Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Children of today socrates quote
Humanities greek philosophers
Wisdom is the quality of having experience, knowledge and good judgement; the quality of being wise
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Children of today socrates quote
Smart people learn from everything and everyone, Average people from their experiences, Stupid people already have all the answers" (Socrates). The Greek Philosopher, Socrates quote about the existing knowledge a person posse determines the characteristics of a person shows the different categories people are placed in society. For example, Socrates first states, "Smart people learn from everything and everyone". This shows Socrates is implying that there are unlimited things one person can learn and gain experience from. Since the universe is constantly changing, people are searching for new answers to questions one may have. This suggests that to gain knowledge, one must be open-minded to new topics and ideas that another might have to expand …show more content…
When someone looks at something from a different point of view, it can cause one to be introduced to new findings and benefit from others and not just themselves. Furthermore, when Socrates claims, "Stupid people already have all the answers,” he implies that "stupid people" know everything, but that is simply not the case. An example of this is Socrates being a philosopher, he questioned; people about things that nobody could answer and be given the death sentence due to his irrational questions. In the world, everybody wants to believe that they are an expert in a certain category but in reality, that is impossible because there will always be something they don't know. "Stupid people" already know the answers to everything because they assume they are the only ones who think they have the superficial of knowing the right answer from things they have been exposed too but is false. For that reason, the amount of knowledge someone has can be frowned upon, the society today focuses on the amount of success one person has to change the world. If one is not "smart" they are seen as "stupid" because of the lack of knowledge deficiency they
In Walter Mosley’s Always Outnumbered, Always Outgunned, the reader is introduced to Socrates Fortlow, an ex-convict who served twenty-seven years for murder and rape. Fortlow is plagued by guilt and, seeing the chaos in his town, feels a need to improve not only his own standards of living, but also those of others in Watts. He attempts this by teaching the people in Watts the lessons he feels will resolve the many challenges the neighbourhood faces. The lessons Fortlow teaches and the methods by which he teaches them are very similar to those of the ancient Greek philosopher for whom Fortlow was named: “‘We was poor and country. My mother couldn’t afford school so she figured that if she named me after somebody smart then maybe I’d get smart’” (Mosley, 44). Though the ancient Greek was born to be a philosopher and Fortlow assumed the philosopher role as a response to the poor state of his life and Watts, both resulted in the same required instruction to their populations. The two Socrates’ both utilize a form of teaching that requires their pupil to become engaged in the lesson. They emphasize ethics, logic, and knowledge in their instruction, and place importance on epistemology and definitions because they feel a problem cannot be solved if one does not first know what it is. Socrates was essential in first introducing these concepts to the world and seemed to be born with them inherent to his being, Fortlow has learned the ideals through life experience and is a real-world application in an area that needs the teachings to get on track. While the two men bear many similarities, their differences they are attributed primarily as a result of their circumstances provide the basis of Fortlow’s importance in Watts and as a modern-...
In “Apology” by Plato, Socrates stated, “… there are plenty of persons, as soon as enough discover, who think that they know anything, but really know little or nothing” (Plato 32). In other words, humans are imperfect and this explains the limited nature of human knowing. Even when we consider things for a while and in our best operation, we can still make mistakes because we are imperfect. At the same time, the student must know his/her purpose for doing something. “God orders me to fulfill the philosopher’s mission of searching into myself and other men….” (Plato 35), stated Socrates. He knows that his job was to teach the young men to follow his footsteps and live a good and virtuous life. Just like Socrates, our modern education system should be concerned with making sure that students are learning what is truly important. There will be different levels of education as one goes through his or her life cycle. The modern model represents the way of growing through education and continues to change. If one is motivated, he or she will be successful in his or her life and become a better educated person. In the “Apology,” Socrates visited the politicians, poets and artisans to see which group was wiser than him. He realized that all three groups lacked knowledge in some type of way. Socrates stated that the politician “knows nothing, and thinks that he knows” (Plato 31). Both the
Socrates concedes that he is actually the wisest person in Athens—but only in one crucial respect. What is it? Explain what he means by it.
Socrates and the Apology Some of the best sources of information about Socrates' philosophical views are the early dialogues of his student Plato, who tried to provide a faithful picture of the methods and teachings of the great master. The Apology is one of the many recorded dialogues about Socrates. It is about how Socrates was arrested and charged with corrupting the youth, believing in no god(s) (Atheism) and for being a Sophist. He attended his trial and put up a good argument. I believe that Socrates was wrongfully accused and should not have been sentenced to death.
The most shameful and worst thing that Socrates states is corruption of soul, including “ “ignorance, cowardice, and injustice (Plato 822),” Ignorance, cowardice and injustice are caused by the lack of knowledge, according to Socrates’ claim that the essence of each virtue (e.g., holiness, justice, courage, self-control) is the same as knowledge or wisdom (Plato 779). Therefore, based on his doctrine that no one knowingly and willingly behaves wrongly, Socrates could make comments on the given case by drawing on the dialogues (e.g., “Protagoras” and “Gorgias”), in which he also mentions about ignorance, cowardice, or injustice. Most importantly, Socrates would want to investigate the central concepts closely since he believes that one must know the truth about the subject s/he is going to discuss (Plato 547-548, 847-857). Therefore, this paper shall also discuss how and why Socrates prefers a philosophical discussion with his dialectic method to mere rhetoric persuasion.
