Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Life and times of martin luther king
Contributions of Niccolo Machiavelli to political philosophy
Introduction to leadership styles summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Life and times of martin luther king
Niccolò Machiavelli and Martin Luther King Jr. are two of the greatest political leaders in history. Although opposite in the spectrum of beliefs, and separated by time and location, these two influenced our world in unbelievable ways. They both helped shape the world as we know it today. In this paper, I will discuss the lives of these two monumental leaders and explain the similarities between their acheivements.
Niccolò Machiavelli was born in Florence, Italy on May 3, 1469. As an adult, he studied business mathematics and worked for a Florentine banker in Rome. After the exile of the Medici family, a powerful family in Italy that owned banks, 29 year-old Machiavelli obtained the role as an ambassador of Florence. Being a diplomat in the
…show more content…
Florentine Republic for Italy, he created a name for himself as an atypical leader, defying norms and being blatant. After 14 years of Machiavelli holding a political position, the Medici family wanted to return to Italy. Machiavelli tried everything in his power to keep the Medicis from returning, even forming a Florentine militia to keep them away. Eventually the Medicis returned, and they were unhappy with the actions of Machiavelli. As a result, he lost his position of political power and was jailed. He died in 1527. It was in prison when Machiavelli authored a book titled The Prince, which was a political theory book that separated the concepts of politics and ethics.
In comparison to political theory that had come before it, Macchiavelli’s work was one of a kind. Instead of theories based on hypotheses, which was how previous authors backed their political data, he backed his claims with evidence of actual accounts that occurred through history. The popularity of The Prince deemed Machiavellianism. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines the adjective Machiavellian as “using clever lies and tricks in order to get or achieve something.” (Merriam-Webster) The purpose of this book being written was to get on the good side of the Medici family, and to convince them to listen to his …show more content…
advice. Macchiavelli’s impact on the world is evident as The Prince is often deemed the most influential work by man done during the Renaissance Era in Italy.
By his book being an examination of how a leader could get in power and remain in power, many politicians have thoroughly studied it. It teaches that as being a leader, sometimes one has to be immoral to achieve certain goals. The compiled thoughts of Macchiavelli proved that he was not afraid to share his thoughts, no matter how unethical they may have been. The Prince remains a universal reference in the world of politics today just as much as it did in 1513. For this reason, Macchiavelli is known as the “father of modern political theory.”
Centuries later, across the Atlantic Ocean, a man named Martin Luther King Jr. was born in Atlanta, Georgia. At age 15, he attended Morehouse College and eventually received a degree in Sociology. Following the lead of his father, Martin Luther King Sr., he furthered his studies in the field of theology, at Crozer Theological Seminary. Concluding his studies, King received his doctorate degree from Boston University after he became a pastor of the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama. A PhD in 1955, he was only
25. King lived during a time of racial inequality, a result of slavery in America. African Americans were treated horribly and segregation was prevalent. Many African American leaders involved themselves in political affairs attempting to remedy the ill treatment of the black community in America. Martin Luther King was one of these leaders. In 1955, he and other civil rights leaders led a boycott in attempts to lift the segregation laws in America. They were successful. After leading many boycotts and sit-ins, King is best known for leading the March on Washington, in the nation’s capital on August 28, 1963. It was here when he made the “I Have a Dream” speech, convincing the world that all men are created equal and can treat each other like brothers. Prior to this speech, on April 12, King was arrested in Birmingham, Alabama after a demonstration in the community. It was in prison when King wrote the famous Letter from Birmingham Jail.
This compare and contrast essay will focus on the views of leadership between Mirandolla and Machiavelli. Mirandolla believes that leadership should not be false and that it should follow the rule of reason. He believes that leaders should strive for the heavens and beyond. On the other hand, Machiavelli believed that leadership comes to those who are crafty and forceful. He believed that leaders do not need to be merciful, humane, faithful or religious; they only need to pretend to have all these qualities. Despite both of them being philosophers, they have drastically different views on leadership, partially because of their views on religion are different. Mirandolla was very religious, and Machiavelli was a pragmatist, which means that he was not interested in religion.
