Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Smoking bans in public places
Smoking bans in public places
Smoking bans in public places
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Smoking bans in public places
TIGHTER RESTRICTIONS. Still, Germany as a whole has remained surprisingly tolerant of cigarettes, even as other European countries including Ireland, Spain, and Italy moved in recent years to ban smoking in public places. Indeed, despite its nature-loving, outdoorsy image, Germany today has the highest smoking rate among major European countries: nearly 34% of the adult population lights up, according to figures from the World Health Organization. By contrast, only 24% of adults smoke in Italy.
Back in 1998, German lawmakers, fearful of voter backlash, defeated proposed legislation that would have effectively banned smoking from the workplace and most public places. But now many of those same politicians are calling for tighter restrictions, including Agriculture and Consumer Protection Minister Horst Seehofer, who opposed a ban in 1998. Even the Chancellor herself, Angela Merkel, has weighed in on the issue, saying through a spokesman that she is "open to the issue of protecting non-smokers."
TAKE IT OUTSIDE. The public appears ready. Opinion polls from TNS Infratest show that three-quarters of Germans now back a public smoking ban, and nearly 60% favor banning tobacco advertising. As if to punctuate the shifting mood, the June 12 cover of influential news weekly Der Spiegel carried a picture of a woman's mouth with a broken cigarette dangling from her lips and the headline Smoking: The End of Tolerance.
Now, antismoking advocates are preparing a new bill that aims to make Germany's restaurants, bars, and other public buildings smoke-free as early as 2007. For the moment, the nonsmoking lobby appears headed for victory.
Germany's federalist system makes it difficult to enact certain kinds of national legislationand i...
... middle of paper ...
...smoking bans complain sales are down sharply. The problem is less severe for restaurants, which often enjoy increased business from nonsmokers, than for bars and other places where patrons go primarily to drink.
Even so, some restaurant owners in Germany are coming around to preferring government actionif only to establish clear rules. "It would be a good thing and would have no impact on my business," says Luciano Pane, 33, owner of Papa Pane, a trendy Italian restaurant in central Berlin frequented by German actors and film executives. "It works in Italy so why shouldn't it work in Germany?"
For a big, proud country accustomed to being more of a leader than a laggard, that could be a tough idea to accept. But Germany seems finally to be moving toward the rest of Europe in tackling the smoking issue. That should be good news for hearts, lungs, and bottom lines
Renneboog, R. M. (2016). Cigarette Smoking Bans: An Overview. Canadian Points Of View: Cigarette Smoking Bans, 1.
Recent television commercials that are against smoking have impacted a lot of the population's opinion on smoking. Recent laws in cities around the country are now banning smoking in a lot of public places.
population had been used to gain acceptance and awareness of cigarette smoking, it was time to
In the article Applebee’s was quoted saying that 14.1 percent of their sales came from alcoholic beverages. That is all most a 1/4 of their gross profit. That can help a restaurant either succeed or fail. The restaurants do not want to take that chance if they can not sell liquor. The article says they want family restaurants like Applebee’s to buy the licenses. The restaurants know there would be some restrictions on the license, such as, no sales after midnight and so fourth. But how many families go out to eat at midnight? The restrictions a reasonable ones. The towns want the restaurants to move in and stop the slumping area from going down any more. The idea that only restaurants having the licenses is a good one. If the town gave the licenses to any business,11 bars could move in. It seems that, the more bars there are in one location, the more problems the towns face. People are there all day and night drinking.
To understand the influence of the Nazi anti-smoking policies, we need to look at the root levels from where the ideology stems from. The Fuhrer, himself a smoker in his early life, regarded the habit as a waste of money and had a compelling hatred for smoking and the consumption of tobacco. He spoke out against the harmful effects of tobacco smoking, including tobacco poisoning, by attributing its use to the loss of “so many excellent men”. Hitler viewed tobacco as a symbol of “decadence”. Further, he believed the indigenous population of North America, the Native Americans retaliated against the Whites through influencing the use of tobacco after the Whites introduced liquor in the society.
"Smoking Bans and the Tobacco Industry." Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 1 July 2013. Web. 4 Dec. 2013. .
in only a few years time we will notice a drastic decline in the total
Over the years, the partnership between health ministers and health groups has produced some very substantial gains on the subject of tobacco use. Smoking bans that were thought of as radical 20 years ago are now commonplace. Public awareness of smoking risks has never been higher. And our new Tobacco Act sets a world standard for anti-tobacco legislation.
... “Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States. It causes serious illness among an estimated 8.6 million persons, it costs $167 billion in annual health-related losses, and it kills approximately 438 000 people each year. (n1, n2) Worldwide, smoking kills nearly 5 million people annually. If current trends continue, this number will double by 2030, and smoking will kill more than 1 billion people during this century” (Frieden and DE). Therefore, banning smoking in public places can reduce at least some of these problems and would enable people to live in a healthier way.
Several other methods for solving the problem of second-hand smoke have been suggested in the past. One method is to use air purifiers to clean the air. While this can remove some smoke particles from the air, even the most expensive air filtration system cannot remove all of the poisons and toxins put into the air by second hand smoke. Another solution would be to have separate rooms in which smoking is allowed, such as a lounge or parlor. This idea is also flawed, because for this to work, the rooms in which smoking is allowed would require entirely separate ventilation systems to accomplish the objective of protecting others (from the New York Times, 1/12/99, Public Smoking Ban: Alternatives?)
Smoking is one of the leading killers in North America and innocent. people shouldn't die because of it. For years people have been smoking. in public thinking, "It's my body, I can do whatever I want to do." now that it has been proven that smoking not only harms the smoker.
However, by prohibiting smoking in public areas and restricting it only to a certain place prevents smokers from fair participation in their social life. The main goal of the smoking ban is to make it socially unacceptable to smoke, which helps force smokers to quit. Medical studies have been conducted and published that show the dangers of smoking and the effects of second hand smoke. The research is very vague though and never truly shows you the exact causes. People have a choice not to expose themselves to many of the same harmful materials in our everyday life, such as soda, fried foods, and car exhaust.
Have you ever been in your favorite restaurant and just as you are about to take a bite of your favorite dish, your lungs are filled with a cloud of smoke which has drifted to your table from the smoking section just a few feet away? This is a common complaint of many patrons who enjoy dining at restaurants. While it is true that the smoke from cigarettes causes many health problems, is it fair to take away the freedom of Americans who wish to smoke? Even as compromises can be made on this subject, the majority of people stand by their strong opinions on whether smoking should be allowed in restaurants.
Those opposing a smoking ban say that freedom of choice would be affected by such legislation. Some people against a ban say that smoking bans damage business. A smoking ban could lead to a significant fall in earnings from bars, restaurants and casinos. Another argument is that the smoker has a basic human right to smoke in public places, and the ban is a limitation for smokers’ rights. Businesses, smokers, publicans, tobacco industries, stars, and some of the non-smokers oppose public smoking ban. Smokers light a cigarette because they need to smoke, not because they want it, because nicotine is physically addictive. Therefore, some smokers think that the public smoking ban is oppressiveness. They see the ban as a treatment to smokers as second-class citizens. Smokers agree that the smoking ban benefits the world, but cannot support the ban, because effects of nicotine obstruct them.
Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places. Every year thousands of people die because of having cancer or other tobacco related illnesses due to smoking. Smoking is seen everywhere. from our own television screens to even the world wide web; the internet.