Victor and Manfred share an important similarity: the desire for radical autonomy. The paths the two characters embark on to follow this desire differ, causing Manfred to be seen a as an admirable protagonist, while Victor’s continuing attempts to attain a defiant autonomy prove to be self-defeating, and he is unable to attain a complete independence because of his responsibility for the monster, which grows and transforms into a dependency of the monster. Although the shared drive of being defiant in their independence is a key factor for the outcomes of both stories, Victor’s inability to be accountable for the responsibility he holds presents a critique of the Byronic hero in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein demonstrating that without the ability …show more content…
to take full accountability for one’s actions true autonomy can never be obtained. Manfred does not shy away from the responsibility he has with regards to Astarte and readily shoulders it.
He exemplifies this when he refuses to trade “lots” with the Chamois hunter saying that he can bear it no matter how wretched it may be (Manfred. II. 74-77). Because he takes accountability for this he is able to grow and become radical independent through the progress of the play. He transitions to defiant autonomy when Astarte refuses to provide forgiveness (III. 154-155). After this event, a spirit describes the change within Manfred: “Yet, see, he mastereth himself, and makes his torture tributary to his will” (III. 160-161). By taking accountability Manfred is able to harness his grievances and turn them into a means of promoting his will. The power he commands over himself shows a growth appropriate for his environment and being successful in the act of achieving this reprieve on his own shows him as …show more content…
honorable. While Victor desires to be fully independent, he does not take accountability for the responsibilities gathers through the novel, and because of this his desire for autonomy does not provide a celebrated outcome. By creating, and then abandoning the monster, Victor enslaves himself. He expresses his wish to be considered godlike: “A new species would bless [him] as its source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me” (Shelley. 80). However, he does not realize the responsibility a god would have to its creations; in this way, a god could not truly be autonomous without first acknowledging the responsibility it has. Victor’s lack of willingness to take on responsibility is displayed when he abandons the monster, rushing away in a frenzy (84). He later becomes ecstatic and manic when he realizes the monster has fled his apartment(86-87). In effect, temporarily releasing him from having to take accountability for the creation. This solution evaporates after William’s murder. Victor again, has to face his responsibility for the monster, not only that, but for the monster’s actions as well. He is aware of his responsibility, describing himself as “the true murderer” (109). He again tries to avoid taking responsibility by “rushing out of the court in agony” (106). Victor does attempt to take accountability and fulfill the monster’s of the creation of a female.
It is in his desire to be beheld as godlike only logical: “did [he] not, as his maker, owe him all the portion of happiness that is in [his] power to bestow?” (157). He saw this opportunity not only as a way to finally rid himself of the monster, but also extricate himself from his family: “I was delighted at the idea of spending a year or two in a change of scene…” (163). However, he cannot abide by the promise because it is not something he can easily ignore or run away from. Thus, Victor breaks his promise in a most dramatic fashion: “I thought with a sensation of madness on my promise of creating another like to him, and, trembling with passion, tore to pieces the thing on which I was engaged” (175). This act temporarily rids him of the unwanted responsibility, but catapults him into a dependency upon the monster. This dependency is strengthened after Elizabeth’s death, demonstrated by the seemingly endless and nonsensical journey the monster leads Victor on. The monster captivates Victor, and keeps him engaged in the chase; even assuring his health by providing him with sustenance and guiding his path by leaving “marks in writing on the barks of the trees, or cut in stone” as to not let him be led astray or lost
(204-205). Victor’s attempts to achieve a defiant autonomy are not an appropriate decision for his situation, as they are for Manfred’s situation, and instead cause a regression in his state of independence. This regression when coupled with how blatantly selfish Victor’s choices sometimes appear to defeat his heroic ambitions. Where Manfred is admirable, Victor loses much of the respect one may hold for him. In Mary Shelley’s novel, the desire for complete autonomy is not a glamorous pursuit; her antihero dramatizes how Manfred’s experience romanticizes the flawed notion of radical independence.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor and the monster go through a journey filled with love, betrayal, and ambition. However, there are key differences between the two of them. Victor leads a good life, but has an inner spark within him that leads him to rebel against the normal world and seek glory. The monster starts off with derelict beginnings and simply wishes for the basic needs that every human gets to experience such as love, affection, and friendship. Eventually, they both face problems, and as a result, devise evil plans, and yet their motivations and rationale cause the reader to have more sympathy for the monster than Frankenstein.
In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, values of society are clearly expressed. In this particular society and culture, a great value is placed on ideologies of individuals and their contribution to society. In order to highlight these values, Shelley utilizes the character of Victor Frankenstein. Frankenstein is the main character of the novel, and with his alienation, he plays a significant role that reveals the surrounding society’s assumptions and moral values of individualism and use in society. This is done through Victor’s actions of self-inflicted isolation.
Victor’s lack of compassion and sympathy towards the monster causes him to become angry instead of guilty. His cruelness to his creation made the monster kill and hurt the people he did but “when [he] reflected on [the monster’s] crimes and malice, [Victor’s] hatred and revenge burst all bounds of moderation,”(Shelley 325). Without compassion Victor thinks that the only way to stop the monster is to get revenge on him, instead of just giving him the empathy and kindness that monster craved. Victor realizes that "if he were vanquished, [he] should be a free man...balanced by those horrors of remorse and guilt which would pursue [him] until death. ”(Shelley 731).
The novel’s protagonist, Victor Frankenstein, emphasizes the importance of having an identity by exemplifying the dissatisfaction that accompanies contorted character-to-character relations. What makes his relationships particularly perverse however, is Victor himself as a person and family member. Often, male “participants in a moral conflict,” such as Victor, “may invoke ‘justice’ and insist on theoretical objectivity” to avoid taking responsibility for their actions, c...
