In the 1800s and early 1900s Sociological Theories were introduced in crime causation. The Social Ecology Theory, Anomie Theory, and Subcultural Theory, are a huge factor in the study of crime causation. While taking a sociological approach, they discovered that “the structure of prevailing social arrangements, the interaction between individuals and groups, and the social environment” (Schmalleger 89) are the main causes of criminal behavior. Prospectively speaking, the majority of sociological viewpoints of crime are very unique from each other. Though the spectrum of this topic is wide, they all originate on a few essential hypotheses.
The Social Ecology Theory also known as the disorganization theory, doesn’t exactly focus on different
…show more content…
types of people like other theories. Instead, the theory focuses on different types of places. For example, they focus on the locations of different neighborhoods and cities. Sociologists Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay discovered while studying a neighborhood in Chicago, that poverty, lack of education, and weak authority in neighborhoods were the main causes of crime. Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay’s theory in neighborhood population characteristics are still used till this day for the predictions of crime causation and offender rates. However, in the 1960s their theory lost its interest in criminology. Criminologists were trying a new way of thinking, and stepping away from Shaw and McKay’s theory. Studies that are similar to Shaw and Mckay’s from other U.S cities, also found that minor crimes committed by younger people are one of the many causes of crime in neighborhoods. Social Ecology falls under the macro- level of studies, because the theory concentrates on geographical areas and why they are disorganized, and why crime rates are higher in certain neighborhoods. Robert Sampson and Byron Grove’s study proved Shaw and McKay’s theory, that social disorganization was a big cause of crime in neighborhoods (Cullen and Agnew 93). This study brought excitement, because it provided more information on crime in certain areas that were tested and proven true.
In the study of social disorganization, it was found that African Americans were more likely to live in neighborhoods that are high in crime rates, poverty, or live these areas because they have single parent homes. Robert Sampson and Julius Wilson claim it also has to deal with them from losing their jobs, or from making new developments, which causes African Americans to leave their homes. In order to go more into depth, they put the cultural side back into the social disorganization theory (Cullen and Agnew 94). By doing this Sampson and Wilson came to the conclusion that African Americans who live in poverty isolate themselves from social interaction outside their neighborhood. In which causes violence to be a part of life in high crime neighborhoods.
Anomie Theory was first brought up in the late nineteenth century by Emile Durkheim. According to Durkheim, Anomie happens when a drastic change happens in societies. In which, causes cultural norms to change. It was not until 1938 when Anomie was first introduced into criminology by Robert Merton. Merton used Anomie to describe that even though society has set goals on how people should live their lives, not everyone are able to achieve these goals because some don’t have the same opportunities as
others. Robert Merton’s take on the Anomie Theory turned into the Strain Theory. Instead of focusing on rapid social change, Merton focuses on American Society’s view of what people’s aspirations should be and the unequal opportunity that not everyone can achieve these goals. Steven Messner and Richard Rosenfeld claim when a person can’t reach these goals the right way, they break the law and turn to criminal activity in order to achieve the goals and society’s standards for being “successful”. Subculture can be defined as a group of people who share the same values and norms. (Schmalleger 91). In criminology, subcultural theory is used to show what causes crime in subcultures. Albert Cohen’s theory was that lower- class people who has goals, but can’t achieve their goals, which turns them to crime. In research, for some subcultures, murder is a way of life. Violence in certain subcultures is common if their values involve aggressive behavior (Heimer 801). In Robert Cohens research, it was found that parents from a lower socioeconomic class are the reason children turn to delinquency and look at it in a positive way because the parent(s) don’t have the resources to prepare their children for success in the middle- class (Heimer 802). Though all of the sociological theories that help with what causes crime today in criminology, I truly believe the Social Ecology Theory is the most relevant for many reasons. Social ecology doesn’t focus on different types of people. Instead, the theory focuses on the locations of neighborhoods and why certain areas have higher crime rates. I think this is most relevant because in my opinion, focusing on types of people and crime rates is a good idea and has lead to many ways to figuring out why these people commit criminal activity but it also sometimes falls short and biased. The social ecology theory is the most relevant, because the tools they use gather more data and have longer studies of crime causation in neighborhoods. Not only that I believe the anomie theory and subculture theory rely on the social ecology theory because both theories have to deal with lower socioeconomic class families and go into depth why delinquents commit minor crimes or why do different subcultures lean more towards violence than other groups. It all relates back to the social ecology theory, by looking into where these people live and how where they live causes them to turn to crime. The social ecology theory is the most relevant in today’s society because it shows how human beings behave in a certain environment.
