Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Distinguish between monopolistic competition and oligopoly
Essay on monopolies
Oligopoly
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Title page
Name: Benjamin Kusi
Question: “A single-price monopoly will always charge a price that is on the elastic range of the demand for the monopoly’s output.” Discuss using relevant diagrams or algebra.”
According to TIMOTHY J. PERRI, he explains that a monopoly is a firm who is the sole seller of its product, and where there are no close substitutes. (WINTER 1984) Monopoly arises as a result of many factors coming to play into the existence of a monopoly. Some of these factors are the location and owning of a key resource by a firm, an exclusive right given to a firm by a government to produce a certain kind of good, and a very high cost of producing a good and among others. As a result of there being a monopoly, it gives
…show more content…
Some monopoly firms practice price discrimination and others do not. Price discrimination is a pricing strategy that involves selling the same good or product to different people at different prices. This means that the seller charges each buyer of his or her product, the highest amount that the buyer is willing and able to pay. With respect to a single price monopoly, Chester S. Spatt explains that, the producer sells each unit of its output (product or goods) at the same price to all of its customers.(Apr., 1983). As such, there are factors that makes a single-price monopoly always charge a price that is on the elastic range of its demand for its output. Some of these factors …show more content…
The market supply curve in a perfect competitive market is the horizontal summation of all the individual firm’s marginal cost. This mathematically means that S = MC. And this curve represents the monopoly’s marginal cost curve. Equilibrium in perfect competition occurs where the quantity demanded of a good is equal to the quantity supplied at quantity (QC ) and price (PC.) Whereas equilibrium output for a monopoly, QM, occurs where marginal revenue equals marginal cost, MR = MC. And its price, PM, occurs on the demand curve at the profit-maximizing quantity. Because marginal revenue is less than price at each output level, QM < QC and PM > PC. Comparing this to that of a perfect competitive market, monopoly limits its output and charges a greater price that is on the elastic range of demand as shown in the diagram
When the word monopoly is spoken most immediately think of the board game made by Parker Brothers in which each player attempts to purchase all of the property and utilities that are available on the board and drive other players into bankruptcy. Clearly the association between the board game and the definition of the term are literal. The term monopoly is defined as "exclusive control of a commodity or service in a particular market, or a control that makes possible the manipulation of prices" (Dictionary.com, 2008). Monopolies were quite common in the early days when businesses had no guidelines whatsoever. When the U.S. Supreme Court stepped into break up the Standard Oil business in the late 1800’s and enacted the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 (Wikipedia 2001), it set forth precedent for many cases to be brought up against it for years to come.
I have never had a strong opinion on monopolies in Canada. However, I believe that monopolies can stifle innovation, competition, and affect the prices that the consumer has to pay for a product or service. Since we live in a mixed market economy, Canada has very few monopolies such as the health, airspace, and telecommunications industries. Companies within theses industries are notorious for price fixing, lack of innovation, and competition. These problems are prevalent because of the barriers to entry the new players face such government regulation, the cost of doing business, and infrastructure.
Price discrimination can be defines as when a firm offers an “individual good at different prices to different consumers” The Library of Economics and Liberty elaborates on its pricing strategy, stating Comcast offers different pricing depending on what features the consumer desires. For instance, the cable company will charge a higher price to a person who uses several services as part of their cable package. Conversely, the firm charges a very low price to someone who would “otherwise not be interested” , providing basic services at a minimum price. It takes advantage of the regulation imposed on the cable industry by offering the required basic package at seemingly attractive prices. Using this pricing system allows for it to attract different consumers whose maximum price they are willing to pay differs. Recently, Comcast attempted a new billing strategy by introducing a data usage cap. It essentially expanded on the company’s existing price discrimination method by charging customers according to how much data they used each month. Comcast also utilizes penetration pricing, where it offers its product at low prices to attract new consumers, later raising the prices once the customer is subscribed for a certain amount of time. Generally it claims the original prices were promotional only, lasting only a small amount of
An oligopoly is defined as "a market structure in which only a few sellers offer similar or identical products" (Gans, King and Mankiw 1999, pp.-334). Since there are only a few sellers, the actions of any one firm in an oligopolistic market can have a large impact on the profits of all the other firms. Due to this, all the firms in an oligopolistic market are interdependent on one another. This relationship between the few sellers is what differentiates oligopolies from perfect competition and monopolies. Although firms in oligopolies have competitors, they do not face so much competition that they are price takers (as in perfect competition). Hence, they retain substantial control over the price they charge for their goods (characteristic of monopolies).
