Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction essay on corporate social responsibility in business
The impact of social media on business performance in the 21st century
Nature and concept of corporate social responsibility
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Business ethics revolves around the importance of relationships between an individual and a business. The field of business ethics is very complicated because of the vast amounts of industries. The relationship between employee and employer is important in the success of a business. Unethical business behaviors can damage a business’ reputation and lose trust in an industry. Corporate and social responsibilities are the blueprint of a profitable business. Businesses that do not practice ethical behavior can affect people outside the business as well. Stakeholders can lose millions of dollars in stock because of unethical behavior inside a company. The social responsibility in this case is between the employees of our company and society. Joseph …show more content…
There are social and ethical issues surrounding social media. Our company is dealing with an issue resulting from interaction on the internet. All individuals are responsible for what they post on the internet. Everybody will disagree when it comes to beliefs and practices. The freedom of expression under the First Amendment includes the freedom to hold opinions without interference. Mr. Epstein, a professor at the University of Chicago and New York University describes how the debate on free speech has drastically changed. Mr. Epstein was quoted saying “Everybody offends everybody a large fraction of the time. So, if I am insulting to you because you’re a progressive and you’re insulting to me because I’m a conservative, and if we allow both people to sue, then neither can talk” (Varadarajan). Epstein is explaining the nature of our country at this moment. No matter what, somebody else is going to disagree with your beliefs and try to become vulgar towards you. As the Chief Executive Officer of a highly visible privately- owned television company it is my job to address my employees on the professional way to use social media. Employees must know that the political matters that they address publicly will be disagreed upon by our customers. Some of our customers will use our employees’ beliefs as a reason to stop using our television company. We must implement a policy that uses a moral framework based on Joseph …show more content…
The question on character focuses on values and the character of the company. Putting our employees first is the main priority. The employees are the ones who are seen on television. I am placing a policy that does not affect the company in a bad way without taking away individual’s rights. Implementing a social media policy is fair and shows a successful business. Our company’s values correlate with the professional social media accounts that employees will own. Stakeholders are the reason that a company is successful. We do not want any post on social media to negatively affect our company in the eyes of shareholders. The last question has to do with what will work in the world as it is. Badaracco explains this is as, “what will work if you bring initiative and imagination and creativity, willingness to shake the tree, and the willingness to take the prudent risks to the party” (Badaracco). The fourth question deals with what managers or leaders must do to ensure survival. The topic of taking away someone’s social media rights cannot be taken lightly. Ethically, we are turning a problem into a positive outlook on our company. Badaracco explained that “you can become paralyzed if you only think about rights” (Badaracco). He is saying that if you only think about rights in the leader’s perspective, you will not succeed. Badaracco hinted
This source supplies my paper with more evidence of how freedom of speech is in a dangerous place. American has always stood by freedom of speech, and to see how social media platforms try to manipulate and take off as the choose to increase slight bias is unpleasant. The article establishes a worry to the fellow readers that hold freedom of speech so high and that it is at risk. The article manages to explain why freedom of speech is in danger, and why there should be no limits to free speech.
From the opening sentence of the essay, “We are free to be you, me, stupid, and dead”, Roger Rosenblatt hones in on a very potent and controversial topic. He notes the fundamental truth that although humans will regularly shield themselves with the omnipresent First Amendment, seldom do we enjoy having the privilege we so readily abuse be used against us. Freedom of speech has been a controversial issue throughout the world. Our ability to say whatever we want is very important to us as individuals and communities. Although freedom of speech and expression may sometimes be offensive to other people, it is still everyone’s right to express his/her opinion under the American constitution which states that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press”.
But the new landscape of ideas and their control leaves many people queasy and uneasy about media, morality, and responsibility. If censorship is wrong and impossible, how then to address the issue of people and companies that use media irresponsibly?
