Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of income inequality in us
Social Darwinism in the Gilded Age
Gilded age political economic social
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of income inequality in us
Kailey Durnez History 132 Dr. Liles During the gilded age it was a time when individual freedom and governmental regulations meant differently from those of upper and middle class to working class. The differences these social classes faced were mainly due to the wealthy of the people. Upper and middle class consisted of wealthy doctors and lawyers as the working class consisted of factory workers who could barely put food on the table. The upper and middle class believed in social Darwinism, as the working class had denied social Darwinism. The upper and middle class accepts Social Darwinism theory as it is known for being the evolution of nature, in other words natural selection. With social Darwinism it was known that the weak had to be …show more content…
During the Gilded age it was important for the men from generation to generations to have this power to keep their family powerful. “Especially misguided, in this view were efforts to uplift those from the bottom of the social order, such as laws regulating condition of work or public assistance to the poor” (Voices of Freedom, 32). By the upper and middle class being the top of the social order they feel as if the governmental regulations will try to cater to the poor so they can rise. They feel as if the working class does not work as hard for their money, and they don’t deserve to be brought up on the social order. “We shall thus lesson the inequalities. We shall favor the survival of the unfittest and we shall accomplish this by destroying liberty” (Voices of freedom 35). With this quote it states that with government regulations and the individual freedom they do not combine due to the Social Darwinism they follow. They have the feeling that is this were to continue that there would be no social order and to be able to continue this social class they …show more content…
The working class almost feels the opposite about how the upper and middle class feel such as they agree with have regulations on working wages and other things like that because they are the class that is working hard for their money and doing everything they can to support their family. “Not all Americans adhere to the social Darwinism definition theory of liberty as frank accepted of social inequalities in an unregulated market” (Voice of Freedom, 36). As the upper and middle class accepts Darwinism as being the proper way to run a country it is because they are not they ones to be working in the conditions the working class is and the working class believes that having and “unregulated market” would bring the country not success. “For it is true that laborers ought to have as little as possible of the wealth they produce, South Carolina slaveholders were right and the Massachusetts abolitionists were wrong. Because, when the working classes are denied everything but the barest necessities of life, they have no decent use for liberty” (Voices of Freedom, 37). With the working class being compared to slaves it could be possible to have the advantage that the upper and middle class wants to destroy the use of liberty. But in such… “Resolved, that while the fourth of July was heralded a hundred years ago in the name of liberty, we
The inequalities in America during the gilded age came from an unequal distribution of wealth, leaving only a small percentage of individuals with riches while the rest suffered in poverty even with constant overproduction of everyday necessities. People argued that social darwinism would chose who was meant to be rich and the survival of the fittest would deem who was better than the rest. From 1870-1895, journalists and critics dismantled the inequality during the period and some offer their own solutions.
The Gilded Age was known as the Second Industrial Revolution because there was change in the economy, politics, and society. Most of the change was occurring because of the growth of large companies. The in the 1900s up to the 1920s, the companies started to decrease in power but not all since Henry Ford was being successful because of his automobile company that allowed the people to move more, and think differently depending on their sexuality. Even though Ford was successful, the businesses still didn’t run the people anymore, the people started to control the government more.
The exact period of time in which the Gilded Age occurred is ever-debatable, but most historians can at least agree that it started within the 20 years after the Civil War ended and lasted until the early 1920s. (West) The Gilded Age itself was characterized by the beginnings of corporations and corrupt political machines. Policies such as the General Incorporation Laws allowed business to grow larger more easily, and with less red tape involved. New technology allowed faster and more efficient production, but this explosive growth of industry called for not only more resources, but new business practices and leaders as well. (Moritz 10-12)
5. Perry, Elisabeth Israels, and Karen Manners Smith. The Gilded Age and Progressive Era: a student companion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.
Howard Zinn approach to explaining the gilded age focused more with the financial part. He also gave names and their significance to the era and what they did to make it what is was. I would say Zinn went
The Gilded Age was the last three decades of the nineteenth century, when America’s industrial economy exploded generating opportunities for individuals but also left many workers struggling for survival. With the many immigrants, skilled and unskilled, coming to America the labor system is becoming flooded with new employees. During this period, the immigrants, including the Italians, were unskilled and the skilled workers were usually American-born. There was also a divide in the workers and the robber barons. Robber barons were American capitalist who acquired great fortunes in the last nineteenth century, usually ruthlessly. There was much turmoil throughout the business and labor community. Two major organizations, the Knights of Labor and the American Federation of Labor, helped represent the workers in this time of chaos. The Knights of Labor, founded in 1869, were representing both skilled and unskilled workers. They were quite popular with a large boost in membership becoming the biggest union in 1885. They sought for equal pay and equal work. All were welcomed to the Knights of Labor; there was no discrimination on race, gender, or sex. They called for an eight-hour day in order to reduce fatigue and for safety issues. The Knights of Labor Declaration of Principles states their purpose is to “make industrial and moral worth, not wealth” (Reading 9, p. 1). This means the moral worth is to what they could contribute to society rather than monetary gains. They were working towards this improvement of the common mans life to advance in civilization and create new ideas for society. They also called upon the employer to treat the employee with respect and fairness so they can contribute to not only their company but to Amer...
