Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media and perceptions of violent crime
The effect of media portrayal of crime on victims of crime
Public perception of crime in media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media and perceptions of violent crime
Recently, FX aired the second season of American Crime Story, a series focusing on murders well-known within American history, such as OJ Simpson’s trial for the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, and the assassination of Gianni Versace by the late spree killer Andrew Cunanan. As these stories grasped the attention of millions of viewers, Scott Bonn, psychologist and criminology professor, studied the motive for the audience’s intrigue to this category of shows. Although Simpson and Versace were icons of their time, already appealing to the public, the concept of serial murder was what drew the vast audience, and the center for Bonn’s research. Bonn discusses how the impact of true crime television is harmless, as it merely just caters to the craving for thrills by the audience. However, true crime entertainment humanizes the inhumanity of these crimes, thus desensitizing the severity for those directly impacted. The persistent advertising of serial killers enables an unhealthy obsession within the American people, causing their fascination to not only be motivated by …show more content…
confusion, yet admiration as well. Regardless of prior fame of the victims or alleged perpetrator, crimes similar in horrific nature are all covered heavily by news outlets. Even with actual broadcasting of news and publicizing of murders, inspiration for copycat killers are put forth by the media. Bonn argues that further publicity through true crime is all in “ghoulish fun” for the viewers, as they feel a similar desire to when “eating my favorite candy in bed at three o’clock in the morning” (Bonn). The naivety of Bonn’s argument completely disregards and innocently categorizes the impacts advertising these crimes may have on the public. As of February 22, 2018, there have been 290 separate school shootings in the United States following the attacks on Sandy Hook elementary school in December 2012, in comparison to the 91 which preceded Sandy Hook from the beginning of the twenty-first century (Wilson). There have been over double the number of school shootings after Sandy Hook in less than half the time. Although there has not been a television series surrounding the Sandy Hook tragedy, the event consumed news stations for weeks following, exposing the killer and his tactics consistently through the media. With publicizing such events, it encourages people with similar notions of the ability to achieve their attack. It may even be viewed by some as a competition to outdo those televised. Although covering these stories is obligatory for news outlets, true crime television creates an appealing and glamorized atmosphere surrounding these crimes. Contrary to Bonn’s belief of the publicizing of these crimes serving as “tasty fun”, it does have a negative impact. The romanticizing of murder on television shows affects the audience’s perspective on crimes. A direct correlation has been shown between what is broadcasted on television and the influence of temperament: “TV violence increases aggression and social anxiety, cultivates a “mean view” of the world, and negatively impacts real-world behavior” (Phillips). The purity of the audience is diminished as these television series desensitize the gruesome crimes which they mimic. By continuously catering to this fascination, these senseless crimes are beginning to be normalized. Actors try to portray a character as accurately as they can, establishing themselves in the psychological and physical mindset of those lives which they are reenacting. When having a production reflect real life, the inhumane acts of criminals are humanized. Bonn argues that the “fascination with serial killers is based in part on a need to understand why anyone would do such horrible things to other people who generally are complete strangers to them” (Bonn), yet his generalization of the audience is ignorant. With the entertainment industry supplying this “understanding” to the public, reasoning is created in order to enable the audience’s comprehension as to why one would murder. Character dynamic allows for the audience to establish empathy and affinity towards characters, thus validating their actions as they relate to the viewers. True crime television tends to focus on capturing the perspective of the murderer, through the investigation of their convoluted mind, while minimizing and ignoring the everlasting impact on their victims. Andrew Cunanan was an unknown name until his identification as Versace’s murderer, as were many other serial killers. The story of Cunanan’s past overtook the focus of the American Crime Story series, therefore glamorizing his life as opposed to Versace’s. Even though he murdered five people, it is his legacy that was focused upon twenty-years later on television. Bonn believes that serial killers act as a source of popular-culture, which “allow us to experience fear and horror in a controlled environment, where the threat is exciting, but not real” (Bonn).
The environments when these crimes took place were not controlled, nor was the fear endured enjoyable. The pain of the victims are easily forgotten, as well as the struggle which they faced the moment of their death and the times preceding it. Bonn’s argument that the horror felt is “not real” is significantly contradictory to the entire basis for true crime television; these murders really happened, and their television scenes emulate that of the actual occurrence. True crimes are continuously embellished as though they are tales that are to be passed down through generations, disregarding the genuine suffering experienced by the victims, both directly murdered and affected by the
murder. Bonn’s interpretation of the effect true crime television has on audiences is narrowed and optimistic. The cruel reality of it is that these shows encourage aggression among their viewers and remind the victims of the horrific events. The attempt to understand behaviors is not just to fathom the brutality, yet copy it as well. True crime television does not serve as contribution to popular culture legends, but glamorizes the murderers, not just their felonies. Clearly demonstrated in the American Crime Story, Andrew Cunanan and OJ Simpson have the most significant characters within the series, sometimes not even mentioning their victims in each episode. The portrayal of Simpson and his team when reaching the non-guilty verdict, eerily encouraged the audience to feel joy, although the families of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson still have not received closure regarding their deaths. Additionally, when Cunanan took his life during his search, the Versaces, the Miglins, the Trails, the Madsons, and the Reeses all were left wondering of the motive for their loved one’s murder. The selfish fascination which audiences have with the murderers disregards the pain of victims, essentially showing respect for the murderer. A motivating factor for these murders could have been to disturbingly achieve recognition and display showmanship. In these cases, creating true crime television directly grants what the murderer wanted. Bonn views true crime television as entertainment for the audience, while ignoring the inevitable with paying respect to the murderers by glorifying their actions.