If Victor had stayed around and showed the monster the real world, he might have not have went on to perform violent actions. This portrays Victor as a selfish character and gives more of an insight on his personal life. As a child, Victor is only interested in furthering his own knowledge and not worried about anyone else. He spent much of his time “drawing the picture of [his] early days... when [he] would account to [himself] for the birth of that passion which afterwards ruled [his] destiny” (Shelley 34), or otherwise a magnificent creation that would change his future. When constructing the Monster, he put all of his relatives in the back of his mind, and only focused on his own success and victory. This further explains the theme of being selfless and only doing certain things that will benefit
In this essay I will be looking at the differences between the creation of the first and second monster, how Mary Shelley portrays the feelings of Victor and the monster and the different myths and legends that she refers to within the novel. Victor Frankenstein had a wonderful life as a child: 'No human being could have passed a happier childhood than myself' (p.39) He was loving and cared deeply for his family, especially for his foster-sister, Elizabeth, who he looked upon as his own, and saw as a 'more than sister' (p.37). Victor always had an 'eager desire to learn' (p.39) about 'the secrets of heaven and earth' (p.39). When he was thirteen years old he started studying the works of Cornelius Agrippa and the fact that his father called it all 'sad trash' (p.40) fuelled his curiosity and enthusiasm and caused him to study even more which was to him, 'the fatal impulse that led to my [his] ruin' (p.41).
...e seeking help and strength to take care of problems in their lives. Victor Frankenstein is a man with a loving and caring family. Family and friends are an important part of his life. He has his whole life in front of him, when creates his monster. He creates the monster in the likeness of man with same need of love and affection as man. Although, this is his creation, he lets the monster down and does not care for him. The monster begins to feel neglected and lonely and wants desperately to have a human relationship. The monster turns angry and revengeful because he is so sad and abandoned. He wants Victor to feel the way that he does, all alone. The monster succeeds and Victor ends up losing all the important in his life and his own life. In the end, the monster dies and the need for human relationship becomes the destruction for both the monster and Victor.
Furthermore, after his creation breathes its first breath, Victor already despises it, which leads to his health’s deterioration and hatred of his previous love. His love quickly changes to despise when he says, “I had worked hard for nearly two years, for the sole purpose of infusing life into an inanimate body. For this I had deprived myself of rest and health. I had desired it with an ardor that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart” (53). His statement shows how his heart does a complete 1800 and stops loving the monster the moment it lives. When Victor’s “…heart palpitated in the sickness of fear…” (54), it proves how his monster tormented his creator without having to be near him. Which also leads to the teaching of the lesson “think before you act”.
Although “Frankenstein” is the story of Victor and his monster, Walton is the most reliable narrator throughout the novel. However, like most narrator’s, even his retelling of Victor’s story is skewed by prejudice and favoritism of the scientist’s point of view. Yet this could be attributed to the only view points he ever gets to truly hear are from Victor himself and not the monster that he only gets to meet after he comes to mourn his fallen master.
Victor Frankenstein, the monster’s creator, is the victim of his own pride. An ego unchecked is a dangerous thing. But in truth, it really just shows Victor’s humanity. He is privileged, educated, talented, loved, adored, but he is not perfect. His flaw is his own ego and pride. Without doubt, this is the result of a childhood where he was overindulged. Overindulged to the extent he was given a little girl “Elizabeth” as a “present”, whom he considered from childhood “mine only” (Shelley 21). Little wonder the twenty year old Victor would think he could create, control and command life. But Victor as with any indulged child did not take the time to learn much from his parents about parenting and fath...
...erstood that the real monster was his ambition which led to his overall tragedy. He died miserable because of his pride; one could say he is selfish because when creating the creature he did not think of the benefit of others.
In Frankenstein, Shelley creates two very complex characters. They embody the moral dilemmas that arise from the corruption and disturbance of the natural order of the world. When Victor Frankenstein is attending school, he becomes infatuated with creating a living being and starts stealing body parts from morgues around the university. After many months of hard work, he finishes one stormy night bringing his creation to life. However, “now that [Victor] had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled [his] heart” (Chambers). Right after Victor realizes what he has done, he falls into deep depression and must be nursed back to health by his friend. Victor spends the rest of the story facing consequences and moral problems from creating unnatural life. When he realizes that the ‘monster’ has killed his brother, even though no one believes him, he feels responsible for his brother’s murder because he was responsible for the existence of the ‘monster’. Also feeling responsible, Victor...
Victor was very saddened by the death of Elizabeth, and was determined to kill it, or be killed. For example Victors says, "You refuse my just demand; I have but one resource, and I devote myself, either in my life or death to his destruction" (348). Victor is basically saying that he will fight to the death, and somebody will die. Victors chase with the monster ultimately ends with his death. For example Walton says, "he pressed my hand feebly, and his eyes closed forever, while their radiation of a gentle smile passed away from his lips" (380). Victor died mainly from the death of Elizabeth, and he was exhausted from chasing the monster. Victor's death displayed that he cared more about Elizabeth's life than his
In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, many similarities can be seen between the creature and his creator, Victor Frankenstein. While Victor and the creature are similar, there are a few binary oppositions throughout the book that make them different. The binary oppositions in the novel serve as thematic contrast; and some of the most illustrative oppositions between the two characters are on the focus of family, parenthood, isolation and association with others.
Victor has a lack of respect for the natural world that leads him on the path to becoming a monster. In creating the monster Victor is trying to change the natural world. He is trying to play the role of god by creating life.