Throughout the Apology and book seven of The Republic of Plato Socrates strongly believes in Socratic wisdom. Socrates believes that being wise is not portraying to know everything when you don’t, but to accept the fact that you may not know everything and learn the truth so that you may truly become wise.
Socrates also considered true wisdom to be the knowledge and acceptance of the fact that one ultimately knows very little, and he found many he came across to be very unwise. By continuing to question people on philosophical issues, I believe Socrates not only sought to gain clarity certain philosophically problematic issues, but to spread what he believed to be true wisdom by revealing to the people of Athens the boundaries of their
Both Socrates and Aristotle strove to better understand the world around them using epistemological approaches they derived on their own. Aristotle disagreed with much of his predecessors' beliefs thus provoking him to create his own methods of understanding. Socrates would walk the streets of Athens barefoot and question anyone willing to listen and search for truth using his Socratic method. If the person was fully engaged with their conversation Socrates would try to lead them both down the path of understanding by constantly asking questions that might get them to the answer they need to be at. Further and further Socrates would prod the bystanders to either prove him wrong or explain their thinking by using definitions. On the other hand, Aristotle created his own method of logic that quite like Socrates method, was supposed to lead the user towards a correct answer by default. Not only that but Aristotle was not satisfied simply by logic, he believed to completely understand a topic you must understand the four causes which would explain the why aspect of a question. Both philosophers believed that the truth would eventually come out on its own if they continued to look into it, but each of these philosophers approached study of knowledge differently.
Now in the third speech, Socrates’ cautious soul addresses him of his alluring defamation of love opposed to the divinity face of love. “ …A[a]ccording to Ibycus, lest by ‘doing something amiss with the gods, I should take in exchange honor from human beings’. ”(Phaedrus p. 45) By making amends Socrates begins a retraction of his speech. Socrates explains that love stems from a form of madness, but clarifies that not all madness is wicked.
Socrates was an Athenian whose words still haven’t ceased to impress, millions of years after his death. Even today his lectures are a reflection of our society, as they help shape modern philosophy as we know it. Despite having earned the title of the wisest man to have ever lived,1 all that is known about Socrates comes from the writings of two of his students: Plato and Xenophon. Although their texts are great in length and much alive today, Socrates is best known for the quote “The only thing I know is that I know nothing”. This is often referred to as the “Socratic Paradox”, for how can you know nothing if you are aware of not knowing?
The real achievement and advancement towards a goal is possible only through self actualization. Socrates argues that goodness is associated with wisdom and in the pursuit of that wisdom an individual can enjoy life and be happy in the real sense of the term. Without questioning oneself or searching for knowledge and wisdom, people will act unreasonably, and will not be able to realize the difference between good and bad actions. Socrates also says the we need to think about ourselves and our conduct on a deeper level. Socrates claims to only have “human wisdom” (20d), not anything “more than human wisdom” (20e).
Socrates was considered by many to be the wisest man in ancient Greece. While he was eventually condemned for his wisdom, his spoken words are still listened to and followed today. When, during his trial, Socrates stated that, “the unexamined life is not worth living” (Plato 45), people began to question his theory. They began to wonder what Socrates meant with his statement, why he would feel that a life would not be worth living. To them, life was above all else, and choosing to give up life would be out of the picture. They did not understand how one would choose not to live life just because he would be unable to examine it.
Socrates was a well-known philosopher who has been recited an uncountable amount of chances since his departure decades ago. He believed that he was escorted by a supreme being and devoted his entire living to displaying the people who held that they were wise, revealing the ones who certainly were not. He had the unbelievable talent to make people question everything. Socrates was recognized as one of the wisest philosophers in the world, He literally held that the meaning of life implied both individual and spiritual germination. This philosopher proves this belief in something that could be arguably with his most famous declaration: "The unexamined life is not worth living."
Throughout this mission, Socrates talked with politicians, artisans, poets and other “experts," and soon realized they all lacked true wisdom. When Socrates tried to explain this lack of real wisdom on the part of the “experts," he noted the consequence was their hatred of him for doing so. Socrates discovered then, that ultimately, they knew nothing more than he did. The difference resides in the fact that Socrates did not pretend to know what he didn’t. While reflecting on his findings, he defined wisdom as human humility, which meant that true wisdom stems from the acknowledgment of one’s own ignorance. After Socrates arrived at this definition of wisdom, he resolved to share his newfound knowledge on what wisdom truly consists of. He likened himself to a gadfly, as he intended to “sting” the citizens of Athens. He would expose their ignorance though a method of questioning that resulted in the exposure of faulty logic. Taking this idea a step farther, the philosopher would claim that “the unexamined life is not worth living”. Through this statement, Socrates acknowledges the distinct difference between living and merely existing. He states that an individual should carefully analyze themselves if they wish to live a life that is worth living. If they do not, they are just existing with no greater purpose. A lack of knowledge, wisdom, or the
Socrates is well known as a Greek philosopher and the main source of Western thought. Socrates is believed to have been born in 470 BC, in Athens. Not much is known about his life except for what his students wrote about him. His most promising students were Plato and Xenophon. He was not born into a noble family. Socrates had two sons, but from the information recorded on his personal life, he didn’t care for them much.