Similarities Between Marx Weber And Durkheim

519 Words2 Pages

In sociology, there are three names you will always hear, Marx, Weber, and Durkheim. Each are successful sociologist, they have made many significant contributions to the development of sociology. While all being enlightenment thinkers, each of them have their own distinguish perspective and focuses in their respective theories. Durkheim, a structural functionalist, argued everything in society exist for a purpose, and that society are bounded together by ideas and social unity, social solidarity. Weber focused on rationality and bureaucracy, he believes they are key element to modern society and he is interested to understand how people feel. Marx is primarily study society with economic perspectives, focused heavily on inequality among classes and Capitalist's exploitation on working class. Like religion, each of their paths have been picked up by sociologist in later era and form their own branches. With each focusing different aspects of society, they criticize each other based on the differences. As diverse as the theories are, there are still shared aspects but …show more content…

People uses it to indicate your economic status and power level. Class has been an essential object of analysis for many scholars. Sociologists, political scientists, anthropologists, and historians have all further extend their theory with the concept of class. However, there isn't a consensus on its best definition. While the 'perfect definition' is yet to be decided, many scholars tend to agree that the term has different contextual meanings. Generally, public understand it as a model of social stratification in which individuals are placed into a group based on their social categories: upper, middle, and lower classes, with upper class controls majority of the wealth and lower class having less accessibility to resources. This ties in well with Marxian as Marx focused mainly on economic

Open Document