Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Three ideas about the character of Simon in Lord of the Flies
Three ideas about the character of Simon in Lord of the Flies
Three ideas about the character of Simon in Lord of the Flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It is only common for the strong to overpower the weak. In dire situations in history, it has been seen that leaders and warriors live while prophets and peacemakers perish. Charles Darwin established a theory that explained the tenacious lived while the decrepit died off due to the fact that those with increased stamina are more likely to be able to conform to change. The naturalist states that even though some may be vastly intelligent, kind, or dignified, they end up dying first because lack of adaptability, or refusal to do so. In William Golding’s The Lord of the Flies, Simon is an example of the sort of weakness Darwin elaborates on in his theory. While he is the wisest and tries to help the boys as much as he can, Simon dies first because …show more content…
Mentally, he hallucinates and speaks in riddlish, poetic phrases that the boys do not understand. Simon’s untimely death was caused by his refusal to abandon his civilized morals in order to abide by the principles of social darwinism in the ways of the other boys. Simon’s physical stature and conditions contributed to his death because it prevented him from adapting on the island like the other boys. Shortly after the boys arrive on the island, the majority of them, mostly Jack and the hunters, become obsessed with killing wild pigs and only care about having fun. The savages run, play, and kill, while Simon prefers to visit his cave and appreciate flora and fauna rather than destroy it. Also, he is unable to hunt and play wildly with the other boys. When Simon is first seen on the island, he is known as the choir boy who faints. As months pass, he continues to get injured, up until right before his death, when he bleeds heavily and trips over rocks in order to return back to camp. (Golding 146). Simon’s repetitive blackouts and abrasions show how he very obviously is not the strongest of the boys. …show more content…
When the boys discuss the origin of the beast, many believe it is a living monster that lurks on the island. They think it could be from the water, the depths of the jungle, or even the sky, but it most definitely is animate. Simon, however, is the only one that realizes that the beast is only them. (Golding 89). Simon’s philosophy of the notorious beast being the boys themselves showcases his perpetual wisdom that the rest of the boys do not have. The others keep jumping to the conclusion that the beast is a living, ferocious creature because on the island, they are slowly losing the mental characteristic that allows them to contemplate the origin of fear and savagery. Simon is able to figure out that the boys are the beast because he is the only one that realizes how savage the boys are becoming. Later in the passage, the boys laugh off his proposition because they do not understand him. However, Simon continues to assert the fact that the boys have nothing to fear but the fact that they are becoming violent, monstrous human beings. Simon is the savior, and feels that he must save the boys from fully turning into disturbing creatures. In The Descent of Man, Charles Darwin explains how “With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to
While they agree that the beast is not a traditional monster, it is Simon’s philosophical understanding that allows him to fully realize the meaning of the beast. At the assembly, Ralph plans to discuss the beast, hoping to bring the fear to an end. Simon suggests that the boys themselves are the beast. Later, when Simon encounters the “Lord of the Flies” in a hallucination, the reader learns the extent of his understanding. The Lord of the Flies mocks Simon by saying, “Fancy you thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill...You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you?”(128). Simon realizes that there is something within humans that can cause them to act savagely. However, at the assembly, in an effort to understand what Simon meant about the beast, the boys suggest that the beast could be a ghost. Piggy firmly rejects this idea because he approaches the beast in the same way he handles most situations: logically and scientifically. As Piggy states, “Life… is scientific, that’s what it is…. I know there isn’t no beast- not with claws and all that, I mean- but I know there isn’t no fear either… unless we get afraid of people” (72). Piggy understands fear can have detrimental effects, but he does not yet understand that fear is within every person, and this is the “beast” that can cause people to act without