One of the sociological theories is conflict theory. The conflict theory deals with people's level on wealth, or class. The conflict theory says that social change is beneficial, contrary to focuses on social order. In the story of the woman and her children, the conflict theory plays a big role on the situation. Police of higher class are threatening the homeless woman. The conflict theory is a constant struggle of people of higher class over powering people of lower class, or the weaker. The police are trying to over power the woman by telling her to leave. Even though the woman and her children were doing nothing wrong, the police used their power to tell her to leave. Also the people of the area showed their conflict theory by telling the police officers to come. They must have felt embarrassed to have a woman of such lower class to be around them. They used their power of class to have the woman removed from their community. The woman wants to be there because she has no home and it is a good community to be in, but the people look at it as an embarrassment to them because it makes their area look bad for someone of such lower class to be around them. The conflict theory is unique to all other theories because it separates people into categories determined by their wealth and standards. Their status is the element that categorizes them, weather it is class, race, or gender. The conflict theory do not always use class, race, and gender all at once. In this situation race and gender is not a main issue, although gender could be a reason, but it would fall under the feminist theory. This story is mainly dealing with class. Through all this conflict the woman feels over powered and domina...
1 Most sociologists interpret social life from one of three major theoretical frameworks or theories: symbolic interactionism, functional analysis, or conflict theory. Describe the major points and key concepts of each framework. List at least one sociologist who is identified with each of these three frameworks.
In addition to biological and psychological elements, there are the social factors that can influence people to engage in criminal activity. As a matter of fact, social and economic pressures play a major role in the cause of crime, since people are more likely to break the law when they have nothing else to lose. Therefore, the biological, psychological, and social factors should all be considered when trying to establish a reason for every crime. Word Count = 1,378
Shaw and McKay (1942) specified residential mobility as a second aspect of social disorganization that influences crime rates. In the words of Kasarda and Janowitz (1974) communities operate "as a complex system of friendship and kinship networks and formal and informal associational ties rooted in family life and ongoing socialization processes.” Population turnover, or the constant influx of new residents into an area reduces opportunities to create long lasting relationships between neighborhood residents (Bursik, 1999). Fewer ongoing relationships cause social ties and social capital to be weak thus contributing to the inability to recognize common values and organize collective efforts against unwanted behaviors. Empirical tests of social disorganization find the residential mobility component also to be mixed as associated with violence rates (Hawkins, et al., 2000; Haynie & South,
Throughout history people have used marijuana for its dried leaves, flowers, stems, and seeds to relieve pain, stress, and other medical issues from one’s life. Within the recent years it has become one of the most debated issues in the United States. In the 1930s, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Narcotics (now the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs) claimed that marijuana was a “gateway” drug and was a powerful, addicting substance. During the sixties marijuana became a symbol for rebellion against authority so it became very popular by college students and “hippies”. So in 1982, Drug Enforcement Administration increased pressure on drug farms and houses which decreased the use of marijuana. In the past twenty years marijuana has become a
A highly debated topic concerns whether criminals commit crimes because of a social pressure or an individual urge. The strain theory supports crime as a social pressure because, as Frank Schmalleger suggests in Criminology Today 222, crime is an adaptive behavior that coincides with problems caused by frustration or unpleasant social surroundings. Also, culture conflict theory states the cause of delinquent behavior is because different social classes conflicting morals of what is appropriate or proper behavior, (Schmalleger 228). Other people believe blaming crime on the economy or where they grew up is making an excuse for criminals instead of making them take responsibility for their actions, as stated by CQ writer Peter Katel. These different views started with statistics taken on crime in the early 1800s. Andre Michel Guerry of France was one of the first examiners of “the moral health of nations” in the early 19th century, (Schmalleger 35). Another early crime statistician was Adolphe Quetelet of Belgium . Quetelet evaluated the crime rates between weather, sex, and age. His findings that climate contributes to high or low crime rate is a main factor in today’s fight against crime. It is doubtful this issue will ever be settled since there are too many pros and cons to each side. However, while specialists’ dispute this, crime is not stopping. There needs to be a way, or possibly several ways, to reduce criminal activity. It is doubtful criminal activity will ever be put to an end. The same is to be said about why people commit crime, but knowing if it is done socially or individually can help with the fight against it. In the end, individuals should take responsibility for their actions, but...
