Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Single sex education is more advantageous than co education
Outline of Benefits of Single Sex Classrooms
Outline of Benefits of Single Sex Classrooms
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Single-Sex Schools: The Wrong Choice
Although, there has been research made and experiments conducted, studies show that single-sex education is not advantageous like it is often thought of as being so. It has not been proven that learning in a single-sex school setting will increase the chances of success any one student will have over a co educated student. The cons outweigh the pros in this educational scenario. This type of education has not been shown to prepare students for life after primary and secondary school. There is no obvious effectiveness that single-sex education provides for students to be able to use. These claims are able to be made because there has been no scientific research conducted that proves single-sex education is a better choice than coeducation. There is no real benefit in learning that single-sex schools provide over coed schools.
When students attend single-sex schools, it does not affect their perceptions of their own academic abilities -- like this type of education is said to do. Learning in an environment with all students around you being those of the same gender can often give students non-realistic perceptions of what college and the “real world” will be like. They can become too comfortable with learning just in this way and that will be a setback for these students in the long run. Naomi Thiers says, “Some people believe it's better for students to learn in mixed groups that are more reflective of society — and that any return to single-sex arrangements will lead to the stereotyping of students of both sexes.” Students are able to attend single-sex colleges, but there are only a small amount of those type of schools throughout the United States. Learning in a setting with the oppos...
... middle of paper ...
... Journal of Education 39.2 (2009): 191-204. Web
Gill, Judith. Beyond the Great Divide: Single Sex or Coeducation? Sydney: UNSW, 2004. Print.
Salomone, Rosemary C. Same, Different, Equal: Rethinking Single-sex Schooling. New Haven:
Yale UP, 2003. Print.
Herron, Arika. "Single-Sex Classrooms." 79.9 (2011): 49-50. Academic Search Premier [EBSCO].
Web. 17 May 2014.
Cantalupo, Nancy Chi. "Comparing Single-Sex and Reformed Coeducation: A Constitutional
Analysis." 49.3: 725-89. Web. 17 May 2014.
Thiers, Naomi. "Do Single-Sex Classes Raise Academic Achievement?" 63.7 (2006): n. pag.
Academic Search Complete. Web. 19 May 2014.
Pahlke, Erin, PhD. "Single-sex Education Unlikely to Offer Advantage over Coed Schools.” APA, 3 Feb. 2014. Web.
Lewin, Tamar. "Single-Sex Education Is Assailed in Report." The New York Times 22 Sept. 2011:
n. pag. Print.
Mary Pipher's "Saplings in the Storm" and William S. Pollack's "How U.S. Schools Are Stifling Male Students"
One of the benefits of attending single sex schools is that it may be helpful for outcomes related to academic achievement and other powerful aspirations. Some of the advantages of attending a single sex school are that students are readily eager to work hard and compete amongst themselves, other than feeling embarrassed or being easily distracted by students of the opposite sex (Lee, 2008). Additionally, males tend to overestimate their academic abilities; while females generally underestimate their abilities and work harder to compensate. Single sex schools, can also broaden the educational prospects of students, by removing the disparities of “male dominated subjects” vs. “female dominated subjects.” Studies show that students attending single sex schools feel more welcoming and confident in their choice of studies.
Colleges and schools where both females and males are educated together are termed to be “coeducational.” Long previous to our modern day society, segregating male and female in education systems was considered the “norm.” During these traditionally dominant ancient times, coeducation was prevalent in Europe and the idea of integrating such unique groups became such a phenomenon. This widespread of coeducation was eventually developed in American countries and has grown to be a universally accepted mode of education. Not only was this idea “new” and “innovative,” but it also crossed the line of our ancestor’s valued practice of tradition. Although this system went against what tradition honored, this new system of education generated comradery between individuals of the opposite sex and has knowledged them of skills one was unable to exercise in a single-sex educational environment. Coeducation, being the more modern system of education, has caused single-sex systems to become more outdated and inconvenient to society’s evolving standards. Exposure to the opposite sex introduces students life skills vital to a professional workfield thus, it shows males and females the importance of maintaining a symbiotic relationship and how they benefit from one another. Schools worldwide should consider the practice of educating students of both sexes in the same educational institution to allow for opportunity for one to build character in accordance to our evolving society and acquire flexibility in social skills.
1.Same sex classrooms have not been allowed in public schools as they prevent students from learning to work together with the opposite sex, raise governmental expenses on building same sex schools, and are made for a less diverse learning environment.
