Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of the french revolution on france and europe
Enlightenment and Napoleon's rule 1799-1815
Effects of the french revolution on france and europe
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
4. Napoleon seriously did adhere to the ideals of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution both in France and where he attempted to spread it like in Westphalia. It is evident that the adhered to the ideals of the Enlightenment as he claims to promote freedom of religion like the ideas of Voltaire as well as safeguarding the protection of natural rights such as liberty, equality, and prosperity like the ideas of Locke. Additionally, he mentions that the sovereignty is in the people coming from the ideas of Montesquieu and also mentions people’s right to a public trial. He adheres to the French Revolution ideas by abolishing serfdom and equalizing tax. Additionally, undermining the power of the nobility also reflect the ideas of the French …show more content…
In her critique of Napoleon, Madame de Stael demonstrates an astute awareness of politics and human nature as she informs people how they cannot be blinded by the Napoleon’s reforms because he is obviously arresting absolute power over the people of France. She is able to see through his façade as the “liberator” of France and can see that he is just a dictator. She calls for people to see that he has established a tyranny and he has been fooling everyone. She claims he produced a constitution that does not safeguard the people at all and that he inhibits the freedoms they earned during the revolution like freedom of the press. She discusses how the people that do publish their opinion are hired writers so they do not actually use freedom of the press because what they publish is not the opinion of the people. She cannot believe that after all the people fought for against the old regime, they let Napoleon take advantage of them. She really shows her capabilities of seeing how Napoleon has risen to power and took away more rights than if he did not come into …show more content…
The Congress of Vienna was a meeting of the Quadruple Alliance after the defeat of Napoleon to make a peace accord that would deal with the aftermath of the Napoleonic Wars. They had to construct a long lasting peace settlement that would not cause more war and keep the balance of power. They had to reassign the borders because of the former territories that was taken by the French. The head of the Congress of Vienna was Prince Klemens von Metternich of Austria and the other main powers was Alexander I of Russia, King Friedrich Wilhelm III of Prussia, Robert Castlereagh from Britain, and eventually Charles Talleyrand from France. The concept of the balance of power in 1814 and 1815 was to make sure that there was a balance of military and political power and to make sure that one state or an alliance was able to dominate all of Europe. Therefore, with great discussion and arguing, they had to agree how to split up the former French territory to keep that balance. Belgium and Holland became the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the German speaking lands became the German Confederation, Austria received Venetia and Lombardy, Britain had received the French colonies, Russia took a small part of the Polish territory, and Prussia took the other part of the Polish territory and a part of
Napoleon just maintains the goals of the French Revolution since he needed to secure and reinforce his own energy. Amid his ascent to power, Napoleon stuck to the goals obediently. In his discourse to his troops, Napoleon said, "We are taking up arms as liberal foes, and we wish just to squash the despots who subjugate [the Italian people]" (Document 1). He instructs them to be deferential of different nations, to give them rights they have the privilege to appreciate. This takes after Locke's illumination thoughts, that everybody has natural rights that can't be taken away.
In short, the three key principles are liberty, equality and fraternity. It is generally thought that Napoleon was a supporter of these principles. Historian Georges Lefebvre wrote that Bonaparte was “.... ... middle of paper ... ... It was he who ended the revolution in France, consolidated its gains, corrected its extravagances and exported its ideals to Europe.
While Robespierre and Napoleon violated the French Revolution’s ideal of liberty, both rulers preserved the ideal of equality. Neither Robespierre nor Napoleon led with freedom from absolutism, but both spread the nationalist zeal during or after the Reign of Terror. There are also other ideals of the revolution preserved and undermined by the two rulers, including will for a limited government, religious toleration, and protection of individual rights. Specifically, Robespierre preserved the ideal of equality during the Reign of Terror.
that contributed to the rise and fall of the French Monarchy. The ideas of the
It is said that Napoleon considered himself a “child of the Revolution” and that his rise to power represented the natural culmination of the French Revolution. Others, such as Ludwig von Beethoven and Francisco Goya, argued that Napoleon had betrayed the values and ideas of the French Revolution. It seems more credible that Napoleon had betrayed the values and ideas of the French Revolution. Some ideals that Napoleon have betrayed were liberty, equality, and fraternity. Napoleon Bonaparte was an ambitious man of conquest and showed his passion of it by conquering most of Western Europe.
Napoleon was able to grant French citizens natural rights, which was the main purpose of the Revolution, and use this to better society as a whole. For example, he used a plebiscite, vote of the people, to approve a new constitution that gave him power to rule. By getting the consent of the people to rule and to create and pursue certain actions in government, Napoleon used the governed as a ruling mechanism; he didn't ignore them. He created a system of meritocracy (what the people wanted): granting positions to those that deserved them based on qualifications, not just handing out jobs to people of higher social status giving “careers open to talent (Coffin and Stacey, 494).” Finally through his supremacy as French ruler,...
