Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical influences on literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Some may argue that “The Chrysanthemums” by John Steinbeck and “The Secret Lion” by Alberto Alvaro Rios are two completely different stories with not a lot in common, but I believe otherwise. Both stories emphasize themes of loyalty and persistence, and their protagonists’ struggles appear to mirror the obstacles each writer faced during childhood. Additionally, both stories are appreciative of nature, and discuss the idea of how the places the authors used to love as children have since depreciated, either to them personally like the arroyo to Rios, or in general, like in the case of Steinbeck, the fall of the western frontier. Both stories are also bildungsroman but in different senses of the word, like in “The Chrysanthemums” it goes along …show more content…
more with the theme of misogyny while in “The Secret Lion” the term takes a more literal meaning. Furthermore, symbolism of elevation is another common theme between the two stories.
“The Chrysanthemums” by John Steinbeck is about a woman by the name of Elisa Allen, who is oppressed by the men in her life. She is not able to live up to her full potential due to the patriarchal and misogynistic ways of society. She is frustrated with her life because despite her potential, she is forced into a “sphere” where according to Skredsvig, in her article “Women’s Space, Women’s Place: Topoanalysis in Steinbeck’s ‘The Chrysanthemums’,” females are supposed to be feminine, delicate, and maternal as opposed to men who have their own sphere. Despite her talent with growing things, her husband doesn’t let her help with the ranch because she is a woman. She is instead expected to complete her “womanly duty” which includes keeping the house in order and tending the garden. Steinbeck shows how over qualified and frustrated Elisa is for the job by describing the perfect condition of the house and …show more content…
garden. The only outlet to showcase her talent Elisa has are her chrysanthemums, which explains her devotion to them. Although some such as Bily in her article “The Chrysanthemums” would argue that her devotion to the flowers is due to her maternal instinct, and need to nurture something due to being childless. Bily also argues that “The Chrysanthemums” has an ecofeminist theme, which is the idea that both nature and women are oppressed by men, which I disagree with because by definition, feminism is gender equality, and saying that women somehow have a better relationship with nature because of their nurturing, gentle approach is not only stereotypical, but also it defeats the purpose of feminism. Even though Bily is right about nature playing a major part in the story, and Elisa having a “gift,” assuming all women are good with nature, and are nurturing is stereotypical, and sexist. “The Secret Lion” by Ríos on the other hand, is a bildungsroman.
It is written through the point of view of a man looking back to his childhood, when he was going through puberty, and the world started losing its magic. As he got older, he started seeing things differently, for example the place that he once believed to be heaven became just a golf course. Melgosa argues in his article “Rios, Alberto Alvaro 1952—” that Ríos uses a lot of common themes such as magic in ordinary things, coming of age, nature, and “rich symbolism” in his writings, which includes “The Secret Lion.” Both Ríos and Steinbeck use elevation for symbolism in their stories. The Salinas valley, for example, in “The Chrysanthemums” is seen as “a pot with no sunshine in December,” signifying it is a sad place that Elisa is trapped in. On the other hand, the hill in “The Secret Lion” is seen as heaven. Both characters have need to go to higher land symbolically and literally. Additionally, the arroyo in “The Secret Lion” is also mentioned multiple times and is meant to represent innocence and childhood, which as the character grows up, he visits it less and less. Rios grew up near the Mexican-American border, playing in nature, therefore his stories are a blend of the two cultures, while incorporating nature. Steinbeck similarly pulls inspiration from his life events, for example Elisa from “The Chrysanthemums” is said to be based off of Steinbeck’s first wife Carol Hennings. Tragedies such as the attack
on Pearl Harbor and his divorces, influenced Steinbeck’s writings. More specifically, Millichap argues in his article “Biography of John Steinbeck” that “(Steinbeck) grew up with a frustrated modern America and witnessed the most notable failure of the American Dream with the Great Depression….” Millichap continues by stating that the geographical settings Steinbeck grew up in, also became common in his writings such as the western frontier and of course the ever popular Salinas Valley. That “the time and place of his birth are important.” Busch claims in his article “Longing for the Lost Frontier: Steinbeck’s Vision of Cultural Decline in ‘The White Quail’ and ‘The Chrysanthemums’ that Steinbeck’s work was influenced by the western frontier, or more specifically, the downfall of the western frontier. Busch argues that “in the course of his forty year career, John Steinbeck consistently integrated elements of American frontier history, mythology, and symbolism into his fiction and nonfiction.” (1). Busch continues by stating that the tinker and Elisa’s husband are both symbols of the western frontier in Steinbeck’s short story “The Chrysanthemums,” which considering her husband is a cattle rancher, and the tinker roams the west in a wagon makes sense. The fact that his wagon is breaking down comes to represent the downfall of western culture. Ultimately, I agree with Busch because gender roles were often quite stereotypical in the west, Elisa only being allowed to do housework and grow flowers supports that claim, and that Steinbeck was influenced by the western frontier. Also the feminine stereotype of women that also went along with that time