Similarities Between Steinbeck And Henry David Thoreau

486 Words1 Page

John Steinbeck and Henry David Thoreau, two famous American authors whom have both been known as a political writer with an agenda. These prominent authors are from different centuries but, have similar ideals in their literature. Political arguments can change over time but the ideals behind the issues stay the same. Thoreau writes about his beliefs upon what the government should rightfully do in his essay the “Civil Disobedience” compared to Steinbeck, who wrote about the correct and proper way to govern a country in “The Grapes of Wrath”. John Steinbeck and Henry David Thoreau both write about the government and problems surrounding it, but they have some variations between what they believe is morally acceptable. The governmental beliefs

Show More
Related

  • Comparing Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau

    1644 Words  | 4 Pages

    on ways to be civil but disobedient, they have opposite ways of convicing you. Dr.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Thoreau And Civil Disobedience

    596 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the great era of foundational philosophers, two stand out, Plato and Thoreau. Each had their own opinion on various topics, especially on civil disobedience. Plato’s life span was approximately 428-348 BC. Plato wrote numerous works throughout his lifetime, however we will be focusing on one, the Crito. Thoreau’s life span was 1817-1862. To help us determine what civil disobedience means to both of these philosophers we will first look at a general definition. According to Merriam-Webster civil disobedience is defined as “refusal to obey governmental demands or commands especially as a nonviolent and usually collective means of forcing concessions from the government.” This definition will act as a springboard to compare and contrast both of their thoughts on the topic. We will determine, according to Plato and Thoreau, when we are called to engage in civil disobedience and when the moral parameters of civil disobedience are pushed too far.

    Read More

  • Comparing Thoreau and Socrates

    341 Words  | 1 Pages

    Thoreau and Socrates start Civil Disobedience and Crito with basically the same premise. They both believe that humans are essentially moral beings. Thoreau says that people if left to their own ends will act justly, and should be treated accordingly by the law. Socrates says essentially the same thing, he says that "no one wants to commit injustice" for its own sake, many people end up doing so anyway. Socrates says that the citizens of a government have entered into an agreement to abide by its laws in exchange for protection. He also says that if one believes these laws to be unjust, one can always leave, but if one agrees to abide by the laws they have a duty to be subjected to punishment if they break these laws. Thoreau on the other hand says that it is the duty of the people not to abide by a law if they perceive it to be unjust, and if they claim to be opposed to it and nevertheless abide by it, they are a hypocrite.

    Read More

  • Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Justification of Defying Unjust Laws

    1828 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...his conscience not the law, “I have paid no poll tax for six years. I was put into a jail once on this account” (Thoreau, P. 26). The rhetorical position of the two writers is close because they both depend on their character to make their arguments more persuasive. On the other hand, Thoreau quoted from important documents like the Bible and the Confucius to make his essay more persuasive and to increase the likelihood that the audience will accept his argument.

    Read More

  • Thoreau's Civil Disobedience and Walden

    1527 Words  | 4 Pages

    Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) was an American philosopher, author, poet, abolitionist, and naturalist. He was famous for his essay, “Civil Disobedience”, and his book, Walden. He believed in individual conscience and nonviolent acts of political resistance to protest unfair laws. Moreover, he valued the importance of observing nature, being individual, and living in a simple life by his own values. His writings later influenced the thoughts of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. In “Civil Disobedience” and Walden, he advocated individual nonviolent resistance to the unjust state and reflected his simple living in the nature.

    Read More

  • Parrallels in the Life of John Steinbeck and the Characters in his Works

    2511 Words  | 6 Pages

    John Steinbeck was perhaps the best author of all time. He was the winner of a Nobel Prize, and among other accomplishments, Steinbeck published nineteen novels and made many movies during his lifetime. All of his experience and knowledge are shown through his novels. A reader can tell, just in reading a novel by Steinbeck, that he had been through a lot throughout his life. Also, Steinbeck worked very hard to accomplish everything that he did during his lifetime. Nothing came very easily to him, and he had to earn everything he owned. This helped him in his writing, because he was able to write about real people and real experiences. John Steinbeck got his inspiration from life experiences, people he knew, and places he had gone.