No other democratic society in the world permits personal freedoms to the degree of the United States of America. Within the last sixty years, American courts, especially the Supreme Court, have developed a set of legal doctrines that thoroughly protect all forms of the freedom of expression. When it comes to evaluating the degree to which we take advantage of the opportunity to express our opinions, some members of society may be guilty of violating the bounds of the First Amendment by publicly offending others through obscenity or racism. Americans have developed a distinct disposition toward the freedom of expression throughout history.
A social media post that creates negativity as well as a civil issue for both the individual and the fire and emergency service can occur through intentional malice or occur accidently. “It is rare for firefighters to post in malice but it does happen” (Roberts, 2012, para. 3). Timothy Dluhos, a FDNY Emergency Medical Service Lieutenant, is facing legal action along with the department, due to a social media post ranting about a patient and posting a photo of the patient in a wheel chair with a wide load sign photo shopped into the photo (Saul, 2013). While it is unclear if FDNY has a policy on social media postings, the woman is seeking damages from emotional suffering and Lieutenant Dluhos has since resigned from his position with FDNY (Saul, 2013). Many argue that the use and posting on social media is his or her constitutional right, however the first amendment of the United States Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or a...
Ethics in business is a highly important concept, as it can affect a company’s profits, salaries paid to employees and CEOs, and public opinion, among many other aspects of a business. Ethics can be enforced by company policies and guidelines, set a precedent when a company is faced with an important decision, and are also evolving thanks to new technology and situations that arise due to technology usage. Businesses have a duty to maintain their ethical responsibilities and also to help their employees enforce these responsibilities in and out of the workplace. However, ethics and the foundation for them are not always black and white. There are many different ethical theories, however Utilitarianism, Kant’s Deontological ethics, and Virtue ethics are three of the most well known theories in existence. Each theory is distinct in that it has a different quality used to determine ethicality and allows for a person to choose which system of ethics works best with both the situation and his or her personal ethical preferences.
Ethical behavior is behavior that a person considers to be appropriate. A person’s moral principals are shaped from birth, and developed overtime throughout the person’s life. There are many factors that can influence what a person believes whats is right, or what is wrong. Some factors are a person’s family, religious beliefs, culture, and experiences. In business it is of great importance for an employee to understand how to act ethically to prevent a company from being sued, and receiving criticism from the public while bringing in profits for the company. (Mallor, Barnes, Bowers, & Langvardt, 2010) Business ethics is when ethical behavior is applied in an business environment, or by a business. There are many situations that can arise in which a person is experiencing an ethical dilemma. They have to choose between standing by their own personal ethical standards or to comply with their companies ethical standards. In some instances some have to choose whether to serve their own personal interests, or the interest of the company. In this essay I will be examining the financial events surrounding Bernie Madoff, and the events surrounding Enron.
On September 11th, 2017, ESPN commentator Jemele Hill tweeted “Donald Trump is a White Supremacist who has largely surrounded himself w/ other white supremacists.” Because of the tweet’s polarizing nature, it caused controversy nationwide. Margaret Hill of The Washington Post defends the tweets legitimacy and ESPN’s decision to keep Hill as a commentator. Jemele Hill’s tweet made questions regarding free speech and constitutionality naturally arise. The United States provides the right to free speech barring obscenity, slander, or clear and imminent danger, but corporations are not held to this same standard.
Business ethics simply can be defined as the application of business values in the business practice of a company (Seawell 2010, p. 2). For a multinational company, business ethics is one of the critical aspects need to be taken into account in business decision-making processes. Failure to give attention on ethics may bring consequences on company’s reputation (Meyer & Jebe 2010, p. 159). The company is expected not only to pursue its own profits but also contributing to the environmental and social welfare of the community where it operates (Svensson & Wood 2008, p. 308).
