Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between setting and character in the necklace
Theme of the story the necklace
The Necklace Characters Analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Drew Caires
Essay
In the stories “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant and “The Gift of the Magi” by O. Henry, they both have themes having to do with true and false values. In both stories the characters chase after what they believe is important to only then later on find out what is truly valuable. Even with distinct characters and plots, these two stories manage to show the same theme through two different stories.
In “The Necklace” the main characters, Monsieur Loisel and Madame Loisel, have very different values, with these values changing throughout the story. In the beginning Mme. Loisel has a good life, she is middle-upper class with a good husband and home. She was born into a family of clerks which is also her husband's occupations.
…show more content…
Loisel’s husband, M. Loisel. His values are very different then hers. He was happy about his situation and his family unlike her. He cares about his wife and her happiness much more than material goods. In comparison to his wife, who also complains about dinner, he has a more positive outlook. Saying “Ah! A good stew! There’s nothing I like better.”(140) He also understands how his wife has these big dreams and he always tries to help her out. He gets her an invitation to the big dance, even with these being extremely hard to come by, especially for a clerk. Later on, when his wife says she can’t go because she doesn’t have a good dress he is willing to sacrifice money he had put aside to buy a rifle just for her happiness. He also has a much more positive outlook on the party in general. He believes Mme. Loisel will look just fine no matter what she wears, even if it’s only a basic dress and flowers. But, his wife doesn’t feel the same so he just goes along with it. When she does eventually lose the necklace her husband sticks by her side. He puts all of his money towards the new necklace while basically signing his life away to try and loan the money for the replacement necklace. This shows how he puts much value in his wife over himself and his values are greatly different from
Mrs. Loisel and the grandmother are very similar due to the fact that they both had the same motivation prior to their accident. It was a selfish motivation that cost them their lives. Mrs. Loisel's character was selfish in "The Necklace" because instead of wearing flowers like her husband suggested, she chose to borrow her friend's jewelry. "You can wear some natural flowers. At this season they look very chic. For ten francs you can have two or three magnificent roses. 'No, she replied, there is nothing more humiliating than to have a shabby air in the midst of rich women.'" (67) This is truly an act of selfishness on Mrs. Loisel's part. If she wouldn't have been so arrogant, she could have just worn the flowers to the party and it would have saved her a lot of trouble.
Guy de Maupassant expresses his theme through the use of situational irony. Guy de Maupassant says, “She suffered endlessly, feeling herself born for every delicacy and luxury. She suffered from the poorness of her house. All these things, of which other women of her class would not even have been aware, tormented and insulted her.”(De Maupassant). She is poor and thinks of herself too much and then he says "but she was as unhappy as though she had married beneath her; for women have no caste or class.”(De Maupassant). She wants more than she can get which will ruin her later in the story. When she lost the necklace by the end of the week they had lost all hope to find it. Loisel, who had aged five years, declared:
In the story, Guy de Maupassant clearly and effectively proves that people come before materialistic items. Such literary devices such as symbolism, situational irony, and juxtaposition are used to prove the theory. Symbolism was expressed through the necklace having a greater meaning within itself. The situational irony was expressed in three different ways. Mme. Loisels’ beauty, her judgment of character, and that her old life she hated, turned out to be greater than what was to come her way. The juxtaposition was shown through her and her husband marriage and values. In conclusion, people always have values that can change, or stay the same. Sometimes people’s values are poor and misleading, but it doesn’t mean they are not a good person at heart.
The stories of “The Necklace” by Guy De Maupassant and “A good man is hard to find” by Flannery O’Conner have many similarities to each other at first glance however, when analyzing deeper into the context, there are obvious differences that be found. The main characters of both of the stories are Mathilde from “The Necklace” and the grandmother from “A good man is hard to find”. Both of these characters are similar to each other as they both share their manipulative and controlling nature in such a way that causes the other characters in the stories to succumb to their desires, they also suffer from the sin of pride as they both refused to admit their mistakes which ultimately leads to their downfall, and the events that they encountered within their story eventually lead them both to undergo character change.
Knowing how she feels he surprises her with a ticket to the ball. He gives her his savings in order for her to buy a new gown. Though he was unable to get her any jewels he suggests her to tell her rich friend to let her borrow a necklaces in order to see his wife happy. On the contrary, the husband from "The Jewel" does not fully satisfy his wife in the way that she wanted. He dreads going out to the opera while his wife loves it. He was also unable to buy her luxurious jewels so she pleases herself with false jewels and ornaments. Though both men adore and love their wife, one tries harder than the other, even though neither one can afford paying the objects the ladies truly desire.
Around the world, values are expressed differently. Some people think that life is about the little things that make them happy. Others feel the opposite way and that expenses are the way to live. In Guy de Maupassant’s short story, “The Necklace”, he develops a character, Madame Loisel, who illustrates her different style of assessments. Madame Loisel, a beautiful woman, lives in a wonderful home with all the necessary supplies needed to live. However, she is very unhappy with her life. She feels she deserves a much more expensive and materialistic life than what she has. After pitying herself for not being the richest of her friends, she goes out and borrows a beautiful necklace from an ally. But as she misplaces the closest thing she has to the life she dreams of and not telling her friend about the mishap, she could have set herself aside from ten years of work. Through many literary devices, de Maupassant sends a message to value less substance articles so life can be spent wisely.