Niccolò Machiavelli was a man who lived during the fourteen and fifteen hundreds in Florence, Italy, and spent part of his life imprisoned after the Medici princes returned to power. He believed that he should express his feelings on how a prince should be through writing and became the author of “The Qualities of a Prince.” In his essay, he discusses many points on how a prince should act based on military matters, reputation, giving back to the people, punishment, and keeping promises. When writing his essay, he follows his points with examples to back up his beliefs. In summary, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of a Prince,” provides us with what actions and behaviors that a prince should have in order to maintain power and respect.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was an American baptist minister, Civil Rights activist, and humanitarian. He was born on January 25, 1929 in Atlanta, Georgia under the name of Michael King, Jr. Both he and his father later adopted the name of the German protestant leader Martin Luther in honor of him. King thrived at Booker T. Washington High School, graduating at the age of 15 before moving on to Morehouse College. For years, he had questioned religion, but in his third year of college, he took a bible class that renewed his faith. King later went on to study at Crozer theological seminary for three years. He met his future wife during his last year of seminary, and went on to receive his Ph.D in 1955 at the age of 25.
In recent history, the last fifty years or so, modern businessmen and politicians have given Machiavelli a Renaissance of his own. Professional politicians have written novels they claim to be on the same philosophical level of Machiavelli’s The Prince. Gary Hart, in his book The Patriot: An Exhortation to Liberate America From the Barbarians attempts to update Niccolo to the modern age with his own political philosophies, and attempts to credit Machiavelli by quoting him frequently. “Hart makes an effort to mimic the form, if not the spirit, of the most famous work by his Florentine ‘mentor.’…There is a dedicatory le...
Niccolò Machiavelli was known during much his life as a part of the republican government in Florence until 1512. At that time, the Medici family took over the city and ruled under a more monarchical system. From that point until his death in 1527, Machiavelli was always just on the outside of Florentine politics. He would occasionally get work from the Medici but his tasks were never as important as they had been under the republican government of the past. As he was trying to find his way back into a major role in Florentine government, Machiavelli wrote The Prince, a manual of sorts that explained how a monarch should rule his state and why. While Machiavelli had been a strong proponent of republican ideals in the past, in The Prince, his ideas are far from adhering to republicanism. The book seems to promote the ideal monarch as a cold, heartless person whose only goal in life should be to retain power, regardless of who or what he destroys. This includes killing enemies of the state, personal enemies of the Prince, and even, in some cases, friends or family. While The Prince was not the first book of this kind, it was the first to suggest a government that rules with no regard for religion or morality. Machiavelli did not particularly pay heed to religious law in the way he lived his life, but he also did not particularly care for the Catholic Church of the time because of the lack of morality demonstrated by the Pope's and other supposedly "religious men's" actions at the time. There are other works that Machiavelli wrote both before and after The Prince that survive today, as well as letters he wrote to his friends that demonstrate a different set of ideals than th...
Machiavelli and Martin Luther were both hugely influential and controversial authors who wrote in times of turmoil. Although they had different focuses, Machiavelli's being political and Luther's being religious, they came to many similar conclusions, this may be in part to their reactions to a similar time period. Both authors saw the importance of looking into the past and using history as a tool to learn from. Luther believed more in returning to the past while Machiavelli saw it as a way to use what worked while learning from past mistakes. Their writings are filled with examples from the past to further their arguments. They were especially similar when it came to human free will, the role of God, and on the governing of the secular state. More specifically, both Machiavelli and Luther believed that there was an element of free will that humans could choose to take control of, and therefore determine their own outcomes; although there was an element of either God or Fortune weighing in. Also, when it came to the secular state, although their motives might have been different, they believed in similar actions that needed to be taken. The most interesting dynamic between the two would have to be in relation to the Catholic Church and how both viewpoints create a compellingly different view of the Church.