period is represented by how the tinker claims, that even though Elisa can fix pots just as well, if not better than he can, “it is no life for a lady.” I believe both stories are bildungsroman in one sense of the word or other. Elisa is going through puberty in the sense that she is confused about her life, and frustrated. She is stuck between being feminine and living up to her potential in the way people going through puberty are stuck between adolescence and maturity. The narrator from “The Secret Lion” on the other hand is going through puberty in a more literal sense of the term. In conclusion, I encourage readers to find the common themes of nature, persistence, and inspiration drawn from personal experiences in both stories, to see what I was talking about. Works Cited Bily, Cynthia. "The Chrysanthemums." Short Stories for Students. Detroit: Gale, 2002. Literature Resource Center. Web. 15 Feb. 2016. Busch, Christopher S. "Longing for the Lost Frontier: Steinbeck's Vision of Cultural Decline in 'The White Quail' and 'The Chrysanthemums'." Steinbeck Quarterly 26, nos. 3 and 4 (Summer–Fall 1993): 81–90. Quoted as "Longing for the Lost Frontier: Steinbeck's Vision of Cultural Decline in 'The White Quail' and 'The Chrysanthemums'" in Bloom, Harold, ed. John Steinbeck's Short Stories, Bloom's Modern Critical Interpretations. New York: Chelsea House Publishing, 2011. Bloom's Literature. Facts On File, Inc. Web. 16 Feb. 2016. Melgosa, Adrián Pérez. "Ríos, Alberto Álvaro 1952—." American Writers: A Collection of Literary Biographies, Supplement 4. Ed. A Walton Litz and Molly Weigh. Vol. 2. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1996. 537-556. Scribner Writers on GVRL. Web. 15 Feb. 2016. Millichap, Joseph R. "Biography of John Steinbeck." Critical Insights: The Grapes of Wrath. Ed. Keith Newline. Hackensack: Salem, 2010. n. pag. Salem Online. Web. 16 Feb. 2016. Skredsvig, Kari Meyers. "Women's Space, Women's Place: Topoanalysis in Steinbeck's 'The Chrysanthemums.'." Revisit de Philologer y Linguistic de la Universidad de Costa Rica 26.1 (Jan.-June 2000): 59-67. Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Jelena O. Krstovic. Vol. 135. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Literature Resource Center. Web. 15 Feb. 2016.
... Their attitude and tone is something that can be contrasted in the two stories.
...a group and “Ladies Committee”. The men do this on a minor scale, but the women are the focal points of these various actions by human beings, especially the selflessness that Rose of Sharon portrays when she saves a dying man. Steinbeck plots a map of the emotional world connected through female influence, like the love for kin that Ma shows when Pa was about to leave Casey and Tom behind with the Wilsons.
How does one compare the life of women to men in late nineteenth century to mid-twentieth century America? In this time the rights of women were progressing in the United States and there were two important authors, Kate Chopin and John Steinbeck. These authors may have shown the readers a glimpse of the inner sentiments of women in that time. They both wrote a fictitious story about women’s restraints by a masculine driven society that may have some realism to what women’s inequities may have been. The trials of the protagonists in both narratives are distinctive in many ways, only similar when it totals the macho goaded culture of that time. Even so, In Backpack Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing we hold two unlike fictional characters in two very different short stories similar to Elisa Allen in the “Chrysanthemums” and Mrs. Louise Mallard in “The Story of an Hour”, that have unusual struggles that came from the same sort of antagonist.
Restraints are set by parents on their children to aid with the developmental process and help with the maturity level. Restrictions and the ability to control exist in our society and our lives. We encounter restraints daily: job, doors, people, and the most frequently used and arduous become intangible. In the following stories tangible and intangible scenarios are presented. Autonomy, desires, and talents spurned by the husbands in John Steinbeck’s “The Chrysanthemums and Charlotte Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper.” The authors share views regarding a similar theme of male domination and imprisonment. “The Yellow Wallpaper” involves the treatment of a depressed woman who is driven insane in a male imposed detention in her own room. On the other hand, Elisa Allen in the “The Chrysanthemums” struggles internally to find her place in a fully male dominated society with definite gender roles. The mirror-like situations bring upon a different reaction for both the women in different ways. The importance of symbolism, control from their husbands, and the lack of a healthy marriage will be discussed in this paper in two stories.
Elisa Allen is a thirty-five-year-old woman who lives on a ranch in the Salinas Valley with her husband Henry. She is "lean and strong," and wears shapeless, functional clothes (Steinbeck 203). The couple has no children, no pets, no near neighbors, and Henry is busy doing chores on the ranch throughout the day. Elisa fills her hours by vigorously cleaning the ''hard-swept looking little house, with hard-polished windows,'' and by tending her flower garden (204). She has ''a gift'' for growing things, especially her chrysanthemums, and she is proud of it (204).
Growing up is unavoidable. No matter how much one tries to hold on to it its inevitable in one way or another we all grow up and mature. The elements used to support this idea are many different ones. The theme for "The Secret Lion” is loss of innocence or childhood; basically the main idea is growing up. This is the case with Alberto Alvaro Rios’s “The Secret Lion.” The whole story revolves around the twelve year old narrator whose name is unknown. But what we do know is that the character is going through changes that he doesn’t quite understand and it takes some time to assimilate.