The life of an immigrant in the United States during the Gilded Age was a rough life. During this time period the U.S. went through a dramatic change in dealing with changing infrastructure and masses of people coming over from different countries for a chance at a better life. This time period was characterized by small wage jobs, poor working conditions and the struggle to survive. The Jungle embodies the themes of the Gilded Age with first hand experiences of an immigrant's hardships of life.
...k advantage of this. The Gilded Age was not all fun and games, of course, with corrupt political machines and robber barons, but the growing upper and middle classes yearned to break free from their urban confines. America wanted to be amused, and it was more than ready to pay for some entertainment.
The decade following the Reconstruction Era in American history is brilliantly and descriptively named; the Gilded Age was coated with superficial prosperity which buried its hardships that laid within its core. The rise of big business grabbed American’s attention---whether it was in a positive or negative notion--- and the United State’s focus on minorities declined. Women in the Gilded Age were continuous victims to inequality in contrast to their male counterparts, and the opportunity to pursue their own economic quickly turned into another element of inequality between the genders. On the other hand, the general working class quickly were slaves to big business and the new factory system. Working conditions and wages were unbearable,
Expansive growth was the moniker which expressly defined the Gilded Age. Industry in all sectors, witnessed massive growth leading to the creation of an American economy. Due to the rapidly changing nature of industrialization important men of both the public and private sectors attempted to institute their own controls over it. However this transforming landscape integrated both economic and political changes, but also cultural and social interactions. In turn, those who controlled the flow of business would also steadily impact the American social scene by extension. Alan Trachtenberg, professor of American studies at Yale and author of The Incorporation of America, argues that the system of incorporation unhinged the idea of national identity that all American’s had previously shared. As a result incorporation became the catalyst for the great debate about what it meant to actually be American, and who was capable of labeling themselves as such. Throughout his work Trachtenberg consistently tackles the ideas of cultural identity and how those ideas struggled against one another to be the supreme definition of Americanism. This work not only brings to life the issue of identity but it attempts to synthesize various scholarly works into a cohesive work on the Gilded Age and demonstrates that concepts developed during the incorporation of the time period have formed the basis for the American cultural, economic, and political superstructure. The Incorporation of America sets a high standard for itself one in which it doesn’t necessarily meet; however the work is still expansive and masterful at describing the arguments of the Gilded Age.
The Gilded Age was was an era that saw rapid immigration. This along with an explosion of Americans moving from farms to the cities, causing more people migrating to urban areas than ever before. The growth of cities gave rise to powerful political machines, that stimulated the economy, and gave birth to an American middle class. It was a time of highs and lows.
From the period between the 1870’s through the 1890’s, it became an era known as the Gilded Age. The term was characterized by a famous American Literature author named Mark Twain. The writer tried to point out that the term means that while on the outside society may seem perfect and in order, underneath there is poverty, crime, corruption, and many other issues between American society’s rich and poor. This era’s gild is thicker than the cheaper material it’s covering. This can be shown through the countless numbers of achievements and advances America has made during the period of reconstruction and expansion, industrialization, and foreign affairs.
During the Gilded Age many people who were rich became philanthropists in order to give back to the poor. Many of them also became activists to further help the working class. Although through their efforts, the organized labor was unsuccessful from 1875 to 1900 to improve the workers rights.
The Gilded Age gets its name from a book by Mark Twain called The Gilded Age: a Tale of Today. It was written in 1873, and unfortunately was not that successful. While the Gilded Age conjures up visions of ostentatious displays of wealth and decorative parties, the over all topic was politics. The book gives an extremely negative assessment of the state of American democracy at that time. Which does not come as a huge surprise coming from Twain, who famously said "It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress.” So when faced with sweeping changes in the American economy after the Civil War, the American political system both nationally and locally dealt with these problems in the best way possible, by inevitably and incredibly becoming corrupt.
Religious, racial and ethnic biases fuelled the class distinctions in the nineteenth-century. As fears increased over the declining birth rate, concerns about racial integrity intensified and were publicly expressed, promoting a climate where exercising control over a woman’s fertility was not only seen as warranted, but necessary (Falconer 2002). The introduction of the term “race suicide” was used to describe the declining birth rate among the “the better class of inhabitants” in both Canada and the United States. The ideal upper class woman was viewed as selfless, dependant, sexually subservient and chaste, a mother and homemaker (Falconer 2002). These women were supposed to provide “sex on demand for their husbands along with preserves, clean linen and roast meat” (Hall 1988). Throughout the nineteenth century, Britain and its colonies came to view motherhood, childbirth, and child-rearing as a “matter of imperial importance” and central to the role of empire building (Davin 1978; Falconer 2008; Summers 1991).