Simon, the wisest, calmest, and maturest of all the boys, is off by himself “talking” to a pig, perhaps going crazy. All others are sitting around the fire relaxing, ignoring the fact that one of the the wisest men of all has himself begun to lose sanity, possibly symbolic of the condition of people on the island. Of course, readers know, by the description of the bulging clouds, that the sky will soon break and, symbolically, something terrible within the plot will soon happen. Indeed, the entire novel has built to this point, as readers have observed the downward spiral of morality amidst the moral characters and increased savagery. Simon has observed this, and perhaps because he tends to take in everything inwardly, his depression over the gradual decline in the children on the island has caused him to become somewhat senile. Simon continues his “conversation” with the pig whom he calls “the lord of the flies” (“Beelzebub” in Hebrew, meaning “the devil”), and it is as if he is being tempted by the devil, or corrupt immorality that has taken over the other children on the island. However, he is able to be triumphant over the temptations, and staggers back down to the island to inform the other children that the beast on the island is
Simon is very intelligent, and perhaps he is even more mature than the rest of the boys, but because of this, he gets blamed for everything, and the boys even end up killing him eventually. During one meeting, where the boys are discussing the “beast” on the island, Simon voices a controversial opinion, “...maybe it’s only us” (Golding 89). Simon could possibly be giving the boys a warning, saying that they are the true beasts. The boys immediately deny and ridicule Simon, which turns out to be incredibly ironic, because they later go on to literally tear him apart a few chapters later. But from the point that Simon makes that comment, all of the blame almost immediately shifts to
During Chapter 5 Simon is asked by Ralph if he believes in the beast, Simon vocalizes his opinion saying “I dont know,” (Golding 89) showing that he does not fully believe in fallacy that there is a beast wondering around the island. He goes on to explain himself saying “What I mean is... maybe it's only us.” (89) this brings to light his idea that perhaps the only beasts on the island
The beast in the story symbolizes the gradation of the morality among the boys. The compete each other becoming in the last survivor and the commander of group. The beast is not a real object which they believe if exists. They don’t realize the internal beast inside of them. Only Simon understands what the real beast is, but is killed when he tries to tell them about that. The beast mind and soul of the boys lead them to the collapse of the society. They begin killing each other and the trustworthy has lost.
The lack of civilization and human goodness leads the young children to evils and a bad environment that they have never faced. Simon, a “skinny, vivid boy, (pg. 24)” is a member of Jack’s choir but soon leaves his tribe and joins Ralph because he is not able to deal with the cruel leadership. As all the other characters fail to maintain responsibilities and their commitments to the rules of the island, Simon is the only person who dedicates to them as things begin to fall apart. He is a character with a respectful, spiritual personality and has a human goodness with nature as he deals with the littluns and the older boys. For example, he helps the littluns pick fruit to eat, recovers Piggy’s glasses when they fly off his face, gives Piggy his own share of meat when he was refused a piece and gives ...
The book can be split into three parts to show how evil on the island advances. In the first part we learn about the boys meeting on the island and the first assembly. The boys share their ideas but hopes fall due to some of the boys, which fail to admit that they think they will be saved. In the second part the threat of evil begins especially due to the arrival of the dead air pilot. Immediately, the boys are struck with fear... and the boys are all affected with it like a disease What the boys don’t realize at this point is that its not an external fear which creates evil it’s the boys own nature. Finally the third part which is the most terrible part of the story is when the book explores the meaning and consequence of the creation of evil. The evil is so great on the island that the boys eventually split, the good and the evil. The hunters are the evil when Ralph and his friends are the good. The parting of the boys resulted in death, pain and savage. Simon projects the internal evil and fear of the boys. However Simon doesn’t share his feelings for the evil with the others. Within the story Simon is seen as the ‘Christ’ of the island.
Simon is different form the other boys not only due to his physical frailty, shown in his fainting spells, but also n his consistently expressed concern for the more vulnerable boys. Littleuns follow him and he picks fruit for them from spots they can’t reach, painting a saintly or Christ-like image. In addition, he has a secret place in the jungle where he spends time alone, emphasising how he is different form the other boys, introspective and philosophical. He is presented in the text as a compassionate figure yet is called insulting names, such as ‘batty’ and ‘queer’ and is also marginalised from the centre of power and influence. Ironically, the representation of consideration and kindness is in fact the character that is ostracized and excluded from the group.
