Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime prevention approaches
How social deprivation relates to crime
Media public perception on crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crime prevention approaches
Social process theories presuppose that everyone has the potential and the capacity to engage in criminal behavior. These theories share the same view of human nature as the classical theorists on the bases that man is basically evil. Rather than asking what makes individuals criminals, social theories seek to explain why most individuals follow the rules or law as well as why few commit delinquent or criminal behaviors. Social process or learning theory says that all behavior is learned in much the same way and that crime is also learned. It places emphasis on the roles of communication and socialization in the acquisition of learned patterns of criminal behavior and the values supporting that behavior (Schmalleger, 2012, p. 178). Edwin Sutherland’s …show more content…
So according to Sutherland, deviant and criminal behavior is learned in an association with intimate others through interaction, not by just watching it on television or being passive but by being involved. A more hands on approach, being involved in the action with others and communicating two things (Schmalleger, 2012, p. 178). The technique or how to do it and the definition, the attitude that is needed to support delinquency, the why. The content of differential association or patterns presented in association would differ from individual to individual. Differential association was accepted in the 20th century theorists because it combined some psychological principles with sociological principles onto what was perceived as a coherent perspective on criminality. Other principles includes, the specific direction of motives, may vary in frequency, duration, priority and …show more content…
186). Labeling theory is also known as the social reaction theory and its concepts are tagging, labeling, outsider’s primary and secondary deviance, shaming and stigmatic. Everyone at some point has experienced some form of labeling and the powers labeling, some labels are empowering and some can be demeaning. We as individuals are labeled politically, geographically, even on a more personal labeling such as hair color. Unfortunately some are negative in nature and can be carried with a person that create long term consequences. For example offenders are called convicts, ex-cons which can limit them in many areas, such as friends, jobs and even places to live. People tend to react to labels more than they do the person in question. If society tags or label offenders than it gives a sense that rehabilitation is not an option for them and that it creates recidivism (Gay, 2017). The last social process theory is dramaturgical perspective, it depicts that human behavior is centered on the purposeful management of impressions and seeks explanatory powers in the analysis of social performance. The concepts are total institutions, impression management, back and front regions, performance, stigma and spoiled identity.
Differential association theory was founded by Edwin H. Sutherland (Lilly, 2012, p. 43). This theory states that “any person will inevitably come into contact with definitions favorable to violation of the law and with definitions unfavorable to violation of the law” (Lilly, 2012, p. 44). Whichever definition is more prominent in a person’s mind, will lead to their decision of “whether the person embraces crime as an acceptable way of life” (Lilly, 2012, p. 44). Sutherland composed nine propositions that explained the theory. He explained that “crime is learned through the process of differential association” (Lilly, 2012, p. 45). The nine propositions explained that “criminal behavior is learned” (Lilly, 2012, p. 45). He explained that by communicating with others, especially those that are close to them they are more likely to pick up behaviors from those people. Differential association theory also explains that learning criminal behaviors “involves all the mechanisms that are involved in any other learning” (Lilly, 2012, p. 45). While learning a criminal behavior one not only learns “the techniques of committing the crime” but also the “specific direction of motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes” involved with crime (Lilly, 2012, p. 45). This is theory is shown throughout the book when the young Mr. Moore was influenced by the life of crime that was present in his
First and foremost, the theory states that criminal behavior is learned, meaning that the behaviors of an individual are influenced and shaped by those they associate with (Clinard & Meier, 2015). The primary reference point here is the nuclear family. Parents teach their children how to walk and talk, who grow up with siblings or in some cases, elderly relatives. With good reason, it is widely held that these interactions create the foundation of the individual’s conception of societal norms and values. That being said, if the individual is capable of assessing proper behavior in society, they are also capable of learning what is considered
Differential association theory best explains the burglary deviance. There are many principles associated with this type of learning theory. Edwin Sutherland’s theory discusses how crime is a learned behavior where one’s family, peers, and environment are of great influence. Differential association theory seeks to prove that criminal behavior is learned and this paper will evaluate the connection between the two.
Social learning theory was first developed by Robert L. Burgess and Ronald L Akers in 1966 (Social Learning theory, 2016). In 1973, Akers wrote a book entitled Deviant Behaviour: A Social Learning Approach, which discussed Aker’s conception of the social learning theory. He developed social learning theory by extending Sutherland’s theory of differential association (Cochran & Sellers, 2017). Social learning theory is based on the principles of Pavlov’s operant and classical conditioning. Akers believes that crime is like any other social behavior because it is learned through social interaction (Social Learning theory, 2016). Social learning theory states that the probability of an individual committing a crime or engaging in criminal behaviour is increased when they differentially associate with others who commit criminal behavior (Cochran & Sellers, 2017). Social learning theory is classified as a general theory of crime, and has been used to explain many types of criminal behaviour (Social Learning theory, 2016). Furthermore, social learning theory is one of the most tested contemporary theories of crime. There are four fundamental components of social learning theory; differential association, definitions, differential reinforcement and imitation (Social Learning theory,
Secondly, differential association varies based on the intensity, duration, frequency, priority, and timing of one’s process of learning. Through this notion, the individual’s self is disregarded and more emphasis is placed on the extrinsic factors. Furthermore, “it is an individual’s experiences and the ways in which the individual defines those experiences which constitute to the learning of criminality”. (Gongenvare & Dotter, 2007,
High crime rates are an ongoing issue through the United States, however the motivation and the cause of crime has yet to be entirely identified. Ronald Akers would say that criminality is a behavior that is learned based on what an individual sees and observes others doing. When an individual commits a crime, he or she is acting on impulse based on actions that they have seen others engage in. Initially during childhood, individuals learn actions and behavior by watching and listening to others, and out of impulse they mimic the behavior that is observed. Theorist Ronald Akers extended Sutherland’s differential association theory with a modern viewpoint known as the social learning theory. The social learning theory states that individuals commit crime through their association with or exposure to others. According to Akers, people learn how to be offenders based on their observations around them and their association with peers. Theorist Akers states that for one, “people can become involved in crime through imitation—that is by modeling criminal conduct. Second, and most significant, Akers contended that definition and imitation are most instrumental in determining initial forays into crime” (Lilly, Cullen, and Ball 2011:57). Although Akers’ theory has been linked to juvenile delinquency in the past, it has also been tested as a possible cause of crime overall. Individuals learn from observation that criminal behavior is justifiable in certain circumstances. In connection with juvenile delinquency and crime, peers and intimate groups have the most effect on individuals when associated with criminal behavior. One is more likely to mimic the behavior of someone who they have close ties with, whether the behavior is justifiable or...
