Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social norms project paper
Social norms project paper
Society social norms
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social norms project paper
Alina Lau
Professor Morra
October 15, 2015
Midterm Exam
Essay 1: There are several things that hold a society together otherwise known as norms, sanctions, status, roles, culture and subculture. Society is a self contained and organized group of people who interact under shared political authority within a well defined geographic area.
There are many types of norms in a society that do not essentially reflect society, but also as individuals. Certain behavior etiquette, mannerisms, and behavioral norms have a big influence on our personal social life as well. Society teaches us as a whole how we should act, and then individuals will teach us what behavior they expect from us in exchange. Being educated on what is socially acceptable will
…show more content…
If rules and expectations are not in effect, there would be commotion, whether talking about traffic problems or something serious like criminal issues. Most societies are unchanging, because the people act normal and do what they should be doing. If they do not follow rules and laws, society would not function. There would be no government prosecutions and money would not be valuable because norms would be broken. Theft would be considered adequate and eventually taxes would not be required. Governments would stop working and there would be no community, no structure and no educational system. This would cause trouble and panic. Societal norms are important to the country’s growth and to its citizens. It is to keep everyone safe and to keep the country stable and to have social …show more content…
It is the rewards or punishments used to enforce norms and to keep people in place. When breaking a sanction, consequences will apply. There are negative and positive sanctions. The negative sanctions are penalties for your conduct regarding a social norm. Sanctions are what happen when people are found to be violating a culture’s shared norms. Such penalties include fines, threats, imprisonment, and stares of contempt. Contrary to that, positive sanctions are rewards for conforming to a social norm. Rewards for being found of conforming to a social norm may include a pay raise, a promotion, a medal or an award and words of praise. The correlation between sanctions and norms are shown in the following examples. For example, you have an interview at one of the biggest financial companies and you show up in a dirty shirt and jeans. The sanction would be you do not get the job and you will be frowned upon. Another example would be you did not put money in your parking meter; the sanction would be you get a parking ticket and have to pay a fine. In general, the more serious the norm, the stricter the penalty is for its violation. There are three types of sanctions such as conscience, ridicule and
Overall, intermediate sanctions have pros and cons as opposed to the method of incarceration. Benefits that are present tend to correlate with the idea of helping both the offender and society, the ability to let an offender still be punished but not to the extent of being too harsh such as imprisonment, and the ability to not overcrowd jails and to focus on more severe cases. Now referring to the negative side of things, intermediate sanctions are very uncertain when it comes to the ethicacy and philosophy behind these
punishment is an asset to society: it is the only punishment that fits the crime, it deters potential criminals
Society has long since operated on a system of reward and punishment. That is, when good deeds are done or a person behaves in a desired way they SP are rewarded, or conversely punished when behaviour does not meet the societal norms. Those who defy these norms and commit crime are often punished by organized governmental justice systems through the use of penitentiaries, where prisoners carry out their sentences. The main goals of sentencing include deterrence, safety of the public, retribution, rehabilitation, punishment and respect for the law (Government of Canada, 2013). However, the type of justice system in place within a state or country greatly influences the aims and mandates of prisons and in turn targets different aspects of sentencing goals. Justice systems commonly focus on either rehabilitative or retributive measures.
Socialization occurs within this perspective, individuals learn the rules of a group, as this theory highlights all members of society has a role to play. Social class is not an issue with this theory although value and ethic’s consensus is essential for effective functioning within society.