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience In Thoreau's Occupy Wall Street Movement

    1293 Words  | 3 Pages

    Though Thoreau 's basis was more along the lines of environmentalism he was quite the political man in his essay Civil Disobedience. Thoreau 's thoughts on the American government can be seen in the first few paragraphs

    Read More

  • Benjamin Franklin & Henry David Thoreau

    1056 Words  | 3 Pages

    Benjamin Franklin and Henry David Thoreau have been thought of as two powerful philosophers in history. Both men were alive centuries ago, but their unique ways of life and ideas still exist in some of history’s most admirable figures. Each man had a judgment that went beyond the era they existed in, but is still obvious in today’s culture. Even though both men are credited for their wise principles, their beliefs do not always coincide with one another. However, one thing they do have in common is that they both revolutionized America through their thoughts, actions, and distinctive opinions on how to improve the world around them.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Beliefs

    604 Words  | 2 Pages

    know it by experience, and be able to give a true account of it in my

    Read More

  • Individualism In David Henry Thoreau's Conscience For America

    1100 Words  | 3 Pages

    Next, we have David Henry Thoreau who wrote Civil Disobedience and Other Essays. In his famous speech, “Slavery in Massachusetts,” Thoreau is seen as a strident speaker in his opposition to slavery, overall not representing the prevailing view at the time and wanting to bring light to a new viewpoint. He is seen as the conscience of our nation through his goal of the betterment of mankind, overall wanting to create more humane ways in society, establish truth, and eliminate governmental inequity. Therefore in this speech, Thoreau emphasizes on individualism as well as his depiction of the lack of logic within the governmental law during the nineteenth century. He illustrates to the American audience that society is polluting man with the current government inequity. He states, “I

    Read More

  • Journey Of John Steinbeck's Life

    915 Words  | 2 Pages

    The journey of John Steinbeck's life is summarized in a line: "A life close to the character of an ideal American, the kind the constitution does its best to reflect and which does more good for his country than all its propaganda at a time of trial" (Benson 2003: xxvi).

    Read More

  • Emerson and Thoreau

    780 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both Thoreau and Emerson argue that asserting one’s opinions is crucial to attaining a better society. Emerson decries the danger of societal conformity and challenges the reader to “speak what you think now in hard words” in order to remedy it (Emerson 367). Likewise, Thoreau speculates that if “every man make known what kind of government would command his respect” it would be “one step toward obtaining it” (Thoreau 381). With these remarkably similar statements, both transcendentalists appeal to the reader’s patriotism by using language evocative of the agitated and outraged colonial Americans who demanded the people’s voice be heard in government. Although published roughly a half century later, “Self-Reliance” and “Civil Disobedience” mirror the sentiments of famous Revolution-era leaders such as Thomas Paine and Patrick Henry.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Thoreau And Thoreau

    777 Words  | 2 Pages

    The who seems a little obvious as the main intended audience for both Thoreau and Martin is the everyday writer. Their easy laid back styles make their writings engaging and thoughtful, as well as a light read. I felt both writers were able to get across the importance they place on writing without becoming technical,

    Read More

  • Personal Freedom and Independence: The Works of Benjamin Franklin and Henry David Thoreau

    1787 Words  | 4 Pages

    It is an undisputable fact that the contribution of such prominent philosophers, writers, political and social activists as Benjamin Franklin and Henry David Thoreau in developing American statehood is tremendous. The literary works of both men can serve as a manifesto of national and personal liberation, a call for building a better society, where each citizen can live and work freely. Indeed, both Henry Thoreau and Benjamin Franklin emphasize the independence and freedom of an individual, but they do so in significantly different ways. These differences can be linked to their different worldview, life positions, philosophies, or interests. Nevertheless, this fact cannot detract from the obvious uniqueness and importance of Thoreau’s and Franklin’s literary heritage.

    Read More

  • Thoreau's Transcendentalism: Impact Beyond Literature

    1456 Words  | 3 Pages

    To him, reality and nature symbolized this higher truth, and, hence, universal laws are perceived in his work (Manzari 3). One specific theme involved the simultaneous relationship between the individual and government. “Civil Disobedience” embodied the ideal that citizens within the scope of government should do what they personally think is right and not what government dictates. Thoreau’s works constantly confronted the injustices perpetuated by the government (Harding and Meyer 135). Explicitly, “Civil Disobedience” discussed the topic of slavery and how Thoreau was morally opposed to the idea in its entirety. He paid homage to the fact that expediency does not take priority over justice. Meaning, the concept of slavery was all too convenient because nobody thought of an intellectual alternative. Thoreau believed in the notion of equality through his writings of, “…my government which is the slave’s government also” (Thoreau 3). The moral of his writings incorporated the ideal that no matter what the costs may be, justice must advance in society because, as humans, we are “ethically and morally obligated” to do the right thing (Neufeldt and Smith 70). He also focused on the contradictory platform of so-called democracy and ultimately the only option to refute such governmental flaws was to become civilly disobedient. On the other hand, in Walden,

    Read More

More about Similarities Between Steinbeck And Henry David Thoreau

Open Document