... It is important to understand that since France had just exited a revolution, it was pretty fragile; one big mistake and France might have ended up in another one. Napoleon was not only a child of both the French Revolution and the Enlightenment, he was also a very intelligent person. His cunning and wits led him to be one of the greatest, if not the greatest, enlightened despots of all time. Works Consulted (none of the above).
The enlightenment was a time of great learning throughout Europe during the eighteenth century. Although the period is significant for scientific and other scholastic advancements, it is most important because it allowed for the opening of great minds—such as that of Napoleon Bonaparte. Shortly after this enlightenment made its way through Europe, revolution and civil war ripped through France between 1879 and 1899. The unrest of the time called for a strong ruler. A man/woman with an open mind and an enlightened soul. France needed a child of the enlightenment to sew its tattered flag. Napoleon Bonaparte was a child of the enlightenment. This was displayed in both his attitudes and policies as a result of enlightened religious ideas, political genius, and social reforms.
The essential cause of the French revolution was the collision between a powerful, rising bourgeoisie and an entrenched aristocracy defending its privileges”. This statement is very accurate, to some extent. Although the collision between the two groups was probably the main cause of the revolution, there were two other things that also contributed to the insanity during the French revolution – the debt that France was in as well as the famine. Therefore, it was the juxtaposing of the bourgeoisie and the aristocracy as well as the debt and famine France was in that influenced the French Revolution.
Napoleon Betrayed the Revolution In order to investigate the claim that ‘Napoleon betrayed the revolution’, it has to be determined what is the French revolution? And what are the revolutionary ideals that Napoleon allegedly betrayed? If Napoleon betrayed the Revolution, then he betrayed the ideals of liberty, equality and fraternity. However, if Napoleon did not betray the revolution, he consolidated the revolutionary ideals.
However, the noble-born were not ready to lose their supremacy, and there are very high chances that had they been aware of what the low-class citizens were planning, they would have retaliated with brutal force. Consequently, an upheaval was a need to change France, and anything contrary to that would need concrete proof that the Crown was ready to consider the problems of the people. On that note, contrary to Burke’s views, the people obviously had enough sense to realize that they were never going to have any privileges without force.
Kirchberger, Joe H. The French Revolution and Napoleon. New York: Facts on File inc, 1989.
... It stated what was reasonably correct, not just what was traditionally taught to people. It allowed the French people to gain a surfeit of power and have a say in the government. However, their work was obliterated once Napoleon Bonaparte declared himself dictator of France in 1799 (French Revolution 13). Not only did the Enlightenment cause the French Revolution by allowing the people to see how inferior France really was, making them question divine right, and opening their eyes to the injustice occurring between states, but it also described the United States as the epitome of an ideal society.
Metternich is well known for the Metternich System, which was put into practice during his most notable success, the Congress of Vienna of 1815. Metternich, additionally, was the guiding spirit of the international congresses, Aachen, Carlsbad, Troppau, Laibach, and Verona and was the chief statesman of the Holy Alliance. The Congress of Vienna, though, and the agreements that followed were the basis for, "no war involving several powers until the Crimean conflicts of the 1850's and no major war embroiling the whole of Europe until 1914." Metternich's goal, however, was not a peaceful Europe for the sake of peace, but for the preservation of the Austrian Empire who was threatened by possible aggressors on all sides, as well as, his personal loathing for liberalism and revolutionary behavior. Moreover, the Congress of Vienna gave Metternich the opportunity to instill his values of conservatism into the other leaders of Europe in a time when liberalism and revolution were the predominant political trends. Even though Metternich was a firm believer in the conservative values of his time, he worked to spread those ideas in 1815 for the more pragmatic reason of balancing power in the European Concert rather than for abstract ideologies.
With all the glory and the splendour that some countries may have experienced, never has history seen how only only one man, Napoleon, brought up his country, France, from its most tormented status, to the very pinnacle of its height in just a few years time. He was a military hero who won splendid land-based battles, which allowed him to dominate most of the European continent. He was a man with ambition, great self-control and calculation, a great strategist, a genius; whatever it was, he was simply the best. But, even though how great this person was, something about how he governed France still floats among people's minds. Did he abuse his power? Did Napoleon defeat the purpose of the ideals of the French Revolution? After all of his success in his military campaigns, did he gratify the people's needs regarding their ideals on the French Revolution? This is one of the many controversies that we have to deal with when studying Napoleon and the French Revolution. In this essay, I will discuss my opinion on whether or not was he a destroyer of the ideals of the French Revolution.