Grisham tells us that two youngsters killed 2 unrelated people after they watched the film, Natural Born Killers, and learned the violent behavior showed in the film and commit crimes afterwards. And he comes to conclusion that this kind of violent movies that will cause bad effects among young people should be not allowed to made. The detail he provides is that nothing in the two perpetrator’s past indicated violent propensities. Stone’s essay is the response to Grisham’s indict. His central idea is that the movies should not be blamed as reasons people commit crime. The details he provides are that: There are many related factor involved if people are guilty, such as their upbringing, parents, schools, and peers, but not films; Teenagers spend more time on watching TV, which also include violent depictions and have effects on teenagers, so TV should have more responsibility on the crime than Natural Born Killers does.
A society that presumes a norm of violence and celebrates aggression, whether in the subway, on the football field, or in the conduct of its business, cannot help making celebrities of the people who would destroy it. Unfortunately, such acts of rampage have become a prevalent factor in the Canadian culture. As a result of endless media coverage, Canadians now are constantly bombarded with numerous images of violence. Many of which often portray a victim avenging their opponent by means of force. Thus, indoctrinating a nation of individuals to believe that it is only through aggression that problems can be resolved. Rather than being punished for acts of violence, those who commit such offenses are often praised for their “heroism”. In addition, the success of films like The Godfather, Gladiator, and Troy further aid in reinstating the fact that we live in a society that praises violence. Furthermore, this ideology allows for individuals to partake in violent acts with little or no backlash from ones community. However, when an individual strays away from the “norm”, they are likely to then be viewed as a deviant. Such cases of rejection within a society, are often seen in the portrayal of serial killers. Although our society tends to condone violence when it is directed towards a specific individual(s), it does not allow the killing of innocent bystanders. Instead, crimes that are targeted against a number of people over a long period of time, entail the harshest forms punishments under the law. Sadly, in executing the law for said crimes, those in charge often face much public scrutiny. Such occurrences were apparent in the faulty murder investigations of Canada's most notorious serial killer Robert Pickton. This is due to the ...
With producing reality shows comes producing inaccuracies in portrayals in order to reach as many viewers and gain as high ratings as possible every week with each new episode. Every day life is boring, yet people tend to be attracted to the relatable shows that portray real life in eccentric ways – ways that they believe could be imitated by the average person. In many cases, these shows could remain harmless, as it is entertainment. No matter how crude or erroneous, it is just television. However, what happens when these sources of amusement actually start being damaging? Research has shown that crime shows like the ever popular CSI: Crime Scene Investigation have started becoming significantly detrimental to criminal cases, influencing a juror's perception of what should realistically be going on with acquittal rates and wrongful convictions, but researchers have also started to find a rising fault in the prosecution, using this false perception to their advantage.
In recent years, the subject of crime has become an increasingly important theme of political, academic, and public debate. In particular, the media today is more focused on victims than it has ever been before. Through media representations of the ‘ideal victim’, this essay will subsequently show how the media are able to construct and re-affirm pre-existing traditional ideologies within the public realm. In effect, this assignment will critically assess the concept of an ‘ideal victim’ and show how the media have used this when describing crime.
Kass-Gergi, Yara (2012), Killer Personalities: Serial Killers as Celebrities in Contemporary American Culture. Wesleyan University p. 4-8
In Richards Willing’s “CSI effect” the author tells the reader how, as a result of crime scene shows’ popularity, the misconceptions they create, and the combining of real life events with TV fantasy, crime scene shows have affected jurors and the oucomes of court cases. The shows’ popularity has increased peoples’ interest in forensic science and has caused workers and students to transfer into the field. The second effect crime scenes created is the misconception concerning when to use forensic tests, as well as misconceptions about the speed and accuracy of forensic workers and machines in tracking and identifying the culprit. Willing tells of a murder trial in Arizona in which the defendant’s bloody coat was listed as evidence, but was not tested. Although the defendant had already told investigators that he was at the scene of the crime, with the jacket, jurors asked for forensic DNA evidence linking the defendant to the bloody coat and to the crime scene. The juror’s exposure to crime scene shows had given them knowledge of forensic tests, but not knowledge of the proper use of the tests. Crime scene shows mix real life with TV fantasy. According to willing’s studies, highly attractive forensic workers and stunning suspects, along with very neat crime scenes on crime scene shows deemphasize the real life violence and brutality of crime. Similarly, tv reality shows have influenced people’s ideas about real life and real relationships through the effects of image, misleading information, and popularity.
