More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast between the interlopers and the story of the hour
Literary devices english 10
Compare and contrast between the interlopers and the story of the hour
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Opening the front door and a man farsightedness leads to death, destruction, and a tree.
Though “The Story of the Hour“ and “The Interlopers“ are short stories, they pack a punch with their similarities and differences which are full of irony, suspense, and paralyzing death.
There were many similarities between “The Story of the Hour” and “The Interlopers”. In both stories, they had a moment of clarity. In “The Story of the Hour”, the woman felt free and very happy to hear that her husband died in a railroad accident. “The Interlopers” moment of clarity was when the two men were stuck under a tree and they thought their men were coming to rescue them. Another similarity was that an unexpected visitor arrived and changed everything. In the first short story, “The Story of the Hour”, the woman was very happy to hear that her husband died, but then she faltered when she saw her very much alive husband walking through the front door. In the other short story, “The Interlopers“, the two men were overjoyed to see “their men coming to save them”, but in reality, their “men” were a pack of wolves. The third similarity was that the main character died.
…show more content…
“The Story of the Hour” had many differences.
In the story, there were inferences in these sentences that entails that the lady and her husband didn’t get along with each other. Looking back at the story, one of the clues was one of her thoughts “And yet she had loved him—sometimes. Often she had not.” . By hearing this bit of text, we can hypothesize that there were some problems with their relationship. Also, another difference in this story was the setting took place in the main character’s house. The last difference was the astounding irony, which, in the beginning, her family said, “We have to tell her slowly because she has a weak heart”. That comment, made by a secondary character, foreshadowed the impending heart
attack. There were also many differences in “The Interlopers”. According to the short story, the two men were from two different families, which fought one another for centuries, over a plot of land. The setting of this story mostly took place, during a sudden storm, under a tree. The final difference of the story was the ironic event that appeared in the end. When the two men were stuck under the tree, they made a vow to stop fighting with each other, so the two families can live in peace. After making their vow, the men decided to yell for help, hoping that either family would save them. In the end, the two men got someone’s attention, a pack of them. The irony was that they weren’t human and weren’t going to help; they were a pack of wolves. In conclusion, there were many similarities and differences in these two short stories. If the irony or the suspense hadn’t got the reader’s attention, the paralyzing death would have.
The short stories "The Interlopers" and "The Story of an Hour" are both great stories. The Interlopers stars Ulrich von Gradwitz and Georg Znaeym along with their decades-long family grudge. The Story of an Hour includes Mrs. Louise Mallard and the unfortunate death of her husband. To compare and contrast these stories, we need to know where their plots overlap and where they are set apart.
Why would a married woman go out, spend the night with a man whom she barely knows, when she has a wonderful, devoted husband and child? Mrs. Mallard's cry of ultimate relief and the joy she felt when she learned of her husband's deathis intolerable.
The starting of the story kept me in suspense: the starting sentence, “No one can accuse Philippa and me of having married in haste” (Fox 1). This clearly brought up the theme of love and marriage. The selection of words by the narrator told that the speaker did not regret his marriage. The defensive tone of the narrator made me to think that perhaps people had criticized his marriage.
The setting in the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” has many similarities and differences to the setting in “The Interlopers”. Though the settings differ in many ways, for example the danger of them and their contents, they are also similar in their mystery and vitality to the plot. These two pieces of writing hold many of the same ideas, but they also are original works that portray them in their own way.
In "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge," Ambrose Bierce recreates a few brief seconds of time for a man being executed whose cognition of these seconds is perceived as the better part of a full day. "All that day he traveled…" (paragraph 33). "In "The Story of an Hour," Kate Chopin relates a meaningful, yet unusual hour of time as the last one lived for a woman who has been given the news of her husband's death in a "railroad disaster" (paragraph 2). "She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance. She wept at once, with sudden, wild abandonment…" (paragraph 3). Both stories are centered on the powerful emotions that occur within the minds of the characters as they live out the last moments of their lives. The narrators reveal the most intimate thoughts of each character.
Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral” is a short story chock-full of irony. The story is presented from the point of view of the narrator, a jealous and somewhat bitter man, who remains nameless throughout. He is a man who has perfect eyesight, yet it is not until he meets a blind man, that he truly learns how to ‘see’.
Both stories transpire in a brief period of time. The events in the ‘Story of an Hour” develop in just one hour from beginning to end. Mrs. Mal...
Both of these short stories are excellent examples of works with masterfully expressed themes that leave a lasting impression on the reader. In particular, the impact of these two stories stems from the two authors' insightful choices about character description, as well as their use of literary device. Although both themes are, themselves, important, without each authors' decision to communicate their characters' traits in a subtle manner that restricted the accessibility of information to the reader, they might not have ended up being studied in literature classes today.
“The Interlopers by Saki” and “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin are two short and stories that are unique in their own ways. Each utilizes certain elements to keep the reader intrigued to the end. However, though they might be similar in that way, they are still quite different from each other.
In both The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman and The Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin, the authors develop detailed yet ambiguous stories riddled with common themes, clever symbols, fitting settings and dramatic conflict, creating classics we can not only glean from, but also enjoy as an entertaining read. When analyzed, the two short stories seem to mirror each other’s purpose through a mutual theme communicated in each story. This, however, does not stop at just that. It actually carries over to not only the general setting, but also the conflicts at hand and symbols used by the pair of writers, creating a great example of two literary works that can be compared successfully
The narrator is forbidden from work and confined to rest and leisure in the text because she is supposedly stricken with, "…temporary nervous depression - a slight hysterical tendency," that is diagnosed by both her husband and her brother, who is also a doctor (1).
She would not have grieved over someone she did not love. Even in the heat of her passion, she thinks about her lost love. She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death; the face that had never looked safe with love upon her, fixed and gray and dead. Her love may not have been the greatest love of all time, but it was still love. Marriage was not kind to Mrs. Mallard, her life was dull and not worth living, her face showed the years of repression.
Most women in Mrs Mallard’s situation were expected to be upset at the news of her husbands death, and they would worry more about her heart trouble, since the news could worsen her condition. However, her reaction is very different. At first she gets emotional and cries in front of her sister and her husbands friend, Richard. A little after, Mrs. Mallard finally sees an opportunity of freedom from her husbands death. She is crying in her bedroom, but then she starts to think of the freedom that she now has in her hands. “When she abandoned herse...
The story begins with the passage; “Knowing that Mrs. Mallard was afflicted with a heart trouble, great care was taken to break to her as gently as possible the news of her husband's death.” The conflict of the story begins here. Mrs. Mallard must be informed of her husband’s death, but there is worry about the condition of her heart and how she will react to the news. The next passage, “It was her sister Josephine who told her, in broken sentences; veiled hints that revealed in half concealing,” explains how this initial conflict was resolved. Two people, both close to Mrs. Mallard and Brentley Mallard, came to inform Louise of the bad news. The information was released to her in broken sentences as hints. This means that they did not walk in and tell Mrs. Mallard her husband had died. They used great care to walk around the subject, to lead Mrs. Mallard to her own conclusion that her husband was now dead. (Chopin)
The first reader has a guided perspective of the text that one would expect from a person who has never studied the short story; however the reader makes some valid points which enhance what is thought to be a guided knowledge of the text. The author describes Mrs. Mallard as a woman who seems to be the "victim" of an overbearing but occasionally loving husband. Being told of her husband's death, "She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance." (This shows that she is not totally locked into marriage as most women in her time). Although "she had loved him--sometimes," she automatically does not want to accept, blindly, the situation of being controlled by her husband. The reader identified Mrs. Mallard as not being a "one-dimensional, clone-like woman having a predictable, adequate emotional response for every life condition." In fact the reader believed that Mrs. Mallard had the exact opposite response to the death her husband because finally, she recognizes the freedom she has desired for a long time and it overcomes her sorrow. "Free! Body and soul free! She kept whispering." We can see that the reader got this idea form this particular phrase in the story because it illuminates the idea of her sorrow tuning to happiness.