Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay african american theatre
Essay african american theatre
Essay african american theatre
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In The Colored Museum, George Wolfe writes in a Brechtian fashion in order to create an atmosphere of interest and to bring the spectators to question their position and comment on the plays “Git on Board” and “Hairpiece” become a political platform by using alienation techniques through narration, character, and dialogue in order to create a take away for the audience from the “exhibit”; the audience in this manner is able to leave the “exhibit” with the historical value of a black play with an emotional or intellectual impact with the political commentary that each play causes. The opening narration and monologue of the first scene of “Git on Board” immediately creates a connection between the play and the spectators by using the alienation technique of …show more content…
time and generating a distance between Miss Pat and the “passengers” within the plot. The first narration displays slides portraying the torturing of African slaves “being flashed before us”(1). This introducing scene itself creates an impact on the audience because the slides touches upon torture and violence something that the audience can understand no matter their race. Wolfe makes the audience become the passengers by including the audience in the narration with the use of “us.” Furthermore, the audience receives a preview of what their life will be once they get on this slaveship. By directing the audience as slaves, the audience now is connected to the play on a personal level. By giving the audience an overview of the black American History, Wolfe creates a historic atmosphere because the passengers are learning during their travel of their future history. Lastly, Miss Pat, our main character holds a higher position than the audience does. She alienates herself from the “slaves”; therefore, the audience becomes Miss Pat’s puppets because she controls them by making them repeat what she says. For example when she says, “repeat after me, I don’t hear any drums”; the fact that the drums are being played since the beginning of monologue to historic facts they encapsulate of important emotions and actions that the audience feels Likewise, in the“Hairpiece” Wolfe personifies the wigs; therefore pointing out that the black woman's choice of hairstyle is a political statement.
Throughout the constant dialogue between the two wigs, unlike “Git on Board,” this play does not directly address the audience. Instead, the personification of the two wigs is pulling the audience into the conversation. The wigs come to life and analyze the cultural connotations they each represent,and argue over which wig should be worm. The Afro wig, Janine, and the long flowing wig, Lawanda, draw on common stereotypes of black women to discourage the Woman from picking the other. For example, Lawanda says, “I am quality. She is kink. I am exotic. She is common. I am class and she is trash. That’s right. T.R.A.S.H.” and Janine replies, You think you cute. She thinks she’s cute just ‘cause that synthetic mop of hers blow in the wind. She looks like a fool and you look like an even bigger fool when you wear her.” (23) The Woman feels torn in both directions, and her indecision reflects a conflict many black women face. Each wig represents a different political stance and they both seem to dislike each other because of the connotation each one brings to the
world. By ending the play without a resolution as a Brechtian play usually does it makes the audience think about the play and be put in the Woman’s shoes. The audience is left unsettled with the ending and has them thinking a possible endings and start a political commentary; since the play outwardly social and political and each person will have a different answer. In this way the audience will think about the play not only as entertainment or comedic atmosphere between the wigs; instead the audience will question and think about the play in a political and social manner. Overall, the Brechtian structure lets the audience connect to the play and furthermore create a platform for political commentary.
When Twyla and Roberta first meet, there is already a racial divide. This is made evident by their different ethnicities and Twyla’s skepticism brought on by her mother’s comment about their hair “smelling funny (Morrison 31).” Although this misconception might not have directly influenced their friendship, it is stated that Twyla and Roberta did not get along in the beginning and Twyla even comments that her mom would not like the set-up; it was not until they
The play The Colored Museum is a pleasant change in pace, in how a play projects itself to the audience. I found that the interaction with the audience to be an exceptional manner to add humor to the play, which was made evident in the exhibits pertaining to the play. However, the theme is constantly present in each unique exhibit, although it would appear that each exhibit could stand on its own. The play is a satire on the stereotypes or clichés seen in African-American culture, both past and present, but at the same time there is some praise or a form of acceptance towards the same diverse heritage. Despite this inherent contradiction, the play does well to spark thought in the viewer on what was said and done and how it can be relatable
The play “Permanent Collection” focuses on an African-American man who has just taken over an art museum named Sterling North. While digging through storage, he finds eight African sculpture pieces and wants to add them to the collection at the Morris Foundation on the campus of a college. The Director of Education Paul Barrow is hanging on to the words of Mr. Morris and his vision because he doesn’t want anything to change at the museum according to Mr. Morris’ will, which contributes to the title of the play “Permanent Collection.” In the play, there is no answer as to who is right and who is wrong. North told a journalist that he believed Barrow to be a racist but Barrow doesn’t feel this way.