What are theories of crime? Why are they important? In this paper, will discuss two crime theories. Social learning theory and the labeling theory. We will compare both crime theories. It will also explain how these theories are related to specific crimes. The two theories discussed will also explain the policy implications. Finally, we will address what types of programs can be created to mitigate specific crimes related to the causation theories.
Labelling theory was suggested by Edwin Lemert (1912- 1996) in 1951 and it was then developed by Howard Becker (b.1928) in 1963. This theory is related to the Social Action perspective. The labelling procedure includes deviancy and crime, certain acts are criminal because they have been labelled in that way, these labels are created by the powerful in society, such as the government. Frank Tannenbaum (1893- 1969) stated the self-fulfilling prophecy could occur when somebody is labelled as a 'criminal'. Self-fulfilling prophecy is when a prediction of something which then becomes a fact. If you have the label of 'delinquency' or 'crime' then the individual may find it difficult to get a job therefore earning less money which could result in them returning to crime. People in society will expect 'criminals' to behave in a certain way. The people with this label may find it challenging to fit into society. Moral panics is a definition which is given when a group of people become known as a threat to societies beliefs.
The theoretical study of societal reaction to deviance has been carried out under different names, such as, labelling theory, interactionist perspective, and the social constructionist perspective. In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy. As a matter of fact, both phrases point equally to the fact that sociological explanations of deviance function as a product of social control rather than a product of psychology or genetic inheritance. Some sociologists would explain deviance by accepting without question definitions of deviance and concerning themselves with primary aetiology. However, labelling theorists stress the point of seeing deviance from the viewpoint of the deviant individual. They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is ascribed deviant behaviour patterns, it is as much, if not more, to do with the way they have been stigmatized, then the deviant act they are said to have committed. In addition, Howard S. Becker (1963), one of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, "social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". Furthermore, the labelling theoretical approach to deviance concentrates on the social reaction to deviance committed by individuals, as well as, the interaction processes leading up to the labelling.
In the end, the Social Process Theory shows a relationship of deviant behavior and how this behavior is learned. It also shows how people react to social norms in a community. Then people are labeled and respond to those labels if they cannot rise above them.
Labeling Theory of Crime and Criminal Behavior Crime and criminal behavior has always been an issue of discussion in society. In the study into crime and criminal behavior that seems to come with many open questions. It is with open questions such as, why does crime happen and what causes criminal behavior in individuals of society that forms many answers and reasons into crime and criminal behavior, but are the answers logical and scientifically proven? Labeling theory are one of the means into understanding crime and criminal behavior through the study and analysis of self-identity and behavior of individuals.
Labelling theory outlines the sociological approach towards labelling within societies and in the development of crime and deviance (Gunnar Bernburg, and D. Krohn et al., 2014, pp. 69-71). The theory purposes that, when an individual is given a negative label (that is deviant), then the individual pursues their new (deviant) label / identity and acts in a manner that is expected from him/her with his/ her new label (Asencio and Burke, 2011, pp. 163-182).
A main perspective that is made by social constructionists in relation to crimes and other forms of difference, like mental illness, is that people are the ones that create the rules leading to the creation of rule breakers as a result of society telling them they are so—coincides with Becker’s (1963) labelling theory. Two known distinctions of social constructionism is weak and strong construction. Weak social construction uses “descriptive terms and classificatory schemas” to determine between brut facts within their social realities i.e. differences between male and female. Strong social construction believe in no brut facts that create social constructs and do not make the
The differential association theory was presented by Edwin H. Sutherland in 1939 who was a criminologist. The idea of the theory is that people learn criminal behavior by interactions with other human beings. Sutherland also said
Sutherland’s differential association theory states, “crime results from those whose role models are criminals and thus who associate with people whose behavior is different or abnormal” about deviant behavior and criminality. Sutherland also explains socialization with other members of groups can cause deviant behavior if the group is breaking the law or showing behavior out of the norm of social culture. Sutherland’s differential association theory is important because he presented this theory that caused the social structural and environmental factors that played a huge factor in understanding deviant behavior and criminality. He is known as the father of positivistic criminology and changed the minds of criminology, who believed that psychological and biological factors caused the deviant behavior. This theory is important because it is very straightforward and to the point.