Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
C s lewis short essays christianity
Christianity impact on literature
Essays on mere christianity cs lewis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: C s lewis short essays christianity
Out of the Silent Planet is a Science Fiction novel written by C.S. Lewis. This genre of writing holds a mix of different and similar characteristics as Lewis’ Narnia books. Differences including direct mentioning of religion, and similarities such as the narrating style. These show that though it is a different genre Lewis still leaves similar pieces in each book or set of books.
A major difference in Out of the Silent Planet compared to the Narnia novels is the direct religious references. In Narnia because it is not a religious allegory there are few a direct references to religion. Direct meaning characters praying, mentioning God or mentioning anything religious in general. These direct references to religion come up several times in
…show more content…
Out of the Silent Planet, mainly involving Ransom praying. Ransom prays during the books multiple times such as “nursed his bruised limbs and prayed for the end,” and “he prayed fervently that there might be only one.” Both of those were in situations of hardship or distress. In Narnia the only thing that could be considered as praying is when Lucy whispers to Aslan saying in one such instance “Aslan, Aslan if you ever loved us at all please send us help now.” Though this is also during a moment of distress it is not referred to as praying to Aslan. Therefore, it cannot be categorized as direct reference to religion. Religion not only comes up in prayer, but also when Ransom encounters the hrossa. While learning about these creatures Ransom, after hearing the word séroni, thinks about hrossa’s religion at one point saying, “perhaps hrossa had a mythology—he took it for granted they were on a low cultural level— and the séroni were gods or demons.” This thought process about another cultures gods happens to a point with the Calormenes’ Tash in The Last Battle, the talking animals discuss how the Calormenes worship him stating, “They have a god called Tash… They kill men on his altar.” Though Aslan is a big part of Narnia and it seems that he is the Narnians’ Tash he is never referred to that way, so he in itself is not a direct reference to religion. This difference is something that would seem deliberate especially leaving out religious references in the Narnia books because they are not a religious allegory. A similarity that Lewis seems to use is that in both Out of the Silent Planet and the Narnia books there is the same type of storyteller narrator.
Lewis either breaks the fourth wall to mention the books in general or to comment to the audience. By commenting to the audience in both books it gives sort of this storyteller feel to it. This comes up in Out of the Silent Planet as the narrator says, “as anyone who has ‘kept house’ will understand, he found that his preparations for the morning had been even more incomplete than he supposed.” It also comes up in the Narnia books several times such as, “It was his own fault, and you can read about it in the other book.” The narrator also achieves the storyteller style in Narnia when he refers to himself saying, “I never heard of a dwarf who was a fool.” It becomes a sort of storyteller narration because he is adding on to the story as if he was telling to you right then and there. This narration also comes up when he mentions his book that the reader is currently reading. In Out of the Silent Planet the narrator says, “bearing on the events recorded in this book or whether it was merely an irresponsible dream.” This also happens in the Narnia book several times. Since Narnia is a children’s book it makes since that the story is a storyteller narrator because keeps the storytelling that children are used to from other figures in there life. Now Out of the Silent Planet is not written for a child audience so why does the narrating style stick. It could be purely accidental or it could be that Lewis did it on purpose for this book as well. Either way it shows that authors can employ the same writing techniques in vastly different
books. How an author writes a story usually differs vastly based on the genre of that book. Though many times certain styles stick. Whether it’s because the author enjoyed that style or something else entirely, it causes many of the authors works to have a certain quality surrounding it.
Whilst every text is unique, they can also have many similarities with other texts. Such is the case with The Dark Game by Paul Janeczko, and the Code Book by Simon Singh. These both focus use the
The story of Rikki-tikki by Rudyard Kipling is a great one, so great that there is a movie made after the book. The Movie follows the story of the book, but there are differences. The differences are very small, and don’t change the story’s theme. There are more similarities between the story and the movie them there are differences, however.
The Christian Sci-Fi novel, Out of the Silent Planet, was written by the British theologian, author, and professor C.S. Lewis in 1938. The book is a third-person account of the space travels and alien encounters of a lonely philologist named Elwin Ransom, who is abducted by two elementary schoolmates while he was on a walking-tour. This begins his unexpected galactic journey to Malacandra, where upon landing there, he escapes from his kidnappers and experiences the nature, creatures, and morals of the foreign land.
There are many differences and similarities in the short story of “A Sound of Thunder” and the movie.
The book Hoot and the movie Hoot are very alike and very different. Some people like them both but some people only like one, or neither.