Therefore, the community has informal social control, or the connection between social organization and crime. Some of the helpful factors to a community can be informal surveillance, movement-governing rules, and direct intervention. They also contain unity, structure, and integration. All of these qualities are proven to improve crime rate. Socially disorganized communities lack those qualities. According to our lecture, “characteristics such as poverty, residential mobility, and racial/ethnic heterogeneity contribute to social disorganization.” A major example would be when a community has weak social ties. This can be caused from a lack of resources needed to help others, such as single-parent families or poor families. These weak social ties cause social disorganization, which then leads higher levels of crime. According to Seigel, Social disorganization theory concentrates on the circumstances in the inner city that affect crimes. These circumstances include the deterioration of the neighborhoods, the lack of social control, gangs and other groups who violate the law, and the opposing social values within these neighborhoods (Siegel,
This theory however as some have argued has emerged from social disorganisation theory, which sees the causes of crime as a matter of macro level disadvantage. Macro level disadvantage are the following: low socioeconomic status, ethnic or racial heterogeneity, these things they believe are the reasons for crime due to the knock on effect these factors have on the community network and schools. Consequently, if th...
Rational Choice Theory is the belief that man is a reasonable actor who decides means and ends, costs and benefits, and makes rational choices. Routine activity theory provides a simple and powerful insight into the causes of crime problems. At its heart is the idea that in the absence of effective controls, offenders will prey upon attractive targets. Social Control Theory gives an explanation for how behavior conforms to that which is generally expected in society. Social disorganization theory explains the ecological differences in levels of crime based on structural and cultural factors shaping the nature of the social order across communities. This approach alters the sociological studies on which is any of two or more random variables exhibiting correlated variation of urban growth to examine the concentration and stability of rates of criminal behavior. Strain Theory. Conflict theory explains the belief that individuals choose to commit a crime, which many po...
Robert K. Merton is a widely respected sociologist who has offered much insight in the field of criminology. In efforts to understand why the U.S has disproportionate levels of crime in comparison to similar countries Merton retouched Emile Durkheim’s form of Anomie theory (Lecture, 2016). Merton’s theory is grounded in the belief that the norms of society and their culturally defined goals (for example: The American Dream) place great pressure (or Strain) on individuals to either conform with the socially accepted behavior to attain those goals, or in its place become a player in a nonstandard subculture in attempts to achieve the same underlying goals of society (Cullen, Ch.13). With this, Merton’s Anomie theory was a macro-level approach
Social theories provide us with a new perspective in the social world. With new perspectives, new opinions can be made. also, they can provide answers or explain a specific social spectacle. Social theories can help clarify and predict the way the social world works. The three major sociological perspectives are functionalism, the conflict theory, and the symbolic interaction theory. Each theory is different and can help answer many questions about human behavior in a social world.
Crime has a substantial influence on everyday life. Theories for criminal behaviour are as old as the types of behaviours themselves. Amongst these theories is the idea of anomie. The sociological notion of anomie is used as a theoretical tool to understand the intersection of social structure, culture and criminal or deviant behaviour. Although the concept of anomie theory has varied between scholars, central to the different versions of anomie theory is the premise that human are normative beings; that people think and act on the basis of commonly held beliefs and traditions. Anomie theory was popularised by the classic works of Emile Durkheim and further explored by Robert K Merton.
Robert K. Melton in (1938) offered the delinquency as a form of adaptive problem solving behavior. It commits to the response of problem by involving the frustrating and undesirable social environments and also developed a concept called “anomie” which is a French word that means “normlessness” (.p.158). Merton did preserve a genuine goal such as wealth, status, and personal happiness that are generally seen as a desire to everyone, but they commonly accepted to see the goals as education, hard work, and financial savings that are not equally
As humans, we look through many different lenses to view the world around us. We use microscopes for objects that are too small and telescopes for objects too far away. However, not all lenses are physical. We also have theoretical lenses, ones in which we use to examine not how things look, but how they behave and interact with one and other. An example of one of these lenses, used by all sociologists when trying to discover why people interact and behave the way they do, is called ‘The Sociological Perspective’.
Different schools of thought propose varying theoretical models of criminality. It is agreeable that criminal behaviour is deep rooted in societies and screams for attention. Biological, Social ecological and psychological model theories are key to helping researchers gain deeper comprehension of criminal behaviour and ways to avert them before they become a menace to society. All these theories put forward a multitude of factors on the outlooks on crime. All these theories have valid relevancy to continuous research on criminal behaviour.