It is imperative to understand the significance of the profound effects these elements have on the audience’s response to the play. Without effective and accurate embodiments of the central themes, seeing a play becomes an aimless experience and the meaning of the message is lost. Forgiveness and redemption stand as the central themes of the message in The Spitfire Grill. Actors communicate character development through both nonverbal and verbal cues; their costumes serve as a visual representation of this development by reflecting the personal transformation of each character. In the case of The Spitfire Grill, set design is cut back to allow for the audience’s primary focus to be on the actors and their story. Different from set design, the use of sound and lights in The Spitfire Grill, establishes the mood for the play. In other words, every theatrical element in a play has a purpose; when befittingly manipulated, these elements become the director’s strongest means of expressing central themes, and therefore a means of achieving set objectives. Here again, The Spitfire Grill is no exception. With the support of these theatrical elements, the play’s themes of forgiveness and redemption shine as bright as the moon on
The detail given in the passage helps the reader see and understand the character. To describe her appearance, she says, “the way I knew my skin was the color of a nut rubbed repeatedly with a soft cloth”(32-33). The audience now knows she is an African American. Race plays a big role in identity, giving people culture, history, and pride. Due to the fact she has just moved, her new environment holds a different culture that she must find where she fits in. While dressing, she puts on “a gay dress made out of madras cloth”(24) the same
Conflict with reality and appearance brings to surface the elements of the traditional commedia dell’arte in the form of mistaken identity, which enriches the farcical plot-lines that occur in the play. The very embodiment of mistaken identity establishes that what may be seem real could be quite the opposite, however the characters in the play are unable to distinguish this as their vision becomes distorted by their fall into the deception of appearance. It is this very comedic device that enables the conflict between Roscoe (Rachel) and Alan, or Charlie and Alan’s father to occur which is a significant part of the comedic nature of the play as the unproportional situation is what sparks laughter from the audience, and so it is the presence of mistaken identity alone that conveys the play into a light-hearted comedy. Furthermore, Peter O'Neill quotes that ‘using humour can provide a degree of safety for expressing difficult ideas or opinions which could be particularly effective…’. In the circumstances of the quotation Richard Bean effectively c...
George C.Wolfe uses plot, character, and dialogue in his play Colored Museum’s exhibit “Git on Board” to implicate the audience in order to force them to realize how they are simply being a part of the racial issues that have been existing. Throughout the play, using a sense of humor and satire, Wolfe continuously makes the audience feel uncomfortable. For example, Wolfe sets up the story in a “Celebrity Slaveship” that takes place into an airplane in order to give the audiences a taste of slavery in a familiar but unpleasant setting; Wolfe intentionally does so to forcefully implicate the audience to make them feel guilty for just being a part of the issue and not taking any action to stop it. To elaborate, Wolfe shows how our society has
I think this play is a lot about what does race mean, and to what extent do we perform race either onstage or in life:
It is difficult to imagine a play which is completely successful in portraying drama as Bertolt Brecht envisioned it to be. For many years before and since Brecht proposed his theory of “Epic Theatre”, writers, directors and actors have been focused on the vitality of entertaining the audience, and creating characters with which the spectator can empathize. ‘Epic Theatre’ believes that the actor-spectator relationship should be one of distinct separation, and that the spectator should learn from the actor rather than relate to him. Two contemporary plays that have been written in the last thirty years which examine and work with Brechtian ideals are ‘Fanshen’ by David Hare, and ‘The Laramie Project’ by Moises Kaufman. The question to be examined is whether either of these two plays are entirely successful in achieving what was later called, ‘The Alienation Effect”.
Bertolt Brecht was a German playwright, theatre critic, and director. He created and developed epic theatre with the belief that theatre is not solely for entertainment but also tools for politics and social activism. Previous theatre performances offered a form of escapism. The audience would become emotionally invested in the performance. In contrast to the suspension of disbelief, Brecht never wanted the audience to fall into the performance. He wanted the audience to make judgments on the argument dealt in the play. The aim of epic theatre is to detach the audience from any emotional connection in order for them to critically review the story. The ultimate goal of this theatre is creating awareness of social surroundings and encouraging the audience to take initiative on changing the society.
In this play, the men and women characters are separated even from their first entrance onto the stage. To the intuitive reader (or playgoer), the gender differences are immediately apparent when the men walk confidently into the room and over to the heater while the women timidly creep only through the door and stand huddled together. This separation between genders becomes more apparent when the characters proceed in investigating the murder. The men focus on means while the women focus on motive: action vs. emotion. While the men...
In this essay I shall be writing about why I agree that with the play,
My work proposes a broader view of the theatre-film interface, one that relies on intertextuality as its interpretive method. I believe it is valuable-both pedagogically and theoretically-to ask broad questions about the aesthetic, narrative, and ideological exchanges between the history of theatre and contemporary film and television. For example, this paper will study how the "Chinese Restaurant" episode of the sitcom, Seinfeld, intertextually reworks Samuel Beckett's modernist play, Waiting for Godot. In each text, characters encounter an existential plight as they are forced to wait interminably, and thus confront their powerlessness at the hands of larger social forces. As a pedagogical matter, this connection encourages the students to see academic culture in the guise of having to read Beckett's play for my course, not as foreign and alienating, but instead as continuous with their understanding of leisure activities like watching sitcoms. As a theoretical matter, this intertextual connection allows important ideological matters to come into bold relie...
The New York Times deems August Wilson as “the poet of black of black America”; Wilson brilliantly and wittingly brings life, meaning, and complexity to a culture of people. Ignorance can be seen as the father of discrimination and through his work, Wilson tears down the walls of ignorance in an effort to cease discrimination. Furthermore, Wilson bridges a connection between African Americans and their cultural identity. The play Fences paints black life during the 1950’s era and it is the sixth play in a ten play cycle. The 1950’s reflects a transitional state of time where African Americans were beginning to stand up and fight against racism. August Wilson integrates the social and cultural factors present during the 1950’s into his play Fences. Additionally, much of the issues faced by the characters within fences are still relevant today, classifying Fences as a true modern drama.
...the characters show how loosing their write to vote and therefore express their opinion, and especially having to carry an identity booklet all the time (just because of the colour of their skin) can generate an inside crisis on one's identity. Is our identity determined by our name? Can we change name and be able to keep a stable identity? This play also raises the issue of being actors, just to survive in the society they lived in. Not being able to show their feelings and their disappointment at any time, obliged them to smile, sing, and fake.