions and beliefs collide—these collisions are known as contradictions. There are endless instances in which we are so determined to make a point that we resort to using absurd overstatements, demeaning language, and false accusations in our arguments. This tendency to contradict ourselves often questions our character and morals. Similarly, in The Trial of Socrates (Plato’s Apology), Meletus’ fallacies in reason and his eventual mistake of contradicting himself will clear the accusations placed on Socrates. In this paper, I will argue that Socrates is not guilty of corrupting the youth with the idea of not believing in the Gods but of teaching the youth to think for themselves by looking to new divinities.
From the beginning of our existence, we as people are taught that life is about the pursuit of
Socrates was a revolutionary thinker. He brought new ideas and processes of thought to Athenian society and his work still has its place in the world today. However during his time, his ideas were not always thought of as a good thing. Many viewed him as a corrupting influence on other people and accused him of forcing his ideas upon others. Perhaps most frequently the center of controversy was his thoughts on theocracy and piety as seen in the Plato’s Euthyphro. Socrates also appears at the butt end of Aristophanes’ comedy Clouds, where he is satirically ridiculed and seemingly corrupting the youth of Athens in his school, the Thinkery. Although virtually completely seen as a positive influence now, in ancient times, Socrates may have done more harm than good for his society.
Socrates and the Apology Some of the best sources of information about Socrates' philosophical views are the early dialogues of his student Plato, who tried to provide a faithful picture of the methods and teachings of the great master. The Apology is one of the many recorded dialogues about Socrates. It is about how Socrates was arrested and charged with corrupting the youth, believing in no god(s) (Atheism) and for being a Sophist. He attended his trial and put up a good argument. I believe that Socrates was wrongfully accused and should not have been sentenced to death.
Adam Smith may have best described self-interest in his book, The Wealth of Nations: “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest.” So why does the baker choose to bake? It is not because of his benevolence, or kindness, it is because of his
Socrates states to the jurors in his trail, “No evil can happen to a good man” (48). Socrates is examining the moral center of the man. Evil can occur to an individual from the outside. Socrates a good, even innocent, man was sentenced to death. Other characters in history and even today are identified as good, but they still have evil occur to them. Socrates is not talking about an outside evil or harm occurring to a good person. He is examining the soul and what is morally evil and morally good.
Gentlemen of the jury, I appear before you today to plead the case of the defendant, Socrates, a man I believe to be innocent of the charge of corruption. This charge, as I see it, defines corruption as the use of questioning the Athenian democracy and the rule of the majority in order to undermine these practices. While this questioning can certainly be interpreted as anti-democratic by some, Socrates does not encourage citizens to challenge the democracy of the only city he has ever known, rather, he attempts to strengthen their beliefs in the state. The plaintiff, Meletus, has charged Socrates with corruption, and while I cannot prove absolutely that his questioning does not corrupt, I believe that there exists sufficient evidence to disprove
The results of committing evil acts have such a powerful effect on the human mind, that it is eventually destroyed by it.
In other words, self-interest is a person’s pleasure, and chasing self-interest as a kind of happiness is comprehensible and somehow necessary, as Fr. Fagothey mentioned, “Man is free in the choice of concrete objects by whose possession he hopes to obtain happiness.” (Fagothey, 47) He also wrote, “We naturally desire health, wealth, knowledge, and other goods; but we cannot always obtain them.” (Fagothey, 56) Gaining all desire is necessary for people rather than simply survive. In this case, there is nothing wrong with reaching a personal goal and dreaming without impeding others, because as Stoic scholar declared, “What people constantly, are things that are not within their control.” (Hospers, 53) Therefore, trying to accomplish desire, promoting self is the only way to reach. For example, if one person wants to be wise, go to school and study hard, finally they gain the knowledge, which in other way finish his personal interest. Without promoting him/herself, it is impossible to reach this goal. Promptly, if everyone tries their best to capture the best by taking this kind of active progress into the society, as each one make little progress; it actually has huge influence to the society.
Socrates, Guilty Or Not? Ancient Athens was the site of a growing culture. Philosophy was among the many improvements and discoveries being made. With these improvements and discoveries, great thinkers were able to stretch their knowledge to new heights.