Born in 1469 to an economically limited family under the parents of Bernardo di Niccolò di Buoninsegna and Bartolomea de’Nelli, Niccolò de Bernardo Machiavelli was exposed to numerous books covering law and Classical texts in his youth, which he consequently learned to reject even before entering in Florentine politics.2 A self-taught intellectual like his father Bernardo, Machiavelli began studies in Latin at age seven. Although he was well-learned in the language by his young adulthood, he quickly refused to write his treatises ...
“The Prince”, by Niccolo Machiavelli, is a series of letters written to the current ruler of Italy, Lorenzo de’ Medici. These letters are a “how-to” guide on what to do and what not to do. He uses examples to further express his views on the subject. The main purpose was to inform the reader how to effectively rule and be an acceptable Prince. Any ruler who wishes to keep absolute control of his principality must use not only wisdom and skill, but cunning and cruelness through fear rather than love. Machiavelli writes this book as his summary of all the deeds of great men.
Dr. King was born the son of Reverend Martin Luther King, Sr, a devout Christian who would raise his son to be so as well. Dr. King skipped ninth and twelfth grade and went on to Morehouse College at the age of fifteen. He graduated in 1948 with a B. A. degree in Sociology. He then went on to attend Crozer Theological Seminary and received his B. Div. degree in 1951. In 1953, he married Coretta Scott and in 1955 he graduated Boston University with a Ph. D. in Systematic Theology. By this point in his life, he was also the pastor of the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church.
Machiavelli is undisputedly one of the most influential political philosophers of all time. In The Prince, his most well-known work, he relates clearly and precisely how a decisive, intelligent man can gain and maintain power in a region. This work is revolutionary because it flies in the face of the Christian morality which let the Roman Catholic Church hold onto Europe for centuries. Machiavelli's work not only ignores the medieval world's ethics: The Prince suggests actions which oppose the four most basic of Christianity's Ten Commandments.
Niccolo Machiavelli was born in Florence, Italy in 1469 to a middleclass family. The time in which Machiavelli lived Italy as a country was not united but divide and split into little providences and republics. He latter became responsible for the Florentine militia against the Medici government and rule. When the Medici power reclaimed Florence Machiavelli was arrested for conspiracy he was tortured and then banished from Florence. During his banishment he wrote the book The Prince in 1513 which is dedicated to the new prince of Florence Lorenzo De Medici. The book was a discourse to the prince on how to run a country and also a way Machiavelli can get a job working in politics again.
Possibly the most controversial book ever written, The Prince by Machiavelli, focuses on how a Prince or leader should rule. Many of the techniques that are stated in the text have caused many debates ever since it’s publication. When Machiavelli composed the Prince, his contemporaries were shocked at the ideas and themes presented. The Prince introduced a whole new way of thinking that was almost completely contrary to present beliefs. For that reason, in 1559 the Pope banned the printing of the Prince and the rest of Machiavelli’s writings.
Machiavelli has long been required reading for everyone intrested in politics and power. In The Prince Niccolo M
Machiavelli’s The Prince was written more than 500 years ago and it is “one of the most influential and controversial books published in Western literature.” (Article A) It was about Machiavelli’s political philosophies and the basic principles of what he believes a politician or “prince” should be. The three main ideas of the Prince were “Liberality and Stinginess”, “Cruelty and Mercy: Is It Better to Be Loved Than Feared, or the Reverse?”, and “How a Prince Should Keep Their Promises” and for the most part many of his concepts should or are already instilled in our government.
During the time 1469, a child by the name of Niccolo Di Bernardo Del Machiavelli was born. Some may know him as an Italian philosopher, humanist, or an evil minded fellow associated with the corruptness of totalitarian government. In Machiavelli’s home state of Florence, he introduces the modern political theory. Hoping to gain influence with the ruling Medici family, Niccolo wrote a pamphlet called The Prince (Prezzolini). Niccolo lived a nondescript childhood and his main political experience in his youth was watching Savonarola from afar.