America’s Most Wanted has also changed the public’s perception of both, victims and criminals. I believe that the show transformed America to be more sensitive to victims and what they have been through especially when the family has no closure. It gives the victim the...
Mark Seltzer has clearly presented his concepts to reveal how the media has played part in exposing the existence of serial killers. Mark argues that some common videos that are shown on televisions have in one way or the other contributed to the increase of serial killers. Below are some of his arguments that reveal the media as part of the abnormality.
Knowing a victim of an unforgettable and unforgivable crime will cause a person to lose a type on innocence. However, witnessing the heinous violation of the victim is much stronger. After the witness sees and hears the exact event, it is nearly impossible to disregard his or her memory. This is true in the short story “In the Shadow of War.” The protagonist of the literary work, a young boy named Omovo, witnesses the killing of a woman.
Death and violence is not something experienced everyday, but is seen on a daily basis. Not always witnessed by someone near the accident, but it is usually watched on their computer or on their television. Violence seems to be one of the most common issues in many of today’s society. Acts of murder are feared and are avoided by anyone in their right mind. With this in mind, how can people watch murders on the TV screen, but will do anything at their power to avoid death. No one wants to die, but they find entertainment in other people’s deaths. Don Delillo’s Videotape reveals how humans have a tendency to watch terror and death due to a desire to numb one’s own fear of death and for personal entertainment.
Whether appearing on breaking news headlines, or vividly depicted in mainstream contemporary entertainment, murder and the act of murdering are no foreign concept to the public. But, one thought still perplexes our mind: “How can someone ever think of committing such a heinous act?”. In The Murderer Next Door: Why the Mind is Designed to Kill by David M. Buss, he explains the mind’s inner workings that can compel us to find murder as actually, a rational thing to do. He breaks the preconceived idea and definition of what it takes to be a murderer, such as only the mentally insane can be murders (brought on by only shocking/”news-worthy” depictions of serial killers/ psychopaths in today’s movies, games , or news) or that today’s mainstream media
Over the years and with various mediums crime has illustrated in many different ways, ranging from the facts driven newspapers to the films that make the audience feel sympathy for the criminal. Although there is a significant amount of research conducted on the role the media plays in instigating people into the world of crime, there is a distinct lack of research and information on why the media is saturated with real life criminals-turned-celebrities and why the public continues to be fascinated by them. The information collected from a wide variety of sources indicate that criminal’s stories provide a source of entertainment and fascinate the general public and there will always been a strong desire to read or watch the next story. The majority of my literature agrees with my hypothesis and gives detailed examples and research into the subject matter.
Turnbull, S. (2010) “Crime as Entertainment: The Case of TV Crime Drama” Journal of Media and Cultural Studies Vol. 24. (December) p. 819-827.
America’s attraction to crime and drama can be credited to the viewers desire to see good defeating evil: “In popular media, law enforcement is oftentimes presented being insufficient in upholding justice, calling for the intervention of a hero; a figure capable of recognizing and punishing evil without the restrictions of the law”(Dexter). “Dexter” is an hour-long American physiological thriller on Showtime TV. Created by Jeff Lindsay and James Manos, “Dexter” first aired in 2009 and has been the spotlight of Showtime since then. The show depicts Michael C Hall as Dexter Morgan, a blood spatter analyst for the local Miami Metro Police Department. If Dexter isn’t at a crime scene, he is cleaning his own one up. In his spare time he is a cautious serial killer who kills other murderers who have escaped the judicial system. Dexter’s layers of personality, ability to problem solve and his ability to balance both sides of himself are what makes him an enthralling character. Although most people aren’t serial killers the general viewing audience can relate to Dexter: Everyone has different layers of personality and everyone to a certain degree has a dark side.
The media sure has its hands full! First off, it’s changing the physiology of grown men, transforming their brains into those of sixteen-year-olds with its cathode tubes, according to Steven Stark in his essay, “Where The Boys Are.” Next on the list is the task of convincing our youth that “murder is cool and fun,” a statement courtesy of John Grisham’s essay, “Unnatural Killers.” The media is making today’s youth somehow disregard everything they’ve ever heard about it being wrong to kill someone and consult their television for guidance instead! That job can’t be easy! Never having a moment’s rest, the media has also been sighted by Marie Winn. It was in the act of changing our entire families into groups of distant acquaintances, which we read in, “Television: The Plug-in Drug.” Finally, add to this list “screaming.” Deborah Tannen states that the media is making us scream at each other, an enlightening fact one may find in her essay, “The Triumph of the Yell.”