Similarities Between Slave Traders And Owners

1428 Words3 Pages

The slave business ensued for the reason that it became a practical and profitable business in the 1600 to1800’s. Many people have not considered the parts they play and how different they may be. The most obvious similarity between the two happens to be their eyes for profit .The men that entered the slave business did it for income. Despite this similarity, there remained three items that the two did not share, status being one. Another being that they had a completely different need of the slaves they dealt with. The final difference is that the slave owners paid for their slaves and the slave Traders took the slaves and sold them to the Owners. There are a few people that discuss the differences and similarities between Traders and Owners: …show more content…

For example, the slave Owners needed the slaves to work their fields and bring in the profit and the crops they needed to survive. This idea is proven by Zinn, “The Virginians needed labor to grow corn for sustenance and to grow tobacco for export” (25). The Owners of the slaves needed them in order for their efforts to bring in profit. In order to survive and bring in an income Owners needed slaves to cultivate the land that they had. This is different from the needs of the Traders, which focused solely on profit. The Traders did not need the slaves to work the land they had, they needed them so they sell them to the Owners. The Trader’s needs are explained by Zinn, “By 1800 10 to 15 million blacks had been transported as slaves to the Americas” (29). With this many slaves being transported Traders began to gain a vast profit. They did not need them to survive like the Owners did, they needed others to keep wanting slaves so the Traders can keep providing them what they needed, and by the numbers Zinn gives “10 to 15 million” that’s enough demand to give plenty of Traders a profit. With that amount of slaves being transported, one can only imagine the profits that motivated the slave Traders to keep taking slaves to the Americas. Understanding the needs of the Owners and Traders makes it easier to identify the treatment that both gave to the …show more content…

The slave Traders genuinely did not care about the treatment of slaves, and they treated them how ranchers would treat their cattle. This is proven by Zinn, “They are brought down to a large plain, where the ships surgeon examines every part of them, to the smallest member, men and women being stark naked… Such are allowed good and sound are set on one side… Marked on the breast with a red hot iron, imprinting the mark of the French, English, or Dutch companies” (28). The Traders did not care about the treatment of the slaves only that the slaves got to their future Owners marked and ready for servitude. If a few slaves were lost along the way it did not bother the Traders much, they still got their profit and moved on. While the slave Owners had to treat them a little better because they were their property now. The treatment of slaves in America became known as, “It was a harsh servitude, but they had rights which slaves brought to America did not have, and they were altogether different from the human cattle of the slave ships and the American plantations” (27). The slave Traders treated the slaves like products while the slave Owners simply thought of them as farming equipment. The Owners knew in order to prosper they needed to take care of their equipment, but the slave Traders had the mentality that “there’s more where that came from”. It is in this way the slave Owners and Traders are

Open Document