The film and writing industry go hand in hand, as they often inspire one another. As a result, the translation of many novels into movie format and vice versa vary in success. For instance, many people prefer the film format over the novel since it is usually less time consuming and requires less active participation. However, films tend to overlook significant details which assist the viewer's understanding of the story. Therefore, the two separate forms of media have too many differences to portray the same work of fiction accurately, as they both have their pros and cons that appeal to different types of stories and plots. Numerous changes in the movie adaptation of the novel, A Separate Peace by John Knowles, affected the viewer’s interpretation
Quite a while before “green” was the new black; Dr. Seuss wrote a cautionary story about trees. The Lorax, originally published in 1971 by Dr. Seuss, became a classic children’s book. The classic was recently turned into an animated film. In 2012, The Lorax film was made by directors Chris Renaud and Kyle Balda (“The Lorax”). The book and the film have the same basic storyline; however, there are a few differences. The Lorax film is more in depth than the book. The book, The Lorax went through many changes to become a film.
In 1952, Ray Bradbury published the science fiction short story “A Sound Of Thunder.” The story was about a hunter named Eckels who goes to a company called Time Safari Inc, which allows hunters to travel back in time to hunt the Tyrannosaurus rex, while he back in time he steps on a butterfly which causes the present time to change. The film version of “A Sound Of Thunder” that came out in 2005 has a similar plot; a group of hunters go back in time at Time Safari Inc. which causes an unknown change in the present that Travis Ryer and Sonya Rand try to find the cause and fix.
A Comparison A Sound of Thunder by Ray Bradbury and The Star by H.G. Wells
So many books or pieces of literature have been made into films. At times the films can mirror exactly what the author wrote and hoped to convey, but often films can either create this sense of enhancement of the book or distort it completely due to more or less background information and a change the perspective of the main character. The book Into the Wild, written by John Krakauer was one of those movies that was recreated into film by director Sean Penn. This is a story of a young man who is unsettled with the poisoned ways of society. He goes on to destroy his previous identity and creates a new one, he abandons his home, car, life-savings, and family life to live on the road and in the wilderness of Alaska. It was mentioned he was trying to escape society as a whole and find himself and happiness. Both the book and the film follow a pretty consistent plot that correlate with each other, both making it evident that Chris was a polarizing subject. So, why does the book portray Chis McCandles as a charismatic, outgoing, well-educated nice kid, as where the movie portrays him more as foolish, immature, unprepared boy biting off more than he can chew? It all depends on your interpretation of both sources within the given information. The following comparison will address the book versus film version of Into the Wild and raise the issue of the amount of background information given in the book versus the film and the change in perspective of the main character Christoper Johnson McCandles.
The Martian is a story that involves a visit to the mars, and after that, the astronauts come out of the Mars leaving behind Mark Watney who his real name is Matt Damon. The team assumed Mark was dead after a strong storm. He tried to survive with the remains of the supplier till he was able to launch his way back to the Earth (MacIsaac, 2015). The story is represented in the Novel, and a movie and these two platforms have some similarities and differences. The movie is the representation of what is happening in the book. Therefore, not everything that it is in the book is covered in the one and half film, therefore several scenarios are left out.
The dialogue a narrator uses with characters in a short story reflects on how the story is being understood by the reader. A character’s dialogue is assumed to be controlled by the author, and then the reader comprehends the dialogue through different points of view in which is told by a narrator. Which point of view the author uses can change how the reader may understand the story. Understanding a story is not just based off the ability to comprehend the plot, setting, characters, and theme. But importantly, understanding what point of view the narrator is in and whether the narrator has dialogue with characters within the story is important. The short story “Lusus Naturae”, written by Margaret Atwood, it’s a short story told by a first person narrator who is a main character in the story but has very minimum dialogue with the other characters. Another short story, “Sonny’s Blues”, written by James Baldwin, is
...re imaginative and child friendly. These stories had many of the same dilemmas and faced many of the same challenges. They both had to do with innocence, betrayal, and temptation. C.S. Lewis’s work was defiantly reflective of the Bible, but it fit better with the times, and the people. This trend of using fiction as a device to spread messages, like religion, has been used, is being used, and will continue to be used in the future. In the end the stories are different, but the messages are all the same.
Happiness: an idea so abstract and intangible that it requires one usually a lifetime to discover. Many quantify happiness to their monetary wealth, their materialistic empire, or time spent in relationships. However, others qualify happiness as a humble campaign to escape the squalor and dilapidation of oppressive societies, to educate oneself on the anatomy of the human soul, and to locate oneself in a world where being happy dissolves from a number to spiritual existence. Correspondingly, Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 and Krakauer’s Into the Wild illuminate the struggles of contentment through protagonists which venture against norms in their dystopian or dissatisfying societies to find the virtuous refuge of happiness. Manifestly, societal
In Heart of Darkness and The Stranger Joseph Conrad and Albert Camus manipulate different styles of language and structure, yet both emphasize the isolation of the protagonists from society. In Heart of Darkness Conrad employs descriptive language and metaphors about society while using minor roles in order to display Marlow’s isolation. Meanwhile in The Stranger Camus structures the story in two parts to capture both sides of Meursault yet still develops a simple and direct writing style throughout the story to keep the theme of isolation. Through the theme of isolation both Conrad and Camus present the idea that life can be meaningless if not shared with the company of others.