More handpicked essays just for you.
Short biography of martin luther king
Short biography of martin luther king
Short biography on martin luther king jr
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Socrates shares similar qualities as Martin Luther King Jr. In comparison, both men exposed their beliefs, methods, and philosophies to convey social change. Socrates and Dr. King rebelled against accepting social norm. Socrates taught his followers to defy tradition and question their knowledge on law, virtue, immorality, ethnics, wisdom, logic, etc. Dr. King encouraged equality and fought to erase racial segregation. Though they faced different circumstances, their motives were the same; they persuaded individuals to think for themselves. Socrates was executed and Dr. King was assassinated, but both men died honoring their principle, despite the public disapprovals and
"an unjust law is no law at all."- quote by St. Augustine who was an Christian theologian and philosopher, whose writings influenced the development of Western Christianity. Martin Luther King Jr. was a baptist minister and civil rights leader that made advancements for civil rights peacefully, exclusively for African Americans in America. Mohandas Gandhi was a non-violent leader of the Indian independence movement against British rule. Accordingly, both MLK Jr. and Gandhi were leaders for civil rights that practiced and preached non-violent approaches for their freedom.Martin Luther King Jr. and Mohandas Gandhi were both valid in their judgment to break the law for their peaceful protests.
The similarity between Susan B. Anthony speech and Martin Luther King Juniors “I Have a Dream” speech is that they are fighting for the equality of America. Susan B. Anthony is fighting for women being able to vote like everyone else. Martin Luther King is fighting for the equality of African Americans. Both just want to see America as an equal place instead of discrimination against others based on race or gender. Even though their message has similarities the way they delivered them was different.
Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks has fought for the African-American civil rights and against racism, however their legacy did not succeed as blacks are still living in a prejudiced society. According to an article by CBC News, Montreal singer Freddie James was driving in West Island when he was pulled over by a police officer. James was demanded for his car registration and was ignored as to why he was pulled over. The police tried to arrest him aggressively even though James wasn't trying to resist. James was fined $162 for failure to provide identification although James had offered to show his ID. This experience by James proved that racial profiling and police brutality exists especially towards Black people, for example: “young black
How well known people are effects how influential you are, and while these 2 characters from history are not as influential as LeBron James and trending pop stars are in their time, they’ve used their influential abilities in positive ways that affect everyone today. Susan B. Anthony and Martin Luther King Jr. are both amazing leaders of the suffrage and civil rights movements. Anthony with Women’s rights, and King with African American’s rights took Civil Rights as a whole a few great leaps forward; brought forth an era where the Civil Rights Movement is something almost everyone believes in, that equal rights should be something everyone has. In these great leaps forward, King and Anthony have used their influential abilities to help start, carry on, and pass on a legacy. This is a legacy that is the idea or thought that everyone is equal.
Socrates and Martin Luther King Jr. have shown and voiced their own and have their own definitions of civil disobedience. Socrates believed in the law as complete truth. He believed that all individuals are to follow the laws. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that the laws had flaws, and that it was our responsibility to get them to change. Would Socrates agree with Martin Luther King Jr. on his acts of civil disobedience? I believe Socrates would agree with Martin Luther King Jr. on everything that he did, except when he actually broke the law which led him to be jailed in Birmingham.
In history we know that no two men are alike but, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were phenomenal people and leaders. Both had visualized some type of change in the future, yet were not literally able to see it. Both Dr. King and Malcolm X set out to bring a sense of confidence to blacks all over the United States. Their main purpose was to help instill black’s power and strength so that they could overcome racial disparity and prejudice that surrounded them, but both of them had very unique and distinct different ways of promoting their message. Martin was more geared and focused on equality and wellness of the world as a whole, a Malcolm X’s personal interpretation of the world was very well blinded by anger, bitterness, and the desire to get revenge at the expense of the world that he thought treated him unfairly.
Dr. King uses Socrates’s philosophy to justify how much help the African American community needs to abolish the injustice of racism because the community itself cannot fight for freedom alone, the more individuals support them, the more likely the community can overcome segregation. Using psychological tension to help individuals rise from the myths, Dr. King uses an example of Socrates’ philosophy to help society become united. Dr. King states, “Just as Socrates felt that it was necessary to create a tension in the mind so that individuals could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths” (497). Dr. King uses Socrates because he is a historical figure; individuals saw Socrates as a threat to society, but he later became an inspiration to others. In addition, the white community saw Dr. King as a threat to society because he wanted to change the segregation laws, but he became a hero to all the communities.
Socrates and Thomas Hobbes, two independent philosophers of two independent eras, both had divergent beliefs of government and citizen. Socrates’ whole life was persuading and disagreeing with common beliefs and questioning everything and everyone - except his own death since he had no comprehension of “self-preservation.” Hobbes, however, believed people had to give up the right to question in order for the sovereign to protect the commonwealth. The life and death of Socrates contradicts Thomas Hobbes’s view of self-preservation because ultimately, Socrates defied protecting himself and died in the hands of his own government. Although Socrates might argue that his death was justified because he failed to persuade the Athenian government for
On this issue, both King and Socrates stood firm in their belief that a man could not do wrong because he was wronged himself. Even nearing death, Socrates refused to break a law he considered unjust because it would make him no better than those putting him to death.
Is it okay to break the law if they are unjust and morally incorrect? This is a conflict both Antigone and Martin Luther King Jr. faced when their governments passed laws that went against the natural and god-given rights. In Antigone, the king, Creon, declared that is was illegal to bury the traitor, Polyneices. Antigone, the sister of Polyneices, was deeply upset as it was the law of the Gods to bury a family member or anybody. Martin Luther King was faced with a similar problem, when the government of the United States would not give blacks and other people of color their “God-given and constitutional rights”. By burying her brother, Antigone was not only honoring her brother but also the Gods and by MLK breaking the racist laws of the south
Niccolò Machiavelli and Martin Luther King Jr. are two of the greatest political leaders in history. Although opposite in the spectrum of beliefs, and separated by time and location, these two influenced our world in unbelievable ways. They both helped shape the world as we know it today. In this paper, I will discuss the lives of these two monumental leaders and explain the similarities between their acheivements.
The definition of a leader is a person who influences people to a common purpose. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr are examples of great leaders who brought about social change through alternative means in the 20th century. Their means were through nonviolent protests of freedom. Gandhi fought for freedom from Great Britain, and King fought for freedom from segregation and equal rights for all Americans.
Spanning from the mid-1950s to the late 1960s, America saw the emergence of the Civil Rights Movement as the African Americans struggled to gain rights and opportunities equal to those of their white neighbors. During this time the two most influential speakers of all time emerged, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Junior. Despite their contrasting ideas and rhetorical strategies, these two martyrs had the same passion to motivate people to create justice for all races. Apparent in the practices of both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr are similar methods of persuasion. Specific parallels are found in Malcolm’s speech “The Ballot or the Bullet” where he addresses the upcoming election to persuade the audience to practice Black Nationalism and when
Thesis: Actions, beliefs, and patience are characteristics that are comparable in both the lives of Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela.
Growing up in the South I experienced the affects of desegregation in the schools and saw how one person standing up for what they believe in could make a difference. On the national stage Martin Luther King Jr. was a powerful agent of change. He stood up for what he believed in and was subjected to abuse and violence as a result. Martin Luther King became the leader of a movement that forced huge changes in this country - from desegregation to voting rights to equal opportunity laws.