While breaking the three social norms there was one feeling that I felt was mutual throughout. Breaking those norms made me felt extremely out of place and rude. They made me feel that way because I knew what I was doing wasn 't socially right and people would get mad or be rude to me with their reactions. For the most part throughout my experiment, most people reacted the way I thought they would. You could tell that most people felt awkward or uncomfortable while I was breaking the norm. I faced a couple of difficulties through my assignment when it came to violating the social norms. While trying to break the movie theater norm, it was difficult for me to pick movies with different variety of people and movies that were a little older so less people would be attending them. I also had a little trouble when it came to answering the phone and waiting for the other person to talk first. The problem with this one was that I had to wait for people to actually call me which doesn 't happen that often in this day and age anymore. To conclude, these social norms forced people to be in uncomfortable situations and make a decision as to how they would react to
There are several types of punishment that can be inflicted upon an offender including, fines, community sanctions and imprisonment (The Judicial Conference of Australia, 2007). Punishment is described as a sanction which inflicts a certain amount of pain and loss on the offender, used for payback and deter (The Judicial Conference of Australia, 2007; Carlsmith, Darley, & Robinson, 2002). There are three ways society justifies punishing offenders, through the
Social norms are the implicit or explicit rules a group has for the acceptable behaviors, values, and beliefs of its members. Implicit social norms are introduced to us at a very early age, and exert a powerful influence on our behavior into adulthood. Our culture is ruled by social norms. In many situations, people 's perception of these norms have a big influence on their behavior. Implicit social norms are not openly stated, but found out when disobeyed. Implicit rules are rules we conform to as a society, and generally these rules make living together more comfortable. Social norms are important because they define the nature of a group, clarify relationships among members, and express values. They are also important because they create cohesion within the society, and members of that society are very aware when such norms are violated. Social norms are often strictly enforced and offenders are often disliked for their conduct. Also, some norms are more strictly held to in certain situations than in
If the citizens in a society do not obey the law, anarchy will ensue. Anarchy is a lack of government, a state of total political disorder and lawlessness due to the absence or incapability of a supreme power. Military rule in Indonesia and authoritarian rule in Singapore and Malaysia have led to a persuaded efficiency that was later torn apart by stress. The system broke down in social chaos, riots, and civil disorder that did not lead to fairnesss or justice. The same fate is probable for the United States, if every individual tossed aside the importance of the law. A law is an important system of rules established to maintain order and function of the state. Without the effectiveness of laws, society as we know it would crumble.
They are still being punished while giving back to the community and being rehabilitated or treated. Although alternative sanctions seem to have more freedom, offenders are still restricted on what they can do and on their choices. The offender and other possible offenders are deterred from committing a crime because they are still being punished through these sanctions and sometimes have to do more physical work as punishment (Travis III 2012). Offenders are still incapacitated in the sense that they are still being controlled by an authority, although in some sanctions more than others. The offenders still must obey their terms of their punishment and still lack choice in the matter. Alternative sanctions offer more rehabilitation and treatment services, than if the offender were incarcerated (Travis III 2012). They can work to pay back their community and better themselves by changing their perspective on committing a crime. There is still a stigma associated with alternative sanctions, however the purpose of alternative sanctions is to make a positive change on the offender, rather than with incarceration where the punishment is more of a payback for the crime they committed (Travis III
There have been many research studies conducted in the past to measure punitiveness. Through public, professionals and students, different methods have been used and there are varieties of definition of such. Punitiveness is an adjective that comes from the word “punitive” which means “inflicting punishment” or “intended to punish someone or something” (Falco, 2008). As what Courtney and Mackey (2004), defines punitivenes, as “an attitude toward sanctioning and punishment that includes retribution, incapacitation, and lack of concern for rehabilitation”. Meaning, those people who support for the purpose of retribution, deterrence and incapacitation are more punitive than those who believe that the primary goal of punishment is restoration
However if people did not conform to the norms/values that society thrusts upon them, and there were many deviants, this would surely result in anarchy. But so it is, people do conform, and surely enough society roles on as, as both functionalist and Marxists agree " society is more important than the individuals within it"(12)
Provide the justifications for punishment in modern society. Punishment functions as a form of social control and is geared towards “imposing some unwanted burden such as fines, probations, imprisonment, or even death” on a convicted person in return for the crimes they committed (Stohr, Walsh, & Hemmens, 2013, p.6). There are four main justifications for punishment and they are: retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation. There is also said to be a fifth justification of reintegration as well.
The use of punishment as a threat to prevent people from committing crimes is knows as deterrence. Deterrence also has a role to make the person or persons feel afraid or anxious. It rests on the theory that it is feasible to deter the rest of society from lousy conduct by arresting and chastising those as the example to others, even if th...
According to David Garland, punishment is a legal process where violators of the criminal law are condemned and sanctioned with specified legal categories and procedures (Garland, 1990). There are different forms and types of punishment administered for various reasons and can either be a temporary or lifelong type of punishment. Punishment can be originated as a cause from parents or teachers with misbehaving children, in the workplace or from the judicial system in which crimes are committed against the law. The main aim of punishment is to demonstrate to the public, the victim and the offender that justice is to be done, to reduce criminal activities and to deter people from wanting to commit any form of crime against the law. In other words it is a tool used to eliminate the bad in society or to deter people from committing criminal activities.
...ccur more often. Punishment is the delivery of a consequence that decreases the likelihood that a response will occur. It is defined as the exact opposite of reinforcers and they are made to weaken or get rid of a response rather to increase it. Punishment can work by applying an unpleasant stimulus after a response.