Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities between humans and apes
Similarities and differences between humans and apes
Differences between humans and apes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Similarities between humans and apes
Take a close look at an ape. Doesn’t it resemble something you see in an everyday life? Focus on their mental states, facial features, and body structures. Most of these features are similar to us- humans. Considering the vast amount of similarities we share, many believe that humans have evolved from apes. Yes, there may be a significant amount of differences to prove it wrong, however it has been scientifically proven humans did evolve from great apes.
For the reason that humans and great apes share 97% similarity in DNA, it is proven that humans have evolved from great apes because of their similarities of being in the same primate group, having related body movements, and similar minds. Great apes might have a different look than humans
…show more content…
If their body movements were to be compared, many similarities could be easily spotted. The way both mammals walk are similar, as well as their ability to use different objects, and to move around freely. First of all, the most eye catching feature that many people observe is their ability to walk. Even though their walking differs in a considerable amount whereas the great apes are knuckle- walking hominids, this does not prove humans did not evolve from the great apes. For instance, Selam, who was a 3-year old female juvenile australopithecus, had shown how humans came to move on two feets. It was discovered that Selam’s lower body was adapted for walking upright. (Haskings & Collishaw, 38) Similarly, Lucy had also proved humans have evolved from the great apes. Mary Leakey, who had discovered Lucy’s fossil had proven the evolution of bipedalism of great apes to humans. Due to the fact she had discovered footprints preserved in the ground, that were made by small primates who walked on two feets, had determined that bipedalism existed during that time and must have been passed down. Correspondingly, the ability to use different objects to complete different tasks are quite similar between the great apes and humans. For example, Kanzi (a bonobo ape) communication was studied by primatologist Sue Savage- Rumbaugh. She had observed Kanzi for many years and had discovered how they can make stone tools, …show more content…
Humans and great apes communicate very much alike, they both show a great deal of emotions, and their behaviours are very much identical, in which they all lead to the evolution of great apes to humans. To start off, even though you have never heard a great ape talk, studies have shown human and great apes communication are very much alike. Apes and humans communicates through facial expressions, touch, vocalizations, and body language. (Haskings & Collishaw, 47) As previously stated, Sue Savage- Rumbaugh has studied a bonobo’s communication. Throughout her studies, she has taught Kanzi how to communicate using graphic symbols. Kanzi was then able to say simple sentences, respond to requests, and have conversations with her human caretakers. (Haskings & Collishaw, 48) Although the learning capacity for language of great apes are more limited than humans, studies have shown that great apes have the capacity to learn many things previously considered to be only human. (Haskings & Collishaw, 48) To add on, great apes are able to employ sounds and gestures in a way that mirrors a human conversation. “Communicative interactions of great apes thus show the hallmarks of human social action during conversation and suggest that cooperative communication arose as a way of coordinating collaborative activities more efficiently,” stated by lead researcher Simone Pika. (Hays, 3)
To start, research shows that there are a striking number of similarities between humans and chimpanzees in context to their social behavior.
This article, titled Common Ground, written by Barbara Smuts, points out the main differences between humans and apes, such as our upright stance, large brains, and capacity for spoken language and abstract reasoning. However, the main point of this article is to emphasize the many similarities that apes share with us. Smuts goes into great detail about how human social and emotional tendencies are very reflective in the family of apes.
Chimpanzees make tools and use them to procure foods and for social exhibitions; they have refined hunting tactics requiring collaboration, influence and rank; they are status cognizant, calculating and capable of trickery; they can learn to use symbols and understand facets of human language including some interpersonal composition, concepts of number and numerical sequence and they are proficient in spontaneous preparation for a future state or event.
The evolution of man is constantly in question. While we are reasonably sure that modern humans and primates are both related to the same common ancestor, there is constant debate over what initially caused the two species to split into early hominids and apes. According to some, our longest and most popular theory on the division of man and ape is profoundly wrong. However, those same individuals usually offer an equally controversial theory as a substitute, one that is almost impossible to scientifically test or prove. Both the Savanna Theory and the Aquatic Ape Theory offer solutions to how and why humans evolved into bipedal toolmakers. But with enough questioning, each loses its accountability to rhetorical science.
