Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Deviance behavior three theoretical perspectives
According to labeling theory, a major solution to deviance is
Deviance behavior three theoretical perspectives
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Deviance behavior three theoretical perspectives
Theories of Deviance
Every society has its conventional norms that everyone is required to adhere to all the time. Violation of the dominant norms is usually met with harsh punishments since the society consider violation of societal norms as deviance. Deviance, according to Thio, Taylor and Schwartz (2012), is any behavior that violates the society's dominant norms. Conversely, in sociology, the term deviance is used to refer to the violation of the societal social norms. According to Henslin et al. (2013), deviant behaviors vary in magnitude and can be as small as violating traffic rules to murder. Normally, what is considered deviant behavior varies from one society to another. For instance, whereas some societies consider possession or use of marijuana as a deviant behavior, such as Canada, some societies, such as Jamaica does not consider marijuana possession or use as a deviant behavior. In Canada, section 4.3 of the criminal code considers possession or use of marijuana a crime, thus a deviant behavior. This implies that possession or use of marijuana violates the Canadian social norms. Although sociologists agree as to the definition of deviance, Henslin et al. (2013) noted that there has been a strong disagreement as to why people engage in deviant behaviors. The persistent disagreements have resulted in the emergence of different theories of deviance that attempts to explain how deviance operates in society. The theories include structural strain theory, labeling theory, social control theory, differential association theory and deterrence theory. However, as much as the perspectives of all the theories can be relied on, differential association theory appears to be a theory that best explains how deviance operat...
... middle of paper ...
... best in explaining deviance. The theory holds that the deviance is learned through social interaction with others, which is true of what can be observed in the society. This certainly makes differential association theory the best in explaining how deviance operates
Works Cited
Brinkerhoff, D., Ortega, S., & Weitz, R. (2013). Essentials of sociology. Toronto, ON: Cengage Learning.
Clinard, M., & Meier, R. (2010). Sociology of deviant behavior. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Henslin, J. M., Glenday, D., Duffy, A., & Pupo, N. (2013). Sociology: A down to earth approach sixth Canadian edition, loose leaf version. Toronto, ON: Pearson Education Canada.
Sacco. (1992). Deviance: Conformity and control in Canadian society. Ontario, ON: Prentice-Hall Canada.
Thio, A., Taylor, J. D., & Schwartz, M. D. (2012). Deviant behavior. Princeton, NY: Pearson Education, Limited.
Curtis, J. E., Tepperman, L., & Albanese, P. (2012). Sociology: A Canadian perspective(3rd ed.). Don Mills, Ont: Oxford University Press.
"Sociological Theories To Explain Deviance." Sociological Theories To Explain Deviance. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2013. .
Adler, Patricia A., and Adler Peter. Constructions of Deviance: Social Power, Context, and Interaction. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomas/Wadsworth, 2009.
Brinkerhoff, David B., Rose Weitz, Suzanne T. Ortega. Essentials of Sociology Ninth Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2013. Print.
Deviant theories from a positivist perspective are based on biological or social determinism. Determinism is the view that something “is determined or caused by forces beyond the individual’s control” (Thio, 2010, p. 7). Positivist sociologists apply the deterministic view to each individual deviant to determine the reason for his or her deviant behavior. Multiple theories from the positivist perspective try to explain the reason for deviant behavior. Phrenology and anomie-strain are two such theories that have been used to explain deviant behavior from this perspective.
Kendall, Diana. 2012. Sociology in Our Times: The Essentials, Edited by M. Kerr. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Macionis. J, J. Plummer, K. (2005). Sociology. A global Introduction. Pearson Education Limited. Essex. (UK) Third Edition.
Before the 1950’s theorists focused on what the difference was between deviants and criminals from “normal” citizens. In the 1950’s researchers were more involved exploring meaning and reasons behind deviant acts. This led to the most dominant question in the field of deviance, “what is the structural and culture factors that lead to deviant behavior?” This question is important when studying deviance because there is no clear answer, everyone sees deviance in different ways, and how deviance is created. Short and Meier states that in the 1960’s there was another shift in focus on the subject of deviance. The focus was what causes deviance, the study of reactions to deviance, and the study of rule breaking and rule making. In the 1960’s society was starting to speak out on what they believed should be a rule and what should not; this movement create chaos in the streets. However, it gave us a glimpse into what makes people become deviant, in the case it was the Vietnam War and the government. Short and Meier also write about the three levels that might help us understand were deviance comes from and how people interact to deviance. The first is the micro level, which emphasizes individual characteristics by biological, psychological, and social sciences. The second level is macrosociological that explains culture and
We live today in the societies which are shaped by rules and norms that must be follow. At the same time, people establish their own way to do things or not and when these people break or not respect the established rules, that’s is called deviance. According to Henslin “Deviance is the violation of norms (rules or expectations)”. I will define deviance as set of behaviors that are beyond the rules accepted by society or a group of people.
Murray, Jane Lothian, Linden, Rick and Kendall, Diane. (2011). SOCIOLOGY IN OUR TIMES, Fifth Canadian Edition by Nelson Education Limited, Published by Thomson Wadsworth, USA.
Conclusively, sociological attention on the study of deviance has provided various explanations of crime, such as social learning theory, which provide a strong theoretical framework through empirical research and ongoing anecdotal evidence in arguing that criminal behaviour is learned behaviour (Brezina and Piquero, 2002). While statistical analyses of adolescent offending in 2013 appears to further support this notion (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2013; Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2013; NSW Recorded Crime Statistics, 2013; Western Australia Police, 2014; Victoria Police, 2013), it would be a correlative-based fallacy (Richardson, 2012) to assume all deviant behaviour is rooted solely in social learning and modelling in favour of examining all behavioural determinants and risk factors (Winfree, Bäckström and Mays, 1994).
Giddens, Anthony, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Applebaum and Deborah Carr. Introduction to Sociology. New York: Norton & Company, 2012. Print.
Schaefer, R.T. (2009). Sociology: a brief introduction, 8th edition. New York, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
[10] Kendall, Diana, et al. Sociology in Our Times. ITP Nelson and Co. Toronto, 1997. 126.
Hebding, D.E and Leonard, G. (1996) Introduction to sociology: A text with readings, 5th ed. McGraw Hill Inc. (worldwide).