Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Retirement planning research paper
Retirement planning research paper
Retirement planning research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Retirement planning research paper
The current social security system should not be replaced by a private pension program. Replacing the problem would only make the current issue worse and cause more problems down the line. The issue with social security isn’t that people are living longer, it is the fact that people are having fewer children. The biggest problem is the economy, not how the current system is being ran. The only problem with social security is the fact that newer generations don’t believe that it will benefit them by the time they retire.
One of the biggest issues is the fact that future generations are having fewer children. Since the baby boom, the amount of children being born per year have been declining. Therefore, with fewer children being born the current
…show more content…
and future economy is to suffer. This is caused by fewer people entering the workforce, therefore less money being made to be spent. At this rate only 12.4 percent of tax is going towards social security per person in the workforce. Another issue is American women’s fertility rates, which also leads to fewer children.
Since the 1960s and more forms of birth control have been found, social security funds have been challenged by a revolutionary improvement that has been brought into women’s lives. To solve this issue the government will have to implement more taxes on people in the workforce to help fund the future of social security.
To solve this issue we need to find a way to generate the amount of money lost by fewer people entering the workforce. Mainly because this is the only issue with the system, fewer people working which equals to social security’s budget to be low. One way to solve this issue would be to implement more taxes, or to ensure more security over its treasury. As long as the treasury is protected with its surplus in those accounts it should help secure future generations of retirees.
Overall social security should not be replaced with a private pension program. All that must be done is to help fix the current system and find another way to gather funding. Instead, invest what can be afforded safely so that even if the stock market was to crash the money would be safe. So no social security should not be replaced with a private pension program because it would not help hard working Americans when it came their turn to
retire. Works Cited: DeSilver, Drew. “5 Facts about Social Security.” Pew Research Center, 18 Aug. 2015, www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/18/5-facts-about-social-security/. Vernon, Steve. “Will Social Security Run out of Money?” CBS News, CBS Interactive, 4 Nov. 2013, www.cbsnews.com/news/will-social-security-run-out-of-money/. Vernon, Steve. “The Real Reason behind Social Security's Problems.” CBS News, CBS Interactive, 6 Nov. 2013, www.cbsnews.com/news/the-real-reason-behind-social-securitys-problems/.
To understand how privatizing social security will help the social security program in the future, first it is important to know what it is and what it does. How social security works now is that everybody that gets benefits from the social security program all get them from one big pot, so to speak. By privatizing the different accounts, they can earn interest faster and make more money for the consumer on an individual basis. This can work better to because the accounts are individualized and earn the right amount of money for the different financial situation that the person is in. This will be a big change for the way that social security is run, but it is for the better and it will help lots of older Americans and the social security program in general for years to come.
Social security was designed to assist constituents during financial hardship. The program insured non-Negroes who needed unemployment compensation, met retirement age requirements, or child welfare prevention programs. Despite its forward objective, critics’ perception of the social security program was depicted as legal thievery. M.A.’s candid retort to the government’s evasive program was simply to rape the pocket’s of the people. M.A. as well as others primarily prepared for retirement or a rainy day from stock returns. Contrarily, the social security program stimulated other economic restructures, which included limited full-time workers. The shift in the economy and Roosevelt’s failed promises created a wedge between the people and the government. For instance, Mrs. OM voices her views of President Roosevelt’s campaign as a misleading trick. She further explained
pros and cons. The pros would be that the people who really needed social security would be receiving it, and it would also be able to fulfill it’s initial purpose, which was to act as a safety net for retirees. One of the cons would be having to determine the amount of income that would qualify as a high-class income.
PROS: The proponents of privatization of social security stated, “Workers should have the freedom to control their own retirement investments, that private accounts will give retirees higher returns than the current system can offer, and that privatization may help to restore the system 's solvency.”
When we hear about social security we think of that number every adult and college teen should memorize as they venture on the real world. We don’t think any more of it and most people don’t know about the benefits of such a number and having one. Some migrants from other countries dream of being in America and having a social security so that they may reap the benefits of having such a number and becoming a US citizen, while most every day people just assume it’s a number. What social security is would be a program created back in 1935 and it was used to provide old age, disability, and survivors insurance and on top of that, a supplemental security income which is a income for the elderly and/or disabled people of these United States. Now lets say we privatize all that and therefore do what we did with healthcare, of course their will be good outcomes of doing such a move but where this is good, there will always be bad no matter how good something turns out to be. The stock market, pride, government, all of these are several factors that can be towards privatization of social security but also can be bad things about it as well. Without the government we lose order, with the government we have less freedom, with the stock market people could win, without the stock market (when it crashes) people lose, yin and yang, pro and con one cannot exist with out the other.
Social Security is a system that was set up in 1935 after the Great depression to help people get through tough times. "Social Security is now used by nearly 44 million Americans"(policy.com). Only people who payed into social security are eligible to collect when they retire. Many people think that they receive the money they pay in but that is not total true. The money that you pay in is used for the people that are receiving it now. "In 1950 there were 16 workers for every beneficiary; today there are only three workers per beneficiary"(policy.com). There is more money going into social security then coming out now. The extra money goes into a trust to be used when it is needed. By the year 2032 those numbers are going to drop. By this time most baby boomers will be retired and collecting social security. This will put a big strain on the funds. There will be more money going out then coming in. And it will not take long to use all the money that is in the trust. By the year 2034 they will only be able to pay 75 percent of the beneficiaries. "The projected average monthly Social Security benefit in 2032 of about 1,100 (in 1998 dollars) would fall to about $800, and would drop further in later years. Average benefits for low-wage earners would drop from $670 to $480"(www.ssab). Theses cut would effect the people just starting to receive benefits and those who are already receiving benefits. And with each year these benefits will decrease. As these benefits continue to decrease "the percentage of aged people living in poverty would rise"(www.ssab).Most people believe this is happening because of the baby boomers generation. There will be more people taking from social security then giving in. By the time my generation is eliable to receive social security there may not be any money to give.