Throughout “The Necklace” it is clearly obvious that Madame Loisel is not satisfied with the
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
In “The Necklace” Guy De Maupassant writes a story about a woman and her husband and how a necklace changed their lives. The story begins with Maupassant describing Mathilde Loisel as a woman that was born into the wrong path of life due to her characteristics. Mathilde liked all the aspects of a rich lifestyle but she could not partake in these aspects because she was poor. She spent most of her time visualizing herself with a higher social status and interacting the things that came with it. One day her husband, Mister Loisel, was able to procure for her an invitation to a ball at a palace. Evidently, she wasn’t as excited as he was. She was sad that she wouldn’t be able to look good at the ball because she was to plain. Her husband decided that in order to please her, he would use his savings that he was going to use to buy a gun and give it to her in order to buy a dress. After she got the dress she was still sad because she didn’t have any jewelry to go along with it.
6. Mme. Loisel’s life changes with her becoming more poor which makes her give up some of the luxuries she had before she lost the necklace. She also becomes less beautiful and more strained. She changes on the inside by becoming a more honest and less lustful character. When the necklace is revealed to be a cheep fake, it symbolizes Mme. Loisel in the way that she way posing as a wealthy person when in fact she is not.
The man is not very picky and is mostly pleased with his life. While he enjoys his simple tastes, he would do anything for his wife, who he loves dearly. Loisel presents his wife the invitation to a fancy party, thinking she will be thrilled when she receives the news. However, when the woman begins to cry because she does not have an acceptable garment, he does what he can to fix the situation. In fact, the man goes as far as giving her the money that he was saving up for a new gun. When she questions him about wearing jewels, Monsieur Loisel suggests asking her rich friend for a loan. He even takes time to search for the jewels and report them missing when his wife misplaces them. Monsieur Loisel sees the world through an optimistic eye and does not feel the need to have more than what he already obtains. He appears to be a pleasant man with a fantastic heart. While he may not have as much as others, he is content with life and all he
In the short story “The Necklace”, the main character, Loisel, is a woman who dreams of greater things in her life. She is married to a poor clerk who tries his best to make her happy no matter what. In an attempt to try to bring happiness to his wife, he manages to get two invitations to a very classy ball, but even in light of this Loisel is still unhappy. Even when she gets a new dress she is still unhappy. This lasts until her husband suggests she borrows some jewelry from a friend, and upon doing so she is finally happy. Once the ball is over, and they reach home, Loisel has the horrible realization that she has lost the necklace, and after ten years of hard labor and suffering, they pay off debts incurred to get a replacement. The central idea of this story is how something small can have a life changing effect on our and others life’s. This idea is presented through internal and external conflicts, third person omniscient point of view, and the round-dynamic character of Loisel. The third person limited omniscient point-of-view is prevalent throughout this short story in the way that the author lets the reader only see into the main character’s thoughts. Loisel is revealed to the reader as being unhappy with her life and wishing for fancier things. “She suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born for all the delicacies and all the luxuries.” (de Maupassant 887) When her husband tries to fancy things up, “she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry which peopled the walls…” (de Maupassant 887) As the story goes on her point of view changes, as she “now knew the horrible existence of the needy. She took her part, moreover all of a sudden, with heroism.” (de Maupassant 891) Having the accountability to know that the “dreadful debt must be paid.” (de Maupassant 891 ) This point-of-view is used to help the reader gain more insight to how Loisel’s whole mindset is changed throughout her struggle to pay off their debts. Maupassant only reveals the thoughts and feelings of these this main character leaving all the others as flat characters. Loisel is a round-dynamic character in that Maupassant shows how she thought she was born in the wrong “station”. “She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was as unhappy as though she had really fallen from her proper station.
Honesty can prevent years of misery, guilt and regret which Guy de Maupassant depicts throughout “The Necklace.” Guy de Maupassant, a French writer, born in 1850, was considered one of France’s greatest short-story writers. His writings were mostly influenced by the divorce of his parents when he was thirteen years old and by great writers such as Shakespeare, Schopenhauer, and Flauber. His parent’s divorce caused his stories to depict unhappiness of matrimony, deceit, miscommunication, and a profound misunderstanding (Maupassant, Guy de, 1850-1893). In the short-story “The Necklace,” Madame Mathilde Loisel, an unhappy person living in Paris, France, is given an invitation to a party at the Ministerial Mansion, but she will not attend without a fancy dress to wear and fancy jewelry. Her husband tells her to borrow jewelry from her friend, Madame Forestier, but this ends up being her downfall. She borrows the necklace, and eventually loses it after the party. She ends up paying for it with 10 years of hard labor, only later to find out that it was a fake. In “The Necklace,” Maupassant proves the theme that things do not always turn out as one expects through the use of point of view, characterization, and irony.
In the short story, “The Necklace,” by Guy de Maupassant, the character Mme. Loisel progresses from selfish to selfless. One of the first descriptions of Mme Loisel, is of her “griev[ing] incessantly” (161). This grief she displays isn’t present because of a loss or tragic event, but because she feels that “she had been born for all the little necessities and luxuries of living” (161). Though she is blessed with a devoted husband, an apartment, and even a servant, she continues to weep and desire a better life. Indignant towards life, Mme. Loisel behaves selfishly. But, a full transition of her character is seen by the end of the story. Upon meeting Mme. Forestier ten years later, Mme Loisel reveals to her the truth about the necklace. “We’ve
The author uses the situational irony to highly impact the theme in the end of the short story. The necklace was supposed to make her younger, add more beauty to her, and make her feel better about herself, but the opposite happened. Madame Loisel and her husband became poorer than they were in the beginning and she has now aged and is more upset than before she borrowed the necklace. “Madame Loisel looked old now. She had became the sort of woman often found in poor households: tough, grasping and coarse”(103).