After his meeting with the Lord of the Flies, Simon travels to tell the boys and is murdered. From this point on Evil and Savagery are released and run rampant and the majority of the boys on the island. This just confirms the fact that Simon was right, the beast lives in all of
The reason the Lord of the Flies threatens Simon is because Simon knows that the beast is not a tangible creature that lives in the forest which is dangerous information. In reality, the beast is simply the innate evil that resides in every man. Simon knows this because he realizes that all the information the boys know about the beast does not add up and that such a creature cannot exist so it must be something impalpable but powerful, something that is making them so afraid that it is changing them from the inside out. He questions this “beast with claws that scratched, that sat on a mountaintop, that left no tracks and yet was not fast enough to catch Samneric” and grasps the concept that the more they fear the beast, the more they change (112).
Throughout the story, the fear the boys have of the beast becomes incredibly strong. This ends up driving the boys apart, as seen when Jack organizes a feast for the boys to try to get people to join his tribe, separate from Ralph: “‘I gave you food,’ said Jack, ‘and my hunters will protect you from the beast. Who will join my tribe?’”(172). Everyone is afraid of the beast at this point, and Jack uses this fear to urge people to join his group of hunters. The fear of the beast in turn because a driving factor of the group tearing apart, leaving Ralph against angry savages by the end of the book. The beast therefore is a cause of the boy’s opening up to their inner savagery. The reason for this is explained when Jack gives the beast a physical being when he puts the head of one of the pigs he killed, and Simon, in an hallucination, hears it speak: “Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill!...You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you? Close, close, close! I’m the reason why it’s no go? Why things are what they are?”(164). The pig’s head, or the Lord of the Flies, is a physical manifestation of the beast in Simon’s hallucination, and it explicitly states it is part of Simon. In other words, the beast is representative of the savagery and evil within humans, not a monster roaming the island. The only fear the boys have had is fear of what is within: their inherent evil. This idea is perpetuated when all the boys go to Jack’s tribe’s feast, and end up doing a pig dance, when an unsuspecting Simon comes stumbling into the area the boys are doing their dance in: “‘Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood! Do him in!’...The beast was on its knees in the center, its arms folded over its face… At once the crowd surged after it, poured down
Beforehand, everything was all fun and games on the island, and Piggy was the only one that actually worried about anything. However, the idea of the beast brought fear to them again and again. Whether it was when it was first mentioned as a snake, or when it was thought to come from the sea, or when it was guessed to be ghosts, the idea of something being there at the island made the boys afraid even though there was no actual evidence of the beast. Golding wrote, “‘He says in the morning it turned into them things like ropes in the trees and hung in the branches. He say will it come back tonight?’ ‘But there isn’t a beastie!’ There was no laughter at all now and more grave watching.’” At the idea there there was some sort of mysterious fearsome monster that might come after the boys, the previously joyous atmosphere quickly bursted as fear settles on them. Though the beast only symbolized fear in the beginning, by the latter parts of the novel, it had become a representation of the savagery within a human. Simon was the first one to notice, at how he pointed out how maybe the beast lived within themselves. Also, Jack’s bloody offering to the beast, the sow’s head, represented how the darkness has taken over the hunters. Their belief in the beast strength as their savagery increased, it was almost as if they worshipped it, leaving offerings and such. Also, the Lord
In chapter five, the boys begin to discuss the existence of a beast on the island. When asked what he thought about it, Simon replied with “what I mean is... maybe it’s only us” (Golding 89). The idea that the evil was not something to be feared in the jungle, but to be feared within themselves was not received wel...
** Historical Context :** Eadweard Muybridge, born in England in 1830, was a pioneering photographer known for his work in capturing motion through sequential images. His career began in the mid-19th century, a time when photography was still in its infancy and the idea of capturing movement seemed impossible. At this time, most were static portraits or landscapes, lacking the dynamism and energy that motion could bring. During the 19th century, there was a growing interest in the study of motion, particularly in scientific and artistic circles.
Throughout the novel, Lord of the Flies, Simon has been unable to effectively communicate his message about the reality of beast, that the beast is really the innate evil nature that exists in everybody. Simon tries to articulate his idea, but yields when the others brush him off: “Maybe there is a beast.... maybe it's only us." (Golding, 80). Simon's inability to convey his message to the others stemmed from his own evil nature.