Today, the future of Social Security is in the news again. The reason Social Security is of such concern is that the extremely large group of citizens born in the post-World War II period—the much-discussed baby-boom generation—is retiring. The generation that will take its place in the workforce is far smaller in proportion to the number of retirees, raising fears about the sustainability of Social Security. In the past, proposed solutions to the various problems facing Social Security aroused great debate. Each time, however, the arguments were stilled, repairs were made, and the system continued to fulfill its mandate. That uncertainty about the future has resulted in suggestions for change that range from minor adjustments to complete privatization of the ...
Medicare was designed as a universal healthcare program for individuals 65 years old and older. This program is funded by Medicare taxes and general federal funding withholding taxes. Medicare is a partnership between federal and state with the goal to provide medical insurance to the elderly that is poor and disabled. Generally all people who are 65 years or older and qualify for social security will automatically qualify for Medicare.
Social Security is on the verge of taking care of the baby boomers generation. This means that it will be paying more benefits than taxes it receives. In lay-man’s terms it means it will be spending more money than it is making. I think that you should pay into your own private retirement account for you to reap the benefits in the future. Not for you to pay into a cluster of workers money for current elders to benefit from. You need to take care of your own future and not rely on other people’s responsibility. “…people began to think retirement funding as a right…and so…started saving less” (Klay & Steen). That being said, people of a certain age should be “grandfathered” into this meaning, people of the age of say 40, still get the normal social security retirement money but anyone younger must start abiding this new reform. If you get married, keep paying into your own unless your spouse is not working. If that is the case then pay the same amount BUT put half into your own and half into your spouses. If the other spouse is working however, they should pay into their own account and you into your own.
Unlike social security, people invest in their own retirement. People are able, when negotiating a contract, to decide how much they would like to put towards their retirement. One may decide how much of their salary will go into their retirement (How Does a 401(k) Plan Work?). Having a parent who participates in a 401(k) plan, I can personally vouch for the program. As stated earlier, it allows the worker to choose how much they would like to go into their retirement. They are also able to withdraw a portion of it even before they hit the retirement age. It allows people to have more financial control over their
There is much-heated debate on the issues of Social Security today. The Social Security system is the largest government program of income distribution in the United States. People are concerned that they won't see a dime of what they worked so hard to contribute into the Social Security system for so many years. Social Security provides benefits to about forty-three million Americans. Not only to retired workers, but also to their spouses and dependents of the workers who die prematurely. It also provides benefits to disabled workers and their dependents. Social Security appears to most people like a simple retirement saving’s account. After all, you generally contribute through payroll deductions, then get money back after you retire. Nonetheless, Social Security is a complex and intricate communal program. By design, Social Security involves massive subsidies from the next generation of retirees to the present, from single workers to married couples. Now that the gigantic post World War II baby boomers generation approaches retirement age, there is concern about the consequences it will have on Social Security. There are basically three options, we can do nothing and allow Social Security to run it’s course, revise Social Security, or consider privatization of the system.
Medicare is a national social insurance program, run by the U.S. federal government since 1966 that promises health insurance for Americans aged 65 and older and younger people with disabilities. Being the nation’s single largest health insurance program, covering a large population for a wide range of health services, Medicare's funding is a fundamental part of it sustainability. Medicare is comprised of several different parts, serving different purposes, some of which require separate funding. In general, people at the age of 65 and older who have been legal residents of the United States for at least 5 years are eligible for Medicare. Same is true with people that have disabilities under 65, if they receive Social Security Disability Insurance benefits. Medicare involves four parts: Part A is hospital insurance. Part B is additional medical insurance, that Part A doesn't cover. Part C health plans, also mostly known as Medicare Advantage, are another way for original Medicare beneficiaries to receive their Part A, B and D benefits. Medicare Part D covers many prescription drugs, some of which are covered by Part B. Medicare is a major operation, not only needing adequate administering but the necessary allocated funds to keep this massive system afloat.
Currently, voters may be unenthusiastic to accept tax increases to fund social long term care insurance program. Moreover, private long term care insurance is only able to serve a small fraction of the aging population because of the cost. However, the government funded long term care insurance program can relieve pressure on family caregivers, improve the quality of life for some elderly, and put in place a framework for addressing the nation’s severe demographic challenges.
Social problem is a broad topic, there is “No conclusive idea of what constitutes a social problem.” To define a social problem, there are generally three different ideas to define a social problem, “Something that impacts a large group; Something that the people in a society collective agree it is problematic; Something that violates a moral code.” (Logan) Healthcare has been on the spot light, because of The American Health Care Act. I’d like to present health care in United States as a social problem, because it qualify the three ideas to define social problem. First of all, it impacts a large group in the society, because of its cost. According to CDC, “28.2 million people who are under age of sixty five are insured” (CDC). Second, people in a society collective
...leads some economic problems. The population will continue growing and will peak in 2030 and start to decrease in 2050.