Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender discrimination in today's society
Equal rights for gays
Argumentative essay gay rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender discrimination in today's society
Over the years in our country’s history it has been apparent that the idea of same sex marriages is becoming much more popular, however in most states there is still one thing stopping them. That one thing stopping two people from the pursuit of happiness which they desire is a social injustice. Social injustices are situations where a person or group of people is treated unfairly due to certain factors for example discrimination, prejudice, racism, heterosexism, sexism, and so forth. In the case of same sex marriages, the factor playing a major role in this social injustice is where most people believe that opposite sexes attract, but in the case of a same sex couple wanting to be married, this brings about many topics to be discussed by people, as not everyone thinks the same way. Everyday a same sex couple wants to get married but is either denied their want, or is forced to conform to a civil union. This should not be the case however; people of the same sex should be allowed what every other couple is allowed due to the fact that each and every person has the right to happiness, and the right to marriage despite their sexual orientation.
In order to have same sex marriages be allowed in all states of the United States of America, it would be vital to get a large group of people together that the social injustice was preventing from happiness and bring their stories courts. It would be important for everyone to have their point of view heard, and for the courts to see how many people their social injustice was affecting by not allowing people of the same sex to be married. The first step in making a change in this social injustice would be trying the courts. It has been seen through many events such as the Black Power Mov...
... middle of paper ...
...st for everyone. People will always disagree with things people do, but you cannot deny an individual the right to happiness and a life they deserve just as any other person does. The change would allow happiness for those who want it the most. After all the United States is a place which was started because people wanted a better life, so why deny people a better life, one which they’ll enjoy. Allow same sex marriage, and stop social injustices that continue to form!
Works Cited
Peters, Jeremy W. "Would Gay Marriage Help the State Economy? - NYTimes.com." Metro - City Room Blog - NYTimes.com. Web. 02 May 2011. .
"U.S. Constitution | LII / Legal Information Institute." LII | LII / Legal Information Institute. Web. 03 May 2011. .
Throughout the recent history of America, gay marriage has always been an issue. With the different views and morals everyone has on the subject, it makes it hard for individual states to determine what side they should be on. In 1983 a Harvard Law School student, Evan Wolfson, wrote a thesis stating the rule of marriage equality. Justices concluded that gay couples were entitled to the legal benefits of civil marriage; and most crucially in the Supreme Judicial Court in Massachusetts, whose favorable ruling, in a suit by lawyer Mary Bonauto and the Boston-based Gay and Lesbian Advocated and Defenders, led to the nation’s first bona fide same-sex marriages…” (“Gay Marriage turns 10 and Credit Should Be Spread around- The Boston Globe). On May 17, 2004 Massachusetts became the first state to legalize gay marriages. In June of 2013, California legalized gay marriages, which helped their large LGBT (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered) community. (“History and Timeline of the Freedom…”). When this finally happened, it was seen as a great achievement by Karmala Harris, a California Attorney. “This is a profound day in our country, and its just the right thing: ‘Justice is finally being served’” (“Court Gives OK for California Gay Marriages”).
Abstract On June 26, 2015 a divided Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples could now marry nationwide. At the time of the split ruling there were 9 supreme court justices, 5 of the justices were Republicans, and the remaining 4 were Democrats. In high profile cases it is except that the justices will vote along party lines. When the 5-4 ruling was reveled by the following statement. “It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right (Corn,2015).” written by
After the preamble the second part of the Constitution is the seven articles which describe the elements of the Constitution. One of the articles gives the legislativ...
Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 27, Issue 2 (Fall 2011), pp. 347-360 Volokh, Eugene 27 Const. Comment. 347 (2010-2011)
Story, J. (1987). Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press.
Gunther, G. (1991). Constitutional Law. Twelfth Edition. New York: The Foundation Press, Inc. pp. 1154-1161.
Spaeth, Harold J. and Edward Conrad Smith. The Constitution of the United States, 13th ed. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1991 (paper). ISBN 0064671054.
October 5, 2013 in Cornell Law. CRS/LII Annotated Constitution of the United States. Cornell University Law School, Inc. 2013. The. Web. The Web.
A V Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (10th ed 1964) 40.
Remy, Richard C., Gary E. Clayton, and John J. Patrick. "Supreme Court Cases." Civics Today. Columbus, Ohio: Glencoe, 2008. 796. Print.
Wolf, Richard. “Timeline: Same-Sex marriage through the years.” USA Today, Gannett Satellite Information Network, 26 June 2015,
As of 2015, the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community continues to struggle for equal rights held by their straight counterparts. Socially, LGBT persons are subject to discrimination, hate crimes, and stigma, while legally, LGBT persons encounter obstacles that preclude them from basic rights afforded to every other subculture in America. One of the most divisive issues related to LGBT rights has been same-sex marriage, which has been creating conflict both politically and socially dating back to the 1970’s (Finnis, 1997). Those in favor of same-sex marriage argue that regardless of gender or sexual preference, marriage is a basic right that the government has no legitimate interest in blocking. Opponents argue that same-sex marriage is ethically and morally wrong, and they cite reasons spanning from religious beliefs to the creation of a slippery slope that would lead to the demise of the institution of marriage (Volokh, n.d.). Faced with the difficult task of balancing both sides of the equation, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the policy that will be analyzed in this paper.
Social injustices occur all over the world, so much so that it’s almost second nature to see people undergoing turmoil. The biggest injustice of our era are the murders occurring in the middle east due to personal beliefs by the Taliban and many of the eastern governments. Hundreds of people have been murdered and tortured because they do not follow the Muslim and Islamic religion. America needs to take charge and stop these criminal actions, stop the spread of these acts, and help the people in need (Fariba Nawa 1).
With every generation there is always some kind of injustice that happens. For the 21st generation it is the racial injustices happening around the country, however this paper consists of the injustices within the 19th until today that is happening among women. One of the brave ladies who wanted to fight the female injustices named Simone De Beauvoir stated “a woman is not born, but made” and I do agree with her that a woman is indeed made and not made, however for us to understand this quote we have to define who a woman is and everyone has their own definition. Personally, I define a woman as someone who is strong, independent and not afraid of voicing their opinions. With this definition everyone woman is made depending on what kind of society
...e the Next Gay-Marriage Battlegrounds’, Time.Com, p. 1, Business Source Elite, EBSCOhost, viewed 6 January 2014.