First, a perfectly competitive market provides low prices for consumer of the market. This exists as a pro for the consumers buying the product. In the example, it remains a pro for people purchasing the corn cheaply in Tap. When low prices exist in the market however, the burden is placed on the producers. This happens because the producers identify as price takers, and the price stays low due to competition. Low prices result in lower profits. On the island of Tap for example, low prices in a competitive market hurt the producers of corn. Meaning, farmers prefer the monopoly version of the market. The monopoly form results in farmers getting paid above the perfectly competitive market price. On the contrast, in a monopoly form prices remain higher for the consumers. The final pro of the monopoly form exists as the uniform packaging and quality. Since only one firm produces the specific product, they use the same quality and packaging throughout the process. This also be views as a con for the perfectly competitive side. This side uses many different forms of packaging and quality due to the various amounts of producing firms. Overall, many different pros and cons result when implementing various kinds of market
A monopoly exists when a specific individual or an enterprise has sufficient control over a particular product or service to determine significantly the terms on which other individuals shall have access to it. A monopoly sells a good for which there is no close substitute. The absence of substitutes makes the demand for the good relatively inelastic thereby enabling monopolies to extract positive profits. It is this monopolizing of drug and process patents that has consumer advocates up in arms. The granting of exclusive rights to pharmacuetical companies over clinical a...
When a monopoly occurs because it is more efficient for one firm to serve an entire market than for two or more firms to do so, because of the sort of economies of scales available in that market. A common example is water distribution, in which the main cost is laying a network of pipes to deliver water.
By law a monopoly is not allowed to exist in the US. It has been long debated whether Microsoft is a monopoly or not? Among other charges Microsoft was charged with "monopolizing the computer operating system market, integrating the Internet Explorer web browser into the operating system in an attempt to eliminate competition from Netscape, and using its market power to form anticompetitive agreements with producers of related goods" (SWLearning).
A monopoly is a market structure in which there is a single seller (Hendrikse, 2003) indicating the incumbent firm has price setting power- and the buyers are price takers. Remaining as a monopoly can have advantages in terms of market power, controlling and dictating the market, meaning they can charge prices that are abnormally profitable.
For a monopoly to maximise profits it must have an equilibrium point where marginal cost equals marginal revenue, there is no reason for a firm to move from this equilibrium point because they are fulfilling their market plan. Using Figure 1 (Stewart, 2005) it can be explained why a monopoly firm would advertise. Marginal cost is fixed and is the line MC and demand is line D, marginal revenue is line MR. As the firm wishes to profit maximise it sets output at level Qm where marginal revenue crosses marginal cost, this means price is set at Pm where the quantity reaches the demand curve. If a firm is going to advertise it is likely that it will cause demand to shift to the right, this is because more people are going to buy the product when it is being sold at the same price.
Perfect and monopolistic competition markets both share elasticity of demand in the long run. In both markets the consumer is aware of the price, if the price was to increase the demand for the product would decrease resulting in suppliers being unable to make a profit in the long run. Lastly, both markets are composed of firms seeking to maximise their profits. Profit maximization occurs when a firm produces goods to a high level so that the marginal cost of the production equates its marginal
The Perceived Demand Curve for a Perfect Competitor and Monopolist (Principle of Microeconomics, 2016). A perfectly competitive firm (a) has multiple firms competing against it, making the same product. Therefore the market sets the equilibrium price and the firm must accept it. The firm can produce as many products as it can afford to at the equilibrium price. However, a monopolist firm (b) can either cut or raise production to influence the price of their products or service. Therefore, giving it the ability to make substantial products at the cost of the consumers. However, not all monopolies are bad and some are even supported by the
Markets have four different structures which need different "attitudes" from the suppliers in order to enter, compete and effectively gain share in the market. When competing, one can be in a perfect competition, in a monopolistic competition an oligopoly or a monopoly [1]. Each of these structures ensures different situations in regards to competition from a perfect competition where firms compete all being equal in terms of threats and opportunities, in terms of the homogeneity of the products sold, ensuring that every competitor has the same chance to get a share of the market, to the other end of the scale where we have monopolies whereby one company alone dominates the whole market not allowing any other company to enter the market selling the product (or service) at its price.
In a perfectly competitive market, the goods are perfect substitutes. There are a large number of buyers and sellers, and each seller has a relatively small market share. Perfect competition has no barriers to information regarding prices and goods, meaning there is no risk-taking behaviour – sellers and buyers are rational. There is also a lack of barriers for entry and exit.
A monopoly is “a single firm in control of both industry output and price” (Review of Market Structure, n.d.). It has a high entry and exit barrier and a perceived heterogeneous product. The firm is the sole provider of the product, substitutes for the product are limited, and high barriers are used to dissuade competitors and leads to a single firm being able to ...