Single sex schools have their pros and cons. Having both sexes in the classroom could be considered a distraction where studies are not considered the main priority and that attraction are more attended to. Single sex schools
...can encourage students to be collaborate with the other gender, single-gender schools can further benefit a students’ education. The merits of single-sex schools include classrooms focused on only one gender, a sexual harassment free environment, and a place for students to focus on school and not their appearance. In an interview with Vanessa Vogel, she stated, “I think that in schools like mine [single-gender] the students are not afraid to ask questions that they might be embarrassed to ask in front of the other gender. This helps me to learn more about the specific subject. This is especially helpful in mandatory classes like health.” Additionally, Studies have shown that students in single-sex schools and classrooms are more likely to receive higher scores on quizzes and tests, than students in co-educational schools and classrooms. (Jim Rex and David Chadwell)
In this paper I will use a multitude of research that shows scholarly evidence on why single sex education is harmful to one’s over all wellbeing and physiological health throughout one’s life. Single sex education is defined, as “the practice of conducting education where male and female students attend separate classes or in separate buildings or schools”(Pinzler, p. 785, 2005). The controversy over single sex education involves aspects such as its effectiveness and social ramifications of binary genders. Supports of single sex education believe that there are fewer distractions because everyone is of the same sex. Supporters also believe single sex education is also seen as a way to break down stereotypes such as women not doing well in the math and science field. They believe that single sex education helps males also break out of typical gender roles such as hyper masculinity. However, proponents believe separating girls and boys makes little to no difference in their academic achievement and is actually more harmful to your identity.
Sokol, Marlene. "ADVOCATES DEFEND SINGLE-GENDER EDUCATION; Criticism of the Approach as Being Ineffective Will Only Heighten, a Proponent Predicts." St. Petersburg Times [St. Petersburg, FL] 9 Oct. 2011: 1B. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Dec. 2013.
The single-sex format creates opportunities that do not exist in the coed classroom. (Edison 1) Researchers are unaware that both genders brains function differently. This lack of knowledge may be why the real truth about single-sex education being more efficient than co-ed education has not been discovered. Some say single-sex education may be the key for a brighter generation. It shows to improve test score dramatically. The number of public schools experimenting with single sex classes is now reported to be more than 350. (Silva 130) Some research also shows that single-sex classes have a more welcoming atmosphere. Single-sex education improves grades while coed educations keep an average pace.
Single sex education is a controversial battle that will most likely continue for decades. However, research and studies have shown in multiple cases and circumstances that single sex education is an extremely important tool that should be utilized in numerous situations. Many people think that dividing students based on sex will perpetuate gender discrimination; however, this kind of education may bridge more gaps than people realize. Not only do boys and girls develop and function differently, they are distracted by one another. Eliminating distractions and making classrooms conducive to each gender and learning style will ultimately result in a tremendous incline in academic grades and student participation.
Garner, R. (2009). Why single-sex schools are bad for your health (if you're a boy). THE INDEPENDENT.
...having a hard time in their early educational career due to the lack of focus or lack of a comfortable environment, single-sex education should be highly considered. In order to obtain our goal, we must be willing to try these new routes of education; you never know what can happen and you just might enlighten the student in their educational course by changing the environment in which they’re learning in.
This problem occurs in schools everywhere and is starting to become more evident in today's society. The problem is that boys and girls learning potential are not being reached when put into the same teaching atmosphere. Girls seem to be out smarting boys in many classes. While boys excel in math and sciences and girls seem to be better in English. The styles in which boys and girls feel comfortable with are extremely different. The learning styles of girls usually contain socializing and context. For instance, most girls like to talk in small groups about the current discussion. They also like hands on activities or real life situations to compare things to. Boys are confrontational and formal. They need to be challenged by their teachers to help motivate them to become better students and be prepared. In contrast girls do not like to be confronted by teachers who are asking for an immediate answers. In most cases, girls seem to be more reserved and modest than boys about their intelligence ("What are someÉ) are. Their differences may not seem evident but make a difference to reaching their highest learning potential.
The supporters of single-sex education believe that students are greatly interested in the educational process itself, not caring for their appearance or behavior. These types of schools help students acting freely without any motivations. Series of studies have proved that boys' and girls' brains are organized differently so each of them needs special treatment. Also each gender has its own privacy in joking and talking seriously. The scientists who support the theory of single sex education contribute their opinion religiously, saying that all religions call for separating both sexes as it is forbidden and against the religious teachings. They also think that mixing both genders inside any place is an evil deed that leads to committing sins that all religions forbid and say that there will be a severe punishment in the judgment day .While opposite opinions think that both sexes should exist together to grow up and learn how to be...
Summers, Christopher B. “Md. Should Support Single-Sex Schools.” Baltimore Sun. Mar. 2013: A.13. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. Jan. 2014.