Australopithecus afarensis who existed 3.5 million years ago and a 4.4 million year old skeleton of an Ardipithecus ramidus are the closest science has come to discovering the human lineage. Shattered Ancestry an article written by Katherine Harmon discusses the remains of two hominids found within Ethiopia. These skeletal remains have created a huge controversy within the topic of evolution questioning many assumptions that have been made referencing the human lineage. The skeleton of the Australopithecus afarensis was named Lucy and was discovered in 1974. The evidence of her walking upright on her two feet essentially guaranteed her a spot in the human lineage line. Lucy was a chimplike ape that was said to walk upright making scientists believe the human ancestry was simple. The complete skeleton found in Ethiopia of an Ardipithecus ramidus named Ardi completely changed all assumptions made from scientists about the complexity of the human lineage. These remains have encouraged researches that the human line is not the only lineage to have evolved but the chimpanzee line has undergone drastic changes as well. There are many traits that researchers have always directly linked to the human lineage however since these discoveries occurred researchers are reconsidering. The recent discoveries that have shattered what has always suggested what linked a species to the human lineage have changed the certainty of whether it is possible to confidently identify the human’s last common ancestor. Majority of scientist had forgotten that there would have been many hominid species living together at one time. New theories have been suggested since scientists revealed that the foot of a hominid found called the Burtele site was found ju...
Do non-human primates have communication, language, both, or neither? By definition, communication is the imparting or interchange of thoughts, opinions, or information (Snowdon). Communication is very closely related to social behavior since they are both referring to the ways animals interact with each other (Quiatt and Reynolds 1993). Conversely, language is defined as a system of communication using sounds or gestures that are put together in meaningful ways according to a set of rules (Haviland et al. 2010). Non-human primates and human primates are similar in many ways, and communication is no exception. They both have various types of communication senses and styles. Human primate communication senses consist of sight, smell, taste, hearing, and touch. Non-human primates mainly understand the world through sight, but smell, taste, and hearing are important as well (Quiatt and Reynolds 1993). Human primates are capable of speaking a language, while non-human primates use different vocal calls to communicate. In essence, the difference is simple, human primates have language while non-human primates do not. Even though non-human primates do not have language, they do have communication.
Homo erectus was the second hominid species. They are called erectus because they were the first to stand upright posture from all. In my research, there are fossil evidences showing that they have lived until 1.3 million years from today and the earliest Homo erectus fossil dates back to 1.8 million years. Given this d...
According to National Geographic, scientists have sequenced the genome factor of the chimpanzee and found that humans are 98.5% similar to the ape species. The chimpanzee is our closest relative in the animal kingdom; however, some people are not aware of our resembling traits with chimpanzees. Jane Goodall’s, In the Shadow of Man, describes some similar traits humans and chimpanzees have such as their facial expressions and emotions, use of tools, and diet.
Reaching into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes, ed. A. E. Russon, K. A. Bard & S. T. Parker, pp. 257–77. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Primates are characterized by their unique characteristics, behaviors, and features. This is also why humans are considered to be a primate. With the human evolution researchers are able to find these common similarities. And even though chimpanzees have a very close body type and size they also have some differences. Researchers have found all these results by studying non-primates many different way in the non-primate own environment. With these results and studies it proves the facts that humans are indeed primates.
Since we share 98% of DNA with both bonobos and chimps, there’s a lot of similarities in behavior. I think the behaviors that bonobos exhibit are more similar to our behaviors. They are peacemakers and are highly social and develop lifelong friendships. They are also more inclined to get along with their neighbors, and are more sensitive and have a high emotional awareness. They also don’t have sex just to procreate, they use sex as a way to avoid violence.
The northern sparrows have adapted to a larger body than the southern sparrows, in order to survive lower temperatures. Along with these similarities, evolution and creation both acknowledge that apes and humans show resemblance. Evolution and creation both recognize the comparable characteristics that humans and apes acquire.
Creationists believe that humans were always humans. Humans are classified in the mammalian family Primates. In this arrangement, humans, along with our extinct close ancestors, and our nearest living relatives, the African apes, are sometimes placed together in the family Hominidae because of genetic similarities. Two-leg walking seems to be one of the earliest of the major hominine characteristics to have evolved. In the course of human evolution the size of the brain has been more than tripled.
When thinking on the lines of evolution, animals and humans can be categorized in the same group since we have the ability to learn, remember past events, and experience emotions that can affect our thoughts, even on the decisions we have made in the past. This idea might sound very unrealistic but studies have shown that it is, in fact, a viable theory.
The origin of human beings has to trace back to the chimps which lived in millions of years ago. About six to eight million years ago, people’s ancestor split from chimp (Pickrell, 2006). In The Origin of Species, which is published by Darwin in 1859, African apes were thought as the ancestor of human beings. And in the next