Many ethical dilemmas are philosophical in nature, an ethical issue can be described as a problem with no clear resolution. In order to solve the issue or dilemma a consensus between the parties involved must be reached. There are several reasons to come to an agreement over an ethical dilemma, it is the basis for all aspects of personal and professional dealings. Each one of us is part of a civilized society and as such it is our responsibility to be rational, honest and loyal in our dealings with others. (Alakavuklar, 2012) states that individuals make decisions for different situations in business life involving various ethical dilemmas. Each time either consciously or unconsciously individuals may follow some ethical approaches
A new age has developed and society is altering to adapt to new forms of technological communication. Through the use of the vast Internet through the use of social networking, image boards, blog sites and news media, society is altering in a way never seen before. Over the past couple of decades, the use of the Internet has expanded and grown exponentially as new technology develops. Since the introduction of social networking as well as alternative news media sites, the way people interact and communicate has altered. New ideas and discussions have been created. With all of this freedom granted with easy access, society might take advantage of the ability to speak freely as an anonymous source. The personal obsession with imagery is lost because the users of the Internet are judging based on a screen name and nothing more. The ability to have an alternate persona allows users a freedom of speech and thought never granted before and can be erased and created with only a few clicks. We see that true opinion and reasoning among society varies on the anonymity of the commenter, where as one is more likely to be more holistic and honest if their imagery isn’t entirely threatened by the judgment of their peers, but because of many networking sites, individualism is lost; specifically, society’s lack of expression of true free thought and in reality because of social constraints.
Ethics are the driving force behind good business. Every ethical choice made by a professional can and will have a much different outcome than any unethical choice. Bad ethics can ruin many aspects of a business and as (Gaye-Anderson, 2007) states how quite easily the lives and professional reputation of the employees can even be severally damaged (para. 3). Everything from morale to motivation can be severely affected by poor ethical choices. Customers will take their business elsewhere. Employees will abandon ship. Other, competing businesses reap the benefits of the bad moral choices. Ultimately, the entire business can be brought down by one poor ethical choice.
In the United States of America, the right to freedom of speech is protected constitutionally. Privacy is a concept which is protected only through laws, and is thus superseded by the constitutional freedom of speech in a court of law (Determann 1-2). The private companies which manufacture smartphones and operate social networks as well as the individuals who use these products and services retain this right, which places their actions over the interests of maintaining the privacy of others who use the technologies. Additionally, while users may look to social media companies such as Facebook to blame for invasions of privacy, it is often other users who are responsible for the breach. Most people are offended by the content uploaded by others, whether it is a picture or a revealing status update, which is not within the control of the company (Determann 2). Social media companies are responsible for enforcing and upholding their terms of service and ensuring that the rights of their users are not being infringed. They cannot violate these rights in the name of protecting
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube, are some of the most prevalent social platforms that most people like to use religiously. But just like anything on the internet, there is controversy that surrounds it, that being censorship on these platforms. Specifically, YouTube! The demonetization of videos has become more frequent on YouTube and has caused creators to lose advertisements at the start of their videos…meaning they get not money. These creators are being censored from expressing their own opinions on their own platform! YouTube has set out certain “advertiser-friendly guidelines [that] are vague and essentially
Many social media sites use actual censors in order to remove content deemed inappropriate (Sandvig 2015, p. 2). This raises important questions about power and power relations on social media, however what is perhaps a less obvious concern is the impact of the algorithms that determines which users see what content. Eli Pariser (2011) introduced the concept of “filter bubbles”, where platforms like Facebook shows only what it is believed the user wants to see. Consequently the user may not be shown anything oppositional or challenging to their world view. Presumably, this filtering is done with the aim of improving user experience in mind, rather than coming from a place of ill intentions, as seeing only what one wants to see should hypothetically create a more pleasant time on a social media platform. However, the filtering becomes especially problematic considering that social media is more and more becoming a primary source of news (Pariser 2011, p. 66 cited in Willson 2013, p. 218). The inextricability of the freedom of press and democracy (Karlekar & Becker 2014, p. 32) demonstrates that it is important for an individual to be privy to a range of perspectives. This matter is further complicated by the matter of user knowledge and consent. Often users are unaware that this filtering is happening, and in