"The Chrysanthemums" is a good depiction of most marriages in the early 1900's, the husband is the chief breadwinner and the wife is considered nothing more than a housewife. "The simple story outlines are enriched by irony and imagery which contrast the rich land and the sterile marriage, the fertile plants and Elisa's inner emptiness" (McCarthy 26). The story begins by introducing the setting: "The high grey-flannel fog of winter closed off the Salinas Valley from the sky and the rest of the world" (Steinbeck 115). This vivid illustration unconsciously gives the reader a look into the dominating theme. However, it is not until the climax of the story that the reader begins to notice Elisa's true pain and need for her own self-identity. The main protagonist i...
For readers who observe literature through a feminist lens, they will notice the depiction of female characters, and this makes a large statement on the author’s perception of feminism. Through portraying these women as specific female archetypes, the author creates sense of what roles women play in both their families and in society. In books such as The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck and The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, the roles that the main female characters play are, in different instances, both comparable and dissimilar.
The Salinas Valley is symbolic to Elisa’s inner feelings. The farm responsibilities Elisa shared with her husband Henry encouraged “cold and tender” thoughts that often left Elisa feeling “closed off from the rest of the world” (paragraph 1). Her consistent lonely and empty days began to “fog” the belief of any better days to come. The [quiet of waiting] was yearning for any “sharp and positive” (paragraph 2) notion that had yet to be nurtured. But until Elisa was given any chance to set free of such desires she had to remain forcibly content inside of her chrysanthemum garden.
Feminism in John Steinbeck’s The Chrysanthemums. At first glance, John Steinbeck’s "The Chrysanthemums" seems to be a story about a woman whose niche is in the garden. Upon deeper inspection, the story has strong notes of feminism in the central character, Elisa Allen. Elisa’s actions and feelings reflect her struggle as a woman trying and failing to emasculate herself in a male-dominated society.
Both Ernest Hemingway’s Hills Like White Elephants and John Steinbeck’s The Chrysanthemums portray oppressed female characters in the early 1900s. In Hemingway’s short, Jig is oppressed by her lover known only as “The American,” whereas, the main character in The Chrysanthemums, Elisa Allen, feels the weight of oppression from society (male dominated) as a whole. Although the driving force of the two women’s subjugation varies slightly, their emotional responses to such are what differentiate the two.
Reading literature, at first, might seem like simple stories. However, in works like William Faulkner's “A Rose for Emily,” Katherine Mansfield's “Miss Brill,” and Kate Chopin's “The Storm,” the female protagonists are examples of how society has oppressive expectations of women simply because of their gender.
“Frailty, thy name is a woman!” This quote can be found in William Shakespeare’s famed literary work, Hamlet. Throughout the decades and centuries there has been much dispute about the strength and role of “the weaker vessel.” But, many other sources have proven that women are, in fact just as strong if not stronger than any other “vessel.” In literary works throughout history, women have been portrayed in helpless and domestic, “feminine” roles. John Steinbeck did not employ this depiction in his novels, The Grapes of Wrath in particular. In the novel, The Grapes of Wrath the roles in which Stienbeck portrayed the women was contrary to the common roles of women, in the economic depression the United States suffered through in the 1930’s, which is the time period in which the book was set. Examining his portrayal of the female characters throughout the book one sees, the women becoming strong, dominant characters, and family leaders.
Women roles have changed drastically in the last 50 to 80 years, women no longer have to completely conform to society’s gender roles and now enjoy the idea of being individuals. Along with the evolution of women roles in society, women presence and acceptance have drastically grown in modern literature. In early literature it was common to see women roles as simply caretakers, wives or as background; women roles and ideas were nearly non-existent and was rather seen than heard. The belief that women were more involved in the raising of children and taking care of the household was a great theme in many early literatures; women did not get much credit for being apart of the frontier and expansion of many of the nations success until much later.
Katherine Mansfield belongs to a group of female authors that have used their financial resources and social standing to critique the patriarchal status quo. Like Virginia Woolf, Mansfield was socioeconomically privileged enough to write influential texts that have been deemed as ‘proto-feminist’ before the initial feminist movements. The progressive era in which Mansfield writes proves to be especially problematic because, “[w]hile the Modernist tradition typically undermined middle-class values, women … did not have the recognized rights necessary to fully embrace the liberation from the[se] values” (Martin 69). Her short stories emphasized particular facets of female oppression, ranging from gendered social inequality to economic classism, and it is apparent that “[p]oor or rich, single or married, Mansfield’s women characters are all victims of their society” (Aihong 101). Mansfield’s short stories, “The Garden Party” and “Miss Brill”, represent the feminist struggle to identify traditional patriarchy as an inherent caste system in modernity. This notion is exemplified through the social bonds women create, the naïve innocence associated with the upper classes, and the purposeful dehumanization of women through oppressive patriarchal methods. By examining the female characters in “The Garden Party” and “Miss Brill”, it is evident that their relationships with other characters and themselves notify the reader of their encultured classist preconceptions, which is beneficial to analyze before discussing the sources of oppression.